Optimization of kinetic mechanism for hydrogen combustion based on machine learning

Shuangshuang Cao, Houjun Zhang, Haoyang Liu, Zhiyuan Lyu, Xiangyuan Li, Bin Zhang, You Han

PDF(1564 KB)
PDF(1564 KB)
Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (11) : 136. DOI: 10.1007/s11705-024-2487-0
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Optimization of kinetic mechanism for hydrogen combustion based on machine learning

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The reduced mechanism based on the minimized reaction network method can effectively solve the rigidity problem in the numerical calculation of turbulent internal combustion engine. The optimization of dynamic parameters of the reduced mechanism is the key to reproduce the experimental data. In this work, the experimental data of ignition delay times and laminar flame speeds were taken as the optimization objectives based on the machine-learning model constructed by radial basis function interpolation method, and pre-exponential factors and activation energies of H2 combustion mechanism were optimized. Compared with the origin mechanism, the performance of the optimized mechanism was significantly improved. The error of ignition delay times and laminar flame speeds was reduced by 24.3% and 26.8%, respectively, with 25% decrease in total mean error. The optimized mechanism was used to predict the ignition delay times, laminar flame speeds and species concentrations of jet stirred reactor, and the predicted results were in good agreement with experimental results. In addition, the differences of the key reactions of the combustion mechanism under specific working conditions were studied by sensitivity analysis. Therefore, the machine-learning model is a tool with broad application prospects to optimize various combustion mechanisms in a wide range of operating conditions.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

hydrogen combustion / machine learning / chemical kinetics / mechanism optimization

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Shuangshuang Cao, Houjun Zhang, Haoyang Liu, Zhiyuan Lyu, Xiangyuan Li, Bin Zhang, You Han. Optimization of kinetic mechanism for hydrogen combustion based on machine learning. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(11): 136 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-024-2487-0

