Developing a new agenda for increased food and climate security

William J. DAVIES

PDF(3767 KB)
PDF(3767 KB)
Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1) : 35-54. DOI: 10.15302/J-FASE-2023514
REVIEW

Developing a new agenda for increased food and climate security

Author information +
History +

Highlights

● The urgent need to address increasing worldwide food and climate insecurity.

● Potential conflicts between these aims.

● Environmental challenges require a revolution in global farming practices.

● Growing concerns over diet-related health problems.

● New plant science to reduce global food insecurity.

Abstract

In many countries, political and environmental pressures are currently combining to generate a perfect storm of circumstances that is reducing food availability, increasing food costs and thereby reducing the availability of food to many. The UK is currently considering new national food and land management policies, and attention is also being given to legislation to address diet-related health issues. Many now argue for a revolution in UK farming practices to reduce their impact on the natural environment. The UK is not alone in facing these and other challenges. Both the contribution of agriculture to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and the effects of climate change on food production are issues receiving worldwide attention. Regenerative agricultural practices can result in greater C capture, reduced GHG emissions, enhanced soil quality and enhanced biodiversity. However, it is questioned if such farming systems will be productive enough to feed a growing population with the food required for social and health benefits. To fully exploit the impact of new plant science in farmer fields, it is imperative to effectively link science to farming practices and conduct a broader conversation around the food revolution with social scientists and with the general public.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

climate resilience / food security / human health / planetary health / regenerative agriculture

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
William J. DAVIES. Developing a new agenda for increased food and climate security. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng., 2024, 11(1): 35‒54 https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2023514

