Spatiotemporal variation and evaluation of agriculture green development: a case study of Hainan Province, China

Tianxiang YU, Jichen ZHOU, Lin MA, Fusuo ZHANG, Zed RENGEL, William J. DAVIES, Jianbo SHEN

PDF(6934 KB)
PDF(6934 KB)
Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1) : 83-99. DOI: 10.15302/J-FASE-2024538
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Spatiotemporal variation and evaluation of agriculture green development: a case study of Hainan Province, China

Author information +
History +

Highlights

● Knowledge of the quantitative evaluation of changes in agriculture green development (AGD) is currently insufficient at the regional scale.

● Progress and potential pathways towards AGD in Hainan Province were assessed.

● The AGD index for Hainan Province improved from 38.8 in 1988 to 40.9 in 2019.

● Optimized nutrient management and diet structure improved the AGD index significantly.

● This approach can be used to assess the effects of future policies.

Abstract

The realization of green and sustainable development of agriculture is the common pursuit all over the world. Agriculture green development (AGD) program has been proposed as a sustainable development strategy in China, but insufficient is known about the quantitative evaluation of spatiotemporal variation in AGD at the regional scale. This study aimed to assess spatiotemporal patterns in AGD at the county/city-based regional level. For this purpose, a systematic index evaluation system was developed to assess the performance of socioeconomic, food production and environmental components in a key economic region (Hainan Province) of China. Hainan improved its AGD index (representing the overall performance toward achieving AGD) from 38.8 in 1988 to 40.9 in 2019. The socioeconomic development and agricultural productivity have improved with time; environmental quality declined due to overuse of chemicals from 1988 to 2013, but steadily improved after 2013, indicating positive effects of reducing chemical input. There was a higher AGD index in the coastal vs. central regions and the southern vs. northern regions. Scenarios featuring improved nutrient management or optimized diet structure and reduced waste improved economic benefits and social productivity while concurrently reducing environmental degradation. These results provide new insights for the future development of green and sustainable agriculture and formulation of agricultural policies in Hainan Province of China and even other developing countries that are facing or will soon face similar challenges.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Agriculture / environmental impact / green and sustainable development / Hainan Province / index evaluation system

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Tianxiang YU, Jichen ZHOU, Lin MA, Fusuo ZHANG, Zed RENGEL, William J. DAVIES, Jianbo SHEN. Spatiotemporal variation and evaluation of agriculture green development: a case study of Hainan Province, China. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng., 2024, 11(1): 83‒99 https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2024538

