The structural properties of the NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-10 sample generated were investigated by X-Rays Dirrfaction (XRD), Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), and Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM), and the results are presented in Fig. 1. As shown in Fig. 1(a) of XRD patterns, signals from NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-10 sample were ascribed to the characteristic diffraction peaks of the four phases, (1) face-centered-cubic Ni phase derived from the Ni foam substrate, which was characterized by three strong peaks at 2θ = 44.3°, 51.6° and 76.3°, (2) spinel NiCoP phase categorized by the clear peaks at 2θ = 40.7°, 47.2°, and 54.2° corresponding to the (111), (210) and (300) planes, (3) NiCoP4O12 phase identified by the enlarged peaks at 2θ = 21.0°, 23.5°, and 26.3° attributing to the (112), (021) and (221) planes, and (4) NiCo2O4 phase demonstrated by the weak peak at 2θ = 36.1°, and diffraction peaks of the (311) planes, indicating that heterostructures of NiCoP4O12 and NiCoP (NiCoP4O12/NiCoP) were formed in the sample obtained. The micro-shape of the NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-10, generated by SEM, as observed in Fig. 1(b), was a uniform rod-like array, which was similar to that of the NiCo2O4 (Fig. S1, cf. ESM). Enlarged SEM images, presented in Fig. 1(c), displays the rods’ tops overlap each other, indicating the formation of a bridged architecture. To further analyze the framework of the electrode, the fine structure of rods was investigated by TEM. As displayed in Fig. 1(d), the rod was composed of several irregular spherical particles, denoting the presence of multiple grain boundaries in the heterostructure. Magnified TEM in Fig. 1(e) showed many slit-like spaces between the particles, suggesting that NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-10 had not only a porous structure but also various void/solid interfaces. Explicit lattice fringes, having inter-planar distances of 0.24 and 0.22 nm, were clearly observed in Fig. 1(f), which were in accordance with the (311) plane of NiCo2O4 and (111) plane of NiCoP, respectively, which demonstrated the existence of two phases in the rods. Following the above results, the EDX spectrum of NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-10, as seen in Fig. 1(g), revealed the signals of Ni, Co, P, and O elements, implying that the rods were made of the four elements. In the selected region, presented as STEM in Fig. 1(h), the observed elemental mapping (Figs. 1(i–l)) depicted that the four elements were equally distributed throughout the rods.
Fig.1 (a) XRD pattern; (b, c) SEM images; (d–f) TEM images; (g) EDX; (h–l) STEM image and the element mapping of Ni, Co, P and O of NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-10. |
Full size|PPT slide
The density of the grain boundary, an important factor of active sites, was assessed by grain size, which was tuned by adjusting the thermal-driven growth of NiCoP4O12 and NiCoP grains through different phosphating times at 350 °C. The SEM, TEM, XRD, grain size, and specific surface area of NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-X are shown in Fig. 2. As illustrated in Figs. 2(a–c), the samples obtained at 0, 5 and 20 min displayed rod-like appearances. When extending the time to 30 min, the size of rod primitives become thick, although the shape of rod array is retained, as shown in Fig. S2 (cf. ESM), which is evident in the SEM image shown in Fig. S2(a). The deposit configuration of the grain was similar for NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-0 to NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-20, as observed from the TEM images depicted in Figs. 2(d–f). The small particle-assembled rods of NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-0 and NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-5 were similar to that of the NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-10 and NiCo2O4 (Fig. S1(c)). As the phosphating time increased, the particles visibly grew, as shown in the TEM image of NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-20 (Fig. 2(f)). However, this particle-accumulation structure disappeared in NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-30 sample due to the abnormal growth of grains as a result of long-term thermal treating (TEM image as observed in Fig. S2(b)). Thus, at 350 °C, a holding time of not more than 20 min was essential for retaining the feature of rich grain boundaries of samples.
The phase change of the bulk with phosphating time was also investigated using XRD. As depicted in Fig. 2(g), the relative intensity of (111) of NiCoP increased consistently from NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-0 to NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-30, while, the relative intensity of the NiCo2O4 diffraction peaks decreased with longer phosphating times. This indicated that a large number of NiCo oxides transformed to NiCoP4O12 and NiCoP during phosphating. At the same time, it was also found that P atoms were progressively doped into the arrays, as perceived by the increased signals of P 2p in the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) survey spectrum as well as the negative shift of binding energy in the high-resolution P 2p XPS images of NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-0 to NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-30 (Fig. S3, cf. ESM). In addition, the complete absenceof the feature of NiCoP4O12 signified that it had been converted to the NiCoP phase. From the above results, it was inferred that the NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-30 sample was composed of the single NiCoP.
