RESEARCH ARTICLE

Investigation of bubble diameter and flow regime between water and dilute aqueous ethanol solutions in an airlift reactor

  • Baharak SAJJADI ,
  • Mostafa Keshavarz MORAVEJI ,
  • Reza DAVARNEJAD
Expand
  • Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Arak University, Arak 38156-8-8349, Iran

Received date: 12 Aug 2010

Accepted date: 15 Nov 2010

Published date: 05 Jun 2011

Copyright

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

Abstract

In this study, the effect of ethanol addition into pure water and its concentration on bubble diameter, gas hold-up and flow regimes were investigated in an airlift reactor. Air and water with ethanol (concentration ranging from 0%–1%, v/v) were as dispersed and continuous phases, respectively. Superficial gas velocity was considered as an effective parameter. Bubble size distribution was measured by photography and picture analysis at various concentrations of ethanol and various velocities of gas. Alcohol concentration enhancement caused bubble diameter to decrease. Furthermore, the bubbles diameter in pure water was nearly 4 times higher than that of ethanol with concentration of 1% (v/v) and also was 3.4 times higher than that of ethanol with concentration of 0.25% (v/v) at the highest aeration gas velocity inlet. For ethanol solutions in lower superficial gas velocity, a homogenous flow regime was observed. This trend continued to inlet gas velocity of about 0.4 cm/s. The transition flow regime occurred after this datum although in pure water, a homogenous flow regime was observed up to a superficial gas velocity of 0.7 cm/s. The gas hold-up in dilute ethanol solutions were more than (around 2 times) that of pure water and increased with increasing concentration of ethanol in those solutions.

Cite this article

Baharak SAJJADI , Mostafa Keshavarz MORAVEJI , Reza DAVARNEJAD . Investigation of bubble diameter and flow regime between water and dilute aqueous ethanol solutions in an airlift reactor[J]. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2011 , 5(2) : 194 -202 . DOI: 10.1007/s11705-010-1019-2

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Arak University for facilities preparation and financial support.
1
Camarasa E, Carvalho E, Meleiro L A C, Maciel Filho R, Domingues A, Wild G, Poncin S, Midoux N, Bouillard J. Development of a complete model for an air-lift reactor. Chemical Engineering Science, 2001, 56(2): 493-502

DOI

2
Loh K H, Liu J. External loop inversed fluidized bed airlift bioreactor (EIFBAB) for treating high strength phenolic waste water. Chemical Engineering Science, 2001, 56(21-22): 6171-6176

DOI

3
Zhang Z, Zhou J, Wang J, Guo H, Tong J. Integration of nitrification and denitrifying dephosphatation in air lift loop sequencing batch biofilm reactor. Process Biochemistry (Barking, London, England), 2006, 41(3): 599-608

DOI

4
Lo C S, Hwang S J. Degradation of waste gas containing toluene in an airlift bioreactor. Environmental Science & Technology, 2004, 38(7): 2271-2280

DOI PMID

5
Chisti Y, Moo-Young M. Airlift reactors: characteristics, applications, and design considerations. Chemical Engineering Communications, 1987, 60(1): 195-242

DOI

6
Jones S T. Gas-liquid mass transfer in an external airlift loop reactor for syngas fermentation. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree.Iowa: Iowa State University, 2007, 6-24

7
Kluytmans J H J, van Wachem B G M, Kuster B F M, Schouten J C. Design of an industrial size airlift loop redox cycle (ALRC) reactor for catalytic alcohol oxidation and catalyst reactivation. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2003, 42(18): 4174-4185

DOI

8
Choi K H. Hydrodynamic and mass transfer characteristics of external-loop airlift, reactors without an extension tube above the down-comer. Korean J Chem Eng, 2001, 18(2): 240-246

DOI

9
Abashar M E, Narsingh U, Rouillard A E, Judd R. Hydrodynamic flow regimes, gas hold-up, and liquid circulation in airlift reactors. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1998, 37(4): 1251-1259

DOI

10
Vial C, Poncin S, Wild G, Midoux N. Experimental and theoretical analysis of axial dispersion in the liquid phase in external-loop airlift reactors. Chemical Engineering Science, 2005, 60(22): 5945-5954

DOI

11
van Benthum W A J, van der Lans R G J M. van lossdrecht M C M, Heijnen J J. Bubble recirculation regimes in an internal-loop airlift reactor. Chemical Engineering Science, 1999, 54(18): 3995-4006

DOI

12
Jin B, Lant P. Flow regime, hydrodynamics, floc size distribution and sludge properties in activated sludge bubble column, air-lift and aerated stirred reactors. Chemical Engineering Science, 2004, 59(12): 2379-2388

