Enrichment of CO from syngas with Cu(I)Y adsorbent by five-bed VPSA

Abstract

Cu(I)Y adsorbent was prepared by reduction of Cu(II)Y which was prepared by ion exchange between the NaY zeolite and a solution of Cu(II) chloride. The dynamic adsorption capacity of Cu(I)Y for CO was calculated by adsorption breakthrough curve measured on a fixed bed at 30°C and 0.006 MPa (g) of CO partial pressure. The calculated CO adsorption capacity was 2.14 mmol/g, 37.5 times as much as that of NaY zeolite. The adsorption breakthrough curve experiment was also simulated with Aspen Adsorption software and the results were approximately consistent with experimental results. Then a five-bed VPSA process for separating CO from syngas on this adsorbent was dynamically simulated with Aspen Adsorption software with the adsorption pressure of 0.68 MPa (g) and the desorption pressure of -0.075 MPa (g). The results showed that CO was enriched from 32.3% to 95.16%–98.12%, and its recovery was 88.47%–99.44%.

Keywords

Cu(I)Y adsorbent / breakthrough curve / desorption / VPSA / simulation

1 Introduction

Monosaccharides are among the basic building blocks of life and play an essential role in the function of several physiological processes, including metabolism and cellular recognition [1]. The monosaccharide glucose serves as the main form of energy for tissues and cells [2]. Due to their biological importance, there has been extensive effort in the development of methods and techniques for monosaccharide detection [3–4].

Lorand and Edwards reported the ability of boronic acids to form complexes with 1,2- and 1,3- diols. In addition it was discovered that D-fructose formed a 1:1 fructose-boronic acid complex and D-glucose formed a 1:2 glucose-boronic acid complex [5]. The strength of the boronic acid binding to monosaccharides is determined by the orientation and relative position of hydroxyl groups. In aqueous solution fructose predominates in the furanose form with a syn-periplanar pair of hydroxyl groups resulting in a strong binding constant with boronic acids [4]. As a result, a number of aryl boronic acid-based sensors have been developed for the detection of monosaccharides which exploit the difference in binding stoichiometry and inherent binding affinity to achieve either D-fructose or D-glucose selectivity [4,6–8]. More specifically, in 1994, James et al. developed an anthracene-containing mono boronic acid derivative as a photoinduced electron transfer (PET) fluorescence probe for the detection of fructose (Fig. 1) [9]. In this system, it was discovered that ortho-aminomethylphenylboronic acid functionality facilitated the detection of fructose in neutral aqueous solution. This pioneering work has led to the development of other ortho-aminomethylphenylboronic acid-containing fluorescence sensors improving selectivity, increasing excitation/emission profile and binding affinities [10–12]. While there was never any doubt that the ortho-aminomethylphenylboronic acid group was important to improve saccharide binding at neutral pH the mechanism of action had been under debate for a number of years [13–15]. Recently, the debate was concluded and the fluorescence enhancement on saccharide binding is caused by modulation of internal conversion resulting in different levels of quenching. Initially, before saccharide binding the free -B(OH)₂ groups quench the fluorescence by internal conversion, then when saccharides bind the -B(OR)₂ groups formed have reduced internal conversion and less quenching resulting in an enhanced fluorescence [16].

Fig.1 Shinkai et al. anthracene-based boronic acid PET fluorescence probe for the detection of fructose

Full size|PPT slide

The saccharide-binding properties of aryl boronic acid derivatives have been exploited as recognition motifs across a number of different domains including polymer hydrogels [6,17,18]. Hydrogels are three dimensionally cross-linked hydrophilic polymers, with a high (~90 wt-%) water content [19]. The modification of hydrogels to contain boronic-acid binding motifs enables the physical properties of the hydrogel to be reversibly modulated through exposure to saccharide-containing stimuli, i.e., glucose responsivity [20–23]. Co-authors of this report have developed stimuli responsive hydrogels and fluorescent sensors [24–30], and as a result, we were motivated to translate a Shinkai-like anthracene-containing boronic acid sensor unit into a hydrogel sensor by linking to an acrylamide functionality, thus generating a fluorescence-on sensor hydrogel for monosaccharide detection.

2 Results and discussion

Whilst solution-based fluorescent sensors offer a significant advantage in terms of binding-kinetics over analogous heterogenous sensors [31]. Heterogenous immobilisation of a fluorescent sensor is preferential as it avoids contamination of the sensor in a practical situtation, i.e., in vivo [32,33]. The near-solvated nature of a hydrogel is thus an attractive alternative as they offer heterogeneity without the disadvantages associated with a solution-based system. By integrating the Shinkai et al. anthracene PET fluorescent probe into a hydrogel, we hoped to develop a fluorescence responsive boronic acid hydrogel, which could eliminate the need for an additional competitive optical reporter [33]. The desired boronic acid monomer AM-5 is shown below in Fig. 2.

