China’s agriculture green development: from concept to actions

Haixing ZHANG, Yuan FENG, Yanxiang JIA, Pengqi LIU, Yong HOU, Jianbo SHEN, Qichao ZHU, Fusuo ZHANG

PDF(9821 KB)
PDF(9821 KB)
Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1) : 20-34. DOI: 10.15302/J-FASE-2023512
RESEARCH ARTICLE

China’s agriculture green development: from concept to actions

Author information +
History +

Highlights

● A target-threshold indicator evaluation system is proposed to measure China’s agriculture transformation.

● Evaluation based on a development score showed China is currently at a medium level in the Agriculture Green Development initiative.

● There was a trend for increasing development scores for 2010–2020 compared to 1997–2010.

● Trade-offs between eco-environmental factors and socioeconomic/food production factors were found to be the major barriers to the transformation.

● More effort is needed to address the insufficient and uneven development to provide coordinated improvement.

Abstract

China has initiated a green transformation plan in 2015, which was soon applied to agriculture, known as the Agriculture Green Development (AGD) initiative, with the goals of achieving food security, high resource use efficiency, and an ecofriendly environment. To assess the agricultural transformation from 1997 to 2020, this paper proposes a national-scale indicator system consisting three dimensions (socioeconomic, food production and eco-environmental) and ten sub-dimensions to quantify the AGD score. This study showed that AGD score in China was at a moderate level during 1997–2010, scoring 40 out of 100. During this stage, decreased scores in the sub-dimensions of resource consumption, environmental quality, and environmental cost have offset the improvement in the socioeconomic dimension, resulting in fluctuated scores around 40. In the second stage (2011–2020), China’s AGD score improved but still at moderate level, scoring an average of 46.3, with each dimension increasing by 5.3%–25.0%. These results indicate that China has made progress in the agricultural transformation, transitioning from conceptualization to actions through the implementation of various policies and projects. However, the study emphasizes the need for more effort to address the insufficient and unbalanced development, along with the growing eco-environmental challenges, especially the trade-offs among dimensions.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

agricultural transformation / Agriculture Green Development / historical trend / indicator system / theoretical conception

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Haixing ZHANG, Yuan FENG, Yanxiang JIA, Pengqi LIU, Yong HOU, Jianbo SHEN, Qichao ZHU, Fusuo ZHANG. China’s Agriculture Green Development: from Concept to Actions. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng., 2024, 11(1): 20‒34 https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2023512

References

[1]
Behera K K, Alam A, Vats S, Sharma H, Sharma V. Organic farming history and techniques. In: Lichtfouse E, ed. Agroecology and Strategies for Climate Change. Springer, 2011, 287–328
[2]
Stone G D. Agricultural intensification. In: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2018
[3]
Matson P A, Parton W J, Power A G, Swift M J . Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science, 1997, 277(5325): 504–509
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBSC). National Data, 2021. Available at NBSC website on October 9, 2021
[5]
Zhang D, Wang H, Lou S, Zhong S . Research on grain production efficiency in China’s main grain producing areas from the perspective of financial support. PLoS One, 2021, 16(3): e0247610
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Chen W H, Chen J C, Xu D Y, Liu J C, Niu N N . Assessment of the practices and contributions of China’s green industry to the socio-economic development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 153: 648–656
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Ahmed M, Rauf M, Mukhtar Z, Saeed N A . Excessive use of nitrogenous fertilizers: an unawareness causing serious threats to environment and human health. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2017, 24(35): 26983–26987
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Zhang L, Yan C X, Guo Q, Zhang J B, Ruiz-menjivar J . The impact of agricultural chemical inputs on environment: global evidence from informetrics analysis and visualization. International Journal of Low Carbon Technologies, 2018, 13(4): 338–352
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Sheng F F, Wang J J, Chen K Z, Fan S G, Gao H X . Changing Chinese diets to achieve a win–win solution for health and the environment. China & World Economy, 2021, 29(6): 34–52
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Zhu S J, Yu C D, He C F . Export structures, income inequality and urban-rural divide in China. Applied Geography, 2020, 115: 102150
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Chan J C N, Zhang Y, Ning G . Diabetes in China: a societal solution for a personal challenge. Lancet. Diabetes & Endocrinology, 2014, 2(12): 969–979
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
The Lancet Diabetes Endocrinology . Obesity in China: time to act. Lancet. Diabetes & Endocrinology, 2021, 9(7): 407
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Zhao H, Chang J F, Havlik P, Dijk M V, Valin H, Janssens C, Ma L, Bai Z H, Herrero M, Smith P, Obersteiner M . China’s future food demand and its implications for trade and environment. Nature Sustainability, 2021, 4(12): 1042–1051
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Kroeze C . Comments on the article of “Agriculture Green Development: a model for China and the world”. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2020, 7(1): 106–107
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Ma W Q, Ma L, Zhang J J, Zhang F S. Theoretical framework and realization pathway of agricultural green development. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2020, 28(8): 1103−1112 (in Chinese)
[16]
Zhu Q C, Li Y J, Shen J B, Xu J L, Hou Y, Tong B X, Xu W, Zhang F S. Green development of agricultural whole industry chain: pathway and countermeasures. Strategic Study of Chinese Academy of Engineering, 2022, 24(1): 73−82 (in Chinese)
[17]
Abubakar M S, Attanda M L . The concept sustainable agriculture: challenges and prospects. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2013, 53(1): 012001
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Shen J B, Zhu Q C, Jiao X Q, Ying H, Wang H L, Wen X, Xu W, Li T, Cong W, Liu X, Hou Y, Cui Z, Oenema O, Davies W, Zhang F . Agriculture Green Development: a model for China and the world. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2020, 7(1): 5–13
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Kumar S, Meena R S, Jhariya M K. Resources Use Efficiency in Agriculture. Springer, 2020
[20]
Chinese Agriculture Ministry Press Office. Holding the “ox nose” of green development to promote sustainable agricultural development—Interpretation of “five major actions of agriculture green development”. Agricultural Products Market, 2017, 20: 26−31 (in Chinese)
[21]
Wei Q, Zhang B, Jin S Q. A study on construction and regional comparison of agricultural green development index in China. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2018, 11: 11−20 (in Chinese)
[22]
Zhao H J, Yu F W. Evaluation of agricultural green development level in main grain producing areas based on entropy method. Reform, 2019, (11): 136−146 (in Chinese)
[23]
Kussul N, Lavreniuk M, Shumilo L, Kolotii A. Nexus approach for calculating SDG indicator 2.4.1 using remote sensing and biophysical modeling. IGARSS 2019—2019 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Yokohama. IEEE, 2019, 6425–6428
[24]
Chaudhary A, Gustafson D, Mathys A . Multi-indicator sustainability assessment of global food systems. Nature Communications, 2018, 9(1): 848
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Zhang X, Yao G L, Vishwakarma S, Dalin C, Komarek A M, Kanter D R, Davis K F, Pfeifer K, Zhao J, Zou T, D’Odorico P, Folberth C, Rodriguez F G, Fanzo J, Rosa L, Dennison W, Musumba M, Heyman A, Davidson E A . Quantitative assessment of agricultural sustainability reveals divergent priorities among nations. One Earth, 2021, 4(9): 1262–1277
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Eurostat. Organic farming area in the EU up 46% since 2012. Eurostat, 2021. Available at Eurostat website on November 27, 2021
[27]
Seufert V, Ramankutty N, Foley J A . Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture. Nature, 2012, 485(7397): 229–232
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Bryan B A, Gao L, Ye Y, Sun X, Connor J D, Crossman N D, Stafford-Smith M, Wu J, He C, Yu D, Liu Z, Li A, Huang Q, Ren H, Deng X, Zheng H, Niu J, Han G, Hou X . China’s response to a national land-system sustainability emergency. Nature, 2018, 559(7713): 193–204
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Moldan B, Janoušková S, Hák T . How to understand and measure environmental sustainability: indicators and targets. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 17: 4–13
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Li L, Xie G D, Cao S Y, Luo Z H, Sarah H, Cheng S K, Gai L Q, Li H Y, Brad E. China ecological footprint report 2010. WWF Report, 2011
[31]
Xie G D, Cao S Y, Yang Q S, Xia L, Fan Z Y, Chen B P, Zhou S, Chang Y D, Ge L Q, Seth C, Sarah H. China ecological footprint report 2012. WWF Report, 2013
[32]
Yang C, Cui X F . Global changes and drivers of the water footprint of food consumption: a historical analysis. Water, 2014, 6(5): 1435–1452
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Mekonnen M M, Fulton J . The effect of diet changes and food loss reduction in reducing the water footprint of an average American. Water International, 2018, 43(6): 860–870
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Zeng G A, Hu J J. An international comparison of the income gap between urban and rural residents. Shandong Social Sciences, 2008, (10): 47−53 (in Chinese)
[35]
Pan J H, Wei H K, Song Y C, Sheng G Y. Annual Report on Urban Development of China No.4. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press (China), 2011, 93–110
[36]
Ti C P, Han X, Chang S X, Peng L Y, Xia L L, Yan X Y . Mitigation of agricultural NH3 emissions reduces PM2.5 pollution in China: a finer scale analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 350: 131507
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Hoekstra A Y. How to reduce our water footprint to a sustainable level? United Nations, UN Chronicle, 2018. Available at United Nations website on November 12, 2022
[38]
CPC Central Committee. No. 1 Central Document of 2016. CPC Central Committee, 2016 (in Chinese)
[39]
CPC Central Committee. The 13th Five-year Plan for Economic and Social Development of the People’s Republic of China. CPC Central Committee, 2016 (in Chinese)
[40]
CPC Central Committee. No. 1 Central Document of 2022. CPC Central Committee, 2022b (in Chinese)
[41]
Sadorsky P . The effect of urbanization on CO2 emissions in emerging economies. Energy Economics, 2014, 41: 147–153
CrossRef Google scholar

Supplementary materials

The online version of this article at https:doi:org/10.15302/J-FASE-2023512 contains supplementary material (Table S1).

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by Yunnan Provincial Major Science and Technology Special Project (202102AE090030), the Strategic Consulting Project of Chinese Academy of Engineering (2022-XY-49), China Scholarship Council (201913043), and Hainan University.

Compliance with ethics guidelines

Haixing Zhang, Yuan Feng, Yanxiang Jia, Pengqi Liu, Yong Hou, Jianbo Shen, Qichao Zhu, and Fusuo Zhang declare that they have no conflicts of interest or financial conflicts to disclose. All applicable institutional and national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s) 2023. Published by Higher Education Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(9821 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/