Effects of combined drip irrigation and mulching practices on the soil evaporation characteristics in a young apple orchard in arid northwestern China

Xinyu WANG, Haijing WANG, Xiao LI, Di WANG

PDF(3072 KB)
PDF(3072 KB)
Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (4) : 575-588. DOI: 10.15302/J-FASE-2024563
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effects of combined drip irrigation and mulching practices on the soil evaporation characteristics in a young apple orchard in arid northwestern China

Author information +
History +

Highlights

● Effects of the combination of drip irrigation and mulching practices on SE characteristics in a young orchard were investigated.

● Mulching treatments significantly affected daily SE and SWCs dynamics of the young orchard.

● Daily SE under FM and SM treatments was more susceptible to be affected by meteorological factors.

● SM is considered to be a more effective mulching practice for reducing unproductive SE and improving SWC status in young orchard with DI.

Abstract

Soil evaporation (SE) is a key component of regional hydrological balance, especially in arid areas. China has the largest area of apple orchards in the world, but the effects of mulching practices on SE dynamics and their controlling factors remain poorly understood in orchards using drip irrigation (DI). This study was conducted to address these issues by measuring SE, meteorological factors, soil temperature (ST), and soil water content (SWC) in young apple orchard under two mulching treatments during the growing season. Field experiments, which included three treatments—film mulching (FM) and maize straw mulching (SM), and clean tillage (TL) as a comparator—were conducted in 3-year-old apple orchard with DI in arid northwestern China. The results revealed that mulching significantly affected the daily SE dynamics of the young orchard (p < 0.05), and the daily mean SE under FM, SM, and TL treatments was about 1.3 ± 0.5, 1.3 ± 0.4, and 1.7 ± 0.4 mm·d−1, respectively. No significant differences were detected in the daily SE between FM and SM treatments (p > 0.05), whereas the daily SWC in the four soil layers to 120 cm were consistently greater under SM treatment than under FM and TL treatments (p < 0.05). Compared to the TL treatment, the daily SE under FM and SM treatments was more susceptible to meteorological factors. Stepwise regression analysis showed that the daily SE of the young orchard was mainly controlled by the vapor pressure deficit, reference evapotranspiration and solar radiation, regardless of the treatment. However, there was no significant relationship between the daily SE and wind speed under TL treatment (p > 0.05). This study highlighted the significant differences in SE losses and SWC dynamics of the mulching treatments. Overall, SM is considered to be a more effective mulching practice for reducing unproductive SE and improving SWC status in young apple orchards with DI in arid and similar climatic regions.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Drip irrigation / orchards soil evaporation / surface mulching / water-limited regions

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xinyu WANG, Haijing WANG, Xiao LI, Di WANG. Effects of combined drip irrigation and mulching practices on the soil evaporation characteristics in a young apple orchard in arid northwestern China. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng., 2024, 11(4): 575‒588 https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2024563

