Biomaterial amendments improve nutrient use efficiency and plant growth

Ying LIU, Natasha MANZOOR, Miao HAN, Kun ZHU, Gang WANG

PDF(3833 KB)
PDF(3833 KB)
Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. ›› DOI: 10.15302/J-FASE-2024586
REVIEW

Biomaterial amendments improve nutrient use efficiency and plant growth

Author information +
History +

Highlights

● Microbial inoculants boost nutrient availability, crop yield, stress resilience and soil remediation.

● Nanomaterials enhance soil fertility, nutrient delivery and mitigate abiotic stresses.

● Biochar acts as an efficient microbial carrier, boosting soil organic carbon.

● Integrating bio-amendments enhances soil health and crop productivity and environmental sustainability.

● Challenges persist in scaling up production, ensuring safe use and understanding long-term impacts.

Abstract

The achievement of global food security faces exceptional challenges due to the rapid population growth, land degradation and climate change. Current farming practices, including mineral fertilizers and synthetic pesticides, alone are becoming insufficient to ensure long-term food security and ecosystem sustainability. The lack of robustness and reliability of conventional approaches warrants efforts to develop novel alternative strategies. Bio-based management strategies offer promising alternatives for improving soil health and food productivity. For example, microbial inoculants can enhance nutrient availability, crop production and stress resistance while also remediating contaminated soils. Nanobiotechnology is a promising strategy that has great potential for mitigating biotic and abiotic stresses on plant toward sustainable agriculture. Biochar (including modified biochar) serves as an effective microbial carrier, improving nutrient availability and plant growth. Also, biochar amendments have been demonstrated to have great potential facilitating soil organic carbon sequestration and mitigating greenhouse gas emissions and therefore contribute to climate change mitigation efforts. This review examines the integration of microbial inoculants, nano-fertilizers and biochar, which demonstrates as a promising strategy to enhance soil health, crop productivity and environmental sustainability. However, overcoming challenges related to their mass production, application and potential risks remains crucial. Future research should focus on optimizing these bio-amendment strategies, evaluating their economic viability and developing robust regulatory frameworks to ensure safe and effective agricultural implementation.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Biochar / climate change / food security / microbial inoculant / nanomaterial / soil amendment

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ying LIU, Natasha MANZOOR, Miao HAN, Kun ZHU, Gang WANG. Biomaterial amendments improve nutrient use efficiency and plant growth. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng., https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2024586

