Investigation of bubble diameter and flow regime between water and dilute aqueous ethanol solutions in an airlift reactor
Baharak SAJJADI, Mostafa Keshavarz MORAVEJI, Reza DAVARNEJAD
Investigation of bubble diameter and flow regime between water and dilute aqueous ethanol solutions in an airlift reactor
In this study, the effect of ethanol addition into pure water and its concentration on bubble diameter, gas hold-up and flow regimes were investigated in an airlift reactor. Air and water with ethanol (concentration ranging from 0%–1%, v/v) were as dispersed and continuous phases, respectively. Superficial gas velocity was considered as an effective parameter. Bubble size distribution was measured by photography and picture analysis at various concentrations of ethanol and various velocities of gas. Alcohol concentration enhancement caused bubble diameter to decrease. Furthermore, the bubbles diameter in pure water was nearly 4 times higher than that of ethanol with concentration of 1% (v/v) and also was 3.4 times higher than that of ethanol with concentration of 0.25% (v/v) at the highest aeration gas velocity inlet. For ethanol solutions in lower superficial gas velocity, a homogenous flow regime was observed. This trend continued to inlet gas velocity of about 0.4 cm/s. The transition flow regime occurred after this datum although in pure water, a homogenous flow regime was observed up to a superficial gas velocity of 0.7 cm/s. The gas hold-up in dilute ethanol solutions were more than (around 2 times) that of pure water and increased with increasing concentration of ethanol in those solutions.
airlift rector / bubble diameter / gas hold-up / flow regime / ethanol
[1] |
Camarasa E, Carvalho E, Meleiro L A C, Maciel Filho R, Domingues A, Wild G, Poncin S, Midoux N, Bouillard J. Development of a complete model for an air-lift reactor. Chemical Engineering Science, 2001, 56(2): 493-502
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Loh K H, Liu J. External loop inversed fluidized bed airlift bioreactor (EIFBAB) for treating high strength phenolic waste water. Chemical Engineering Science, 2001, 56(21-22): 6171-6176
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Zhang Z, Zhou J, Wang J, Guo H, Tong J. Integration of nitrification and denitrifying dephosphatation in air lift loop sequencing batch biofilm reactor. Process Biochemistry (Barking, London, England), 2006, 41(3): 599-608
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Lo C S, Hwang S J. Degradation of waste gas containing toluene in an airlift bioreactor. Environmental Science & Technology, 2004, 38(7): 2271-2280
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Chisti Y, Moo-Young M. Airlift reactors: characteristics, applications, and design considerations. Chemical Engineering Communications, 1987, 60(1): 195-242
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Jones S T. Gas-liquid mass transfer in an external airlift loop reactor for syngas fermentation. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree.Iowa: Iowa State University, 2007, 6-24
|
[7] |
Kluytmans J H J, van Wachem B G M, Kuster B F M, Schouten J C. Design of an industrial size airlift loop redox cycle (ALRC) reactor for catalytic alcohol oxidation and catalyst reactivation. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2003, 42(18): 4174-4185
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Choi K H. Hydrodynamic and mass transfer characteristics of external-loop airlift, reactors without an extension tube above the down-comer. Korean J Chem Eng, 2001, 18(2): 240-246
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Abashar M E, Narsingh U, Rouillard A E, Judd R. Hydrodynamic flow regimes, gas hold-up, and liquid circulation in airlift reactors. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1998, 37(4): 1251-1259
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Vial C, Poncin S, Wild G, Midoux N. Experimental and theoretical analysis of axial dispersion in the liquid phase in external-loop airlift reactors. Chemical Engineering Science, 2005, 60(22): 5945-5954
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
van Benthum W A J, van der Lans R G J M. van lossdrecht M C M, Heijnen J J. Bubble recirculation regimes in an internal-loop airlift reactor. Chemical Engineering Science, 1999, 54(18): 3995-4006
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Jin B, Lant P. Flow regime, hydrodynamics, floc size distribution and sludge properties in activated sludge bubble column, air-lift and aerated stirred reactors. Chemical Engineering Science, 2004, 59(12): 2379-2388
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Sotiriadis A A, Thorpe R B, Smith J M. Bubble size and mass transfer characteristics of sparged down wards two-phase flow. Chemical Engineering Science, 2005, 60(22): 5917-5929
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Homayouni S S, Mehrnia M R, Mostoufi N, Rajabi M, Yazdani A. Bubble size distribution in oil-based bubble columns. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2008, 31(11): 1668-1675
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Ruen-ngam D, Wongsuchoto P, Limpanuphap A, Charinpanitkul T, Pavasant P. Influence of salinity on bubble size distribution and gas–liquid mass transfer in airlift contactors. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2008, 141(1-3): 222-232
