LARGE-SCALE FARMING BENEFITS SOIL ACIDIFICATION ALLEVIATION THROUGH IMPROVED FIELD MANAGEMENT IN BANANA PLANTATIONS

Donghao XU, Jiangzhou ZHANG, Yajuan LI, Shiyang LI, Siyang REN, Yuan FENG, Qichao ZHU, Fusuo ZHANG

PDF(2565 KB)
PDF(2565 KB)
Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. ›› 2023, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1) : 48-60. DOI: 10.15302/J-FASE-2022475
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

LARGE-SCALE FARMING BENEFITS SOIL ACIDIFICATION ALLEVIATION THROUGH IMPROVED FIELD MANAGEMENT IN BANANA PLANTATIONS

Author information +
History +

Highlights

● Large farms had the highest average yield and the least yield variation.

● Greater plant density and optimized nutrient input occurred on large farms.

● Substituting organic N for mineral fertilizers prevented soil acidification.

● Large-scale farming had lower soil acidification but higher risk of P losses.

● Large-scale farming benefits sustainable soil management and banana production.

Abstract

Large-scale farming by agricultural land transfers has been increasingly promoted in recent years, but the possible impacts on crop production, especially cash crops, and soil acidification remain unclear. This study obtained data for 110 banana plantations in Long’an County, China, and categorized them into small (< 0.67 ha), medium (0.67−6.7 ha), and large (> 6.7 ha) to determine banana cultivation, nutrient management, and soil acidification rates on farms of the three sizes. Banana yield per unit area significantly increased with increased farm size, and large farms had the highest average yield (48.9 t·ha−1) with the least variation. Despite a significant increase in organic fertilizer and base cation inputs, nitrogen (N) surplus did not differ significantly with increasing farm size. With large farms, actual soil acidification rate was significantly lower by 19.1 to 24.0 keq·ha−1·yr−1; however, potential soil acidification rate increased with increased overuse of phosphorus. Overall, larger banana plantations used fewer mineral N fertilizers reducing the rate of soil acidification and increasing the H+ buffering provided by organic fertilizers. It is concluded that larger farms deliver the dual benefits of higher, less variable banana yield and mitigation of soil acidification by substituting organic N for mineral N fertilizers, supporting sustainable soil management and food production.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

plantations / land transfer / large-scale farming / nutrient management / soil acidification

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Donghao XU, Jiangzhou ZHANG, Yajuan LI, Shiyang LI, Siyang REN, Yuan FENG, Qichao ZHU, Fusuo ZHANG. LARGE-SCALE FARMING BENEFITS SOIL ACIDIFICATION ALLEVIATION THROUGH IMPROVED FIELD MANAGEMENT IN BANANA PLANTATIONS. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng., 2023, 10(1): 48‒60 https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2022475