References

[1]
Strer M, Svoboda N, Herrmann A . Abundance of adverse environmental conditions during critical stages of crop production in Northern Germany. Environmental Sciences Europe, 2018, 30(1): 10
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Mao H, Chen S J, Ying R Y, Fu Y . How crop insurance influences agrochemical input use: evidence from cotton farmers in China. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2023, 67(2): 224–244
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Santos M S, Nogueira M A, Hungria M . Microbial inoculants: reviewing the past, discussing the present and previewing an outstanding future for the use of beneficial bacteria in agriculture. AMB Express, 2019, 9(1): 205
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Pandiyan A, Sarsan S, Guda Sri Durga G, Ravikumar H. Biofertilizers and biopesticides as microbial inoculants in integrated pest management for sustainable agriculture. In: Pratap Singh R, Manchanda G, Sarsan S, Kumar A, Panosyan H, eds. Development in Application of Microbial Biotechnology. New York: Academic Press, 2024, 485–518
[5]
Ayilara M S, Adeleke B S, Akinola S A, Fayose C A, Adeyemi U T, Gbadegesin L A, Omole R K, Johnson R M, Uthman Q O, Babalola O O . Biopesticides as a promising alternative to synthetic pesticides: a case for microbial pesticides, phytopesticides, and nanobiopesticides. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2023, 14: 1040901
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Alori E T, Dare M O, Babalola O O. Microbial inoculants for soil quality and plant health. In: Lichtfouse E, ed. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews. Springer International Publishing, 2017, 281–307
[7]
Kumar A, Dubey A . Rhizosphere microbiome: engineering bacterial competitiveness for enhancing crop production. Journal of Advanced Research, 2020, 24(2): 337–352
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Kalwani M, Chakdar H, Srivastava A, Pabbi S, Shukla P. Effects of nanofertilizers on soil and plant-associated microbial communities: emerging trends and perspectives. Chemosphere, 2022, 287(Pt 2): 132107
[9]
Naseem F, Zhi Y, Farrukh M A, Hussain F, Yin Z Y . Mesoporous ZnAl2Si10O24 nanofertilizers enable high yield of Oryza sativa L. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1): 10841
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Ahmed T, Noman M, Qi Y T, Xu S C, Yao Y L, Masood H A, Manzoor N, Rizwan M, Li B, Qi X J . Dynamic crosstalk between silicon nanomaterials and potentially toxic trace elements in plant–soil systems. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2023, 264: 115422
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Sohail M I, Waris A A, Ayub M A, Usman M, ur Rehman M Z, Sabir M, Faiz T. Environmental application of nanomaterials: a promise to sustainable future. In: Verma S K, Das A K, eds. Comprehensive Analytical Chemistry. Elsevier, 2019, 1–54
[12]
Ran H Y, Wang Y, Wei K Y, Liu Y, Wang G, Zhu K . Spatial and temporal changes of charosphere hotspots with or without nitrogen additions. Biochar, 2023, 5(1): 49
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Rajabi H, Hadi Mosleh M, Prakoso T, Ghaemi N, Mandal P, Lea-Langton A, Sedighi M . Competitive adsorption of multicomponent volatile organic compounds on biochar. Chemosphere, 2021, 283: 131288
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Hesham A E L, Kaur T, Devi R, Kour D, Prasad S, Yadav N, Singh C, Singh J, Yadav A N. Current trends in microbial biotechnology for agricultural sustainability: conclusion and future challenges. In: Yadav AN, Singh J, Singh C, Yadav N, eds. Current Trends in Microbial Biotechnology for Sustainable Agriculture. Environmental and Microbial Biotechnology, 2021, 555–572
[15]
Shahwar D, Mushtaq Z, Mushtaq H, Alqarawi A A, Park Y, Alshahrani T S, Faizan S . Role of microbial inoculants as bio fertilizers for improving crop productivity: a review. Heliyon, 2023, 9(6): e16134
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Xing J P, Cao X C, Zhang M C, Wei X, Zhang J, Wan X Y . Plant nitrogen availability and crosstalk with phytohormones signallings and their biotechnology breeding application in crops. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2023, 21(7): 1320–1342
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Sheng Y Z, Baars O, Guo D Y, Whitham J, Srivastava S, Dong H L . Mineral-bound trace metals as cofactors for anaerobic biological nitrogen fixation. Environmental Science & Technology, 2023, 57(18): 7206–7216
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Huang Z, Ruan S T, Sun Y Y, Cheng X Y, Dai J H, Gui P, Yu M J, Zhong Z T, Wu J Y . Bacterial inoculants improved the growth and nitrogen use efficiency of Pyrus betulifolia under nitrogen-limited conditions by affecting the native soil bacterial communities. Applied Soil Ecology, 2022, 170(10): 104285
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Sindhu S S, Sharma R, Sindhu S, Sehrawat A. Soil fertility improvement by symbiotic rhizobia for sustainable agriculture. In: Panpatte D, Jhala Y, eds. Soil Fertility Management for Sustainable Development. Springer, 2019, 101–166
[20]
Sun B, Gu L K, Bao L J, Zhang S W, Wei Y X, Bai Z H, Zhuang G Q, Zhuang X L . Application of biofertilizer containing Bacillus subtilis reduced the nitrogen loss in agricultural soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2020, 148: 107911
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Sattar A, Naveed M, Ali M, Zahir Z A, Nadeem S M, Yaseen M, Meena V S, Farooq M, Singh R, Rahman M, Meena H N . Perspectives of potassium solubilizing microbes in sustainable food production system: a review. Applied Soil Ecology, 2019, 133(1): 146–159
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Cheng Y Y, Narayanan M, Shi X J, Chen X P, Li Z L, Ma Y . Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria: their agroecological function and optimistic application for enhancing agro-productivity. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 901(1): 166468
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Rafique M, Ortas I, Rizwan M, Chaudhary H J, Gurmani A R, Hussain Munis M F . Residual effects of biochar and phosphorus on growth and nutrient accumulation by maize (Zea mays L.) amended with microbes in texturally different soils. Chemosphere, 2020, 238: 124710
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Talekar O B. Effect of MPKV bacterial consortium on growth and yield of maize. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Rahuri: Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth (MPKV), 2024
[25]
Sinha D, Tandon P K. An overview of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium: key players of nutrition process in plants. In: Mishra K, Tandon P K, Srivastava S, eds. Sustainable Solutions for Elemental Deficiency and Excess in Crop Plants. Springer Singapore, 2020, 85–117
[26]
Wang J J, Li R C, Zhang H, Wei G H, Li Z F . Beneficial bacteria activate nutrients and promote wheat growth under conditions of reduced fertilizer application. BMC Microbiology, 2020, 20(1): 38