References

[1]
Abdel-Sattar M, Kotb H R M. Nutritional status and productivity of Anna apple trees in the year following autumn irrigation determent. Agricultural Water Management, 2021, 252: 106882
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Lecaros-Arellano F, Holzapfel E, Fereres E, Rivera D, Muñoz N, Jara J. Effects of the number of drip laterals on yield and quality of apples grown in two soil types. Agricultural Water Management, 2021, 248: 106781
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Production/Crops and Livestock Products—Metadata. FAO: 2023. Available at FAO website on June 22, 2023
[4]
Wang D, Wang L. Dynamics of evapotranspiration partitioning for apple trees of different ages in a semiarid region of Northwest China. Agricultural Water Management, 2017, 191: 1–15
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Du S Q, Kang S Z, Li F S, Du T S. Water use efficiency is improved by alternate partial root-zone irrigation of apple in arid Northwest China. Agricultural Water Management, 2017, 179: 184–192
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Liu C W, Kang S Z, Li F S, Li S E, Du T S, Tong L. Relationship between environmental factor and maximum daily stem shrinkage in apple tree in arid region of northwest China. Scientia Horticulturae, 2011, 130(1): 118–125
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Volschenk T. Evapotranspiration and crop coefficients of Golden Delicious/M793 apple trees in the Koue Bokkeveld. Agricultural Water Management, 2017, 194: 184–191
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Zhou X, Wang R S, Gao F, Xiao H J, Xu H S, Wang D M. Apple and maize physiological characteristics and water-use efficiency in an alley cropping system under water and fertilizer coupling in Loess Plateau, China. Agricultural Water Management, 2019, 221: 1–12
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Ntshidi Z, Dzikiti S, Mazvimavi D, Mobe N T. Contribution of understorey vegetation to evapotranspiration partitioning in apple orchards under Mediterranean climatic conditions in South Africa. Agricultural Water Management, 2021, 245: 106627
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Mobe N T, Dzikiti S, Zirebwa S F, Midgley S J E, von Loeper W, Mazvimavi D, Ntshidi Z, Jovanovic N Z. Estimating crop coefficients for apple orchards with varying canopy cover using measured data from twelve orchards in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. Agricultural Water Management, 2020, 233: 106103
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Cai Y H, Wu P T, Zhu D L, Zhang L, Zhao X N, Gao X D, Ge M S, Song X L, Wu Y, Dai Z G. Subsurface irrigation with ceramic emitters: an effective method to improve apple yield and irrigation water use efficiency in the semiarid Loess Plateau. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2021, 313: 107404
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Tudi M, Yang L, Yu J, Wei B, Xue Y, Wang F, Li L, Yu Q J, Ruan H D, Li Q, Sadler R, Connell D. Leaching characteristics and potential risk of heavy metals from drip irrigation pipes and mulch substrate in agricultural ecosystems. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 882: 163573
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Ren T B, Fan P F, Zuo W B, Liao Z Z, Wang F L, Wei Y W, Cai X J, Liu G S. Biochar-based fertilizer under drip irrigation: more conducive to improving soil carbon pool and promoting nitrogen utilization. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 154: 110583
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Su X L, Shi P Z, Yang X Y, He L J, Kang S Z. Water consumption variation and growth of apple trees under drip irrigation in Shiyanghe River basin of Gansu Province. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2005, 16(1): 19−23 (in Chinese)
[15]
Li M M, An G Y, Guo Y, Zhao Z. Effects of different irrigation patterns on soil water and WUE in Weibei apple orchard. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2011, 29(4): 174−179 (in Chinese)
[16]
Shi X B, Bao Z W, Du H L, Ma W Y. Experimental study on the soil evaporation under root-zone irrigation and drip irrigation in agricultural system in the downstream part of Tarim River. Water Saving Irrigation, 2012, (6): 17−21 (in Chinese)
[17]
Patra S K, Poddar R, Pramanik S, Bandopadhyay P, Gaber A, Hossain A. Growth, yield, water productivity and economics of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) in response to gravity drip irrigation under mulch and without-mulch conditions. Scientia Horticulturae, 2023, 321: 112327
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Kool D, Agam N, Lazarovitch N, Heitman J L, Sauer T J, Bengal A. A review of approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2014, 184: 56–70
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Sun X M, Wilcox B P, Zou C B. Evapotranspiration partitioning in dryland ecosystems: a global meta-analysis of in situ studies. Journal of Hydrology, 2019, 576: 123–136
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Zanotelli D, Montagnani L, Andreotti C, Tagliavini M. Evapotranspiration and crop coefficient patterns of an apple orchard in a sub-humid environment. Agricultural Water Management, 2019, 226: 105756
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Żelazny W R, Licznar-Małańczuk M. Soil quality and tree status in a twelve-year-old apple orchard under three mulch-based floor management systems. Soil & Tillage Research, 2018, 180: 250–258
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Ochege F U, Luo G P, Yuan X L, Owusu G, Li C F, Justine F M. Simulated effects of plastic film-mulched soil on surface energy fluxes based on optimized TSEB model in a drip-irrigated cotton field. Agricultural Water Management, 2022, 262: 107394