In order to analyze the density of the grain boundary, the average crystalline size of the samples was calculated using the XRD patterns. However, the NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-30 sample was not considered because of the absence of granule-like features. As elucidated in Fig. 2(h), the average crystalline size of the samples increased with an increase in phosphating times, due to the growth of the grains bythermal treatment. The increase in the average crystalline size implied that the density of the grain boundary decreased from NiCo2O4 to NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-20.
Fig.2 (a) SEM, TEM patterns of the NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-X (X= 0 (a, d), 5 (b, e), 20 (c, f)) samples; (g) XRD patterns; (h) the average crystalline size; (i) specific surface area diagram of the NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-X samples indicated by the phosphating time. |
Full size|PPT slide
The changes in the specific surface area of the samples caused by the varied phosphating times were investigated by Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method (Fig. S4, cf. ESM). From Fig. 2(i), the BET surface area increased gradually from NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-0 to NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-10 and reached its maximum at 117.6 dm2∙g–1. This phenomenon was ascribed to the following two reasons. On one hand, the growth of the grain leads to the increase of the specific surface area from NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-0 to NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-10 and decrease from NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-10 to NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-30. On the other hand, the pores among the particles would increase owing to the nanoscale Kirkendall effect from NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-0 to NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-30. Further, there was a balance between the two opposing factors, as a result of which the specific surface area reached its maximum value. All in all, the aforementioned results expounded that the density of the grain boundary and specific surface area of the samples can be tuned by varying the phosphating times.
Electrochemical properties of every NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-X sample, evaluated by cyclic voltammetry (CV) in 1 mol·L−1 KOH alkaline electrolyte, are shown in Fig. 3. A couple of redox peaks, 0.43 V for positive scan and 0.25 V for negative scan, appeared due to the redox transitions of Ni and Co, indicating the pseudocapacitive nature of the elements in alkaline electrolyte, as shown in Fig. 3(a). The current densities of the redox peaks increased at first, from NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-0 till NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-10, and then decreased for the NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-20 sample. Furthermore, the current density of the redox peaks of NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-10 was greater than that of NiCo2O4 and NiCoP (Fig. S5, cf. ESM), confirming that it was the best charge storage capability value. To further examine the charge storage mechanism of NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-10, CVs measurements for different scan rates (Fig. 3(b)) were calculated. The non-distortion CV curves at higher scan rates indicated faster electron transfer on the NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-10 electrode than at lower scan rates. The curve derived from Fig. 3(b) showed the power-law dependence of current on sweep rate and has been plotted in Fig. 3(c) based on the equation ip= avb, where ip represented the peak current, a and b were the adjustable parameters, and v was the scan rate. The mechanisms of the charge storage of the electrodes were revealed by the slope of peak 1, denoting the parameter b. When the charge/discharge process was controlled by diffusion, b was 0.55; whereas b value of 0.64, as presented in Fig. 3(c), specified the mixed diffusion and surface-controlled electrochemical reactions occurring on the NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-10 electrode.
Fig.3 (a) CV curves of all the NiCoP4O12/NiCoP samples at 5 mV·s−1; (b) CV curves of NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-10 sample at various scan rates; (c) power law dependence of current on sweep rate; (d) galvanostatic charge-discharge (GCD) curves of all the NiCoP4O12/NiCoP samples at 1 mA∙cm–2; (e) GCD curves of NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-10 at different current densities; (f) area specific capacitance vs. current density for all the NiCoP4O12/NiCoP samples. |
Full size|PPT slide
GCD curves of every NiCoP
4O
12/NiCoP-X electrode, depicted in Fig. 3(d), showed non-linear features. The potential plateaus existing between 0.35 and 0.48 V in GCD curves corresponded to the redox peaks of CV curves, indicating the battery-type behavior of electrodes during both charge and discharge processes [
4,
10]. The capacitance values of the samples were calculated based on their GCD curves, which were 403.6, 427.2, 507.8 and 451.1 µAh∙cm
–2 from NiCoP
4O
12/NiCoP-0 to NiCoP
4O
12/NiCoP-20, respectively, with the current density of 1 mA∙cm
–2. These values were higher than NiCo
2O
4 and NiCoP values (Fig. S5). Among the samples, NiCoP
4O
12/NiCoP-10 had the highest capacitance, which was consistent with the CV results.