References

[1]
Headley D D, Fan S. Reflections on the Global Food Crisis. Washington D C: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), 2010, 142
[2]
Baulcombe D, Crute I, Davies W J, Dunwell J, Gale M, Jones J, Pretty J, Sutherland W, Toulmin C. Reaping the Benefits: Science and the Sustainable Intensification of Global Agriculture. London: The Royal Society, 2009
[3]
Rockström J, Williams J, Daily G, Noble A, Matthews N, Gordon L, Wetterstrand H, DeClerck F, Shah M, Steduto P, de Fraiture C, Hatibu N, Unver O, Bird J, Sibanda L, Smith J . Sustainable intensification of agriculture for human prosperity and global sustainability. Ambio, 2017, 46(1): 4–17
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Beddington J. Food, Energy, Water and the Climate: a Perfect Storm of Global Events? London: Government Office for Science, 2009
[5]
Oxford Martin Programme on the Future of Food. What is the Food System? Oxford: Oxford Martin Programme on the Future of Food, University of Oxford. Available at Oxford Martin Programme on the Future of Food website on July 16, 2023
[6]
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Summary for policymakers. In: Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pirani A, Connors S L, Péan C, Berger S, Caud N, Chen Y, Goldfarb L, Gomis M I, Huang M, Leitzell K, Lonnoy E, Matthews J B R, Maycock T K, Waterfield T, Yelekçi O, Yu R, Zhou B, eds. Climate Change 2021: the Physical Science Basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021
[7]
Crippa M, Solazzo E, Guizzardi D, Monforti-Ferrario F, Tubiello F N, Leip A . Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions. Nature Food, 2021, 2(3): 198–209
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Searchinger T D, Wirsenius S, Beringer T, Dumas P . Assessing the efficiency of changes in land use for mitigating climate change. Nature, 2018, 564(7735): 249–253
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Adoption of the Paris Agreement, 21st Conference of the Parties. FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1. Paris: UNFCCC, 2015
[10]
Kendon M, McCarthy M, Jevrejeva S, Matthews A, Sparks T, Garforth J, Kennedy J . State of the UK climate. International Journal of Climatology, 2022, 42(S1): 1–80
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Doherty B, Benton T G, Fastoso F J, Gonzalez Jimenez H. British Food—What Role Should UK Food Producers have in Feeding the UK? Wm Morrisons plc, 2017. Available at British Food Report website on June 16, 2023
[12]
GOV.UK. Environmental Land Management Schemes: Overview. GOV.UK, 2021. Available at GOV.UK website on July 7, 2023
[13]
Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, Vermeulen S, Garnett T, Tilman D, DeClerck F, Wood A, Jonell M, Clark M, Gordon L J, Fanzo J, Hawkes C, Zurayk R, Rivera J A, De Vries W, Sibanda L M, Afshin A, Chaudhary A, Herrero M, Agustina R, Branca F, Lartey A, Fan S, Crona B, Fox E, Bignet V, Troell M, Lindahl T, Singh S, Cornell S E, Reddy K S, Narain S, Nishtar S, Murray C J L . Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet, 2019, 393(10170): 447–492
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). The Future of Food and Agriculture—Trends and Challenges. Rome: FAO, 2017
[15]
The Global Food Security programme. The Role of the UK Food System in Meeting Global Agreements: Supporting Evidence. The Global Food Security programme, UK Research and Innovation, 2021. Available at the Global Food Security programme website on August 5, 2023
[16]
Metcalfe S, Sasse T. Tackling Obesity: Improving Policy Making on Food and Health. UK Institute of Government, 2023. Available at UK Institute of Government website on August 5, 2023
[17]
World Health Organisation (WHO). Obesity and Overweight. Geneva: WHO, 2021. Available at WHO website on July 7, 2023
[18]
National Biodiversity Network. State of Nature Data Survey. National Biodiversity Network, 2019. Available at UK National Biodiversity Network website on July 16, 2023
[19]
Emmett B A, Reynolds B, Chamberlain P M, Rowe E, Spurgeon D, Brittain S A, Frogbrook Z, Hughes S, Lawlor A J, Poskitt J, Potter E, Robinson D A, Scott A, Wood C, Woods C. Countryside Survey: Soils Report from 2007. NERC/Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, 2010, 192
[20]
FAO. ITPS, GSBI, SCBD and EC. State of Knowledge of Soil Biodiversity—Status, Challenges and Potentialities, Summary for Policy Makers. Rome: FAO, 2020