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Jin Y Q, Zhu H F, Luo S, Yang W W, Zhang L, Li S S, Jin Q, Cao Q, Sun S R, Xiao M . Role of maize root exudates in promotion of colonization of Bacillus velezensis strain S3–1 in rhizosphere soil and root tissue. Current Microbiology, 2019, 76(7): 855–862
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Zhang H, Chen F, Zhao H Z, Lu J S, Zhao M J, Hong Q, Huang X . Colonization on cucumber root and enhancement of chlorimuron-ethyl degradation in the rhizosphere by Hansschlegelia zhihuaiae S113 and root exudates. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2018, 66(18): 4584–4591
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Zhalnina K, Louie K B, Hao Z, Mansoori N, Da Rocha U N, Shi S J, Cho H, Karaoz U, Loqué D, Bowen B P, Firestone M K, Northen T R, Brodie E L . Dynamic root exudate chemistry and microbial substrate preferences drive patterns in rhizosphere microbial community assembly. Nature Microbiology, 2018, 3(4): 470–480
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Finkel O M, Castrillo G, Herrera Paredes S, Salas González I, Dangl J L . Understanding and exploiting plant beneficial microbes. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2017, 38: 155–163
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Correa P A, Nosheen A, Yasmin H, Ali M A. Regulatory role of microbial inoculants to induce salt stress tolerance in horticulture crops. In: Seymen M, Kurtar E S, Erdinc C, Kumar A, eds. Sustainable Horticulture. Academic Press, 2022, 125–155
[32]
Backer R, Rokem J S, Ilangumaran G, Lamont J, Praslickova D, Ricci E, Subramanian S, Smith D L . Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: context, mechanisms of action, and roadmap to commercialization of biostimulants for sustainable agriculture. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2018, 9: 1473
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Belimov A A, Dodd I C, Hontzeas N, Theobald J C, Safronova V I, Davies W J . Rhizosphere bacteria containing 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase increase yield of plants grown in drying soil via both local and systemic hormone signalling. New Phytologist, 2009, 181(2): 413–423
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Saha I, Datta S, Biswas D . Exploring the role of bacterial extracellular polymeric substances for sustainable development in agriculture. Current Microbiology, 2020, 77(11): 3224–3239
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Haque M M, Biswas M S, Mosharaf M K, Haque M A, Islam M S, Nahar K, Islam M M, Shozib H B, Islam M M, Ferdous-E-Elahi . Halotolerant biofilm-producing rhizobacteria mitigate seawater-induced salt stress and promote growth of tomato. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12(1): 5599
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Liu C Y, Hao Y, Wu X L, Dai F J, Abd-Allah E F, Wu Q S, Liu S R . Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve drought tolerance of tea plants via modulating root architecture and hormones. Plant Growth Regulation, 2024, 102(1): 13–22
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Armada E, Portela G, Roldán A, Azcón R. Combined use of beneficial soil microorganism and agrowaste residue to cope with plant water limitation under semiarid conditions. Geoderma, 2014, 232−234: 640−648
[38]
Tiwari S, Lata C, Chauhan P S, Nautiyal C S . Pseudomonas putida attunes morphophysiological, biochemical and molecular responses in Cicer arietinum L. during drought stress and recovery. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2016, 99: 108–117
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Thomas L, Singh I. Microbial biofertilizers: types and applications. In: Giri B, Prasad R, Wu Q S, Varma A, eds. Biofertilizers for Sustainable Agriculture and Environment. Springer, 2019, 1–19
[40]
Dinnage R, Simonsen A K, Barrett L G, Cardillo M, Raisbeck-Brown N, Thrall P H, Prober S M . Larger plants promote a greater diversity of symbiotic nitrogen-fixing soil bacteria associated with an Australian endemic legume. Journal of Ecology, 2019, 107(2): 977–991
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
He Y, Pantigoso H A, Wu Z, Vivanco J M . Co-inoculation of Bacillus sp. and Pseudomonas putida at different development stages acts as a biostimulant to promote growth, yield and nutrient uptake of tomato. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2019, 127(1): 196–207
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Munir I, Bano A, Faisal M . Impact of phosphate solubilizing bacteria on wheat (Triticum aestivum) in the presence of pesticides. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 2019, 79(1): 29–37
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Yaghoubi Khanghahi M, Pirdashti H, Rahimian H, Nematzadeh G H, Ghajar Sepanlou M, Salvatori E, Crecchio C . Leaf photosynthetic characteristics and photosystem II photochemistry of rice (Oryza sativa L.) under potassium-solubilizing bacteria inoculation. Photosynthetica, 2019, 57(2): 500–511
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Ali A M, Awad M Y, Hegab S A, Gawad A M A E, Eissa M A . Effect of potassium solubilizing bacteria (Bacillus cereus) on growth and yield of potato. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2021, 44(3): 411–420
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Irshad S, Xie Z M, Wang J, Nawaz A, Luo Y, Wang Y X, Mehmood S, Faheem M. Indigenous strain Bacillus XZM assisted phytoremediation and detoxification of arsenic in Vallisneria denseserrulata. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 381: 120903
[46]
Abou-Aly H E, Youssef A M, Tewfike T A, El-Alkshar E A, El-Meihy R M . Reduction of heavy metals bioaccumulation in sorghum and its rhizosphere by heavy metals-tolerant bacterial consortium. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 2021, 31(1): 101911
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Wang R, Wang C, Feng Q, Liou R M, Lin Y F . Biological inoculant of salt-tolerant bacteria for plant growth stimulation under different saline soil conditions. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2021, 31(3): 398–407
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Prittesh P, Avnika P, Kinjal P, Jinal H N, Sakthivel K, Amaresan N . Amelioration effect of salt-tolerant plant growth-promoting bacteria on growth and physiological properties of rice (Oryza sativa) under salt-stressed conditions. Archives of Microbiology, 2020, 202(9): 2419–2428
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Çığ F, Erman M, Ceritoğlu M . Combined application of microbial inoculation and biochar to mitigate drought stress in wheat. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 2021, 11: 3528–3538
[50]
Zhang M, Yang L, Hao R Q, Bai X X, Wang Y, Yu X . Drought-tolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria isolated from jujube (Ziziphus jujuba) and their potential to enhance drought tolerance. Plant and Soil, 2020, 452(1−2): 423–440
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Sharma P, Parakh S K, Singh S P, Parra-Saldívar R, Kim S H, Varjani S, Tong Y W . A critical review on microbes-based treatment strategies for mitigation of toxic pollutants. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 834: 155444
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
Lebeau T, Braud A, Jézéquel K . Performance of bioaugmentation-assisted phytoextraction applied to metal contaminated soils: a review. Environmental Pollution, 2008, 153(3): 497–522
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
Comte S, Guibaud G, Baudu M . Biosorption properties of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) towards Cd, Cu and Pb for different pH values. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, 151(1): 185–193
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Bharagava R N, Mishra S . Hexavalent chromium reduction potential of Cellulosimicrobium sp. isolated from common effluent treatment plant of tannery industries. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2018, 147: 102–109
CrossRef Google scholar
[55]
Maurya A, Kumar P S, Raj A. Characterization of biofilm formation and reduction of hexavalent chromium by bacteria isolated from tannery sludge. Chemosphere, 2022, 286(Pt 2): 131795
[56]
Tang F H M, Lenzen M, McBratney A, Maggi F . Risk of pesticide pollution at the global scale. Nature Geoscience, 2021, 14(4): 206–210
CrossRef Google scholar
[57]
Zhang G C, Wang J, Zhao H, Liu J, Ling W T . PAH degradation and gene abundance in soils and vegetables inoculated with PAH-degrading endophytic bacteria. Applied Soil Ecology, 2021, 168(3): 104193
CrossRef Google scholar
[58]
Fu L, Bai Y N, Lu Y Z, Ding J, Zhou D D, Zeng R J . Degradation of organic pollutants by anaerobic methane-oxidizing microorganisms using methyl orange as example. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2019, 364: 264–271
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Liu X C, Ge W, Zhang X M, Chai C, Wu J, Xiang D, Chen X Y . Biodegradation of aged polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in agricultural soil by Paracoccus sp. LXC combined with humic acid and spent mushroom substrate. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2019, 379: 120820
CrossRef Google scholar
[60]
Hong J, Wang C, Wagner D C, Gardea-Torresdey J L, He F, Rico C M . Foliar application of nanoparticles: mechanisms of absorption, transfer, and multiple impacts. Environmental Science. Nano, 2021, 8(5): 1196–1210
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
Wang L H, Pedersen P B M, Svenning J C . Rewilding abandoned farmland has greater sustainability benefits than afforestation. npj. Biodiversity, 2023, 2(1): 1–4
[62]
Yan H, Gu S, Li S, Shen W, Zhou X, Yu H, Ma K, Zhao Y, Wang Y, Zheng H, Deng Y, Lu G . Grass-legume mixtures enhance forage production via the bacterial community. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2022, 338: 108087
CrossRef Google scholar
[63]
Li C, Nie H, Zhang S F, Jia Z H, Ma S L, Li T, Zhai L, Zhang B, Liu X, Zhang J C, Müller C . Mineral-solubilizing microbial inoculant positively affects the multifunctionality of anthropogenic soils in abandoned mining areas. Journal of Environmental Management, 2023, 344: 118553
CrossRef Google scholar
[64]
Khan S T, Adil S F, Shaik M R, Alkhathlan H Z, Khan M, Khan M . Engineered nanomaterials in soil: their impact on soil microbiome and plant health. Plants, 2022, 11(1): 109
CrossRef Google scholar
[65]
Shukla P, Chaurasia P, Younis K, Qadri O S, Faridi S A, Srivastava G . Nanotechnology in sustainable agriculture: studies from seed priming to post-harvest management. Nanotechnology for Environmental Engineering, 2019, 4(1): 11
CrossRef Google scholar
[66]
Usman M, Farooq M, Wakeel A, Nawaz A, Cheema S A, Rehman H, Ashraf I, Sanaullah M . Nanotechnology in agriculture: current status, challenges and future opportunities. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 721: 137778
CrossRef Google scholar
[67]
Madzokere T C, Murombo L T, Chiririwa H . Nano-based slow releasing fertilizers for enhanced agricultural productivity. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021, 45(6): 3709–3715
CrossRef Google scholar
[68]
Jarosz R, Szerement J, Gondek K, Mierzwa-Hersztek M . The use of zeolites as an addition to fertilisers—A review. Catena, 2022, 213(9): 106125
CrossRef Google scholar
[69]
Ain ul Q, Hussain HA, Zhang Q, Rasheed A, Imran A, Hussain S, Ahmad N, Bibi H, Ali K S. Use of nano-fertilizers to improve the nutrient use efficiencies in plants. In: Aftab T, Hakeem K R, eds. Sustainable Plant Nutrition. Elsevier, 2023, 299–321
[70]
Chhowalla M . Slow release nanofertilizers for bumper crops. ACS Central Science, 2017, 3(3): 156–157
CrossRef Google scholar
[71]
Wahab A, Munir A, Saleem M H, AbdulRaheem M I, Aziz H, Mfarrej M F B, Abdi G . AbdulRaheem M I, Aziz H, Mfarrej M F B, Abdi G. Interactions of metal-based engineered nanoparticles with plants: an overview of the state of current knowledge, research progress, and prospects. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2023, 42(9): 5396–5416
CrossRef Google scholar
[72]
De Souza-Torres A, Govea-Alcaide E, Gomez-Padilla E, Masunaga S H, Effenberger F B, Rossi L M, Lopez-Sanchez R, Jardim R F . Fe3O4 nanoparticles and Rhizobium inoculation enhance nodulation, nitrogen fixation and growth of common bean plants grown in soil. Rhizosphere, 2021, 17: 100275
CrossRef Google scholar
[73]
Kumar H, Bhardwaj K, Nepovimova E, Kuča K, Singh Dhanjal D, Bhardwaj S, Bhatia S K, Verma R, Kumar D . Antioxidant functionalized nanoparticles: a combat against oxidative Stress. Nanomaterials, 2020, 10(7): 1334
CrossRef Google scholar
[74]
Shang Y F, Hasan M K, Ahammed G J, Li M Q, Yin H Q, Zhou J . Applications of nanotechnology in plant growth and crop protection: a review. Molecules, 2019, 24(14): 2558
CrossRef Google scholar
[75]
Li M S, Zhang P, Guo Z L, Zhao W C, Li Y B, Yi T J, Cao W D, Gao L, Tian C F, Chen Q, Ren F Z, Rui Y K, White J C, Lynch I . Dynamic transformation of nano-MoS2 in a soil–plant system empowers Its multifunctionality on soybean growth. Environmental Science & Technology, 2024, 58(2): 1211–1222
CrossRef Google scholar
[76]
Khan M T, Ahmed S, Shah A A, Noor Shah A, Tanveer M, El-Sheikh M A, Siddiqui M H . Influence of zinc oxide nanoparticles to regulate the antioxidants enzymes, some osmolytes and agronomic attributes in Coriandrum sativum L. grown under water stress. Agronomy, 2021, 11(10): 2004
CrossRef Google scholar
[77]
Seleiman M F, Almutairi K F, Alotaibi M, Shami A, Alhammad B A, Battaglia M L . Nano-fertilization as an emerging fertilization technique: Why can modern agriculture benefit from its use. Plants, 2021, 10(1): 2
CrossRef Google scholar
[78]
Salehi H, Chehregani A, Lucini L, Majd A, Gholami M. Morphological, proteomic and metabolomic insight into the effect of cerium dioxide nanoparticles to Phaseolus vulgaris L. under soil or foliar application. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 616−617: 1540−1551
[79]