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Farrell A E, Plevin R J, Turner B T, Jones A D, O’Hare M, Kammen D M. Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science, 2006, 311(5760): 506-508
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Rao K, Chaudhari V, Varanasi S, Kim D S. Enhanced ethanol fermentation of brewery wastewater using the genetically modified strain E. coli KO11. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2007, 74(1): 50-60
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Lessard R R, Zieminski S A. Bubble coalescence and gas transfer in aqueous electrolyte solutions. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals, 1971, 10(2): 260-269
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Eren H. Particle concentration characteristics and density measurements of slurries using electromagnetic flowmeters. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 1995, 44(3): 783-786
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Burattini L, Bini S, Burattini R. Correlation method versus enhanced modified moving average method for automatic detection of T-wave alternans. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2010, 98(1): 94-102
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Winters P R. Forecasting sales by exponentially weighted moving averages. Management Science, 1960, 6(3): 324-342
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Zuber N, Findlay J. Average volumetric concentration in two-phase flow systems. ASME J Heat Trans, 1965, 87: 453-468
|
[23] |
Biswas A B, Das S K. Hold up characteristics of gas non-Newtonian liquid flow through helical coils in vertical orientation. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2006, 45(21): 7287-7292
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Atenas M, Clark M, Lazarova V. Hold-up and liquid circulation velocity in a rectangular air-lift bioreactor. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1999, 38(3): 944-949
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Jin R C, Zheng P, Mahmood Q, Zhang L. Hydrodynamic characteristics of airlift nitrifying reactor using carrier-induced granular sludge. J Hazard Mater, 2008, 157(2-3): 367-373
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Vazquez G, Alvarez E, Navaza J M. Surface tension of alcohol+ water from 20°C to 50°C. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 1995, 40(3): 611-614
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Marrucci G. A theory of coalescence. Chemical Engineering Science, 1969, 24(6): 975-985
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Prince M J, Blanch H W. Transition electrolyte concentrations for bubble coalescence. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1990, 36(9): 1425-1429
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[29] |
Tsang Y H, Koh Y H, Koch D L. Bubble-size dependence of the critical electrolyte concentration for inhibition of coalescence. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2004, 275(1): 290-297
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[30] |
Advani S G, Dimitrovová Z. Role of capillary driven flow in composite manufacturing. In: Surface and interface tension: measurement, theory, and applications. Hartland S ed. Surfactant Science Series. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc, 2004, 119: 263-312
|
[31] |
Zahradníc J, Kuncová G, Fialová M. The effect of surface active additives on bubble coalescence and gas hold-up in viscous aerated batches. Chemical Engineering Science, 1999, 54 (13-14): 2401-2408
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[32] |
Camarasa E, Vial C, Poncin S, Wild G, Midoux N, Bouillard J. Influence of coalescence behavior of the liquid and of gas sparging on hydrodynamics and bubble characteristics in a bubble column. Chemical Engineering and Processing, 1999, 38(4-6): 329-344
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[33] |
Jeng J J, Maa J R, Yang Y M. Surface effects and mass transfer in bubble column. Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev, 1986, 25(4): 974-978
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[34] |
Keitel G, Onken U. Inhibition of bubble coalescence by solutes in air/water dispersions. Chemical Engineering Science, 1982, 37(11): 1635-1638
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[35] |
Zahradník J, Kuncová G, Fialová M. The effect of surface active additives on bubble coalescence and gas hold-up in viscous aerated batches. Chemical Engineering Science, 1999, 54: 2401-2408
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[36] |
Albijanić B V, Ðurić M S, Petrović D L, Tekić M N. Prediction of gas hold-up for alcohol olutions in a draft-tube bubble column. Acta Periodica Technologica, 2006, 37(37): 71-82
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[37] |
Šijaćki I M, Čolović R R, Petrović D L, Tekić M N, Ðurić M S. Diluted alcohol solutions in bubble columns and draft tube airlift reactors with a single orifice sparger: experiments and simple correlations. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 2010, 85: 39-49
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |