Characteristics of soil quality attributes under different agroecosystems and its implications for agriculture in the Choke Mountain watershed in Ethiopia

Demeku MESFIN, Engdawork ASSEFA, Belay SIMANE

PDF(1576 KB)
PDF(1576 KB)
Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (2) : 303-313. DOI: 10.15302/J-FASE-2023502
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Characteristics of soil quality attributes under different agroecosystems and its implications for agriculture in the Choke Mountain watershed in Ethiopia

Author information +
History +

Highlights

● Soil properties varied within coefficients of variation ranging from 7% to 169%.

● High variation in available phosphorus was caused by different management practices.

● Midland plains are dominated by Vertisol and Nitosols more suitable for agriculture.

● Lowland and mountainous highland area of the watershed are neither fertile nor suitable for agriculture.

● Lime application and organic fertilizer are fundamental to reversing soil acidity.

Abstract

Awareness of how soil properties vary over agroecosystems (AES) is essential for understanding soil potentials and improving site-specific agricultural management strategies for a sustainable ecosystem. This study examined the characteristics of soil quality attributes and implications for agriculture in the Choke Mountain watershed in Ethiopia. Forty-seven composite soil samples (0–20 cm deep) were collected from lowland and valley fragmented (AES 1), midland plain with black soil (AES 2), midland plain with brown soil (AES 3), sloppy midland land (AES 4), and hilly and mountainous highlands (AES 5). Ten of 15 soil quality properties were significant (P < 0.05 or 0.01), including silt, exchangeable bases, cation exchange capacity, percent base saturation, pH, organic matter, total nitrogen and available phosphorous (P) across the five AES. However, all properties were variable with coefficients of variation from 7% (total porosity) to 169% (available P) across the AES. Although AES 2 and 3 are affected by waterlogging and acidity, these two have better prospects for agriculture, but AES 1, 4, and 5 are unsuitable for agriculture because of soil erosion. Therefore, appropriate and applicable soil management strategies, particularly lime application and organic fertilizer, are fundamental to reversing soil acidity and improving soil fertility.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Agroecosystem / Choke Mountain watershed / coefficients of variation / Ethiopia / soil quality indicator

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Demeku MESFIN, Engdawork ASSEFA, Belay SIMANE. Characteristics of soil quality attributes under different agroecosystems and its implications for agriculture in the Choke Mountain watershed in Ethiopia. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng., 2024, 11(2): 303‒313 https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2023502