References

[1]
Shen J B, Cui Z L, Miao Y X, Mi G H, Zhang H Y, Fan M S, Zhang C C, Jiang R F, Zhang W F, Li H G, Chen X P, Li X L, Zhang F S. Transforming agriculture in China: from solely high yield to both high yield and high resource use efficiency. Global Food Security, 2013, 2(1): 1–8
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Springmann M, Clark M, Mason-D’Croz D, Wiebe K, Bodirsky B L, Lassaletta L, de Vries W, Vermeulen S J, Herrero M, Carlson K M, Jonell M, Troell M, DeClerck F, Gordon L J, Zurayk R, Scarborough P, Rayner M, Loken B, Fanzo J, Godfray H C J, Tilman D, Rockström J, Willett W. Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature, 2018, 562(7728): 519–525
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Cusworth S J, Davies W J, McAinsh M R, Stevens C J. Sustainable production of healthy, affordable food in the UK: the pros and cons of plasticulture. Food and Energy Security, 2022, 11(4): e404
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Yu J L, Wu J. The sustainability of agricultural development in China: the agriculture-environment nexus. Sustainability, 2018, 10(6): 1776
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Norse D, Ju X T. Environmental costs of China’s food security. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2015, 209: 5–14
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Wang M, Janssen A B G, Bazin J, Strokal M, Ma L, Kroeze C. Accounting for interactions between Sustainable Development Goals is essential for water pollution control in China. Nature Communications, 2022, 13(1): 730
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Oenema O. Toward Agriculture Green Development. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2020, 7(1): 110–111
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Lu Y, Jenkins A, Ferrier R C, Bailey M, Gordon I J, Song S, Huang J, Jia S, Zhang F, Liu X, Feng Z, Zhang Z. Addressing China’s grand challenge of achieving food security while ensuring environmental sustainability. Science Advances, 2015, 1(1): e1400039
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Zhao H, Chang J F, Havlík P, Van Dijk M, Valin H, Janssens C, Ma L, Bai Z H, Herrero M, Smith P, Obersteiner M. China’s future food demand and its implications for trade and environment. Nature Sustainability, 2021, 4(12): 1042–1051
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Seppelt R, Klotz S, Peiter E, Volk M. Agriculture and food security under a changing climate: an underestimated challenge. iScience, 2022, 25(12): 105551
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Silva J V, Reidsma P, Baudron F, Laborte A G, Giller K E, van Ittersum M K. How sustainable is sustainable intensification? Assessing yield gaps at field and farm level across the globe. Global Food Security, 2021, 30: 100552
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Swagemakers P, Domínguez García M D, Milone P, Ventura F, Wiskerke J S C. Exploring cooperative place-based approaches to restorative agriculture. Journal of Rural Studies, 2019, 68: 191–199
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Shen J B, Zhu Q C, Jiao X Q, Ying H, Wang H, Wen X, Xu W, Li T Y, Cong W F, Liu X J, Hou Y, Cui Z L, Oenema O, Davies W J, Zhang F S. Agriculture Green Development: a model for China and the world. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2020, 7(1): 5–13
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Zhang X, Yao G L, Vishwakarma S, Dalin C, Komarek A M, Kanter D R, Davis K F, Pfeifer K, Zhao J, Zou T, D’Odorico P, Folberth C, Rodriguez F G, Fanzo J, Rosa L, Dennison W, Musumba M, Heyman A, Davidson E A. Quantitative assessment of agricultural sustainability reveals divergent priorities among nations. One Earth, 2021, 4(9): 1262–1277
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
United Nations (UN). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: UN, 2015
[16]
EU CAP NETWORK. The Common Agricultural Policy: An Overview. Belgium: EU CAP NETWORK, 2022. Available at EU CAP NETWORK on August 20, 2023
[17]
Xu Z, Chau S N, Chen X, Zhang J, Li Y, Dietz T, Wang J, Winkler J A, Fan F, Huang B, Li S, Wu S, Herzberger A, Tang Y, Hong D, Li Y, Liu J. Assessing progress towards sustainable development over space and time. Nature, 2020, 577(7788): 74–78
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Zhang J Z, Wang S, Zhao W W, Meadows M E, Fu B J. Finding pathways to synergistic development of Sustainable Development Goals in China. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 2022, 9(1): 21
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Fu J, Zhang Q, Wang P, Zhang L, Tian Y, Li X. Spatio-temporal changes in ecosystem service value and its coordinated development with economy: a case study in Hainan province, China. Remote Sensing, 2022, 14(4): 970
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Ma L, Ma W Q, Velthof G L, Wang F H, Qin W, Zhang F S, Oenema O. Modeling nutrient flows in the food chain of China. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2010, 39(4): 1279–1289
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Ma L, Velthof G L, Wang F H, Qin W, Zhang W F, Liu Z, Zhang Y, Wei J, Lesschen J P, Ma W Q, Oenema O, Zhang F S. Nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiencies and losses in the food chain in China at regional scales in 1980 and 2005. Science of the Total Environment, 2012, 434: 51–61
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Hainan Provincial Bureau of Statistics. Hainan Statistical Yearbook. Haikou: Hainan Provincial Bureau of Statistics, 1989–2020 (in Chinese)
[23]