[21]
The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (Summary for Policy Makers). Bonn: IPBES Secretariat, 2019
[22]
Cusworth S J, Davies W J, McAinsh M R, Stevens C J . Sustainable production of healthy, affordable food in the UK: the pros and cons of plasticulture. Food and Energy Security, 2022, 11(4): e404
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Thorez L, Vandenburgh H . Challenges in the quest for ‘clean meat’. Nature Biotechnology, 2019, 37(3): 215–216
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
National Food Strategy. National Food Strategy Independent Review: the Plan 2021. National Food Strategy, 2021. Available at National Food Strategy website on July 16, 2023
[25]
Sillman J, Nygren L, Kahiluoto H, Ruuskanena V, Tamminenb A, Bajamundib C, Nappab M, Wuokkob M, Lindha T, Vainikkac P, Pitkänenc J P, Aholaa J . Bacterial protein for food and feed generated via renewable energy and direct air capture of CO2: Can it reduce land and water use?. Global Food Security, 2019, 22: 25–32
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Linder T . Making the case for edible microorganisms as an integral part of a more sustainable and resilient food production system. Food Security, 2019, 11(2): 265–278
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Strassburg B B N, Iribarrem A, Beyer H L, Cordeiro C L, Crouzeilles R, Jakovac C C, Braga Junqueira A, Lacerda E, Latawiec A E, Balmford A, Brooks T M, Butchart S H M, Chazdon R L, Erb K H, Brancalion P, Buchanan G, Cooper D, Díaz S, Donald P F, Kapos V, Leclère D, Miles L, Obersteiner M, Plutzar C, de M . Scaramuzza C A, Scarano F R, Visconti P. Global priority areas for ecosystem restoration. Nature, 2020, 586: 724–729
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Hong T K, Shin D M, Choi J, Do J T, Han S G . Current issues and technical advances in cultured meat production: a review. Food Science of Animal Resources, 2021, 41(3): 355–372
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Impossible Foods: Creating Plant-Based Alternatives to Meat | Singapore, Hong Kong, USA, Macau. Paris: UNFCCC. Available at UNFCCC website on July 7, 2023
[30]
The Royal Society. Future Food: Health and Sustainability (Conference Report). London: The Royal Society, 2019
[31]
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). The 17 Goals: Sustainable Development Goals. UNDP, 2015. Available at UNDP website on July 16, 2023
[32]
Benton T G, Froggatt A, Wellesley L, Grafham O, King R, Morisetti N, Nixey J, Schröder P. The Ukraine War and Threats to Food and Energy Security—Cascading Risks from Rising Prices and Supply Disruptions. London: Chatham House, 2022. Available at Chatham House website on July 16, 2023
[33]
United Nations. Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations, 2015. Available at United Nations website on July 7, 2023
[34]
Giller K E, Hijbeek R, Andersson J A, Sumberg J . Regenerative agriculture: an agronomic perspective. Outlook on Agriculture, 2021, 50(1): 13–25
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Newton I . The recent declines of farmland bird populations in Britain: an appraisal of causal factors and conservation actions. Ibis, 2004, 146(4): 579–600
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Benton T G, Bryant D M, Cole L, Crick H Q P . Linking agricultural practice to insect and bird populations: a historical study over three decades. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, 39(4): 673–687
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Fan M, Shen J, Yuan L, Jiang R, Chen X, Davies W J, Zhang F . Improving crop productivity and resource use efficiency to ensure food security and environmental quality in China. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2012, 63(1): 13–24
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
National Audit Office (NAO). The Environmental Land Management Scheme. Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs. NAO, 2021. Available at NAO website on July 16, 2023
[39]
European Commission. Agriculture and Rural Development: the Common Agricultural Policy: 2023–2027. European Union, 2023. Available at European Union website on July 16, 2023
[40]
UK National Farmers Union (NFU). Achieving Net Zero: Farming’s 2040 Goal. NFU, 2019. Available at NFU website on July 16, 2023