For studying the rate capability of the samples, a set of GCD measurements with different current densities were assessed. As depicted in Fig. 3(e), the time span decreased with the increase of current density from 1 to 30 mA∙cm–2 on the NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-10 electrode, indicating that the capacitance of the sample dropped as a result of polarization on the electrode surface. At the current density of 30 mA∙cm–2, NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-10’s capacitance was 328.3 µAh∙cm–2, which was 64.7% lesser than the capacitance at the current density of 1 mA∙cm–2 (507.8 µAh∙cm–2). Similarly, other samples also showed higher loss of capacitance as NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-10, which was shown in Fig. 3(f) and Fig. S6 (cf. ESM). Simultaneously, the cyclic stability of NiCo2O4 and NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-X samples was analyzed using a three-electrode system, the result of which is shown in Fig. S7 (cf. ESM). Compared to other electrode samples, NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-10 exhibited the best stability and lowest loss. After analyzing cyclic test results, we characterized the samples by TEM from the images displayed in Fig. S8 (cf. ESM). It was inferred that the grain boundaries sustained the morphology of the array electrode substantially after the stability test.
To reveal the principle of the good capacitive behavior of NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-10, the process of electron and mass transfer was analyzed by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) with the results shown in Fig. S9 (cf. ESM). The straight line at low frequency region and the semicircle at high frequency region indicate that charge storage process is controlled by the charge transport and mass transfer. Clearly, the slope of the straight line at low frequency for NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-10 is larger than that of other frequency regions, suggesting the ion diffusion process in NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-10 is easier than the bulk of the active mass, which is related to the richer porosity of NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-10 than those of others supported by the specific surface areas obtained from BET. According to the fitting circuit diagram for the zoomed semicircle in Fig. S9(b), the charge transfer resistance (Rct) were estimated for the all electrode system. As listed Table S1 (cf. ESM), NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-10 has the smallest Rct among all the samples, suggesting that the charge transfer resistance at electrode/electrolyte interface in NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-10 is smaller than others. This was attributed to its high electrical conductivity listed in Table S2 (cf. ESM) and high activity of Ni and Co sites due to their modified electron distribution, as depicted by the high-resolution 2p XPS of Co and Ni. Based on the EIS, we made equivalent electric circuits of samples, as shown in Fig. S9(c).
As presented in Fig. S10 (cf. ESM) and Table S3 (cf. ESM), the variation of binding energy of Ni 2p could be present from the peak of XPS spectra from NiCo
2O
4 to NiCoP
4O
12/NiCoP-30. As observed in the Ni 2p XPS of NiCo
2O
4, except for the two peaks coupled with satellites, two new peaks appeared at 851.3 and 868.6 eV in the Ni 2p kspectra of the NiCoP
4O
12/NiCoP-X samples, which could be related to the two Ni
0 peaks at the Ni 2p
3/2 and Ni 2p
1/2 electron orbits of formed NiCoP [
25,
26]. It is also noted that, the binding energy of the 2p
3/2 peak of the NiCoP
4O
12/NiCoP-X samples (855.3 eV) is negative to that of the free Ni atom. As binding energies of reduced atoms shift negatively than free atoms, due to improved electronic shielding effect, some Ni atoms in the NiCoP
4O
12/NiCoP-X samples were in ‘reduced’ state [
27,
28] as the electrons were transferred from Co and P to Ni atoms, which was also proved by the change in the chemical state of Co atoms. There was an 11.6% increase in the portion of Co(III) increase from 52.0% in NiCoP
4O
12/NiCoP-0 to 63.6% in NiCoP
4O
12/NiCoP-30 (Fig. S11 (cf. ESM) and Table S4 (cf. ESM)). Moreover, the presence of “reduced-state” Ni species in NiCoP
4O
12/NiCoP-10 sample was larger than those in other samples, implying that the effect of electron reached the optimum. Thus, the NiCoP
4O
12/NiCoP-10 electrode had the highest capacity among all samples, proved by its porous framework and modified electron structure of Ni and Co atoms.