References

[1]
Awad O I , Zhou B , Harrath K , Kadirgama K . Characteristics of NH3/H2 blend as carbon-free fuels: a review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48(96): 38077–38100
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
LiXYaoXShentuJSunXLiJLiuMXuS. Combustion reaction mechanism construction by two-parameter rate constant method. Chemical Journal of Chinese Universities, 2020, 41(3): 512–520 (in Chinese)
[3]
LiXShentuJLiYLiJWangJ. Combustion mechanism construction based on minimized reaction network: hydrogen-oxygen combustion. Chemical Journal of Chinese Universities, 2020, 41(4): 772–779 (in Chinese)
[4]
Wang H , Sheen D A . Combustion kinetic model uncertainty quantification, propagation and minimization. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2015, 47: 1–31
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Wang H , Yao M , Reitz R D . Development of a reduced primary reference fuel mechanism for internal combustion engine combustion simulations. Energy & Fuels, 2013, 27(12): 7843–7853
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Ra Y , Reitz R D . A reduced chemical kinetic model for IC engine combustion simulations with primary reference fuels. Combustion and Flame, 2008, 155(4): 713–738
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Lv D , Chen Y , Chen Y , Guo X , Chen H , Huang H . Development of a reduced diesel/PODEn mechanism for diesel engine application. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 199: 112070
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Lin S , Sun W , Guo L , Cheng P , Sun Y , Zhang H . Development of a reduced mechanism of a three components surrogate fuel for the coal-to-liquid and diesel combustion simulation. Fuel, 2021, 294: 120370
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Lapene A , Debenest G , Quintard M , Castanier L M , Gerritsen M G , Kovscek A R . Kinetics oxidation of heavy oil. 2. Application of genetic algorithm for evaluation of kinetic parameters. Energy & Fuels, 2015, 29(2): 1119–1129
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Niu B , Jia M , Xu G , Chang Y , Xie M . Efficient approach for the optimization of skeletal chemical mechanisms with multiobjective genetic algorithm. Energy & Fuels, 2018, 32(6): 7086–7102
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Si J , Wang G , Li P , Mi J . Optimization of the global reaction mechanism for MILD combustion of methane using artificial neural network. Energy & Fuels, 2020, 34(3): 3805–3815
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Lin Q , Zheng J , Zou C , Cheng J , Li J , Xia W , Shi H . An improved 3-pentanone high temperature kinetic model using Bayesian optimization algorithm based on ignition delay times, flame speeds and species profiles. Fuel, 2020, 279: 118540
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Lin Q , Zou C , Liu S , Wang Y , Lu L , Peng C . An improved 2-pentanone low to high-temperature kinetic model using Bayesian optimization algorithm. Combustion and Flame, 2021, 231: 111453
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Li W , Zou C , Yao H , Lin Q , Fu R , Luo J . An optimized kinetic model for H2/CO combustion in CO2 diluent at elevated pressures. Combustion and Flame, 2022, 241: 112093
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Liu X , Wang Y , Bai Y , Yang W . Development of reduced and optimized mechanism for ammonia/hydrogen mixture based on genetic algorithm. Energy, 2023, 270: 126927
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Lin Q , Zou C , Luo J , Xia W , Li W , Peng C . A shock tube experiment and an improved high-temperature diisopropyl ketone model by Bayesian optimization. Combustion and Flame, 2022, 245: 112305
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Vollmer N I , Al R , Gernaey K V , Sin G . Synergistic optimization framework for the process synthesis and design of biorefineries. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2022, 16(2): 251–273
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Wang X , Li J , Zheng Y , Lin J . Smart systems engineering contributing to an intelligent carbon-neutral future: opportunities, challenges, and prospects. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2022, 16(6): 1023–1029
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Fang H , Zhou J , Wang Z , Qiu Z , Sun Y , Lin Y , Chen K , Zhou X , Pan M . Hybrid method integrating machine learning and particle swarm optimization for smart chemical process operations. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2022, 16(2): 274–287
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Chee E , Wong W C , Wang X . An integrated approach for machine-learning-based system identification of dynamical systems under control: application towards the model predictive control of a highly nonlinear reactor system. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2022, 16(2): 237–250
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Ludl P O , Heese R , Höller J , Asprion N , Bortz M . Using machine learning models to explore the solution space of large nonlinear systems underlying flowsheet simulations with constraints. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2022, 16(2): 183–197
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Kéromnès A , Metcalfe W K , Heufer K A , Donohoe N , Das A K , Sung C J , Herzler J , Naumann C , Griebel P , Mathieu O . . An experimental and detailed chemical kinetic modeling study of hydrogen and syngas mixture oxidation at elevated pressures. Combustion and Flame, 2013, 160(6): 995–1011
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Healy D , Kalitan D M , Aul C J , Petersen E L , Bourque G , Curran H J . Oxidation of C1–C5 alkane quinternary natural gas mixtures at high pressures. Energy & Fuels, 2010, 24(3): 1521–1528
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Olm C , Zsély I G , Varga T , Curran H J , Turányi T . Comparison of the performance of several recent syngas combustion mechanisms. Combustion and Flame, 2015, 162(5): 1793–1812
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Cantera: an object-oriented software toolkit for chemical kinetics, thermodynamics, and transport processes. Version 2.6.0. Pasadena: California Institute of Technology, 2022
[26]
