Direct ethanol production from rice straw by coculture with two high-performing fungi

Abstract

To develop efficient and economical direct ethanol production from fine rice straw crashed mechanically, two high-performing fungi, which can secret hyperactive cellulases and/or ferment effectively various sugars, were selected from some strains belong to Mucor circinelloides preserved in our laboratory. The simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) by coculture with these fungi was investigated. The screening of high-performing fungi resulted in the selection of NBRC 4572 as an ethanol-producing fungus and NBRC 5398 as a cellulase-secreting fungus. The strain 4572 produced ethanol aerobically from glucose and xylose in high yields of 0.420 g/g at 36 h and 0.478 g/g at 60 h, respectively, but secreted fairly low cellulases. On the other hand, the strain 5398 also produced ethanol from glucose in yield of 0.340 g/g though it had a little growth in xylose culture. However, it secreted hyperactive cellulases that are essential for hydrolysis of rice straw in culture and the maximum activities of endo-β-glucanase and β-glucosidase were 2.11 U/L and 1.47 U/L, respectively. In SSF of rice straw by coculture with two fungi selected, the ethanol production reached 1.28 g/L after 96 h when the inoculation ratio of the strain 5398 to the strain 4572 was 9.

Key words： Mucor circinelloides; ethanol production; cellulase secretion; SSF; coculture; rice straw

Acknowlegements

This work was supported by the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) of Japan and a Grant-in Aid (No. 21612003) for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.

References

1 Summersa M D, Jenkinsa B M, Hydeb P R, Williamsc J F, Muttersd R G, Scardaccie S C, Haire M W. Biomass production and allocation in rice with implications for straw harvesting and utilization. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2003, 24(3): 163–173

2 Ahamed A, Vermette P. Culture-based strategies to enhance cellulase enzyme production from Trichoderma reesei RUT-C30 in bioreactor culture conditions. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2008, 40(3): 399–407

3 Bhat M K, Bhat S. Cellulose degrading enzymes and their potential industrial applications. Biotechnology Advances, 1997, 15(3–4): 583–620

4 Abedinifar S, Karimi K, Khanahmadi M, Taherzadeh M J. Ethanol production by Mucor indicus and Rhizopus oryzae from rice straw by separate hydrolysis and fermentation. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2009, 33(5): 828–833

5 Karimi K, Emtiazi G, Taherzadeh M J. Ethanol production from dilute-acid pretreated rice straw by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation with Mucor indicus, Rhizopus oryzae, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2006, 40(1): 138–144

6 Arima K, Iwasaki S, Tamura G. Milk clotting enzyme from microorganisms. Part I. Screening test and the identification of the potent fungus. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, 1967, 31(5): 540–545

7 Kavadiaa A, Komaitis M, Chevalot I, Blanchard F, Marc I, Aggelis G. Lipid and γ-linolenic acid accumulation in strains of Zygomycetes growing on glucose. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 2001, 78(4): 341–346

8 Sues A, Millati R, Edebo L, Taherzadeh M J. Ethanol production from hexoses, pentoses, and dilute-acid hydrolyzate by Mucor indicus. FEMS Yeast Research, 2005, 5(6–7): 669–676

9 Karimi K, Emtiazi G, Taherzadeh M J. Production of ethanol and mycelial biomass from rice straw hemicellulose hydrolyzate by Mucor indicus. Process Biochemistry (Barking, London, England), 2006, 41(3): 653–658

10 Millati R, Edebo L, Taherzadeh M J. Performance of Rhizopus, Rhizomucor, and Mucor in ethanol production from glucose, xylose, and wood hydrolyzates. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2005, 36(2–3): 294–300

11 Lübbehüsen T L, Nielsen J, McIntyre M. Aerobic and anaerobic ethanol production by Mucor circinelloides during submerged growth. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2004, 63: 543–548

12 Efremenko E N, Stepanov N A, Nikolskaya A B, Senko O V, Spiricheva O V, Varfolomeev S D. Biocatalysts based on immobilized cells of microorganisms in the production of bioethanol and biobutanol. Catalysis in Industry, 2011, 3(1): 41–46