Philippot L, Chenu C, Kappler A, Rillig M C, Fierer N . The interplay between microbial communities and soil properties. Nature Reviews. Microbiology, 2024, 22(4): 226–239
CrossRef Google scholar
[80]
Pérez-Hernández H, Fernández-Luqueño F, Huerta-Lwanga E, Mendoza-Vega J, Álvarez-Solís José D . Effect of engineered nanoparticles on soil biota: do they improve the soil quality and crop production or jeopardize them. Land Degradation & Development, 2020, 31(16): 2213–2230
CrossRef Google scholar
[81]
Singh A, Tiwari S, Pandey J, Lata C, Singh I K . Role of nanoparticles in crop improvement and abiotic stress management. Journal of Biotechnology, 2021, 337: 57–70
CrossRef Google scholar
[82]
Tian H, Kah M, Kariman K . Are nanoparticles a threat to mycorrhizal and rhizobial symbioses? A critical review. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2019, 10: 1660
CrossRef Google scholar
[83]
Sillen W M A, Thijs S, Abbamondi G R, Janssen J, Weyens N, White J C, Vangronsveld J . Effects of silver nanoparticles on soil microorganisms and maize biomass are linked in the rhizosphere. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2015, 91: 14–22
CrossRef Google scholar
[84]
Dai Y H, Chen F R, Yue L, Li T, Jiang Z X, Xu Z F, Wang Z Y, Xing B S . Uptake, transport, and transformation of CeO2 nanoparticles by strawberry and their impact on the rhizosphere bacterial community. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2020, 8(12): 4792–4800
CrossRef Google scholar
[85]
Grün A L, Manz W, Kohl Y L, Meier F, Straskraba S, Jost C, Drexel R, Emmerling C . Impact of silver nanoparticles (AgNP) on soil microbial community depending on functionalization, concentration, exposure time, and soil texture. Environmental Sciences Europe, 2019, 31(1): 15
CrossRef Google scholar
[86]
Li Y, Zhao R Q, Wang L F, Niu L H, Wang C, Hu J X, Wu H N, Zhang W L, Wang P F . Silver nanoparticles and Fe(III) co-regulate microbial community and N2O emission in river sediments. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 706: 135712
CrossRef Google scholar
[87]
Lin J J, He F, Su B, Sun M G, Owens G, Chen Z L . The stabilizing mechanism of cadmium in contaminated soil using green synthesized iron oxide nanoparticles under long-term incubation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2019, 379: 120832
CrossRef Google scholar
[88]
Rexlin J, Vijayakumar S, Nilavukkarasi M, Vidhya E, Alharthi N S, Sajjad M, Punitha V N, Praseetha P K . Bioengineered ZnO nanoparticles as a nano priming agent in Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L).Taub. to improve yield and disease resistance. Applied Nanoscience, 2023, 13(9): 5993–6001
CrossRef Google scholar
[89]
Abdelkhalek A, Al-Askar A A . Green synthesized ZnO nanoparticles mediated by mentha spicata extract induce plant systemic resistance against tobacco mosaic virus. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(15): 5054
CrossRef Google scholar
[90]
Elsherbiny E A, Taher M A . Silicon induces resistance to postharvest rot of carrot caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and the possible of defense mechanisms. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2018, 140: 11–17
CrossRef Google scholar
[91]
Naidu S, Pandey J, Mishra L C, Chakraborty A, Roy A, Singh I K, Singh A . Silicon nanoparticles: synthesis, uptake and their role in mitigation of biotic stress. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2023, 255: 114783
CrossRef Google scholar
[92]
El-Shetehy M, Moradi A, Maceroni M, Reinhardt D, Petri-Fink A, Rothen-Rutishauser B, Mauch F, Schwab F . Silica nanoparticles enhance disease resistance in Arabidopsis plants. Nature Nanotechnology, 2021, 16(3): 344–353
CrossRef Google scholar
[93]
Lopez-Lima D, Mtz-Enriquez A I, Carrión G, Basurto-Cereceda S, Pariona N . The bifunctional role of copper nanoparticles in tomato: effective treatment for Fusarium wilt and plant growth promoter. Scientia Horticulturae, 2021, 277: 109810
CrossRef Google scholar
[94]
Cao X S, Wang C X, Luo X, Yue L, White J C, Elmer W, Dhankher O P, Wang Z Y, Xing B S . Elemental sulfur nanoparticles enhance disease resistance in tomatoes. ACS Nano, 2021, 15(7): 11817–11827
CrossRef Google scholar
[95]
Zhang J, Kothalawala S, Yu C Z . Engineered silica nanomaterials in pesticide delivery: challenges and perspectives. Environmental Pollution, 2023, 320: 121045
CrossRef Google scholar
[96]
El-Saadony M T, Saad A M, Soliman S M, Salem H M, Desoky E S M, Babalghith A O, El-Tahan A M, Ibrahim O M, Ebrahim A A M, Abd El-Mageed T A, Elrys A S, Elbadawi A A, El-Tarabily K A, AbuQamar S F . Role of nanoparticles in enhancing crop tolerance to abiotic stress: a comprehensive review. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2022, 13: 946717
CrossRef Google scholar
[97]
Sheng Y Z, Hu J L, Kukkadapu R, Guo D Y, Zeng Q, Dong H L . Inhibition of extracellular enzyme activity by reactive oxygen species upon oxygenation of reduced iron-bearing minerals. Environmental Science & Technology, 2023, 57(8): 3425–3433
CrossRef Google scholar
[98]
Dilnawaz F, Misra A N, Apostolova E . Involvement of nanoparticles in mitigating plant’s abiotic stress. Plant Stress, 2023, 10: 100280
CrossRef Google scholar
[99]
Hayat F, Khanum F, Li J, Iqbal S, Khan U, Javed H U, Razzaq M K, Altaf M A, Peng Y, Ma X Y, Li C Q, Tu P F, Chen J Z . Nanoparticles and their potential role in plant adaptation to abiotic stress in horticultural crops: a review. Scientia Horticulturae, 2023, 321: 112285
CrossRef Google scholar
[100]
Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra S M A . Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2009, 29(1): 185–212
CrossRef Google scholar
[101]
Behboudi F, Tahmasebi Sarvestani Z, Kassaee M Z, Modares Sanavi S A M, Sorooshzadeh A . Improving growth and yield of wheat under drought stress via application of SiO2 nanoparticles. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(7): 1479–1492
[102]
Semida W M, Abdelkhalik A, Mohamed G F, Abd El-Mageed T A, Abd El-Mageed S A, Rady M M, Ali E F . Foliar application of zinc oxide nanoparticles promotes drought stress tolerance in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Plants, 2021, 10(2): 421
CrossRef Google scholar
[103]
Zahedi S M, Moharrami F, Sarikhani S, Padervand M . Selenium, silica nanostructure-based recovery of strawberry plants subjected to drought stress. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1): 17672
CrossRef Google scholar
[104]
Hellal F, Amer A K, El-Sayed S, El-Azab K . Mitigating the negative effect of water stress on barley by nano silics application. Plant Archives, 2020, 20: 3224–3231
[105]
Namjoyan S, Sorooshzadeh A, Rajabi A, Aghaalikhani M . Nano-silicon protects sugar beet plants against water deficit stress by improving the antioxidant systems and compatible solutes. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2020, 42(10): 157
CrossRef Google scholar
[106]
Ikram M, Raja N I, Javed B, Mashwani Z R, Hussain M, Hussain M, Ehsan M, Rafique N, Malik K, Sultana T, Akram A . Foliar applications of bio-fabricated selenium nanoparticles to improve the growth of wheat plants under drought stress. Green Processing and Synthesis, 2020, 9(1): 706–714