References

[1]
Liang X, He J, Zhang F, Shen Q, Wu J, Young I M, O'Donnell A G, Wang L, Wang E, Hill J, Chen D. Healthy soils for sustainable food production and environmental quality. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2020, 7(3): 347–355
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Wall D H, Six J. Give soils their due. Science, 2015, 347(6223): 695
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[3]
Guo J, Liu X, Zhang Y, Shen J, Han W, Zhang W, Christie P, Goulding K W P, Vitousek P M, Zhang F. Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands. Science, 2010, 327(5968): 1008–1010
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[4]
Zhang Q, Chu Y, Xue Y, Ying H, Chen X, Zhao Y, Ma W, Ma L, Zhang J, Yin Y, Cui Z. Outlook of China’s agriculture transforming from smallholder operation to sustainable production. Global Food Security, 2020, 26: 100444
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Zhu Q, Liu X, Hao T, Zeng M, Shen J, Zhang F, de Vries W. Cropland acidification increases risk of yield losses and food insecurity in China. Environmental Pollution, 2020, 256: 113145
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[6]
Yan P, Wu L, Wang D, Fu J, Shen C, Li X, Zhang L, Zhang L, Fan L, Wenyan H. Soil acidification in Chinese tea plantations. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 715: 136963
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[7]
Lambers H, Wright I J, Guilherme Pereira C, Bellingham P J, Bentley L P, Boonman A, Cernusak L A, Foulds W, Gleason S M, Gray E F, Hayes P E, Kooyman R M, Malhi Y, Richardson S J, Shane M W, Staudinger C, Stock W D, Swarts N D, Turner B L, Turner J, Veneklaas E J, Wasaki J, Westoby M, Xu Y. Leaf manganese concentrations as a tool to assess belowground plant functioning in phosphorus-impoverished environments. Plant and Soil, 2020, 461(1–2): 43–61
[8]
Bojórquez-Quintal E, Escalante-Magaña C, Echevarría-Machado I, Martínez-Estévez M. Aluminum, a friend or foe of higher plants in acid soils. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017, 8: 1767
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[9]
Goulding K W T. Soil acidification and the importance of liming agricultural soils with particular reference to the United Kingdom. Soil Use and Management, 2016, 32(3): 390–399
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[10]
Zhu H, Chen C, Xu C, Zhu Q, Huang D. Effects of soil acidification and liming on the phytoavailability of cadmium in paddy soils of central subtropical China. Environmental Pollution, 2016, 219: 99–106
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[11]
Zhao F. Strategies to manage the risk of heavy metal(loid) contamination in agricultural soils. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2020, 7(3): 333–338
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Zeng M, de Vries W, Bonten L T C, Zhu Q, Hao T, Liu X, Xu M, Shi X, Zhang F, Shen J. Model-based analysis of the long-term effects of fertilization management on cropland soil acidification. Environmental Science & Technology, 2017, 51(7): 3843–3851
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[13]
Hao T, Zhu Q, Zeng M, Shen J, Shi X, Liu X, Zhang F, de Vries W. Impacts of nitrogen fertilizer type and application rate on soil acidification rate under a wheat-maize double cropping system. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, 270: 110888
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[14]
Debonne N, van Vliet J, Ramkat R, Snelder D, Verburg P. Farm scale as a driver of agricultural development in the Kenyan Rift Valley. Agricultural Systems, 2021, 186: 102943
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Noack F, Larsen A. The contrasting effects of farm size on farm incomes and food production. Environmental Research Letters, 2019, 14(8): 084024
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Ren C, Liu S, van Grinsven H, Reis S, Jin S, Liu H, Gu B. The impact of farm size on agricultural sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 220: 357–367
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Wu Y, Xi X, Tang X, Luo D, Gu B, Lam S K, Vitousek P M, Chen D. Policy distortions, farm size, and the overuse of agricultural chemicals in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018, 115(27): 7010–7015
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[18]
Wang S, Bai X, Zhang X, Reis S, Chen D, Xu J, Gu B. Urbanization can benefit agricultural production with large-scale farming in China. Nature Food, 2021, 2(3): 183–191
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Huang J, Hu R, Yi H, Sheng Y, Wang J, Bao M, Liu X. Development visions and policies of China’s agriculture by 2050. Strategic Study of Chinese Academy of Engineering, 2022, 24(1): 11−19 (in Chinese)
[20]
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Banana facts and figures. Available at FAO website on October 4, 2022
[21]
Textor C. Banana production volume in China from 2011 to 2021. Available at statista website on October 4, 2022
[22]
Zhang J, Li B, Zhang J, Christie P, Li X. Organic fertilizer application and Mg fertilizer promote banana yield and quality in an Udic Ferralsol. PLoS One, 2020, 15(3): e0230593