DOI

13
Sotiriadis A A, Thorpe R B, Smith J M. Bubble size and mass transfer characteristics of sparged down wards two-phase flow. Chemical Engineering Science, 2005, 60(22): 5917-5929

DOI

14
Homayouni S S, Mehrnia M R, Mostoufi N, Rajabi M, Yazdani A. Bubble size distribution in oil-based bubble columns. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2008, 31(11): 1668-1675

DOI

15
Ruen-ngam D, Wongsuchoto P, Limpanuphap A, Charinpanitkul T, Pavasant P. Influence of salinity on bubble size distribution and gas–liquid mass transfer in airlift contactors. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2008, 141(1-3): 222-232

DOI

16
Farrell A E, Plevin R J, Turner B T, Jones A D, O’Hare M, Kammen D M. Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science, 2006, 311(5760): 506-508

DOI PMID

17
Rao K, Chaudhari V, Varanasi S, Kim D S. Enhanced ethanol fermentation of brewery wastewater using the genetically modified strain E. coli KO11. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2007, 74(1): 50-60

DOI PMID

18
Lessard R R, Zieminski S A. Bubble coalescence and gas transfer in aqueous electrolyte solutions. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals, 1971, 10(2): 260-269

DOI

19
Eren H. Particle concentration characteristics and density measurements of slurries using electromagnetic flowmeters. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 1995, 44(3): 783-786

DOI

20
Burattini L, Bini S, Burattini R. Correlation method versus enhanced modified moving average method for automatic detection of T-wave alternans. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2010, 98(1): 94-102

DOI PMID

21
Winters P R. Forecasting sales by exponentially weighted moving averages. Management Science, 1960, 6(3): 324-342

DOI

22
Zuber N, Findlay J. Average volumetric concentration in two-phase flow systems. ASME J Heat Trans, 1965, 87: 453-468

23
Biswas A B, Das S K. Hold up characteristics of gas non-Newtonian liquid flow through helical coils in vertical orientation. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2006, 45(21): 7287-7292

DOI

24
Atenas M, Clark M, Lazarova V. Hold-up and liquid circulation velocity in a rectangular air-lift bioreactor. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1999, 38(3): 944-949

DOI

25
Jin R C, Zheng P, Mahmood Q, Zhang L. Hydrodynamic characteristics of airlift nitrifying reactor using carrier-induced granular sludge. J Hazard Mater, 2008, 157(2-3): 367-373

DOI PMID

26
Vazquez G, Alvarez E, Navaza J M. Surface tension of alcohol+ water from 20°C to 50°C. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 1995, 40(3): 611-614

DOI

27
Marrucci G. A theory of coalescence. Chemical Engineering Science, 1969, 24(6): 975-985

DOI

28
Prince M J, Blanch H W. Transition electrolyte concentrations for bubble coalescence. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1990, 36(9): 1425-1429

DOI

29
Tsang Y H, Koh Y H, Koch D L. Bubble-size dependence of the critical electrolyte concentration for inhibition of coalescence. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2004, 275(1): 290-297

DOI PMID

30
Advani S G, Dimitrovová Z. Role of capillary driven flow in composite manufacturing. In: Surface and interface tension: measurement, theory, and applications. Hartland S ed. Surfactant Science Series. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc, 2004, 119: 263-312

31
Zahradníc J, Kuncová G, Fialová M. The effect of surface active additives on bubble coalescence and gas hold-up in viscous aerated batches. Chemical Engineering Science, 1999, 54 (13-14): 2401-2408

DOI

32
Camarasa E, Vial C, Poncin S, Wild G, Midoux N, Bouillard J. Influence of coalescence behavior of the liquid and of gas sparging on hydrodynamics and bubble characteristics in a bubble column. Chemical Engineering and Processing, 1999, 38(4-6): 329-344

DOI

33
Jeng J J, Maa J R, Yang Y M. Surface effects and mass transfer in bubble column. Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev, 1986, 25(4): 974-978

DOI

34
Keitel G, Onken U. Inhibition of bubble coalescence by solutes in air/water dispersions. Chemical Engineering Science, 1982, 37(11): 1635-1638

DOI

35
Zahradník J, Kuncová G, Fialová M. The effect of surface active additives on bubble coalescence and gas hold-up in viscous aerated batches. Chemical Engineering Science, 1999, 54: 2401-2408

DOI

36
Albijanić B V, Ðurić M S, Petrović D L, Tekić M N. Prediction of gas hold-up for alcohol olutions in a draft-tube bubble column. Acta Periodica Technologica, 2006, 37(37): 71-82

DOI

37
Šijaćki I M, Čolović R R, Petrović D L, Tekić M N, Ðurić M S. Diluted alcohol solutions in bubble columns and draft tube airlift reactors with a single orifice sparger: experiments and simple correlations. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 2010, 85: 39-49

DOI

Outlines

/