Binder C R. From material flow analysis to material flow management Part I: Social sciences modeling approaches coupled to MFA. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2007, 15(17): 1596–1604
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Wang Y, Fan L, Khan S J, Roddick F A. Fugacity modelling of the fate of micropollutants in aqueous systems—Uncertainty and sensitivity issues. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 699: 134249
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
The People’s Government of Hainan Province. 14th Five-year Plan of Hainan Province for National Economic and Social Development and the Outline of the Long-term Goal of 2035. Haikou: The People’s Government of Hainan Province, 2021. Available at The People’s Government of Hainan Province website on August 20, 2023 (in Chinese)
[26]
Gu B, Zhang X, Lam S K, Yu Y, van Grinsven H J M, Zhang S, Wang X, Bodirsky B L, Wang S, Duan J, Ren C, Bouwman L, de Vries W, Xu J, Sutton M A, Chen D. Cost-effective mitigation of nitrogen pollution from global croplands. Nature, 2023, 613(7942): 77–84
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, Vermeulen S, Garnett T, Tilman D, DeClerck F, Wood A, Jonell M, Clark M, Gordon L J, Fanzo J, Hawkes C, Zurayk R, Rivera J A, De Vries W, Majele Sibanda L, Afshin A, Chaudhary A, Herrero M, Agustina R, Branca F, Lartey A, Fan S, Crona B, Fox E, Bignet V, Troell M, Lindahl T, Singh S, Cornell S E, Srinath Reddy K, Narain S, Nishtar S, Murray C J L. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet, 2019, 393(10170): 447–492
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Bai Z, Ma W, Ma L, Velthof G L, Wei Z, Havlík P, Oenema O, Lee M R F, Zhang F. China’s livestock transition: driving forces, impacts, and consequences. Science Advances, 2018, 4(7): eaar8534
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Li H G, Liu J, Li G H, Shen J B, Bergström L, Zhang F S. Past, present, and future use of phosphorus in Chinese agriculture and its influence on phosphorus losses. AMBIO, 2015, 44(Suppl 2): S274–S285
[30]
Jiao X, Lyu Y, Wu X, Li H, Cheng L, Zhang C, Yuan L, Jiang R, Jiang B, Rengel Z, Zhang F, Davies W J, Shen J. Grain production versus resource and environmental costs: towards increasing sustainability of nutrient use in China. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2016, 67(17): 4935–4949
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Hainan Provincial Bureau of Statistics. Fifty Years in Hainan (1949–1999). Beijing: China Statistics Press, 1999 (in Chinese)
[32]
Zhang X, Fang Q, Zhang T, Ma W, Velthof G L, Hou Y, Oenema O, Zhang F. Benefits and trade-offs of replacing synthetic fertilizers by animal manures in crop production in China: a meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 2020, 26(2): 888–900
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). FAOSTAT Data. Rome: FAO, 2019. Available at FAO website on August 20, 2023
[34]
Jin S Q, Zhang B, Wu B, Han D M, Hu Y, Ren C C, Zhang C Z, Wei X, Wu Y, Mol A P J, Reis S, Gu B J, Chen J. Decoupling livestock and crop production at the household level in China. Nature Sustainability, 2021, 4(1): 48–55
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Bai Z, Fan X, Jin X, Zhao Z, Wu Y, Oenema O, Velthof G, Hu C, Ma L. Relocate 10 billion livestock to reduce harmful nitrogen pollution exposure for 90% of China’s population. Nature Food, 2022, 3(2): 152–160
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Zou T, Zhang X, Davidson E A. Global trends of cropland phosphorus use and sustainability challenges. Nature, 2022, 611(7934): 81–87
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Song M L, Peng J, Wang J L, Zhao J J. Environmental efficiency and economic growth of China: a Ray slack-based model analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 2018, 269(1): 51–63
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
The People’s Government of Hainan Province. Regulations on the Prevention and Control of Livestock and Poultry Breeding Pollution. Haikou: The People’s Government of Hainan Province, 2013. Available at The People’s Government of Hainan Province website on August 20, 2023 (in Chinese)
[39]
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China (MARA). Action Plan to Achieve Zero Growth in the Use of Chemical Fertilizers and Pesticides by 2020. Beijing: MARA, 2015. Available at MARA website on August 20, 2023
[40]
The People’s Government of Hainan Province. Regulations on Hainan Ecological Protection Red Line Management. Haikou: The People’s Government of Hainan Province, 2016. Available at The People’s Government of Hainan Province website on August 20, 2023
[41]
The People’s Government of Hainan Province. Regulations on Hainan Environmental Protection. Haikou: The People’s Government of Hainan Province, 2017. Available at The People’s Government of Hainan Province website on August 20, 2023
[42]
Zhang T Y, Wang Y J, Zhang S R, Wang Y Y, Yu H. Evaluation of ontological value of regional tourism resources: A case study of Hainan Island, China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2021, 31(7): 1015–1038
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Zhang S, Ju H. The regional differences and influencing factors of tourism development on Hainan Island, China. PLoS One, 2021, 16(10): e0258407
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
National Food Strategy. National Food Strategy Independent Review: The Plan. National Food Strategy, 2021. Available at National Food Strategy on August 20, 2023
[45]
Su S L, Zhou X C, Wan C, Li Y K, Kong W H. Land use changes to cash crop plantations: crop types, multilevel determinants and policy implications. Land Use Policy, 2016, 50: 379–389