CrossRef Google scholar
[107]
Othmani A, Ayed S, Bezzin O, Farooq M, Ayed-Slama O, Slim-Amara H, Ben Younes M . Effect of silicon supply methods on durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) response to drought stress. Silicon, 2021, 13(9): 3047–3057
CrossRef Google scholar
[108]
Behboudi F, Tahmasebi-Sarvestani Z, Kassaee M Z, Modarres-Sanavy S A M, Sorooshzadeh A, Mokhtassi-Bidgoli A . Evaluation of chitosan nanoparticles effects with two application methods on wheat under drought stress. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2019, 42(13): 1439–1451
CrossRef Google scholar
[109]
Geange S R, Arnold P A, Catling A A, Coast O, Cook A M, Gowland K M, Leigh A, Notarnicola R F, Posch B C, Venn S E, Zhu L, Nicotra A B . The thermal tolerance of photosynthetic tissues: a global systematic review and agenda for future research. New Phytologist, 2021, 229(5): 2497–2513
CrossRef Google scholar
[110]
Mittler R . ROS are good. Trends in Plant Science, 2017, 22(1): 11–19
CrossRef Google scholar
[111]
Hassan M U, Chattha M U, Khan I, Chattha M B, Barbanti L, Aamer M, Iqbal M M, Nawaz M, Mahmood A, Ali A . , Aslam M T. Heat stress in cultivated plants: Nature, impact, mechanisms, and mitigation strategies—A review. Plant Biosystems, 2021, 155(2): 211–234
[112]
Aslam M, Fakher B, Ashraf M A, Cheng Y, Wang B R, Qin Y . Plant low-temperature stress: signaling and response. Agronomy, 2022, 12(3): 702
CrossRef Google scholar
[113]
Adhikari L, Baral R, Paudel D, Min D, Makaju S O, Poudel H P, Acharya J P, Missaoui A M . Cold stress in plants: strategies to improve cold tolerance in forage species. Plant Stress, 2022, 4(3): 100081
CrossRef Google scholar
[114]
Kardavan Ghabel V, Karamian R . Effects of TiO2 nanoparticles and spermine on antioxidant responses of Glycyrrhiza glabra L. to cold stress. Acta Botanica Croatica, 2020, 79(2): 137–147
CrossRef Google scholar
[115]
Wang A B, Li J Y, AL-Huqail A A, AL-Harbi M S, Ali E F, Wang J, Ding Z, Rekaby S A, Ghoneim A M, Eissa M A . Mechanisms of chitosan nanoparticles in the regulation of cold stress resistance in banana plants. Nanomaterials, 2021, 11(10): 2670
CrossRef Google scholar
[116]
Elsheery N I, Sunoj V S J, Wen Y, Zhu J J, Muralidharan G, Cao K F . Foliar application of nanoparticles mitigates the chilling effect on photosynthesis and photoprotection in sugarcane. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2020, 149: 50–60
CrossRef Google scholar
[117]
Manzoor N, Ahmed T, Noman M, Shahid M, Nazir M M, Ali L, Alnusaire T S, Li B, Schulin R, Wang G . Iron oxide nanoparticles ameliorated the cadmium and salinity stresses in wheat plants, facilitating photosynthetic pigments and restricting cadmium uptake. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 769: 145221
CrossRef Google scholar
[118]
Rakgotho T, Ndou N, Mulaudzi T, Iwuoha E, Mayedwa N, Ajayi R F . Green-synthesized zinc oxide nanoparticles mitigate salt stress in sorghum bicolor. Agriculture, 2022, 12(5): 597
CrossRef Google scholar
[119]
Sarkar R D, Kalita M C . Green synthesized Se nanoparticle-mediated alleviation of salt stress in field mustard, TS-36 variety. Journal of Biotechnology, 2022, 359: 95–107
CrossRef Google scholar
[120]
Jiang W J, Meng L S, Liu F T, Sheng Y Z, Chen S M, Yang J L, Mao H R, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Ning H . Distribution, source investigation, and risk assessment of topsoil heavy metals in areas with intensive anthropogenic activities using the positive matrix factorization (PMF) model coupled with self-organizing map (SOM). Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2023, 45(8): 6353–6370
CrossRef Google scholar
[121]
Rai P K, Lee S S, Zhang M, Tsang Y F, Kim K H . Heavy metals in food crops: Health risks, fate, mechanisms, and management. Environment International, 2019, 125: 365–385
CrossRef Google scholar
[122]
Kah M, Tufenkji N, White J C . Nano-enabled strategies to enhance crop nutrition and protection. Nature Nanotechnology, 2019, 14(6): 532–540
CrossRef Google scholar
[123]
Qian Y T, Qin C D, Chen M M, Lin S J . Nanotechnology in soil remediation—Applications vs. implications. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2020, 201: 110815
CrossRef Google scholar
[124]
Wang Z Y, Yue L, Dhankher O P, Xing B S . Nano-enabled improvements of growth and nutritional quality in food plants driven by rhizosphere processes. Environment International, 2020, 142: 105831
CrossRef Google scholar
[125]
Rico C M, Morales M I, McCreary R, Castillo-Michel H, Barrios A C, Hong J, Tafoya A, Lee W Y, Varela-Ramirez A, Peralta-Videa J R, Gardea-Torresdey J L . Cerium oxide nanoparticles modify the antioxidative stress enzyme activities and macromolecule composition in rice seedlings. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(24): 14110–14118
CrossRef Google scholar
[126]
Manzoor N, Ali L, Ahmed T, Rizwan M, Ali S, Shahid M S, Schulin R, Liu Y, Wang G . Silicon oxide nanoparticles alleviate chromium toxicity in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Environmental Pollution, 2022, 315: 120391
CrossRef Google scholar
[127]
Manzoor N, Ali L, AL-Huqail A A, Alghanem S M S, Al-Haithloul H A S, Abbas T, Chen G, Huan L, Liu Y, Wang G . Comparative efficacy of silicon and iron oxide nanoparticles towards improving the plant growth and mitigating arsenic toxicity in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2023, 264: 115382
CrossRef Google scholar
[128]
Montanha G S, Rodrigues E S, Marques J P R, de Almeida E, Colzato M, Pereira de Carvalho H W . Zinc nanocoated seeds: an alternative to boost soybean seed germination and seedling development. SN Applied Sciences, 2020, 2(5): 857
CrossRef Google scholar
[129]
He Y J, Hu R R, Zhong Y J, Zhao X L, Chen Q, Zhu H W . Graphene oxide as a water transporter promoting germination of plants in soil. Nano Research, 2018, 11(4): 1928–1937
CrossRef Google scholar
[130]
Nguyen D T C, Le H T N, Nguyen T T, Nguyen T T T, Bach L G, Nguyen T D, Tran T V . Multifunctional ZnO nanoparticles bio-fabricated from Canna indica L. flowers for seed germination, adsorption, and photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 420: 126586
CrossRef Google scholar
[131]
García-López J I, Zavala-García F, Olivares-Sáenz E, Lira-Saldívar R H, Díaz Barriga-Castro E, Ruiz-Torres N A, Ramos-Cortez E, Vázquez-Alvarado R, Niño-Medina G . Zinc oxide nanoparticles boosts phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of Capsicum annuum L. during germination. Agronomy, 2018, 8(10): 215
CrossRef Google scholar
[132]
Estrada-Urbina J, Cruz-Alonso A, Santander-González M, Méndez-Albores A, Vázquez-Durán A . Nanoscale zinc oxide particles for improving the physiological and sanitary quality of a Mexican landrace of red maize. Nanomaterials, 2018, 8(4): 247
CrossRef Google scholar
[133]
Rai-Kalal P, Jajoo A . Priming with zinc oxide nanoparticles improve germination and photosynthetic performance in wheat. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2021, 160: 341–351