Sun W , Wang J , Huang C , Hansen N , Yang B . Providing effective constraints for developing ketene combustion mechanisms: a detailed kinetic investigation of diacetyl flames. Combustion and Flame, 2019, 205: 11–21
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Olm C , Zsély I G , Pálvölgyi R , Varga T , Nagy T , Curran H J , Turányi T . Comparison of the performance of several recent hydrogen combustion mechanisms. Combustion and Flame, 2014, 161(9): 2219–2234
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Pan L , Hu E , Deng F , Zhang Z , Huang Z . Effect of pressure and equivalence ratio on the ignition characteristics of dimethyl ether-hydrogen mixtures. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(33): 19212–19223
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Drakon A , Eremin A , Matveeva N , Mikheyeva E . The opposite influences of flame suppressants on the ignition of combustible mixtures behind shock waves. Combustion and Flame, 2017, 176: 592–598
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
LVXHuEPengCMengXHuangZ. Measurements on laminar burning velocities of hydrogen/oxygen/diluents at elevated pressure and temperature. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2017, 32(7): 1599–1607 (in Chinese)
[31]
Hu E , Huang Z , He J , Jin C , Zheng J . Experimental and numerical study on laminar burning characteristics of premixed methane-hydrogen-air flames. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34(11): 4876–4888
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Qin X , Kobayashi H , Niioka T . Laminar burning velocity of hydrogen-air premixed flames at elevated pressure. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2000, 21(1): 58–63
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Huang Z , Zhang Y , Zeng K , Liu B , Wang Q , Jiang D . Measurements of laminar burning velocities for natural gas-hydrogen-air mixtures. Combustion and Flame, 2006, 146(1): 302–311
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Pang G A , Davidson D F , Hanson R K . Experimental study and modeling of shock tube ignition delay times for hydrogen-oxygen-argon mixtures at low temperatures. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2009, 32(1): 181–188
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Zhou C W , Li Y , Burke U , Banyon C , Somers K P , Ding S , Khan S , Hargis J W , Sikes T , Mathieu O . . An experimental and chemical kinetic modeling study of 1,3-butadiene combustion: ignition delay time and laminar flame speed measurements. Combustion and Flame, 2018, 197: 423–438
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
WangHYouXJoshiA VDavisS GLaskinAEgolfopoulosFLawC. USC Mech Version II. High-Temperature Combustion Reaction Model of H2/CO/C1/C4 Compounds, 2007
[37]
Behrooz H , Hayeri Y M . Machine learning applications in surface transportation systems: a literature review. Applied Sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2022, 12(18): 9156
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Shakya A K , Pillai G , Chakrabarty S . Reinforcement learning algorithms: a brief survey. Expert Systems with Applications, 2023, 231: 120495
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Priore P , Ponte B , Puente J , Gómez A . Learning-based scheduling of flexible manufacturing systems using ensemble methods. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2018, 126: 282–291
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Ryu J I , Kim K , Min K , Scarcelli R , Som S , Kim K S , Temme J E , Kweon C B M , Lee T . Data-driven chemical kinetic reaction mechanism for F-24 jet fuel ignition. Fuel, 2021, 290: 119508
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Nelder J A , Mead R . A simplex method for function minimization. Computer Journal, 1964, 7(4): 308–313
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Sutherland J W , Michael J V , Pirraglia A N , Nesbitt F L , Klemm R B . Rate constant for the reaction of O(3P) with H2 by the flash photolysis-shock tube and flash photolysis-resonance fluorescence techniques; 504 K ≤ T ≤ 2495 K. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1988, 21(1): 929–941
[43]
Ryu S O , Hwang S M , Rabinowitz M J . Rate coefficient of the O + H2 = OH + H reaction determined via shock tube-laser absorption spectroscopy. Chemical Physics Letters, 1995, 242(3): 279–284
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Mousavipour S H , Saheb V . Theoretical study on the kinetic and mechanism of H + HO2 reaction. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, 2007, 80(10): 1901–1913
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Yang H , Gardiner W C , Shin K S , Fujii N . Shock tube study of the rate coefficient of H + O2 → OH + O. Chemical Physics Letters, 1994, 231(4): 449–453
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Du H , Hessler J P . Rate coefficient for the reaction H + O2 → OH + O: results at high temperatures, 2000 to 5300 K. Journal of Chemical Physics, 1992, 96(2): 1077–1092
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Shin K S , Michael J V . Rate constants for the reactions H + O2 → OH + O and D + O2 → OD + O over the temperature range 1085–2278 K by the laser photolysis-shock tube technique. Journal of Chemical Physics, 1991, 95(1): 262–273
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Pirraglia A N , Michael J V , Sutherland J W , Klemm R B . A flash photolysis-shock tube kinetic study of the hydrogen atom reaction with oxygen: H + O2 → OH + O (962 K ≤ T ≤ ltoreq. 1705 K) and H + O2 + Ar → HO2 + Ar (746 K ≤ T ≤ 987 K). Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1989, 93(1): 282–291
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Le Cong T , Dagaut P . Experimental and detailed modeling study of the effect of water vapor on the kinetics of combustion of hydrogen and natural gas, impact on NOx. Energy & Fuels, 2009, 23(2): 725–734
CrossRef Google scholar

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. U20A20151) and the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFA0702400).

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-024-2487-0 and is accessible for authorized users.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1564 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/