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Liu Z, Zhao C, Zhang P, Jia Z K. Long-term effects of plastic mulching on soil structure, organic carbon and yield of rainfed maize. Agricultural Water Management, 2023, 287: 108447
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Suo G D, Xie Y S, Zhang Y, Luo H. Long-term effects of different surface mulching techniques on soil water and fruit yield in an apple orchard on the Loess Plateau of China. Scientia Horticulturae, 2019, 246: 643–651
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Liao Y, Cao H X, Liu X, Li H T, Hu Q Y, Xue W K. By increasing infiltration and reducing evaporation, mulching can improve the soil water environment and apple yield of orchards in semiarid areas. Agricultural Water Management, 2021, 253: 106936
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Di N, Wang Y, Clothier B, Liu Y, Jia L M, Xi B Y, Shi H X. Modeling soil evaporation and the response of the crop coefficient to leaf area index in mature Populus tomentosa plantations growing under different soil water availabilities. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2019, 264: 125–137
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Cavanaugh M L, Kurc S A, Scott R L. Evapotranspiration partitioning in semiarid shrubland ecosystems: a two-site evaluation of soil moisture control on transpiration. Ecohydrology, 2011, 4(5): 671–681
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Wang D, Wang L. Characteristics of soil evaporation at two stages of growth in apple orchards with different ages in a semi-humid region. Agricultural Water Management, 2023, 280: 108233
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Zheng C H, Wang R S, Zhou X, Li C N, Dou X Y. Effects of mulch and irrigation regimes on water distribution and root competition in an apple-soybean intercropping system in Loess Plateau, China. Agricultural Water Management, 2021, 246: 106656
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Liawo Y, Cao H X, Xue W K, Liu X. Effects of the combination of mulching and deficit irrigation on the soil water and heat, growth and productivity of apples. Agricultural Water Management, 2021, 243: 106482
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Nazari E, Besharat S, Zeinalzadeh K, Mohammadi A. Measurement and simulation of the water flow and root uptake in soil under subsurface drip irrigation of apple tree. Agricultural Water Management, 2021, 255: 106972
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Guo H, Li S E, Kang S Z, Du T S, Liu W F, Tong L, Hao X M, Ding R S. The controlling factors of ecosystem water use efficiency in maize fields under drip and border irrigation systems in Northwest China. Agricultural Water Management, 2022, 272: 107839
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Du S Q, Tong L, Zhang X T, Kang S Z, Du T S, Li S E, Ding R S. Signal intensity based on maximum daily stem shrinkage can reflect the water status of apple trees under alternate partial root-zone irrigation. Agricultural Water Management, 2017, 190: 21–30
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Campbell G S, Norman J M. An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1998
[35]
Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D, Smith M. Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper, 1998, 56
[36]
Song X L, Gao X D, Dyck M, Zhang W, Wu P T, Yao J, Zhao X N. Soil water and root distribution of apple tree (Malus pumila Mill) stands in relation to stand age and rainwater collection and infiltration system (RWCI) in a hilly region of the Loess Plateau, China. Catena, 2018, 170: 324–334
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Villegas J C, Breshears D D, Zou C B, Law D J. Ecohydrological controls of soil evaporation in deciduous drylands: How the hierarchical effects of litter, patch and vegetation mosaic cover interact with phenology and season. Journal of Arid Environments, 2010, 74(5): 595–602
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Flumignan D L, Faria R T. Evapotranspiration components and dual crop coefficients of coffee trees during crop production. Agricultural Water Management, 2011, 98(5): 791–800
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Zhang Y Q, Kang S Z, Ward E J, Ding R S, Zhang X, Zheng R. Evapotranspiration components determined by sap flow and microlysimetry techniques of a vineyard in Northwest China: dynamics and influential factors. Agricultural Water Management, 2011, 98(8): 1207–1214
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Tugwell-Wootton T, Skrzypek G, Dogramaci S, McCallum J, Grierson P F. Soil moisture evaporative losses in response to wet-dry cycles in a semiarid climate. Journal of Hydrology, 2020, 590: 125533
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Or D, Lehmann P, Shahraeeni E, Shokri N. Advances in soil evaporation physics—A review. Vadose Zone Journal, 2013, 12(4): 1–16
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Gao G Y, Wang D, Zha T S, Wang L X, Fu B J. A global synthesis of transpiration rate and evapotranspiration partitioning in the shrub ecosystems. Journal of Hydrology, 2022, 606: 127417
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Poulsen T G, Li T N, Lu T J, Chen H. Local-scale evaporation and water loss distribution in surface soil as related to near-surface wind conditions and surface geometry. European Journal of Soil Science, 2022, 73(1): e13199
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Poulsen T G, Cai W L, Garg A. Water evaporation from cracked soil under moist conditions as related to crack properties and near-surface wind speed. European Journal of Soil Science, 2020, 71(4): 627–640
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Amazirh A, Merlin O, Er-Raki S, Bouras E, Chehbouni A. Implementing a new texture-based soil evaporation reduction coefficient in the FAO dual crop coefficient method. Agricultural Water Management, 2021, 250: 106827