In order to analyze the capacitor performance of NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-10 electrode in practical applications, an assemble asymmetric supercapacitor (ASC) was assembled, using the sample as the cathode, activated carbon (AC) as the anode, and 1 mol·L−1 KOH-solution as electrolyte. The performance test of the ASC is shown in Fig. 4. According to the CV curves of the assembled cell (Fig. 4(a)), it was observed that the anode exhibited an approximate rectangle shape, and the cathode displayed redox peaks, illustrating the ASC’s battery-like behavior. CV curves of ASC with different potential window ranges were recorded to choose the most appropriate range. The features depicted in Fig. 4(b), ascertained that rectangular CVs showed a wide range of redox currents. Polarization occurred in the sample as voltage of the ASC was increased to 1.7 V, therefore, 0–1.6 V of voltage window was determined to be suitable for the ASC.
Fig.4 (a) CV curves of activated carbon anode and NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-10; (b) CV curves of ASC measured at different operating voltages at 20 mV∙s–1; (c) CV curves of ASC at different scan rates from 10 to 100 mV∙s–1; (d) GCD curves of ASC at different current densities; (e) cycling stability of ASC at 20 mA∙cm–2; (f) energy density vs. power density of NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-10//AC cell, compared with other studies; (g) red light-emitting diode (LED) powered by two series-connected coin cells after different illumination times. |
Full size|PPT slide
The ability of charge transfer of the ASC was further investigated by CVs at various scan rates. As shown in Fig. 4(c), caused by the polarization, the CV’s rectangular shape is distorted with increasing scan rate. In more detail, at high scan rate, the adsorption/intercalation or desorption/deintercalation depth of OH– ions into the electrode surface becomes lower owing to the inadequate time compared to that at low scan rate. Then, the faster the scan rate is, the more amplified the polarization will be, leading to a spindle-like shape in CVs at 100 mV∙s–1. It implies that the stored charge within the ASC decreases with the scan rate. To quantify the variation of the specific capacitor of the ASC, its GCD at various current densities were performed. As presented in Fig. 4(d), the non-standard straight line of all isosceles triangle curves indicates the supercapacitor typical for the ASC with the current density ranging from 2 to 30 mA∙cm–2. At 30 mA∙cm–2, the ASC’s specific capacitance drops to 377.5 µAh∙cm–2 corresponding to a 63.6% rate retention of its initial capacitance of 592.8 µAh∙cm–2 at 2 mA∙cm–2, indicating a good rate ability of the ACS.
Continuous GCD for 10000 cycles at 20 mA∙cm–2 was performed to test the long-term stability of the ASC. As shown in Fig. 4(e), the specific capacity of the ASC was 360 µAh∙cm–2 after 10000 cycles, with the loss of 0.0007% per cycle, indicating an outstanding cycling stability of ASC. Furthermore, the cycling stability of ASC was at the forefront of existing NiCo-based ASCs, as listed in Table S5 (cf. ESM). Meanwhile, ASC of the present study showed 370.3 and 30.2 W∙kg–1 power density at 38.3 and 1481.6 Wh∙kg–1 of energy density, respectively. The proposed ASC ranked foremost in reported NiCo-based ASCs, as plotted in Fig. 4(f). It can be seen from this figure that the performance of samples presented in the study was better than most nickel-cobalt-based compounds, which proves that the energy storage performance of our prepared samples is at the forefront. Similar to NiCo2O4/NiCoP, Ni–Co oxide showed 95.2 W∙kg–1 power density at 12 Wh∙kg–1 energy density. The performance of these samples was lower than the samples we prepared. These results explained that the as-prepared NiCoP4O12/NiCoP-10 electrode was a promising electrode in a practical ASC cell, which has been visualized in the pictures depicted in Fig. 4(g). The red LED light in series powered by the two ASCs could continuously work for longer than 12 min. Then we also conducted electrochemical measurement for AC anode and results were displayed in Fig. S12 (cf. ESM). Figure S12(a) is the CV curves at different scan rate; Fig. S12(b) shows its GCD curves at different current density; Fig. S12(c) is its specific capacity; and Fig. S12(d) is EIS images.