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[23]
Zhang J, Liu Y, Gao W, Wang B, Ruan Y. Integrated analysis of soil fertility status in the banana orchards in China. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2022, 43(7): 1401−1410 (in Chinese)
[24]
Von Uexküll H R, Mutert E. Global extent, development and economic impact of acid soils. Plant and Soil, 1995, 171(1): 1–15
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Chen D, Lan Z, Bai X, Grace J B, Bai Y. Evidence that acidification-induced declines in plant diversity and productivity are mediated by changes in below-ground communities and soil properties in a semi-arid steppe. Journal of Ecology, 2013, 101(5): 1322–1334
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Fan X, Li J. Effectiveness of alkaline fertilizer on the control of banana Fusarium wilt and regulation of soil acidity in banana orchard. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2014, 20(04): 938−946 (in Chinese)
[27]
Khadivi-Khub A. Physiological and genetic factors influencing fruit cracking. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2015, 37(1): 1718
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Zhu Q, de Vries W, Liu X, Hao T, Zeng M, Shen J, Zhang F. Enhanced acidification in Chinese croplands as derived from element budgets in the period 1980−2010. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 618: 1497–1505
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[29]
Wen Y, Li W, Yang Z, Zhuo X, Guan D X, Song Y, Guo C, Ji J. Evaluation of various approaches to predict cadmium bioavailability to rice grown in soils with high geochemical background in the karst region, Southwestern China. Environmental Pollution, 2020, 258: 113645
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[30]
Gao J, Gai Q, Liu B, Shi Q. Farm size and pesticide use: evidence from agricultural production in China. China Agricultural Economic Review, 2021, 13(4): 912–929
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Zhu Y, Waqas M A, Li Y, Zou X, Jiang D, Wilkes A, Qin X, Gao Q, Wan Y, Hasbagan G. Large-scale farming operations are win-win for grain production, soil carbon storage and mitigation of greenhouse gases. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 172: 2143–2152
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Guangxi Nanning Municipal Bureau of Statistics. Nanning Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2018 (in Chinese)
[33]
Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Statistics Bureau (GBS). The rise of Long’an: an analysis of Long’an County’s economic development since the Tenth Five-year Plan. Available at GBS website on October 4, 2022
[34]
National Agricultural Technical Extension and Service Center of the People’s Republic of China. Organic fertilizer resources in China. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1999 (in Chinese)
[35]
Li B. Investigation of nutrient management technology and its application in drip irrigated banana plantation—Case study in Guangxi Jinsui Agricultural Group Co. Ltd. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2015 (in Chinese)
[36]
Liu L, Zhang X, Wang S, Zhang W, Lu X. Bulk sulfur (S) deposition in China. Atmospheric Environment, 2016, 135: 41–49
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Du E, de Vries W, Han W, Liu X, Yan Z, Jiang Y. Imbalanced phosphorus and nitrogen deposition in China’s forests. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2016, 16(13): 8571–8579
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Ma M, Nong Z. The nutrient element content of irrigation water in suburban counties of Liuzhou. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 1992, 11(2): 14−17 (in Chinese)
[39]
Moreira A, Fageria N K. Yield, uptake, and retranslocation of nutrients in banana plants cultivated in upland soil of central Amazonian. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2009, 32(3): 443–457
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Turner D W, Lahav E. Temperature influences nutrient absorption and uptake rates of bananas grown in controlled environments. Scientia Horticulturae, 1985, 26(4): 311–322
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Gu B, Ju X, Chang J, Ge Y, Vitousek P M. Integrated reactive nitrogen budgets and future trends in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, 112(28): 8792–8797
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[42]
Zhang W, Tang X, Feng X, Wang E, Li H, Shen J, Zhang F. Management strategies to optimize soil phosphorus utilization and alleviate environmental risk in China. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2019, 48(5): 1167–1175
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[43]
De Vries W, Breeuwsma A. The relation between soil acidification and element cycling. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 1987, 35(3−4): 293−310
[44]
Duan L. Study on mapping critical loads of acid deposition in China. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2000 (in Chinese)
[45]
Chen X, Cui Z, Vitousek P M, Cassman K G, Matson P A, Bai J, Meng Q, Hou P, Yue S, Römheld V, Zhang F. Integrated soil-crop system management for food security. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011, 108(16): 6399–6404
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[46]
Yu J, Wu J. The sustainability of agricultural development in China: the agriculture-environment nexus. Sustainability, 2018, 10(6): 1776
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Chen X. Resource and environmental costs of cropping structure change in China. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2018 (in Chinese)
[48]
Zhou H, Xu M, Cai Z, Wen S, Wu H. Quantitative analysis of driving-factors of soil acidification in Qiyang County, Hunan Province. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(8): 1400−1412 (in Chinese)
[49]
Chen X, Yu W, Cai Y, Zhang S, Muneer M A, Zhu Q, Xu D, Ma C, Yan X, Li Y, Huang S, Wu L, Zhou S, Zhang F. How to identify and adopt cleaner strategies to improve the continuous acidification in orchard soils?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 330: 129826
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Armour J D, Nelson P N, Daniells J W, Rasiah V, Inman-Bamber N G. Nitrogen leaching from the root zone of sugarcane and bananas in the humid tropics of Australia. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2013, 180: 68–78
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Muñoz-Carpena R, Ritter A, Socorro A R, Pérez N. Nitrogen evolution and fate in a Canary Islands (Spain) sprinkler fertigated banana plot. Agricultural Water Management, 2002, 52(2): 93–117
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
Xu R, Zhao A, Yuan J, Jiang J. pH buffering capacity of acid soils from tropical and subtropical regions of China as influenced by incorporation of crop straw biochars. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2012, 12(4): 494–502
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
Zhang T, Hou Y, Meng T, Ma Y, Tan M, Zhang F, Oenema O. Replacing synthetic fertilizer by manure requires adjusted technology and incentives: a farm survey across China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2021, 168: 105301
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Jin S, Zhang B, Wu B, Han D, Hu Y, Ren C, Zhang C, Wei X, Wu Y, Mol A P J, Reis S, Gu B, Chen J. Decoupling livestock and crop production at the household level in China. Nature Sustainability, 2021, 4(1): 48–55
CrossRef Google scholar
[55]
Strokal M, Janssen A B G, Chen X, Kroeze C, Li F, Ma L, Yu H, Zhang F, Wang M. Green agriculture and blue water in China: reintegrating crop and livestock production for clean water. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2021, 8(1): 72–80
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Ju X, Gu B, Wu Y, Galloway J N. Reducing China’s fertilizer use by increasing farm size. Global Environmental Change, 2016, 41: 26–32
CrossRef Google scholar
[57]
Zhang W, Cao G, Li X, Zhang H, Wang C, Liu Q, Chen X, Cui Z, Shen J, Jiang R, Mi G, Miao Y, Zhang F, Dou Z. Closing yield gaps in China by empowering smallholder farmers. Nature, 2016, 537(7622): 671–674
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[58]
Chen X, Ma L, Ma W, Wu Z, Cui Z, Hou Y, Zhang F. What has caused the use of fertilizers to skyrocket in China?. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2018, 110(2): 241–255
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Cai Z, Wang B, Xu M, Zhang H, He X, Zhang L, Gao S. Intensified soil acidification from chemical N fertilization and prevention by manure in an 18-year field experiment in the red soil of southern China. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2015, 15(2): 260–270
CrossRef Google scholar
[60]
Zhang X, Fang Q, Zhang T, Ma W, Velthof G L, Hou Y, Oenema O, Zhang F. Benefits and trade-offs of replacing synthetic fertilizers by animal manures in crop production in China: a meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 2020, 26(2): 888–900
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[61]
Liu X, Bi Q, Qiu L, Li K, Yang X, Lin X. Increased risk of phosphorus and metal leaching from paddy soils after excessive manure application: Insights from a mesocosm study. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 666: 778–785
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar

Supplementary materials

The online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2022475 contains supplementary materials (Fig. S1; Table S1).

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by Major Science and Technology Project of Yunnan Province (202102AE090053-2), National Natural Science Youth Foundation of China (41907142) and Natural Science Foundation of Hainan Province (422MS095). We thank our colleagues Xiaodong Chen and Yuqian Suo for their efforts on the farm survey. We thank Guangxi Jinsui Ecological Technology Group Co., Ltd. for the support in data collection.

Compliance with ethics guidelines

Donghao Xu, Jiangzhou Zhang, Yajuan Li, Shiyang Li, Siyang Ren, Yuan Feng, Qichao Zhu, and Fusuo Zhang declare that they have no conflicts of interest or financial conflicts to disclose. All applicable institutional and national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s) 2022. Published by Higher Education Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(2565 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/