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China (MEE). Offering technical support to ensure ecological security, the nationwide ecological protection red line delineation technical guidelines have been promulgated. Beijing: MEE, 2014. Available at MEE website on March 10, 2023
[47]
Gao J. How China will protect one-quarter of its land. Nature, 2019, 569(7757): 457
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Larondelle N, Haase D, Kabisch N. Mapping the diversity of regulating ecosystem services in European cities. Global Environmental Change, 2014, 26: 119–129
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Bai Z, Lu J, Zhao H, Velthof G L, Oenema O, Chadwick D, Williams J R, Jin S, Liu H, Wang M, Strokal M, Kroeze C, Hu C, Ma L. Designing vulnerable zones of nitrogen and phosphorus transfers to control water pollution in China. Environmental Science & Technology, 2018, 52(16): 8987–8988
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Guo C Y, Bai Z H, Shi X J, Chen X J, Chadwick D, Strokal M, Zhang F S, Ma L, Chen X P. Challenges and strategies for agricultural green development in the Yangtze River Basin. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 2021, 18(1): 37–54
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Zhou J, Jiao X, Ma L, de Vries W, Zhang F, Shen J. Model-based analysis of phosphorus flows in the food chain at county level in China and options for reducing the losses towards green development. Environmental Pollution, 2021, 288: 117768
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
Ma L, Wang F, Zhang W, Ma W, Velthof G, Qin W, Oenema O, Zhang F. Environmental assessment of management options for nutrient flows in the food chain in China. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(13): 7260–7268
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
Zhang W, Cao G, Li X, Zhang H, Wang C, Liu Q, Chen X, Cui Z, Shen J, Jiang R, Mi G, Miao Y, Zhang F, Dou Z. Closing yield gaps in China by empowering smallholder farmers. Nature, 2016, 537(7622): 671–674
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Cui Z, Zhang H, Chen X, Zhang C, Ma W, Huang C, Zhang W, Mi G, Miao Y, Li X, Gao Q, Yang J, Wang Z, Ye Y, Guo S, Lu J, Huang J, Lv S, Sun Y, Liu Y, Peng X, Ren J, Li S, Deng X, Shi X, Zhang Q, Yang Z, Tang L, Wei C, Jia L, Zhang J, He M, Tong Y, Tang Q, Zhong X, Liu Z, Cao N, Kou C, Ying H, Yin Y, Jiao X, Zhang Q, Fan M, Jiang R, Zhang F, Dou Z. Pursuing sustainable productivity with millions of smallholder farmers. Nature, 2018, 555(7696): 363–366
CrossRef Google scholar
[55]
Ambikapathi R, Schneider K R, Davis B, Herrero M, Winters P, Fanzo J C. Global food systems transitions have enabled affordable diets but had less favourable outcomes for nutrition, environmental health, inclusion and equity. Nature Food, 2022, 3(9): 764–779
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World. Rome: FAO, 2022. Available at FAO website on August 20, 2023
[57]
Bonnet C, Bouamra-Mechemache Z, Réquillart V, Treich N. Viewpoint: regulating meat consumption to improve health, the environment and animal welfare. Food Policy, 2020, 97: 101847
CrossRef Google scholar
[58]
Read Q D, Brown S, Cuéllar A D, Finn S M, Gephart J A, Marston L T, Meyer E, Weitz K A, Muth M K. Assessing the environmental impacts of halving food loss and waste along the food supply chain. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 712: 136255
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Gustavsson J, Cederberg C, Sonesson U, Van Otterdijk R, Meybeck A. Global Food Losses and Food Waste: Extent, Causes and Prevention. Save food: An Initiative on Food Loss and Waste Reduction. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2011
[60]
Xue L, Liu X, Lu S, Cheng G, Hu Y, Liu J, Dou Z, Cheng S, Liu G. China’s food loss and waste embodies increasing environmental impacts. Nature Food, 2021, 2(7): 519–528
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
Ma L, Bai Z, Ma W, Guo M, Jiang R, Liu J, Oenema O, Velthof G L, Whitmore A P, Crawford J, Dobermann A, Schwoob M, Zhang F. Exploring future food provision scenarios for China. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019, 53(3): 1385–1393
CrossRef Google scholar
[62]
Mair S, Jones A, Ward J, Christie I, Druckman A, Lyon F. A critical review of the role of indicators in implementing the sustainable development goals. In: Leal Filho W, eds. Handbook of Sustainability Science and Research. World Sustainability Series. Springer, 2018, 41–56
[63]
Robert K W, Parris T M, Leiserowitz A A. What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environment, 2005, 47(3): 8–21
CrossRef Google scholar

Supplementary materials

The online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2024538 contains supplementary materials

Acknowledgements

We thank the Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (321CXTD443), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32130094), the Project of New Fertilizer Research and Development of Yun-Tian-Hua Group of Yunnan of China (YTH-4320-WB-FW-2021-031303-00), the project of Beijing’s Advanced Disciplines on Agriculture Green Development, the Science and Technology Project of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, and the 2115 Talent Development Program of China Agricultural University for financially supporting this work.

Compliance with ethics guidelines

Tianxiang Yu, Jichen Zhou, Lin Ma, Fusuo Zhang, Zed Rengel, William J. Davies, and Jianbo Shen declare that they have no conflicts of interest or financial conflicts to disclose. This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s) 2024. Published by Higher Education Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(6934 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/