Fig.2 Anthracene-based fluorescent monomer (A-M5) for the development of a hydrogel for the detection of monosacharides

Full size|PPT slide

AM-5 was synthesised over five steps (Scheme 1). In brief, 1,6- hexanediamine was mono-Boc protected through the dropwise addition of di-tert-butyl dicarbonate ((Boc)₂O) to an excess of 1,6-hexanediamine, which afforded tert-butyl (6-aminohexyl)carbamate (1) in 74% yield. To attach the desired anthracene fluorophore, 1 was stirred with anthracene-9-carbaldehyde at room temperature overnight to form an imine intermediate. NaBH₄ was then added portion-wise to produce the desired secondary amine tert-butyl (6-((anthracen-9-ylmethyl)amino)hexyl)carbamate (2) in reasonable yield (48%). Compound 2 was subsequently alkylated with 2-bromomethylphenylboronic acid pinacol ester to afford 3 in good yield (89%). Compound 3 was then Boc-deprotected using trifluoroacetic acid, which also resulted in the partial hydrolysis of the boronate ester to form boronic acid 4, this intermediate was taken onto the next step without purification. Methacryloyl chloride was then used to afford AM-5, which was confirmed by mass spectrometry. Compound AM-5 proved difficult to characterise by NMR techniques and exhibited a broad and complex ¹H NMR due to the formation of “oligomeric boronic acid anhydrides” [34–35].

Fig.3 Scheme 1 Synthesis of boronic acid fluorescent probes 3 and AM-5

Full size|PPT slide

With 3 in hand, the fluorescence properties and responses to a panel of monosaccharides were evaluated to demonstrate its sensing ability before incorporation into a hydrogel. As shown in Fig. 3(b), 3 was more sensitive towards fructose over other monosaccharides (as expected) and the binding stability constants between mono-boronic acids and saccharides followed: D-fructose>D-galactose>D-mannose>D-glucose (Table S1, cf. Electronic Supplementary Material (ESM)). From these results, we turned our attention towards the incorporation of 3 into a hydrogel.

Fig.4 (a) Fluorescent spectral changes of 3 (0.6 µmol/L) with different concentrations of D-fructose in pH 8.21 aqueous methanolic buffer solution (52.1 wt-% methanol (KCl, 10 mmol/L; KH2PO4, 2.73 mmol/L and Na2HPO4, 2.78 mmol/L)); (b) Fluorescence intensity changes (F/F0) at 419 nm versus increasing saccharide concentration. lex = 370 nm

Full size|PPT slide

Hydrogels containing AM-5 were formed by co-polymerisation of acrylamide and methylene bisacrylamide in water through free radical polymerisation using ammonium persulfate (APS) and tetramethylethylenediamine (TMEDA) (cf. ESM for full detailed procedure). For the evaluation of the fluorescence response of the hydrogel towards different monosaccharides, each hydrogel was placed into a monosaccharide solution for 2 h (Note: 2 h was chosen since at this time point no further increase in fluorescence intensity was observed after addition of monosaccharides).

Acrylamide-based hydrogels consisting of AM-5 were exposed to increasing concentrations of fructose and a significant fluorescence enhancement was observed (~16-fold) as shown in Fig. 4, the selectivity order for the detection of monosaccharides was consistent with the solution titration data of 3 (Fig. 2, Table S1 and Table S2), D-fructose>D-galactose>D-mannose>D-glucose. However, the observed binding constants for each monosaccharide were much lower than in the solution phase, which is believed to be due to the binding event being a diffusion-based process ((1381.7±41.80) versus (52.6±5.3) dm³/mol for D-fructose). The response towards D-glucose in the hydrogel was too low for the binding constant to be determined.

Fig.5 Fluorescence intensity ratios of AM-5 (F/F0) at 409 nm versus monosaccharide concentration in a (1:1) 0.1 mol/L KH2PO4/0.1 mol/L NaOH, pH 8.00 buffer solution and λex = 370 nm

Full size|PPT slide

3 Conclusions

A fluorescent monosaccharide responsive hydrogel was developed by functionalising the proven ortho-aminomethylphenylboronic acid anthracene PET sensor with an acrylamide unit to incorporate into a hydrogel backbone. The boronic acid-containing hydrogel produced a significant fluorescent enhancement (~16 fold) with the addition of fructose and the binding stability constants followed the well-established order for binding between mono-boronic acids and saccharides: D-fructose>D-galactose>D-mannose>D-glucose.

References

[1] Song A D, Feng X J, Xie H. Comparative analysis on two technologies of ethanol production from syngas. Chinese Journal of Bioprocess Engineering, 2012, 10(5): 72-77 (in Chinese)

[2] Geng C X. Technology of pressure swing adsorption sepatating CO and its application in industry of carbonyl synthesis. Shanxi Chemical Industry, 2006, 26(3): 49-52 (in Chinese)

[3] Liu B W. New application of gas separation technology by PSA. Northern Environmental, 2011, 23(5): 174-174 (in Chinese)

[4] Wang L F, Li P F, Huang Z T. A new method for separation and purification of synthesis. Guangzhou Chemical Industry, 1993, 21(1): 34-39 (in Chinese)