CrossRef Google scholar
[134]
Gomaa M A, Kandil E E, El-Dein A A M Z, Abou-Donia M E M, Ali H M, Abdelsalam N R . Increase maize productivity and water use efficiency through application of potassium silicate under water stress. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11(1): 224
CrossRef Google scholar
[135]
Oliva K M E, da Silva F B V, Araújo P R M, de Oliveira E C A, do Nascimento C W A . Amorphous silica-based fertilizer increases stalks and sugar yield and resistance to stalk borer in sugarcane grown under field conditions. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2021, 21(3): 2518–2529
CrossRef Google scholar
[136]
Ahmed T, Noman M, Manzoor N, Shahid M, Abdullah M, Ali L, Wang G, Hashem A, Al-Arjani A B F, Alqarawi A A, Abd_Allah E F, Li B . Nanoparticle-based amelioration of drought stress and cadmium toxicity in rice via triggering the stress responsive genetic mechanisms and nutrient acquisition. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2021, 209: 111829
CrossRef Google scholar
[137]
Ahmed T, Masood H A, Noman M, AL-Huqail A A, Alghanem S M S, Khan M M, Muhammad S, Manzoor N, Rizwan M, Qi X J, Abeed A H A, Li B . Biogenic silicon nanoparticles mitigate cadmium (Cd) toxicity in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) by modulating the cellular oxidative stress metabolism and reducing Cd translocation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 3023, 459: 132070
[138]
Ahmed T, Shahid M, Noman M, Niazi M B K, Mahmood F, Manzoor I, Zhang Y, Li B, Yang Y, Yan C Q, Chen J P . Silver nanoparticles synthesized by using Bacillus cereus SZT1 ameliorated the damage of bacterial leaf blight pathogen in rice. Pathogens, 2020, 9(3): 160
CrossRef Google scholar
[139]
Ahmed T, Noman M, Jiang H B, Shahid M, Ma C X, Wu Z F, Nazir M M, Ali M A, White J C, Chen J P, Li B . Bioengineered chitosan-iron nanocomposite controls bacterial leaf blight disease by modulating plant defense response and nutritional status of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Nano Today, 2022, 45: 101547
CrossRef Google scholar
[140]
Iqbal M, Raja N I, Mashwani Z U R, Wattoo F H, Hussain M, Ejaz M, Saira H . Assessment of AgNPs exposure on physiological and biochemical changes and antioxidative defence system in wheat (Triticum aestivum L) under heat stress. IET Nanobiotechnology/IET, 2019, 13(2): 230–236
CrossRef Google scholar
[141]
Hassan N S, Salah El Din T A, Hendawey M H, Borai I H, Mahdi A A . Magnetite and zinc oxide nanoparticles alleviated heat stress in wheat plants. Current Nanomaterials, 2018, 3(1): 32–43
CrossRef Google scholar
[142]
Ikhajiagbe B, Igiebor F A, Ogwu M C . Growth and yield performances of rice (Oryza sativa var. nerica) after exposure to biosynthesized nanoparticles. Bulletin of the National Research Center, 2021, 45(1): 62
CrossRef Google scholar
[143]
Shakoor N, Adeel M, Zain M, Zhang P, Ahmad M A, Farooq T, Zhou P F, Azeem I, Rizwan M, Guo K R, Jilani G, Ahmar S, Maqbool S, Ming X, Rui Y K . Exposure of cherry radish (Raphanus sativus L. var. Radculus Pers) to iron-based nanoparticles enhances its nutritional quality by trigging the essential elements. NanoImpact, 2022, 25: 100388
CrossRef Google scholar
[144]
Lou L P, Huang Q, Lou Y L, Lu J R, Hu B L, Lin Q . Adsorption and degradation in the removal of nonylphenol from water by cells immobilized on biochar. Chemosphere, 2019, 228: 676–684
CrossRef Google scholar
[145]
Zhang Y, Liu S, Niu L L, Su A X, Li M Y, Wang Y Q, Xu Y . Sustained and efficient remediation of biochar immobilized with Sphingobium abikonense on phenanthrene-copper co-contaminated soil and microbial preferences of the bacteria colonized in biochar. Biochar, 2023, 5(1): 43
CrossRef Google scholar
[146]
Liu M B, Wang S L, Yang M, Wu Y N, Nan Z R . Combined treatment of heavy metals in water and soil by biochar and manganese-oxidizing bacteria. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2023, 23(1): 145–155
CrossRef Google scholar
[147]
Thies J E, Rillig M C. Characteristics of biochar: Biological properties. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S, eds. Biochar for Environmental Management. Taylor & Francis, 2009, 85–105
[148]
Husna N, Budianta D, Munandar M, Napoleon A . Evaluation of several biochar types as inoculant carrier for indigenous phosphate solubilizing microoorganism from acid sulphate soil. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 2019, 20(6): 1–8
CrossRef Google scholar
[149]
Xiang L, Harindintwali J D, Wang F, Redmile-Gordon M, Chang S X, Fu Y H, He C, Muhoza B, Brahushi F, Bolan N, Jiang X, Ok Y S, Rinklebe J, Schaeffer A, Zhu Y, Tiedje J M, Xing B . Integrating biochar, bacteria, and plants for sustainable remediation of soils contaminated with organic pollutants. Environmental Science & Technology, 2022, 56(23): 16546–16566
CrossRef Google scholar
[150]
Pokharel P, Ma Z L, Chang S X . Biochar increases soil microbial biomass with changes in extra-and intracellular enzyme activities: a global meta-analysis. Biochar, 2020, 2(1): 65–79
CrossRef Google scholar
[151]
Yan T T, Xue J H, Zhou Z D, Wu Y B . Biochar-based fertilizer amendments improve the soil microbial community structure in a karst mountainous area. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 794: 148757
CrossRef Google scholar
[152]
Sun D, Hale L, Crowley D . Nutrient supplementation of pinewood biochar for use as a bacterial inoculum carrier. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2016, 52(4): 515–522
CrossRef Google scholar
[153]
Yan W K, Liu Y T, Malacrinò A, Zhang J Y, Cheng X L, Rensing C, Zhang Z Y, Lin W X, Zhang Z, Wu H M . Combination of biochar and PGPBs amendment suppresses soil-borne pathogens by modifying plant-associated microbiome. Applied Soil Ecology, 2024, 193: 105162
CrossRef Google scholar
[154]
Bai X X, Huang Y W, Ren W, Coyne M, Jacinthe P A, Tao B, Hui D F, Yang J, Matocha C . Responses of soil carbon sequestration to climate-smart agriculture practices: a meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 2019, 25(8): 2591–2606
CrossRef Google scholar
[155]
Ali L, Manzoor N, Li X, Naveed M, Nadeem S M, Waqas M R, Khalid M, Abbas A, Ahmed T, Li B, Yan J . Impact of corn cob-derived biochar in altering soil quality, biochemical status and improving maize growth under drought stress. Agronomy, 2021, 11(11): 2300
CrossRef Google scholar
[156]
Liu Z W, Zhang W, Ma R L, Li S X, Song K Y, Zheng J F, Wang Y, Bian R J, Zhang X H, Pan G X . Biochar-plant interactions enhance nonbiochar carbon sequestration in a rice paddy soil. Communications Earth & Environment, 2023, 4(1): 494
CrossRef Google scholar
[157]
Liu Q, Zhang Y H, Liu B J, Amonette J E, Lin Z B, Liu G, Ambus P, Xie Z B . How does biochar influence soil N cycle? A meta-analysis. Plant and Soil, 2018, 426(1−2): 211–225
CrossRef Google scholar
[158]
Zhang L Y, Jing Y M, Chen C R, Xiang Y Z, Rezaei Rashti M, Li Y T, Deng Q, Zhang R D . Effects of biochar application on soil nitrogen transformation, microbial functional genes, enzyme activity, and plant nitrogen uptake: a meta-analysis of field studies. Global Change Biology. Bioenergy, 2021, 13(12): 1859–1873