13 Ueng P P, Gong C S. Ethanol production from pentoses and sugar-cane bagasse hemicellulose hydrolysate by Mucor and Fusariumspecies. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 1982, 4(3): 169–171

14 Rangel-Porras R A, Meza-Carmen V, Martinez-Cadena G, Torres-Guzman J C, Gonzalez-Hernandez G A, Arnau J, Gutierrez-Corona J F. Molecular analysis of an NAD-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase from the zygomycete Mucor circinelloides. Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 2005, 274(4): 354–363

15 Takó M, Tóth A, Nagy L G, Krisch J, Vágvölgyi C, Papp T. A new β-glucosidase gene from the zygomycete fungus Rhizomucor miehei. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2010, 97(1): 1–10

16 Somkuti G A, Babel F J, Somkuti A C. Cellulolysis by Mucor pusillus. Applied Microbiology, 1969, 17(6): 888–892

17 Persson I, Tjerneld F, Hahn-Hägerdal B. Fungal cellulolytic enzyme production. Process Biochemistry (Barking, London, England), 1991, 26(2): 65–74

18 Sugimoto M, Suzuki Y. Molecular cloning, sequencing, and expression of a cDNA encoding α-glucosidase from Mucor javanicus. Journal of Biochemistry, 1996, 119: 500–505

19 Takii Y, Ikeda K, Sato C, Yano M, Sato T, Konno H. Production and characterization of β-glucosidase from Rhizopus oryzae MIBA348. Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2005, 5(1): 11–16

20 Baba Y, Shimonaka A, Koga J, Kubota H, Kono T. Alternative splicing produces two endoglucanases with one or two carbohydrate-binding modules in Mucor circinelloides. Journal of Bacteriology, 2005, 187(9): 3045–3051

21 Saha B C. Xylanase from a newly isolated Fusarium verticillioides capable of utilizing corn fiber xylan. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2001, 56(5–6): 762–766

22 Saha B C. Hemicellulose bioconversion. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2003, 30(5): 279–291

23 Saha B C. Production, purification and properties of endoglucanase from a newly isolated strain of Mucor circinelloides. Process Biochemistry (Barking, London, England), 2004, 39(12): 1871–1876

24 Panagiotou G, Topakas E, Moukouli M, Christakopoulos P, Olsson L. Studying the ability of Fusariumoxysporum and recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae to efficiently cooperate in decomposition and ethanolic fermentation of wheat straw. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2011, 35(8): 3727–3732

25 Saddler J N, Chan M K H, Louis-Seize G. A one step process for the conversion of cellulose to ethanol using anaerobic microorganisms in mono- and co-culture. Biotechnology Letters, 1981, 3(6): 321–326

26 Verma G, Nigam P, Singh D, Chaudhary K. Bioconversion of starch to ethanol in a single-step process by coculture of amylolytic yeasts and Saccharomyces cerevisiae 21. Bioresource Technology, 2000, 72(3): 261–266

27 Bernalier A, Fonty G, Bonnemoy F, Gouet P. Degradation and fermentation of cellulose by the rumen anaerobic fungi in axenic cultures or in association with cellulolytic bacteria. Current Microbiology, 1992, 25(3): 143–148

28 Abouzied M M, Reddy C A. Direct fermentation of potato starch to ethanol by cocultures of Aspergillus niger and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1986, 52(5): 1055–1059

29 Thomas K N G, Ben-Bassat A, Zeikus J G. Ethanol production by thermophilic bacteria: fermentation of cellulosic substrates by cocultures of Clostridium thermocellum and Clostridium thermohydrosulfuricum. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1981, 41(6): 1337–1343

30 Alam M Z, Nassereldeen A, Kabbashi A, Nahdatul S, Hussin I S. Production of bioethanol by direct bioconversion of oil-palm industrial effiuent in a stirred-tank bioreactor. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2009, 36(6): 801–808

31 Sun R, Lawther J M, Banks W B. Fractional and structural characterization of wheat straw hemicelluloses. Carbohydrate Polymers, 1996, 29(4): 325–331

32 Jørgensen H, Mørkeberg A, Krogh K B R, Olsson L. Production of cellulases and hemicellulases by three Penicillium species: effect of substrate and evaluation of cellulase adsorption by capillary electrophoresis. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2005, 36(1): 42–48