Merits and limitations of TiO₂-based photocatalytic pretreatment of soils impacted by crude oil for expediting bioremediation

Abstract

Heavy hydrocarbons (HHCs) in soils impacted by crude oil spills are generally recalcitrant to biodegradation due to their low bioavailability and complex chemical structure. In this study, soils were pretreated with varying concentrations of ultraviolet radiation A (UVA) or ultraviolet radiation C (UVC) activated titanium dioxide (TiO₂) (1%–5%) under varying moisture conditions (0%–300% water holding capacity (WHC)) to enhance biodegradation of HCCs and shorten remediation timeframes. We demonstrate that pretreatment of impacted soils with UVC-activated TiO₂ in soil slurries could enhance bioremediation of HHCs.  Total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) removal after 24 h exposure to UVC (254 nm and 4.8 mW/cm²) was (19.1±1.6)% in slurries with 300% WHC and 5 wt-% TiO₂. TPH removal was non-selective in the C15-C36 range and increased with moisture content and TiO₂ concentration. In a 10-d bioremediation test, TPH removal in treated soil increased to (26.0±0.9)%, compared to (15.4±0.8)% for controls without photocatalytic pre-treatment. Enhanced biodegradation was also confirmed by respirometry. This suggests that addition of UVC-activated TiO₂ to soil slurries can transform recalcitrant hydrocarbons into more bioavailable and biodegradable byproducts and increase the rate of subsequent biodegradation. However, similar results were not observed for soils pretreated with UVA activated TiO₂. This suggests that activation of TiO₂ by sunlight and direct addition of TiO₂ to unsaturated soils within landfarming setting may not be a feasible approach. Nevertheless, less than 1% of UVA (7.5 mW/cm²) or UVC (1.4 mW/cm²) penetrated beyond 0.3 cm soil depth, indicating that limited light penetration through soil would hinder the ability of TiO₂ to enhance soil bioremediation under land farming conditions.

Key words： TiO₂ pretreatment; bioremediation; total petroleum hydrocarbons; ultraviolet

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Chevron Energy Technology Company. We really appreciate the help from Dr. Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown and Dr. Anca G. Delgado at Arizona State University. Any results, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this research are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Chevron.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11705-017-1657-8 and is accessible for authorized users.

References

1 Fingas M. Oil Spill Science and Technology. Houston: Gulf Professional Publishing, 2010, 7–48

2 Kuyukina M S, Ivshina  I B, Ritchkova  M I, Philp  J C, Cunningham  C J, Christofi  N. Bioremediation of crude oil-contaminated soil using slurry-phase biological treatment and land farming techniques. Soil & Sediment Contamination, 2003, 12(1): 85–99

3 Robles-Gonzalez I V ,  Fava F, Poggi-Varaldo  H M. A review on slurry bioreactors for bioremediation of soils and sediments. Microbial Cell Factories, 2008, 7(1): 5

4 Tomei M C, Daugulis  A J. Ex situ bioremediation of contaminated soils: An overview of conventional and innovative technologies. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2013, 43(20): 2107–2139

5 Brame J A, Hong  S W, Lee  J, Lee S H ,  Alvarez P J J . Photocatalytic pre-treatment with food-grade TiO₂ increases the bioavailability and bioremediation potential of weathered oil from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Chemosphere, 2013, 90(8): 2315–2319

6 Hossaini H, Moussavi  G, Farrokhi M . The investigation of the LED-activated FeFNS-TiO₂ nanocatalyst for photocatalytic degradation and mineralization of organophosphate pesticides in water. Water Research, 2014, 59: 130–144

7 Varner K E, Rindfusz  K, Gaglione A E V . Nano titanium dioxide environmental matters: State of the science literature review. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2010: EPA/600/R–10/089

8 Fagan R, Mccormack  D E, Dionysiou  D D, Pillai  S C. A review of solar and visible light active TiO₂ photocatalysis for treating bacteria, cyanotoxins and contaminants of emerging concern. Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing, 2016, 42: 2–14

9 Uddin M T, Babot  O, Thomas L ,  Olivier C ,  Redaelli M ,  D’arienzo M ,  Morazzoni F ,  Jaegermann W ,  Rockstroh N ,  Junge H ,  Toupance T . New insights into the photocatalytic properties of RuO₂/TiO₂ mesoporous heterostructures for hydrogen production and organic pollutant photodecomposition. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2015, 119(13): 7006–7015

10 Daghrir R, Drogui  P, Robert D . Modified TiO₂ for environmental photocatalytic applications: A review. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(10): 3581–3599

11 Keen O S, Baik  S, Linden K G ,  Aga D S ,  Love N G . Enhanced biodegradation of carbamazepine after UV/H₂O₂ advanced oxidation. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(11): 6222–6227

12 Lee J, Hong  S, Mackeyev Y ,  Lee C, Chung  E, Wilson L J ,  Kim J H ,  Alvarez P J J . Photosensitized oxidation of emerging organic pollutants by Tetrakis C-60 aminofullerene-derivatized silica under visible light I\irradiation. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(24): 10598–10604