[41]
Statistics Division of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAOSTAT). Food Balances. FAOSTAT, 2023. Available at FAO website on July 16, 2023
[42]
The Royal Society. Multi-functional Landscapes: the UK Land Use Challenge. London: The Royal Society, 2023. Available at The Royal Society website on July 16, 2023
[43]
Monbiot G. Regenesis: Feeding the World without Devouring the Planet. London: Penguin Books, 2022
[44]
International Centre for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT). The Changing Global Diet. CIAT, 2017. Available at CIAT website on July 16, 2023
[45]
Lang T. Feeding Britain: Our Food Problems and How to Fix Them. London: Pelican, 2020
[46]
Godfray H C J, Aveyard P, Garnett T, Hall J W, Key T J, Lorimer J, Pierrehumbert R T, Scarborough P, Springmann M, Jebb S A . Meat consumption, health, and the environment. Science, 2018, 361(6399): eaam5324
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Jackson J, Williams R, McEvoy M, MacDonald-Wicks L, Patterson A . Is higher consumption of animal flesh foods associated with better iron status among adults in developed countries? A systematic review.. Nutrients, 2016, 8(2): 89
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Garnett T, Godde C, Muller A, Röös E, Smith P, de Boer I, zu Ermgassen E, Herrero M, van Middelaar C, Schader C, van Zanten H. Grazed and Confused? Ruminating on Cattle, Grazing Systems, Methane, Nitrous Oxide, the Soil Carbon Sequestration Question and What It All Means for Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Oxford: Food Climate Research Network, University of Oxford, 2017
[49]
Norat T, Bingham S, Ferrari P, Slimani N, Jenab M, Mazuir M, Overvad K, Olsen A, Tjønneland A, Clavel F, Boutron-Ruault M C, Kesse E, Boeing H, Bergmann M M, Nieters A, Linseisen J, Trichopoulou A, Trichopoulos D, Tountas Y, Berrino F, Palli D, Panico S, Tumino R, Vineis P, Bueno-de-Mesquita H B, Peeters P H M, Engeset D, Lund E, Skeie G, Ardanaz E, González C, Navarro C, Quirós J R, Sanchez M J, Berglund G, Mattisson I, Hallmans G, Palmqvist R, Day N E, Khaw K T, Key T J, San Joaquin M, Hémon B, Saracci R, Kaaks R, Riboli E . Meat, fish, and colorectal cancer risk: the European Prospective Investigation into cancer and nutrition. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2005, 97(12): 906–916
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Rohrmann S, Overvad K, Bueno-de-Mesquita H B, Jakobsen M U, Egeberg R, Tjønneland A, Nailler L, Boutron-Ruault M C, Clavel-Chapelon F, Krogh V, Palli D, Panico S, Tumino R, Ricceri F, Bergmann M M, Boeing H, Li K, Kaaks R, Khaw K T, Wareham N J, Crowe F L, Key T J, Naska A, Trichopoulou A, Trichopoulos D, Leenders M, Peeters P H M, Engeset D, Parr C L, Skeie G, Jakszyn P, Sánchez M J, Huerta J M, Redondo M L, Barricarte A, Amiano P, Drake I, Sonestedt E, Hallmans G, Johansson I, Fedirko V, Romieux I, Ferrari P, Norat T, Vergnaud A C, Riboli E, Linseisen J . Meat consumption and mortality—Results from the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition. BMC Medicine, 2013, 11(1): 63
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
UK Government Committee on Climate Change. Government’s Food Strategy ‘A Missed Opportunity’ for the Climate. UK Climate Change Committee, 2022. Available at UK Climate Change Committee website on July 16, 2023
[52]
Beudou J, Martin G, Ryschawy J . Cultural and territorial vitality services play a key role in livestock agroecological transition in France. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2017, 37(4): 36
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
British Medical Association. Improving the Nation’s Diet: Action for a Healthier Future. British Medical Association, 2018. Available at British Medical Association website on July 16, 2023
[54]
Food Ethics Council. Response to UK Government’s Food Strategy. Food Ethics Council, 2022. Available at Food Ethics Council website on July 7, 2023
[55]
National Biodiversity Network. ‘State of Nature Data’ Survey. National Biodiversity Network, 2021. Available at National Biodiversity Network website on July 16, 2023
[56]
European Commission. Agriculture and Rural Development: Enhancing Agricultural Biodiversity. European Union, 2023. Available at European Union website on July 16, 2023
[57]