References

[1]
Sánchez-Navarro A, Gil-Vázquez J M, Delgado-Iniesta M J, Marín-Sanleandro P, Blanco-Bernardeau A, Ortiz-Silla R. Establishing an index and identification of limiting parameters for characterizing soil quality in Mediterranean ecosystems. Catena, 2015, 131: 35–45
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Fageria N K. Soil quality vs. environmentally-based agricultural management practices. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2002, 33(13−14): 2301−2329
[3]
Zhao G, Mu X, Wen Z, Wang F, Gao P. Soil erosion, conservation, and eco-environment changes in the Loess Plateau of China. Land Degradation & Development, 2013, 24(5): 499–510
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Alwani M A, Nafia O, Al-shaye A, Meklef A A. Studying the fertility status of the soil in some areas of agricultural expansion within western desert from Iraq. Plant Archives, 2019, 19(2): 2343–2350
[5]
Elias E, Biratu G K, Smaling E M A. Vertisols in the Ethiopian Highlands: interaction between land use systems, soil properties, and different types of fertilizer applied to teff and wheat. Sustainability, 2022, 14(12): 7370
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Hurni H, Berhe W A, Chadhokar P, Daniel D, Gete Z, Grunder M, Kassaye G. Soil and water conservation in Ethiopia: guidlines for development agents. Centre for Development and Environment (CDE), University of Bern, Bern Open Publishing (BOP), 2016
[7]
Yirgu T, Yihunie Y, Asele A. Agro-ecological assessment of physico-chemical properties of soils in Kulfo Watershed, South Western Ethiopia. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2020, 14(1): 6–14
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Ebabu K, Tsunekawa A, Haregeweyn N, Adgo E, Meshesha D T, Aklog D, Masunaga T, Tsubo M, Sultan D, Fenta A A, Yibeltal M. Exploring the variability of soil properties as influenced by land use and management practices: a case study in the Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia. Soil & Tillage Research, 2020, 200: 104614
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Simane B, Zaitchik B F, Mesfin D. Building climate resilience in the Blue Nile/Abay Highlands: a framework for action. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2012, 9(2): 610–631
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Negasa T, Ketema H, Legesse A, Sisay M, Temesgen H. Variation in soil properties under different land use types managed by smallholder farmers along the toposequence in southern Ethiopia. Geoderma, 2017, 290: 40–50
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Abate K, Mohammed M, Kibret K. Soil fertility assessment and mapping of spatial variability at Amareganda-Abajarso Sub-Watershed, North-Eastern Ethiopia. East African Journal of Sciences, 2016, 10(1): 1–14
[12]
Bewket W, Stroosnijder L. Effects of agroecological land use succession on soil properties in Chemoga watershed, Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia. Geoderma, 2003, 111(1−2): 85−98
[13]
Teferi E, Bewket W, Simane B. Effects of land use and land cover on selected soil quality indicators in the headwater area of the Blue Nile Basin of Ethiopia. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2016, 188(2): 83
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Debre Markos University (DMU). Potentials of the Choke Mountain watershed threats of Choke watershed. DMU, 2020. Available at DMU website on April 20, 2020
[15]
Zaitchik B F, Simane B, Habib S, Anderson M C, Ozdogan M, Foltz J D. Building climate resilience in the Blue Nile/Abay Highlands: a role for earth system sciences. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2012, 9(2): 435–461
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Simane B, Zaitchik B F, Ozdogan M. Agroecosystem analysis of the choke mountain watersheds, Ethiopia. Sustainability, 2013, 5(2): 592–616
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Alemneh T, Zaitchik B F, Simane B, Ambelu A. Changing patterns of tree cover in a tropical highland region and implications for food, energy, and water resources. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2019, 7: 7
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Mesfin D, Assefa E, Simane B. Variability of soil quality indicators along with the different landscape positions of Choke Mountain agroecosystem, upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia. Heliyon, 2022, 8(7): e09850
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Sertsu S, Bekele T. Procedures for soil and plant analysis. Ethiopia: National Soil Research Center, Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization, 2000
[20]
Landon J R. Booker tropical soil manual: a handbook for soil survey and agricultural land evaluation in the tropics and subtropics. London: Routledge, 1991
[21]
Bouyoucos G J. Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils. Agronomy Journal, 1962, 54(5): 464–465
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Jackson M L. Soil chemical analysis. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1958, 22(3): 272
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Walkley A, Black I A. An examination of the degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 1934, 37(1): 29–38
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Black C A. Method of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Wiley, 2016
[25]
Olsen S R, Cole C V, Watanabe F S, Dean L A. Estimation of Available P in Soils by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1954
[26]
Phil-Eze P O. Variability of soil properties related to vegetation cover in a tropical rainforest landscape. Journal of Geography and Regional Planning, 2010, 3(7): 177–184
[27]
Schoenholtz S H, Miegroet H V, Burger J A. A review of chemical and physical properties as indicators of forest soil quality: challenges and opportunities. Forest Ecology and Management, 2000, 138(1−3): 335−356
[28]
Negassa W, Gebrekidan H. The impact of different land use systems on soil quality of western Ethiopia Alfisols. Berlin: International Research on Food Security, Natural Resource Management, and Rural Poverty Reduction through Research for Development and Transformation, 2004, 5–7
[29]
Fetene E M, Amera M Y. The effects of land use types and soil depth on soil properties of Agedit watershed, Northwest Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Science and Technology, 2018, 11(1): 39–56
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Aprisal A, Istijono B, Juniarti , Harianti M. Soil quality index analysis under horticultural farming in Sumani upper watershed. International Journal of GEOMATE, 2019, 16(56): 191–196
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Buraka T, Lelago A. Physico-chemical properties and agricultural potentials of soils of Tembaro Woreda, Kembata Tembaro Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Chemistry and Materials Research, 2016, 8(7): 64–75
[32]
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Soil and Plant Testing and Analysis. FAO, 1980
[33]
Jensen T L. Soil pH and the availability of plant nutrients. Plant Nutrition Today, 2010: 2
[34]
Tadesse T, Haque L, Aduayi E A. Soil, Plant, Water, Fertilizer, Animal Manure and Compost Analysis Manual. Ethiopia: International Livestock Center for Africa, 1991
[35]
Abate N, Kibret K. Effects of land use, soil depth and topography on soil physicochemical properties along the Toposequence at the Wadla Delanta Massif, Northcentral Highlands of Ethiopia. Environment and Pollution, 2016, 5(2): 57–71
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Guteta D, Abegaz A. Dynamics of selected soil properties under four land uses in Arsamma watershed, Southwestern Ethiopian Highlands. Physical Geography, 2017, 38(1): 83–102
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Doran J W, Coleman D C, Bezdicek D F, Stewart B A. Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment. Soil Science Society of America, Inc., 1994
[38]
Somasundaram J, Singh R K, Parandiyal A K, Ali S, Chauhan V, Sinha N K, Lakaria B L, Saha R, Chaudhary R S, Coumar M V, Singh R K, Simaiya R R. Soil properties under different land use systems in parts of Chambal region of Rajasthan. Journal of Agricultural Physics, 2013, 13(2): 139–147
[39]
Adebo B O, Aweto A O, Ogedengbe K. Assessment of soil quality under different agricultural land use systems: a case study of the Ibadan farm settlement. International Journal of Plant and Soil Science, 2020, 32(4): 89–104
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Mesfin D, Assefa E, Simane B. Soil quality index under different land-use types : the case of Choke Mountain agroecosystems, upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 2023: cjss-2022-0053
[41]
Chakraborty K, Mistri B. Soil fertility and its’ impact on agricultural productivity: a study in Sapar Mouza, Burdwan-I C.D. Block, West Bengal. International Journal of Humanities & Social Science Studies, 2015, 2(3): 196–206

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the farmers who agreed to let us sample their soil and the East Gojjam Zone Agricultural Development office staff for their assistance. The help of national soil testing center with soil testing is also acknowledged.

Compliance with ethics guidelines

Demeku Mesfin, Engdawork Assefa, and Belay Simane declare that they have no conflicts of interest or financial conflicts to disclose. This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any authors.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s) 2023. Published by Higher Education Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1576 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/