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Chen J F, Xie X, Zheng X Q, Xue J, Miao C Y, Du Q, Xu Y X. Effects of sand-mulch thickness on soil evaporation during the freeze-thaw period. Hydrological Processes, 2020, 34(13): 2830–2842
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Sun H Y, Shao L W, Liu X W, Miao W F, Chen S Y, Zhang X Y. Determination of water consumption and the water-saving potential of three mulching methods in a jujube orchard. European Journal of Agronomy, 2012, 43: 87–95
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Thapa R, Mirsky S B, Tully K L. Cover crops reduce nitrate leaching in agroecosystems: a global meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2018, 47(6): 1400–1411
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Zhang Y, Xie Y S. Effects of different patterns of surface mulching on soil hydrology in an apple orchard. Acta Prataculturea Sinica, 2011, 20(2): 85−92 (in Chinese)
[50]
Awe G O, Reichert J M, Wendroth O O. Temporal variability and covariance structures of soil temperature in a sugarcane field under different management practices in southern Brazil. Soil & Tillage Research, 2015, 150: 93–106
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Unkovich M, Baldock J, Farquharson R. Field measurements of bare soil evaporation and crop transpiration, and transpiration efficiency, for rainfed grain crops in Australia—A review. Agricultural Water Management, 2018, 205: 72–80
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
Merlin O, Olivera-Guerra L, Aït Hssaine B, Amazirh A, Rafi Z, Ezzahar J, Gentine P, Khabba S, Gascoin S, Er-Raki S. A phenomenological model of soil evaporative efficiency using surface soil moisture and temperature data. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2018, 256−257: 501−515
[53]
Yamanaka T, Inoue M, Kaihotsu I. Effects of gravel mulch on water vapor transfer above and below the soil surface. Agricultural Water Management, 2004, 67(2): 145–155
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Yamanaka T, Takeda A, Sugita F. A modified surface-resistance approach for representing bare-soil evaporation: wind tunnel experiments under various atmospheric conditions. Water Resources Research, 1997, 33(9): 2117–2128
CrossRef Google scholar
[55]
Diaz F, Jimenez C C, Tejedor M. Influence of the thickness and grain size of tephra mulch on soil water evaporation. Agricultural Water Management, 2005, 74(1): 47–55
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Ben Neriah A, Assouline S, Shavit U, Weisbrod N. Impact of ambient conditions on evaporation from porous media. Water Resources Research, 2014, 50(8): 6696–6712
CrossRef Google scholar
[57]
Zhu W B, Wei J X, Xiu H L, Jia S F, Lv A F. Coupled and continuous estimation of soil moisture and evaporative fraction within the remotely sensed surface temperature-vegetation index framework. Journal of Hydrology, 2021, 592: 125827
CrossRef Google scholar
[58]
Balugani E, Lubczynski M W, van der Tol C, Metselaar K. Testing three approaches to estimate soil evaporation through a dry soil layer in a semi-arid area. Journal of Hydrology, 2018, 567: 405–419
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Pariva D, Ashi Q, Ruchi B, Syed A H. A review of the methods available for estimating soil moisture and its implications for water resource management. Journal of Hydrology, 2012, 458–459: 458–459
[60]
Kustas W P, Norman J M. Evaluation of soil and vegetation heat flux predictions using a simple two-source model with radiometric temperatures for partial canopy cover. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1999, 94(1): 13–29
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
Wu Y J, Du T S, Ding R S, Yuan Y S, Li S E, Tong L. An isotope method to quantify soil evaporation and evaluate water vapor movement under plastic film mulch. Agricultural Water Management, 2017, 184: 59–66
CrossRef Google scholar
[62]
Zhang Y, Mishra P N, Scheuermann A. An improved evaporation quantification method: accounting for soil deformability and side evaporation effect. Journal of Hydrology, 2021, 598: 126486
CrossRef Google scholar
[63]
Brunner P, Li H T, Kinzelbach W, Li W P, Dong X G. Extracting phreatic evaporation from remotely sensed maps of evapotranspiration. Water Resources Research, 2008, 44(8): 1291–1295
CrossRef Google scholar
[64]
Wang D, Wang L, Zhang R. Measurement and modeling of canopy interception losses by two differently aged apple orchards in a subhumid region of the Yellow River Basin. Agricultural Water Management, 2022, 269: 107667
CrossRef Google scholar
[65]
Hayat M, Zha T S, Jia X, Iqbal S, Qian D, Bourque C P A, Khan A, Tian Y, Bai Y J, Liu P, Yang R Z. A multiple-temporal scale analysis of biophysical control of sap flow in Salix psammophila growing in a semiarid shrubland ecosystem of Northwest China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2020, 288–289: 107985
[66]
Wang D, Gao G Y, Li J R, Yuan C, Lü Y H, Fu B J. Sap flow dynamics of xerophytic shrubs differ significantly among rainfall categories in the Loess Plateau of China. Journal of Hydrology, 2020, 585: 124815
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFD1900502) and the National Field Scientific Observation and Research Station on Efficient Water Use of Oasis Agriculture in Wuwei of Gansu Province (KF2021004). We also thank the four anonymous reviewers for their professional comments which have helped us greatly improve the manuscript.

Compliance with ethics guidelines

Xinyu Wang, Haijing Wang, Xiao Li, and Di Wang declare that they have no conflicts of interest or financial conflicts to disclose. This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s) 2024. Published by Higher Education Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(3072 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/