[5] Qian L M, Bai M M. Xiaye H Z. The preparation of adsorbent for separating and recover CO. <patent>88108498.0</patent>, China, 1989, 1-14

[6] Zhang W S, Dai W. Research on new methanation Catalyst. Petrochemical Engineering, 2005, 34: 115-116 (in Chinese)

[7] Kyle P K, Phillip C W. Separation of dilute binary gases by simulated-moving bed with pressure-swing assist: SMB/PSA processes. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2008, 47(9): 3138-3149

[8] Kyle P K, Phillip C W. Separation of concentrated binary gases by hybrid pressure-swing adsorption/simulated-moving bed processes. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2009, 48(9): 4445-4465

[9] Phillip C W, Kyle P K. Hybrid air separation processes for production of oxygen and nitrogen separation. Separation Science and Technology, 2010, 45: 1171-1185

[10] Hideki M, Akio K. Imoproved purge step in pressure swing adsorption for CO purification. Adsorption, 2005, 23(11): 625-630

[11] DiMartino S P, Glazer J L, Houston C D, Schott M E. Hydrogen/carbon monoxide separation with cellulose acetate membranes. Gas Separation & Purification, 1988, 2(3): 120-125

[12] Frank G W. Basics and industrial applications of pressure swing adsorption (PSA), the modern way to separate gas. Gas Separation & Purification, 1988, 2(3): 115-119

[13] Yang S I, Choi D Y, Jang S C, Kim S H, Choi D K. Hydrogen separation by multi-bed pressure swing adsorption of synthesis gas. Adsorption, 2008, 14(4-5): 583-590

[14] Ju S G, Liu X Q, Ma Z F. Advances in removing of small amount of carbon monoxide from gas mixture containing nitrogen by complexing adsorption. Natural Gas Chemical Industry, 2000, 25(6): 38-45 (in Chinese)

[15] Zhu L Q, Tu J L. Adsorption of CO by active carbon-supported cupric chloride. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 1989, 17(8): 284-288

[16] Ulrich K K. USPatent, <patent>3497462</patent>, 1970

[17] Huang Y Y. Selective adsorption of carbon monoxide and complex formation of cuprous-ammines in Cu(I)Y zeolites. Catal, 1973, 30(2): 187-194

[18] Pramathesh R M, Arun S M. High recovery cycles for gas separations by pressure-swing adsorption. Adsorption, 2012, 18: 275-295

[19] Filipe V S L, Carlos A G, Alirio E R. Activated carbon for hydrogen purification by pressure swing adsorption: Multicomponent breakthrough curves and PSA performance. Chemical Engineering Science, 2011, 66(3): 303-317

[20] Jule A R, James N F, Charles L A U S. Patent, <patent>4019879</patent>, 1977

[21] Sliva J A C, Rodrigues A E. Sorption and diffusion of n-pentane adsorption in pellets of 5A zeolite. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1997, 36(2): 493-500

[22] Liu Z, Carlos A G, Li P. Multi-bed vacuum pressure swing adsorption for carbon dioxide capture from flue gas. Separation and Purification Technology, 2011, 81(3): 307-317

[23] Wang S H. Petrochemical Design Handbook. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2002, Vol. 3 (in Chinese)

[24] Do D D. Adsorption analysis: Equilibria and kinetics. London: Imperial College Press, 1984

[25] Chou C T, Huang W C. Simulation of a four bed pressure swing adsorption process for oxygen enrichment. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1994, 33(5): 1250-1258

[26] Shen C Z, Liu Z, Li P, Yu J. Two-stage VPSA process for CO₂ capture from flue gas using activated carbon beads. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2012, 51(13): 5011-5021

[27] Kyle P K, Phillip C W. High recovery cycles for gas separations by pressure swing adsorption. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2006, 45(24): 8117-8133

[28] Kupiec K, Rakoczy J, Lalik E. Modeling of PSA separation process including friction pressure drop in adsorbent bed. Chemical Engineering and Processing, 2009, 48(7): 1199-1211

[29] Rao V R, Farooq S, Krantz W B. Design of a two-step pulsed pressure swing adsorption based oxygen concentrator. AIChE, 2010, 56(2): 357-370

[30] Yang R T. Gas Separation by Adsorption Process. Boston: Butterworths, 1987, 50-101

[31] Olajossy A, Gawdzik A, Budner Z, Dula J. Methane separation from coal mine methane gas by vacuum pressure swing adsorption. Institution of Chemical Engineers, 2003, 4(81): 474-482

[32] Mishra P, Edubilli S, Mandal B, Gumma S. Adsorption of CO₂, CO, CH₄ and N₂ on DABCO based metal organic frameworks. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2013, 169: 75-80

[33] Ruthven D M, Xu Z, Farooq S. Sorption kinetics in PSA systems. Gas Separation & Purification, 1993, 7(2): 75-81

[34] Valenzuela D P, Mayers A L. Adsorption Equilibrium Data Handbook. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1989, 1-2

[35] Kupiec K, Rakoczy J, Lalik E. Modeling of PSA separation process including friction pressure drop in adsorbent bed. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 2009, 48(7): 1199-1211

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg