MICROBIAL NECROMASS WITHIN AGGREGATES STABILIZES PHYSICALLY-PROTECTED C RESPONSE TO CROPLAND MANAGEMENT

Ranran ZHOU, Jing TIAN, Zhengling CUI, Fusuo ZHANG

PDF(7063 KB)
PDF(7063 KB)
Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. ›› 2023, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (2) : 198-209. DOI: 10.15302/J-FASE-2023498
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

MICROBIAL NECROMASS WITHIN AGGREGATES STABILIZES PHYSICALLY-PROTECTED C RESPONSE TO CROPLAND MANAGEMENT

Author information +
History +

Highlights

● The contribution of fungal necromass C to SOC increased with aggregate sizes.

● Bacterial necromass had a higher proportion to SOC in silt and clay.

● Cropland management increased microbial necromass in macro- and microaggregates.

● Greater fungal necromass increases were found in macroaggregates under manure input and no or reduced tillage.

● Cover crops increased bacterial necromass in small macroaggregates.

Abstract

The interactions of soil microorganisms and structure regulate the degradation and stabilization processes of soil organic carbon (SOC). Microbial necromass is a persistent component of SOC, and its magnitude of accumulation dependent on management and aggregate sizes. A meta-analysis of 121 paired measurements was conducted to evaluate the management effects on contributions of microbial necromass to SOC depending on aggregate fractions. Results showed that the contribution of fungal necromass to SOC increased with aggregate sizes, while bacterial necromass had a higher proportion in silt and clay. Cropland management increased total and fungal necromass in large macroaggregates (47.1% and 45.6%), small macroaggregates (44.0% and 44.2%), and microaggregates (38.9% and 37.6%). Cropland management increased bacterial necromass independent of aggregate fraction sizes. Greater fungal necromass was increased in macroaggregates in response to manure (26.6% to 28.5%) and no or reduced tillage (68.0% to 73.5%). Cover crops increased bacterial necromass by 25.1% in small macroaggregates. Stimulation of microbial necromass was proportional to the increases of SOC within soil aggregates, and the correlation was higher in macroaggregates. Increasing microbial necromass accumulation in macroaggregates can, therefore, be considered as a central component of management strategies that aim to accelerate C sequestration in agricultural soils.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

cropland management / microbial necromass / soil aggregates / soil carbon sequestration / soil organic matter

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ranran ZHOU, Jing TIAN, Zhengling CUI, Fusuo ZHANG. MICROBIAL NECROMASS WITHIN AGGREGATES STABILIZES PHYSICALLY-PROTECTED C RESPONSE TO CROPLAND MANAGEMENT. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng., 2023, 10(2): 198‒209 https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2023498

References

[1]
Lehmann J, Bossio D A, Kögel-Knabner I, Rillig M C . The concept and future prospects of soil health. Nature Reviews. Earth & Environment, 2020, 1(10): 544–553
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[2]
Hoffland E, Kuyper T W, Comans R N J, Creamer R E. Eco-functionality of organic matter in soils. Plant and Soil, 2020, 455(1−2): 1−22
[3]
Eswaran H, Vandenberg E, Reich P . Organic-carbon in soils of the world. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1993, 57(1): 192–194
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Lal R. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma, 2004, 123(1−2): 1−22
[5]
Lessmann M, Ros G H, Young M D, de Vries W . Global variation in soil carbon sequestration potential through improved cropland management. Global Change Biology, 2022, 28(3): 1162–1177
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[6]
Six J, Callewaert P, Lenders S, De Gryze S, Morris S J, Gregorich E G, Paul E A, Paustian K . Measuring and understanding carbon storage in afforested soils by physical fractionation. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2002, 66(6): 1981–1987
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Schutter M E, Dick R P . Microbial community profiles and activities among aggregates of winter fallow and cover-cropped soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2002, 66(1): 142–153
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Rillig M C, Muller L A, Lehmann A . Soil aggregates as massively concurrent evolutionary incubators. ISME Journal, 2017, 11(9): 1943–1948
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[9]
Buckeridge K M, Creamer C, Whitaker J . Deconstructing the microbial necromass continuum to inform soil carbon sequestration. Functional Ecology, 2022, 36(6): 1396–1410
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Ding X L, Liang C, Zhang B, Yuan Y R, Han X Z . Higher rates of manure application lead to greater accumulation of both fungal and bacterial residues in macroaggregates of a clay soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2015, 84: 137–146
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Liang C, Schimel J P, Jastrow J D . The importance of anabolism in microbial control over soil carbon storage. Nature Microbiology, 2017, 2(8): 17105
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[12]
Angst G, Mueller K E, Nierop K G J, Simpson M J . Plant- or microbial-derived? A review on the molecular composition of stabilized soil organic matter.. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2021, 156: 108189
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Lu X, Hou E, Guo J, Gilliam F S, Li J, Tang S, Kuang Y . Nitrogen addition stimulates soil aggregation and enhances carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems of China: a meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 2021, 27(12): 2780–2792
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[14]
Huang R, Lan M, Liu J, Gao M . Soil aggregate and organic carbon distribution at dry land soil and paddy soil: the role of different straws returning. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2017, 24(36): 27942–27952
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[15]
Zheng H, Liu W, Zheng J, Luo Y, Li R, Wang H, Qi H . Effect of long-term tillage on soil aggregates and aggregate-associated carbon in black soil of Northeast China. PLoS One, 2018, 13(6): e0199523
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[16]
Topps D, Khabir M I U, Abdelmagid H, Jackson T, Iqbal J, Robertson B K, Pervaiz Z H, Saleem M . Impact of cover crop monocultures and mixtures on organic carbon contents of soil aggregates. Soil Systems, 2021, 5(3): 43
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Simpson R T, Frey S D, Six J, Thiet R K . Preferential accumulation of microbial carbon in aggregate structures of no-tillage soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2004, 68(4): 1249–1255
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Li L D, Wilson C B, He H B, Zhang X D, Zhou F, Schaeffer S M . Physical, biochemical, and microbial controls on amino sugar accumulation in soils under long-term cover cropping and no-tillage farming. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2019, 135: 369–378
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Tian J, Zong N, Hartley I P, He N, Zhang J, Powlson D, Zhou J, Kuzyakov Y, Zhang F, Yu G, Dungait J A J . Microbial metabolic response to winter warming stabilizes soil carbon. Global Change Biology, 2021, 27(10): 2011–2028
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[20]
Joergensen R G . Amino sugars as specific indices for fungal and bacterial residues in soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2018, 54(5): 559–568
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Chen X B, Xia Y H, Rui Y C, Ning Z, Hu Y J, Tang H M, He H B, Li H X, Kuzyakov Y, Ge T D, Wu J S, Su Y R . Microbial carbon use efficiency, biomass turnover, and necromass accumulation in paddy soil depending on fertilization. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2020, 292: 106816
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Luo Y, Xiao M L, Yuan H Z, Liang C, Zhu Z K, Xu J M, Kuzyakov Y, Wu J S, Ge T D, Tang C X . Rice rhizodeposition promotes the build-up of organic carbon in soil via fungal necromass. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2021, 160: 108345
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Hu Y T, Zheng Q, Noll L, Zhang S S, Wanek W . Direct measurement of the in situ decomposition of microbial-derived soil organic matter. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2020, 141: 107660
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Du Y D, Cui B J, Zhang Q, Wang Z, Sun J, Niu W Q . Effects of manure fertilizer on crop yield and soil properties in China: a meta-analysis. Catena, 2020, 193: 104617
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Liang C, Amelung W, Lehmann J, Kästner M . Quantitative assessment of microbial necromass contribution to soil organic matter. Global Change Biology, 2019, 25(11): 3578–3590
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[26]
Hedges L V, Gurevitch J, Curtis P S . The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology, 1999, 80(4): 1150–1156
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C . Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ (Clinical Research Edition), 1997, 315(7109): 629–634
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[28]
Rosenberg M S . The file-drawer problem revisited: a general weighted method for calculating fail-safe numbers in meta-analysis. Evolution, 2005, 59(2): 464–468
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[29]
Chantigny M H, Angers D A, Prévost D, Vézina L P, Chalifour F P . Soil aggregation and fungal and bacterial biomass under annual and perennial cropping systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1997, 61(1): 262–267
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Six J, Frey S D, Thiet R K, Batten K M . Bacterial and fungal contributions to carbon sequestration in agroecosystems. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2006, 70(2): 555–569
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Throckmorton H M, Bird J A, Dane L, Firestone M K, Horwath W R . The source of microbial C has little impact on soil organic matter stabilisation in forest ecosystems. Ecology Letters, 2012, 15(11): 1257–1265
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[32]
Wei H, Guenet B, Vicca S, Nunan N, Asard H, Abdelgawad H, Shen W, Janssens I A . High clay content accelerates the decomposition of fresh organic matter in artificial soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2014, 77: 100–108
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Totsche K U, Amelung W, Gerzabek M H, Guggenberger G, Klumpp E, Knief C, Lehndorff E, Mikutta R, Peth S, Prechtel A, Ray N, Kögel-Knabner I . Microaggregates in soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2018, 181(1): 104–136
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Six J, Elliott E T, Paustian K . Soil macroaggregate turnover and microaggregate formation: a mechanism for C sequestration under no-tillage agriculture. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2000, 32(14): 2099–2103
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Samson M E, Chantigny M H, Vanasse A, Menasseri-Aubry S, Royer I, Angers D A . Management practices differently affect particulate and mineral-associated organic matter and their precursors in arable soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2020, 148: 107867
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Ye G P, Lin Y X, Kuzyakov Y, Liu D Y, Luo J F, Lindsey S, Wang W J, Fan J B, Ding W X . Manure over crop residues increases soil organic matter but decreases microbial necromass relative contribution in upland Ultisols: results of a 27-year field experiment. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2019, 134: 15–24
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Zhou R, Liu Y, Dungait J A J, Kumar A, Wang J, Tiemann L K, Zhang F, Kuzyakov Y, Tian J . Microbial necromass in cropland soils: a global meta-analysis of management effects. Global Change Biology, 2023, 29(7): 1998–2014
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[38]
Griepentrog M, Bodé S, Boeckx P, Hagedorn F, Heim A, Schmidt M W I . Nitrogen deposition promotes the production of new fungal residues but retards the decomposition of old residues in forest soil fractions. Global Change Biology, 2014, 20(1): 327–340
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[39]
Hannula S E, Morriën E . Will fungi solve the carbon dilemma. Geoderma, 2022, 413: 115767
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Yang Y, Xie H, Mao Z, Bao X, He H, Zhang X, Liang C . Fungi determine increased soil organic carbon more than bacteria through their necromass inputs in conservation tillage croplands. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2022, 167: 108587
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Tisdall J M, Oades J M . Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils. Journal of Soil Science, 1982, 33(2): 141–163
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Clayton J, Lemanski K, Bonkowski M . Shifts in soil microbial stoichiometry and metabolic quotient provide evidence for a critical tipping point at 1% soil organic carbon in an agricultural post-mining chronosequence. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2021, 57(3): 435–446
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Wan X, Xiao L, Vadeboncoeur M A, Johnson C E, Huang Z . Response of mineral soil carbon storage to harvest residue retention depends on soil texture: a meta-analysis. Forest Ecology and Management, 2018, 408: 9–15
CrossRef Google scholar

Supplementary materials

The online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2023498 contains supplementary material (Table S1)

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32071629), Agricultural Carbon Neutral Account Establishment Program in Quzhou (202127), the National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFD1901300), and the 2115 Talent Development Program of China Agricultural University.

Compliance with ethics guidelines

Ranran Zhou, Jing Tian, Zhengling Cui, and Fusuo Zhang declare that they have no conflict of interest or financial conflicts to disclose. This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s) 2023. Published by Higher Education Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(7063 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/