13 Turchi C S, Ollis  D F. Photocatalytic degradation of organic-water contaminants—mechanisms involving hydroxyl radical attack. Journal of Catalysis, 1990, 122(1): 178–192

14 Li G Z, Park  S, Rittmann B E . Degradation of reactive dyes in a photocatalytic circulating-bed biofilm reactor. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2012, 109(4): 884–893

15 D’auria M, Emanuele  L, Racioppi R ,  Velluzzi V . Photochemical degradation of crude oil: Comparison between direct irradiation, photocatalysis, and photocatalysis on zeolite. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 164(1): 32–38

16 Marsolek M D, Torres  C I, Hausner  M, Rittmann B E . Intimate coupling of photocatalysis and biodegradation in a photocatalytic circulating-bed biofilm reactor. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2008, 101(1): 83–92

17 Park H, Choi  W. Photocatalytic conversion of benzene to phenol using modified TiO₂ and polyoxometalates. Catalysis Today, 2005, 101(3-4): 291–297

18 Al-Bastaki N M . Performance of advanced methods for treatment of wastewater: UV/TiO₂, RO and UF. Chemical Engineering and Processing, 2004, 43(7): 935–940

19 IARC. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Solar and Ultraviolet Radiation. Lyon: 1992, 43–60

20 Li P G, Yue  P L. Comparison of the effectiveness of photon-based oxidation processes in a pilot falling film photoreactor. Environmental Science & Technology, 1999, 33(18): 3210–3216

21 Li M. Combined effects of sunlight and titanium dioxide nanoparticles on dietary antioxidants and food colors. Dissertation for Doctoral Degree.  College Park : University of Maryland, 2014, 1–24

22 Magpantay G M . Photocatalytic oxidation of ethanol using macroporous titania. Dissertation for Master Degree. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University, 2008, 36–56

23 Unosson E, Welch  K, Persson C ,  Engqvist H . Stability and prospect of UV/H₂O₂ activated titania films for biomedical use. Applied Surface Science, 2013, 285: 317–323

24 Chen T, Delgado  A G, Yavuz  B M, Proctor  A J, Maldonado  J, Zuo Y ,  Westerhoff P ,  Krajamalhik-Brown R ,  Rittmann B E . Ozone enhances biodegradability of heavy hydrocarbons in soil. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science, 2016, 11(1): 7–17

25 Plata D L, Sharpless  C M, Reddy  C M. Photochemical degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in oil films. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(7): 2432–2438

26 Ge Y G, Schimel  J P, Holden  P A. Evidence for negative effects of TiO₂ and ZnO nanoparticles on soil bacterial communities. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(4): 1659–1664

27 Seeger E, Baun  A, Kastner M ,  Trapp S . Insignificant acute toxicity of TiO₂ nanoparticles to willow trees. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2009, 9(1): 46–53

28 Khare P, Sonane  M, Pandey R ,  Ali S, Gupta  K C, Satish  A. Adverse effects of TiO₂ and ZnO nanoparticles in soil nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans. Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology, 2011, 7(1): 116–117

29 Kibanova D, Cervini-Silva  J, Destaillats H . Efficiency of clay-TiO₂ nanocomposites on the photocatalytic elimination of a model hydrophobic air pollutant. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43(5): 1500–1506

30 Zhang L H, Li  P J, Gong  Z Q, Li  X M. Photocatalytic degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on soil surfaces using TiO₂ under UV light. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, 158(2-3): 478–484

31 Zertal A, Sehili  T, Boule P . Photochemical behaviour of 4-chloro-2-methylphenoxyacetic acid—influence of pH and irradiation wavelength. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology a-Chemistry, 2001, 146(1-2): 37–48

32 Fujishima A, Rao  T N, Tryk  D A. Titanium dioxide photocatalysis. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C, Photochemistry Reviews, 2000, 1(1): 1–21

33 Umebayashi T, Yamaki  T, Itoh H ,  Asai K. Analysis of electronic structures of 3D transition metal-doped TiO₂ based on band calculations. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, 2002, 63(10): 1909–1920

34 Bae E Y, Choi  W Y, Park  J W, Shin  H S, Kim  S B, Lee  J S. Effects of surface anchoring groups (Carboxylate vs. phosphonate) in ruthenium-complex-sensitized TiO₂ on visible light reactivity in aqueous suspensions. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2004, 108(37): 14093–14101

35 Park H S, Jung  I M, Choi  G H, Hahn  S, Yoo Y S ,  Lee T. Modification of a rodent Hindlimb model of secondary Lymphedema: Surgical radicality vs. radiotherapeutic ablation. Biomed Research International, 2013, 2013: 208912

36 Higarashi M M ,  Jardim W E . Remediation of pesticide contaminated soil using TiO₂ mediated by solar light. Catalysis Today, 2002, 76(2-4): 201–207

37 Gu J L, Dong  D B, Kong  L X, Zheng  Y, Li X J . Photocatalytic degradation of phenanthrene on soil surfaces in the presence of nanometer anatase TiO₂ under UV-light. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 2012, 24(12): 2122–2126