World Wildlife Fund (WWF). Beef Industries. WWF, 2020. Available at WWF website on July 16, 2023
[58]
Wagg C, Bender F S, Widmer F, van der Heijden M G A . Soil biodiversity and soil community composition determine ecosystem multifunctionality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014, 111(14): 5266–5270
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Filazzola A, Brown C, Dettlaff M A, Batbaatar A, Grenke J, Bao T, Heida I P, Cahill J F Jr . The effects of livestock grazing are multitrophic: a meta analysis. Ecology Letters, 2020, 23(8): 1177–1311
CrossRef Google scholar
[60]
Fraser M D, Vallin H E, Roberts B P . Animal board invited review: grassland-based livestock farming and biodiversity. Animal, 2022, 16(12): 100671
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
MacLaren C, Mead A, van Balen D, Claessens L, Etana A, de Haan J, Haagsma W, Jäck O, Keller T, Labuschagne J, Myrbeck Å, Necpalova M, Nziguheba G, Six J, Strauss J, Swanepoel P A, Thierfelder C, Topp C, Tshuma F, Verstegen H, Walker R, Watson C, Wesselink M, Storkey J . Long-term evidence for ecological intensification as a pathway to sustainable agriculture. Nature Sustainability, 2022, 5(9): 770–779
CrossRef Google scholar
[62]
Posthumus H, Deeks L K, Rickson R J, Quinton J N . Costs and benefits of erosion control measures in the UK. Soil Use and Management, 2013, 31(S1): 16–33
CrossRef Google scholar
[63]
Bernacchi C J, Hollinger S E, Meyers T . The conversion of the corn/soybean ecosystem to no-till agriculture may result in a carbon sink. Global Change Biology, 2005, 11(0): 1867–1872
CrossRef Google scholar
[64]
Kim N, Riggins C W, Zabaloy M C, Allegrini M, Rodriguez-Zas S L, Villamil M B . High-resolution indicators of soil microbial responses to N fertilization and cover cropping in corn monocultures. Agronomy, 2022, 12(4): 954
CrossRef Google scholar
[65]
Rumpel C, Amiraslani F, Koutika L S, Smith P, Whitehead D, Wollenberg E . Put more carbon in soils to meet Paris climate pledges. Nature, 2018, 564(7734): 32–34
CrossRef Google scholar
[66]
Horton P, Long S P, Smith P, Banwart S A, Beerling D J . Technologies to deliver food and climate security through agriculture. Nature Plants, 2021, 7(3): 250–255
CrossRef Google scholar
[67]
Belimov A A, Dodd I C, Hontzeas N, Theobald J C, Safronova V I, Davies W J . Rhizosphere bacteria containing 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase increase yield of plants grown in drying soil via both local and systemic hormone signalling. New Phytologist, 2009, 181(2): 413–423
CrossRef Google scholar
[68]
Ramankutty N, Evan A T, Monfreda C, Foley J A . Farming the planet: 1. Geographic istribution of global agricultural lands in the year 2000. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2008, 22(1): GB1003
CrossRef Google scholar
[69]
Despommier D . The rise of vertical farms. Scientific American, 2009, 301(5): 80–87
CrossRef Google scholar
[70]
Alasdair R. A Land Cover Atlas of the United Kingdom (Document). The University of Sheffield. Journal Contribution, 2017. Available at figshare website on July 16, 2023
[71]
Our World in Data. Land Use per 100 Grams of Protein. Our World in Data, 2018. Available at Our World in Data website on July 7, 2023
[72]
Garnett T, Godfray C. Sustainable Internsification in Agriculture. Navigating a Course through Competing Food System Priorities. Oxford: Food Climate Research Network and the Oxford Martin Programme on the Future of Food, University of Oxford, 2012
[73]
Kuyper T W, Struik P C . Epilogue: global food security rhetoric, and the sustainable intensification debate. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2014, 8: 71–79
CrossRef Google scholar
[74]
van Noordwijk M, Brussaard L . Minimising the ecological footprint of food: closing yield and efficiency gaps simultaneously. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2014, 8: 62–70
CrossRef Google scholar
[75]
Godfray H C J, Garnett T . Food security and sustainable intensification. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 2014, 369(1639): 20120273
CrossRef Google scholar
[76]
Struik P C, Kuper T W, Brossaard L, Leeuwis C . Deconstructing and unpacking scientific controversies in intensification and sustainability: Why the tensions in concepts and values?. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2014, 8: 80–88
CrossRef Google scholar
[77]
Tree I. Rewilding: the Return of Nature to a British Farm. Picador, 2019
[78]
Hou Y, Oenema O, Zhang F . Integrating crop and livestock production systems—Towards agricultural green development. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2021, 8(1): 1–14
CrossRef Google scholar
[79]
Giller K E, Delaune T, Silva J V, Descheemaeker K, van de Ven G, Schut A G T, van Wijk M, Hammond J, Hochman Z, Taulya G, Chikowo R, Narayanan S, Kishore A, Bresciani F, Teixeira H M, Andersson J A, van Ittersum M K . The future of farming: Who will produce our food?. Food Security, 2021, 13(5): 1073–1099
CrossRef Google scholar
[80]
Statistics Division of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAOSTAT). Production, Trade (FAOSTAT Database Collections). FAOSTAT, 2020. Available at FAO website on July 16, 2023
[81]
Realizing Increased Photosynthetic Efficiency (RIPE). Realizing Increased Photosynthetic Efficiency for Sustainable Increases in Crop Yield. RIPE, 2022. Available at UK Royal Society of Biology (RSB) website on July 16, 2023
[82]
van Dijk M, Morley T, Rau M L, Saghai Y . A meta-analysis of projected global food demand and population at risk of hunger for the period 2010–2050. Nature Food, 2021, 2(7): 494–501
CrossRef Google scholar
[83]
Ray D K, Mueller N D, West P C, Foley J A . Yield trends are insufficient to double global crop production by 2050. PLoS One, 2013, 8(6): e66428
CrossRef Google scholar
[84]
Davies W J, Ward S E, Wilson A . Can crop science really help us to produce more better-quality food while reducing the world-wide environmental footprint of agriculture. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2020, 7(1): 28–44
CrossRef Google scholar
[85]
Zhu X G, Long S P, Ort D R . Improving photosynthetic efficiency for greater yield. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2010, 61(1): 235–261
CrossRef Google scholar
[86]
Murchie E H, Pinto M, Horton P . Agriculture and the new challenges for photosynthesis research. New Phytologist, 2009, 181(3): 532–552
CrossRef Google scholar
[87]
Kromdijk J, Głowacka K, Leonelli L, Gabilly S T, Iwai M, Niyogi K K, Long S P . Improving photosynthesis and crop productivity by accelerating recovery from photoprotection. Science, 2016, 354(6314): 857–861
CrossRef Google scholar
[88]
Kohler I H, Ruiz-Vera U M, VanLoocke A, Thomey M L, Clemente T, Long S P, Ort D R, Bernacchi C J . Expression of cyanobacterial FBP/SBPase in soybean prevents yield depression under future climate conditions. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2017, 68(3): 715–726
[89]
South P F, Cavanagh A P, Liu H W, Ort D R . Synthetic glycolate metabolism pathways stimulate crop growth and productivity in the field. Science, 2019, 363(6422): eaat9077
CrossRef Google scholar
[90]
López-Calcagno P E, Brown K L, Simkin A J, Fisk S J, Vialet-Chabrand S, Lawson T, Raines C A . Stimulating photosynthetic processes increases productivity and water use efficiency in the field. Nature Plants, 2020, 6(8): 1054–1063
CrossRef Google scholar
[91]
De Souza A P, Burgess S J, Doran L, Hansen J, Manukyan L, Maryn N, Gotarkar D, Leonelli L, Niyogi K K, Long S P . Soybean photosynthesis and crop yield are improved by accelerating recovery from photoprotection. Science, 2022, 377(6608): 851–854
CrossRef Google scholar
[92]
Głowacka K, Kromdijk J, Kucera K, Xie J, Cavanagh A P, Leonelli L, Leakey A D B, Ort D R, Niyogi K K, Long S P . Photosystem II Subunit S overexpression increases the efficiency of water use in a field-grown crop. Nature Communications, 2018, 9(1): 868
CrossRef Google scholar
[93]
Rebetzke G J, Condon A G, Richards R A, Farquhar G D . Selection for reduced carbon isotope discrimination increases aerial biomass and grain yield of rainfed bread wheat. Crop Science, 2002, 42(3): 739–745
CrossRef Google scholar
[94]
Rebetzke G J, Chapman S C, McIntyre C L, Richards R A, Condon A G, Watt M, van Herwaarden A F. Grain yield improvement in water-limited environments. In: Carver B F, ed. Wheat Science and Trade. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009, 215–249
[95]
Christy B, Tausz-Posch S, Tausz M, Richards R, Rebetzke G, Condon A, McLean T, Fitzgerald G, Bourgault M, O’Leary G . Benefits of increasing transpiration efficiency in wheat under elevated CO2 for rainfed regions. Global Change Biology, 2018, 24(5): 1965–1977
CrossRef Google scholar
[96]
