Agents with foundation models: advance and vision

Graphical abstract

References

[1] Bommasani R, Hudson D A, Adeli E, Altman R, Arora S, , . On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. 2021, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2108.07258

[2] Xi Z, Chen W, Guo X, He W, Ding Y, , . The rise and potential of large language model based agents: a survey. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2309.07864

[3] Wang L, Ma C, Feng X, Zhang Z, Yang H, Zhang J, Chen Z, Tang J, Chen X, Lin Y, Zhao W X, Wei Z, Wen J . A survey on large language model based autonomous agents. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2024, 18( 6): 186345

[4] Gronauer S, Diepold K . Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning: a survey. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2022, 55( 2): 895–943

[5] Qian C, Liu W, Liu H, Chen N, Dang Y, Li J, Yang C, Chen W, Su Y, Cong X, Xu J, Li D, Liu Z, Sun M. ChatDev: communicative agents for software development. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2307.07924

[6] Park J S, O’Brien J, Cai C J, Morris M R, Liang P, Bernstein M S. Generative agents: interactive simulacra of human behavior. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 2023, 2

[7] Chan C M, Chen W, Su Y, Yu J, Xue W, Zhang S, Fu J, Liu Z. ChatEval: towards better LLM-based evaluators through multi-agent debate. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Learning Representations. 2024

[8] Ke Z, Liu B. Continual learning of natural language processing tasks: a survey. 2022, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2211.12701

[9] Wang G, Xie Y, Jiang Y, Mandlekar A, Xiao C, Zhu Y, Fan L, Anandkumar A. Voyager: an open-ended embodied agent with large language models. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2305.16291

[10] Yang J C, Dailisan D, Korecki M, Hausladen C I, Helbing D. LLM voting: human choices and AI collective decision making. 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2402.01766

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests or financial conflicts to disclose.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 Higher Education Press