Direct ethanol production from rice straw by coculture with two high-performing fungi

Maki TAKANO, Kazuhiro HOSHINO

PDF(166 KB)
PDF(166 KB)
Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. ›› 2012, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (2) : 139-145. DOI: 10.1007/s11705-012-1281-6
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Direct ethanol production from rice straw by coculture with two high-performing fungi

Author information +
History +

Abstract

To develop efficient and economical direct ethanol production from fine rice straw crashed mechanically, two high-performing fungi, which can secret hyperactive cellulases and/or ferment effectively various sugars, were selected from some strains belong to Mucor circinelloides preserved in our laboratory. The simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) by coculture with these fungi was investigated. The screening of high-performing fungi resulted in the selection of NBRC 4572 as an ethanol-producing fungus and NBRC 5398 as a cellulase-secreting fungus. The strain 4572 produced ethanol aerobically from glucose and xylose in high yields of 0.420 g/g at 36 h and 0.478 g/g at 60 h, respectively, but secreted fairly low cellulases. On the other hand, the strain 5398 also produced ethanol from glucose in yield of 0.340 g/g though it had a little growth in xylose culture. However, it secreted hyperactive cellulases that are essential for hydrolysis of rice straw in culture and the maximum activities of endo-β-glucanase and β-glucosidase were 2.11 U/L and 1.47 U/L, respectively. In SSF of rice straw by coculture with two fungi selected, the ethanol production reached 1.28 g/L after 96 h when the inoculation ratio of the strain 5398 to the strain 4572 was 9.

Keywords

Mucor circinelloides / ethanol production / cellulase secretion / SSF / coculture / rice straw

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Maki TAKANO, Kazuhiro HOSHINO. Direct ethanol production from rice straw by coculture with two high-performing fungi. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2012, 6(2): 139‒145 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-012-1281-6

References

[1]
Summersa M D, Jenkinsa B M, Hydeb P R, Williamsc J F, Muttersd R G, Scardaccie S C, Haire M W. Biomass production and allocation in rice with implications for straw harvesting and utilization. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2003, 24(3): 163–173
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Ahamed A, Vermette P. Culture-based strategies to enhance cellulase enzyme production from Trichoderma reesei RUT-C30 in bioreactor culture conditions. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2008, 40(3): 399–407
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Bhat M K, Bhat S. Cellulose degrading enzymes and their potential industrial applications. Biotechnology Advances, 1997, 15(3–4): 583–620
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Abedinifar S, Karimi K, Khanahmadi M, Taherzadeh M J. Ethanol production by Mucor indicus and Rhizopus oryzae from rice straw by separate hydrolysis and fermentation. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2009, 33(5): 828–833
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Karimi K, Emtiazi G, Taherzadeh M J. Ethanol production from dilute-acid pretreated rice straw by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation with Mucor indicus, Rhizopus oryzae, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2006, 40(1): 138–144
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Arima K, Iwasaki S, Tamura G. Milk clotting enzyme from microorganisms. Part I. Screening test and the identification of the potent fungus. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, 1967, 31(5): 540–545
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Kavadiaa A, Komaitis M, Chevalot I, Blanchard F, Marc I, Aggelis G. Lipid and γ-linolenic acid accumulation in strains of Zygomycetes growing on glucose. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 2001, 78(4): 341–346
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Sues A, Millati R, Edebo L, Taherzadeh M J. Ethanol production from hexoses, pentoses, and dilute-acid hydrolyzate by Mucor indicus. FEMS Yeast Research, 2005, 5(6–7): 669–676
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Karimi K, Emtiazi G, Taherzadeh M J. Production of ethanol and mycelial biomass from rice straw hemicellulose hydrolyzate by Mucor indicus. Process Biochemistry (Barking, London, England), 2006, 41(3): 653–658
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Millati R, Edebo L, Taherzadeh M J. Performance of Rhizopus, Rhizomucor, and Mucor in ethanol production from glucose, xylose, and wood hydrolyzates. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2005, 36(2–3): 294–300
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Lübbehüsen T L, Nielsen J, McIntyre M. Aerobic and anaerobic ethanol production by Mucor circinelloides during submerged growth. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2004, 63: 543–548
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Efremenko E N, Stepanov N A, Nikolskaya A B, Senko O V, Spiricheva O V, Varfolomeev S D. Biocatalysts based on immobilized cells of microorganisms in the production of bioethanol and biobutanol. Catalysis in Industry, 2011, 3(1): 41–46
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Ueng P P, Gong C S. Ethanol production from pentoses and sugar-cane bagasse hemicellulose hydrolysate by Mucor and Fusariumspecies. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 1982, 4(3): 169–171
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Rangel-Porras R A, Meza-Carmen V, Martinez-Cadena G, Torres-Guzman J C, Gonzalez-Hernandez G A, Arnau J, Gutierrez-Corona J F. Molecular analysis of an NAD-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase from the zygomycete Mucor circinelloides. Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 2005, 274(4): 354–363
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Takó M, Tóth A, Nagy L G, Krisch J, Vágvölgyi C, Papp T. A new β-glucosidase gene from the zygomycete fungus Rhizomucor miehei. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2010, 97(1): 1–10
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Somkuti G A, Babel F J, Somkuti A C. Cellulolysis by Mucor pusillus. Applied Microbiology, 1969, 17(6): 888–892
[17]
Persson I, Tjerneld F, Hahn-Hägerdal B. Fungal cellulolytic enzyme production. Process Biochemistry (Barking, London, England), 1991, 26(2): 65–74
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Sugimoto M, Suzuki Y. Molecular cloning, sequencing, and expression of a cDNA encoding α-glucosidase from Mucor javanicus. Journal of Biochemistry, 1996, 119: 500–505
[19]
Takii Y, Ikeda K, Sato C, Yano M, Sato T, Konno H. Production and characterization of β-glucosidase from Rhizopus oryzae MIBA348. Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2005, 5(1): 11–16
[20]
Baba Y, Shimonaka A, Koga J, Kubota H, Kono T. Alternative splicing produces two endoglucanases with one or two carbohydrate-binding modules in Mucor circinelloides. Journal of Bacteriology, 2005, 187(9): 3045–3051
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Saha B C. Xylanase from a newly isolated Fusarium verticillioides capable of utilizing corn fiber xylan. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2001, 56(5–6): 762–766
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Saha B C. Hemicellulose bioconversion. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2003, 30(5): 279–291
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Saha B C. Production, purification and properties of endoglucanase from a newly isolated strain of Mucor circinelloides. Process Biochemistry (Barking, London, England), 2004, 39(12): 1871–1876
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Panagiotou G, Topakas E, Moukouli M, Christakopoulos P, Olsson L. Studying the ability of Fusariumoxysporum and recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae to efficiently cooperate in decomposition and ethanolic fermentation of wheat straw. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2011, 35(8): 3727–3732
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Saddler J N, Chan M K H, Louis-Seize G. A one step process for the conversion of cellulose to ethanol using anaerobic microorganisms in mono- and co-culture. Biotechnology Letters, 1981, 3(6): 321–326
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Verma G, Nigam P, Singh D, Chaudhary K. Bioconversion of starch to ethanol in a single-step process by coculture of amylolytic yeasts and Saccharomyces cerevisiae 21. Bioresource Technology, 2000, 72(3): 261–266
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Bernalier A, Fonty G, Bonnemoy F, Gouet P. Degradation and fermentation of cellulose by the rumen anaerobic fungi in axenic cultures or in association with cellulolytic bacteria. Current Microbiology, 1992, 25(3): 143–148
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Abouzied M M, Reddy C A. Direct fermentation of potato starch to ethanol by cocultures of Aspergillus niger and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1986, 52(5): 1055–1059
[29]
Thomas K N G, Ben-Bassat A, Zeikus J G. Ethanol production by thermophilic bacteria: fermentation of cellulosic substrates by cocultures of Clostridium thermocellum and Clostridium thermohydrosulfuricum. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1981, 41(6): 1337–1343
[30]
Alam M Z, Nassereldeen A, Kabbashi A, Nahdatul S, Hussin I S. Production of bioethanol by direct bioconversion of oil-palm industrial effiuent in a stirred-tank bioreactor. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2009, 36(6): 801–808
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Sun R, Lawther J M, Banks W B. Fractional and structural characterization of wheat straw hemicelluloses. Carbohydrate Polymers, 1996, 29(4): 325–331
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Jørgensen H, Mørkeberg A, Krogh K B R, Olsson L. Production of cellulases and hemicellulases by three Penicillium species: effect of substrate and evaluation of cellulase adsorption by capillary electrophoresis. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2005, 36(1): 42–48
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowlegements

This work was supported by the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) of Japan and a Grant-in Aid (No. 21612003) for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(166 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/