Ryan A C, Dodd I C, Rothwell S A, Jones R, Tardieu F, Draye X, Davies W J . Gravimetric phenotyping of whole plant transpiration responses to atmospheric vapour pressure deficit identifies genotypic variation in water use efficiency. Plant Science, 2016, 251: 101–109
CrossRef Google scholar
[97]
Sinclair T R, Hammer G L, van Osteram E J . Potential yield and water-use efficiency benefits in sorghum from limited maximum transpiration rate. Functional Plant Biology, 2005, 32(10): 945–952
CrossRef Google scholar
[98]
Messina C D, Sinclair T R, Hammer G L, Curan D, Thompson J, Oler Z, Gho C, Cooper M . Limited-transpiration trait may increase maize drought tolerance in the US corn belt. Agronomy Journal, 2015, 107(6): 1978–1986
CrossRef Google scholar
[99]
Thiry A A, Chavez Dulanto P N, Reynolds M P, Davies W J . How can we improve crop genotypes to increase stress resilience and productivity in a future climate? A new crop screening method based on productivity and resistance to abiotic stress.. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2016, 67(19): 5593–5603
CrossRef Google scholar
[100]
Kirkegaard J, Lilley J M. Using systems agronomy to exploit deep roots in crops. In: Peter Gregory, ed. Understanding and Improving Crop Root Function. Cambridge: Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing, 2020
[101]
McDonald G K, Taylor J D, Verbyla A, Kunchel H . Assessing the importance of subsoil constraints to yield of wheat and its implications for yield improvement. Crop & Pasture Science, 2012, 63(12): 1043–1065
CrossRef Google scholar
[102]
Chenu K, Cooper M, Hammer G L, Matthews K L, Dreccer M F, Chapman S C . Environment characterisation as an aid to wheat improvement: interpreting genotype-environment interactions by modelling water-deficit patterns in North-Eastern Australian. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2011, 62(6): 1743–1755
CrossRef Google scholar
[103]
Chenu K, Deihimfard R, Chapman S C . Large scale characterisation of droughtpatter: a continent wide modelling approach applied to the Australian wheat belt—Spatial and temporal trends. New Phytologist, 2013, 109(3): 801–820
CrossRef Google scholar
[104]
Lilley J M, Kirkegaard J A . Farming systems context drives the value of deep wheat roots in semi-ard environments. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2016, 67(12): 3665–3681
CrossRef Google scholar
[105]
Zhao Z, Wang E, Kirkegaard J A, Rebetzke G J . Novel wheat varieties facilitate deep sowing to beat the heat of changing climates. Nature Climate Change, 2022, 12(3): 291–296
CrossRef Google scholar
[106]
Kirkegaard J A, Hunt J R . Increasing productivity by matching farming system management and genotype in water-limited environments. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2010, 61(15): 4129–4143
CrossRef Google scholar
[107]
Yang J, Zhang J . Grain filling of cereals under soil drying. New Phytologist, 2006, 169(2): 223–236
CrossRef Google scholar
[108]
Zhang D, Lyu Y, Li H, Tang X, Hu R, Rengel Z, Zhang F, Whalley W R, Davies W J, Cahill J F Jr, Shen J . Neighbouring plants modify maize-root foraging for phosphorus: coupling nutrients and neighbours for improved nutrient-use efficiency. New Phytologist, 2020, 226(1): 244–253
CrossRef Google scholar
[109]
Jin K, Li H, Li X, Li H, Dodd I C, Belimov A A, Davies W J, Shen J . Rhizosphere bacteria containing ACC deaminase decrease root ethylene emission and improve maize root growth with localized nutrient supply. Food and Energy Security, 2021, 10(2): 275–284
CrossRef Google scholar
[110]
UK Plant Sciences Federation (UKPSF). Growing the Tuture. A Report by the UK Plant Sciences Federation. UKPSF, 2019. Available at UK Royal Society of Biology (RSB) website on July 16, 2023
[111]
Kornhuber K, Lesk C, Schleussner C F, Jägermeyr J, Pfleiderer P, Horton R M . Risks of synchronized low yields are underestimated in climate and crop model projections. Nature Communications, 2023, 14(1): 3528
CrossRef Google scholar

Compliance with ethics guidelines

William J. Davies declares that he has no conflicts of interest or financial conflicts to disclose. This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the author.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s) 2023. Published by Higher Education Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(3767 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/