CrossRef Google scholar
[159]
Yan S H, Zhang S L, Yan P K, Aurangzeib M . Effect of biochar application method and amount on the soil quality and maize yield in Mollisols of Northeast China. Biochar, 2022, 4(1): 56
CrossRef Google scholar
[160]
Mahmoud E, El-Beshbeshy T, El-Kader N A, El Shal R, Khalafallah N . Impacts of biochar application on soil fertility, plant nutrients uptake and maize (Zea mays L.) yield in saline sodic soil. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2019, 12(23): 719
CrossRef Google scholar
[161]
Choudhary T K, Khan K S, Hussain Q, Ashfaq M . Nutrient availability to maize crop (Zea mays L.) in biochar amended alkaline subtropical soil. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2021, 21(2): 1293–1306
CrossRef Google scholar
[162]
Luo S S, Wang S J, Tian L, Li S Q, Li X J, Shen Y F, Tian C J. Long-term biochar application influences soil microbial community and its potential roles in semiarid farmland. Applied Soil Ecology, 2017, 117−118: 10−15
[163]
Singh H, Northup B K, Rice C W, Prasad P V . Biochar applications influence soil physical and chemical properties, microbial diversity, and crop productivity: a meta-analysis. Biochar, 2022, 4(1): 8
CrossRef Google scholar
[164]
Zulfiqar B, Raza M A S, Saleem M F, Aslam M U, Iqbal R, Muhammad F, Amin J, Ibrahim M A, Khan I H . Biochar enhances wheat crop productivity by mitigating the effects of drought: insights into physiological and antioxidant defense mechanisms. PLoS One, 2022, 17(4): e0267819
CrossRef Google scholar
[165]
Chen X, Liu L, Yang Q Y, Xu H N, Shen G Q, Chen Q C . Optimizing biochar application rates to improve soil properties and crop growth in saline–alkali soil. Sustainability, 2024, 16(6): 2523
CrossRef Google scholar
[166]
Taheri M A R, Astaraei A R, Lakzian A, Emami H . The role of biochar and sulfur-modified biochar on soil water content, biochemical properties and millet crop under saline-sodic and calcareous soil. Plant and Soil, 2024, 499(1−2): 221–236
CrossRef Google scholar
[167]
Aydin E, Šimanský V, Horák J, Igaz D . Potential of biochar to alternate soil properties and crop yields 3 and 4 years after the application. Agronomy, 2020, 10(6): 889
CrossRef Google scholar
[168]
Ali I, He L, Ullah S, Quan Z, Wei S Q, Iqbal A, Munsif F, Shah T, Xuan Y, Luo Y Q, Li T Y, Jiang L G . Biochar addition coupled with nitrogen fertilization impacts on soil quality, crop productivity, and nitrogen uptake under double-cropping system. Food and Energy Security, 2020, 9(3): e208
CrossRef Google scholar
[169]
Zhao W, Zhou Q, Tian Z Z, Cui Y T, Liang Y, Wang H Y . Apply biochar to ameliorate soda saline-alkali land, improve soil function and increase corn nutrient availability in the Songnen Plain. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 722: 137428
CrossRef Google scholar
[170]
Dong H L, Zeng Q, Sheng Y Z, Chen C M, Yu G, Kappler A . Coupled iron cycling and organic matter transformation across redox interfaces. Nature Reviews. Earth & Environment, 2023, 4(9): 659–673
CrossRef Google scholar
[171]
Yuan H J, Zhang Z J, Li M Y, Clough T, Wrage-Monning N, Qin S P, Ge T D, Liao H P, Zhou S G . Biochar’s role as an electron shuttle for mediating soil N2O emissions. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2019, 133: 94–96
CrossRef Google scholar
[172]
Yuan D, Wang G Q, Hu C G, Zhou S, Clough T J, Wrage-Mönnig N, Luo J F, Qin S P . Electron shuttle potential of biochar promotes dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium in paddy soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2022, 172: 108760
CrossRef Google scholar
[173]
Zhou G W, Yang X R, Li H, Marshall C W, Zheng B X, Yan Y, Su J Q, Zhu Y G . Electron shuttles enhance anaerobic ammonium oxidation coupled to iron(III) reduction. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50(17): 9298–9307
CrossRef Google scholar
[174]
Dong H L, Coffin E S, Sheng Y Z, Duley M L, Khalifa Y M . Microbial reduction of Fe(III) in nontronite: role of biochar as a redox mediator. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2023, 345(1−2): 102–116
CrossRef Google scholar
[175]
Villada E, Velasquez M, Gómez A M, Correa J D, Saldarriaga J F, López J E, Tamayo A . Combining anaerobic digestion slurry and different biochars to develop a biochar-based slow-release NPK fertilizer. Science of the Total Environment, 2024, 927: 171982
CrossRef Google scholar
[176]
Glaser B, Lehr V I . Biochar effects on phosphorus availability in agricultural soils: a meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9(1): 9338
CrossRef Google scholar
[177]
Ye Z X, Zhang L M, Huang Q Y, Tan Z X . Development of a carbon-based slow release fertilizer treated by bio-oil coating and study on its feedback effect on farmland application. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 239(8): 118085
CrossRef Google scholar
[178]
Yasmeen T, Arif M S, Shahzad S M, Riaz M, Tufail M A, Mubarik M S, Ahmad A, Ali S, Albasher G, Shakoor A . Abandoned agriculture soil can be recultivated by promoting biological phosphorus fertility when amended with nano-rock phosphate and suitable bacterial inoculant. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2022, 234: 113385
CrossRef Google scholar
[179]
Rubel R I, Wei L . Biochar-based controlled release nitrogen fertilizer coated with polylactic acid. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 2022, 30(10): 4406–4417
CrossRef Google scholar
[180]
Ghorbanpour M, Mohammadi H, Kariman K . Nanosilicon-based recovery of barley (Hordeum vulgare) plants subjected to drought stress. Environmental Science: Nano, 2020, 7(2): 443–461
CrossRef Google scholar
[181]
Manzoor N, Ali L, Ahmed T, Noman M, Adrees M, Shahid M S, Ogunyemi S O, Radwan K S, Wang G, Zaki H E . Recent advancements and development in nano-enabled agriculture for improving abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2022, 13: 951752
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial supports of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42102340, 42277298), the Pingduoduo-China Agricultural University Research Fund (PC2023B02007), the National Key Research and Development Project of China (2022YFD1500205), and the National High-end Foreign Experts Recruitment Plan (G2022108011L).

Declaration regarding the use of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies

During the preparation of this work, the authors utilized the Claude tool to enhance language quality and readability. Subsequent to its use, the authors conducted a thorough review and made necessary edits to the content, thereby accepting full responsibility for the entirety of the publication’s content.

Compliance with ethics guidelines

Ying Liu, Natasha Manzoor, Miao Han, Kun Zhu, and Gang Wang declare that they have no conflicts of interest or financial conflicts to disclose. This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s) 2024. Published by Higher Education Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(3833 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/