LARGE-SCALE FARMING BENEFITS SOIL ACIDIFICATION ALLEVIATION THROUGH IMPROVED FIELD MANAGEMENT IN BANANA PLANTATIONS

Highlights

● Large farms had the highest average yield and the least yield variation.

● Greater plant density and optimized nutrient input occurred on large farms.

● Substituting organic N for mineral fertilizers prevented soil acidification.

● Large-scale farming had lower soil acidification but higher risk of P losses.

● Large-scale farming benefits sustainable soil management and banana production.

Abstract

Large-scale farming by agricultural land transfers has been increasingly promoted in recent years, but the possible impacts on crop production, especially cash crops, and soil acidification remain unclear. This study obtained data for 110 banana plantations in Long’an County, China, and categorized them into small (< 0.67 ha), medium (0.67−6.7 ha), and large (> 6.7 ha) to determine banana cultivation, nutrient management, and soil acidification rates on farms of the three sizes. Banana yield per unit area significantly increased with increased farm size, and large farms had the highest average yield (48.9 t·ha⁻¹) with the least variation. Despite a significant increase in organic fertilizer and base cation inputs, nitrogen (N) surplus did not differ significantly with increasing farm size. With large farms, actual soil acidification rate was significantly lower by 19.1 to 24.0 keq·ha⁻¹·yr⁻¹; however, potential soil acidification rate increased with increased overuse of phosphorus. Overall, larger banana plantations used fewer mineral N fertilizers reducing the rate of soil acidification and increasing the H⁺ buffering provided by organic fertilizers. It is concluded that larger farms deliver the dual benefits of higher, less variable banana yield and mitigation of soil acidification by substituting organic N for mineral N fertilizers, supporting sustainable soil management and food production.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

plantations / land transfer / large-scale farming / nutrient management / soil acidification

1 Current situation of food security

1.1 Food is the precondition and foundation for human survival and development

Food security is the precondition for human survival and development, the foundation for national economic and social development, as well as the basic constraint for the existence and development of human society[1]. Under the basic self-sufficient food security policy, increased grain production has become the primary goal that the agricultural management and production departments in China have been aiming to achieve. With the increase in population, the improvement in economic conditions, and the changes in dietary patterns in China, food demand will continue to expand[2]. The constraints of resource and environment, however, restrict the further increase of grain yield. Therefore, it is of significant importance, in both theory and reality, to establish scientific and reasoned approaches so that food production and food consumption match each other by formulating an appropriate food qualitative and quantitative targets based on the human nutritional requirements.

1.2 Food and nutritional requirements

Food contains the nutrients that meet the needs of the human body. Proteins, fat, carbohydrates, water, vitamins and minerals are the six major nutrient groups. Among them, proteins, fat and carbohydrates are the main constituents and energy supplying materials for the activities of living cells, and their requirements are substantial, whereas vitamins and minerals are needed in only ^†

The Author(s) 2015.This article is published with open access at http://engineering.cae.cn

trace amounts. China is rich in resources and is completely able to meet its current and future nutritional requirements.

Fat comes mainly from vegetable oil and animal fat. In terms of nutritional requirements of fat, the people in mainland China need about 28 Mt of fat (Tab.1). Edible fat and oil consumption in China has increased from 13.5 Mt[5] in 2000 to 30.4 Mt in 2013, which shows the trend in China and a shift from an inadequate intake of oil and fat to a state of excessive consumption. In the past decade or so, the large imports of oil and oil plants have seriously inhibited domestic edible oil production using squeezing/extracting techniques[6]. In 2013, China’s vegetable oil production was about 14 Mt, while the production of edible oilseeds reached up to 58 Mt[7], which was equivalent to about 19 Mt of vegetable oil (Tab.2). In addition, the availability of animal fat was about 8.7 Mt in 2000 (supplies of pork, beef and mutton were 47 Mt, and eggs were 21 Mt[8], when the amount of soybean meal made from imported soybeans and used to feed livestock was less than 7 Mt). After taking into account a loss rate of 5%, the sum could reach 26.6 Mt, which would be 94.3% of the fat requirements of the population. Thus, from the perspective of dietary patterns and nutritional requirements, the domestic production oil plants can basically meet Chinese edible oil requirement.

Tab.1 The requirements of main nutrients (proteins, fat and carbohydrates)

Age (years old)	Populationa (ten thousand)	Average weight/kg	Protein requirementsb		Fat requirements		Carbohydrate requirements
			Average requirements per person each day /g	Annual total requirements/kt ( × 10)	Average requirements per person each day/g	Annual total requirements /kt ( × 10)	Average requirements per person each day/g	Annual total requirements/kt ( × 10)
0	1378.64	7.85	22.32	11.23	19.84	9.99	111.62	56.17
1	2311.92	9.63	24.45	20.63	21.73	18.34	122.26	103.17
2	2412.51	12.09	31.02	27.31	27.57	24.28	155.10	136.57
3	2352.33	14.38	35.10	30.13	31.20	26.79	175.48	150.67
4	2346.62	16.36	38.52	33.00	34.24	29.33	192.61	164.98
5	2272.03	18.22	41.56	34.47	36.95	30.64	207.82	172.34
6	2283.89	20.2	44.76	37.31	39.78	33.16	223.78	186.55
7-9	4134.49	25.25	52.20	78.77	46.40	70.02	260.98	393.85
10-12	4378.96	36.20	66.33	106.01	58.96	94.23	331.63	530.04
13-15	4914.33	50.34	80.91	145.12	71.92	129.00	404.53	725.61
16-18	6032.12	61.28	85.22	187.63	75.75	166.78	426.09	938.13
19-64	91421.54	62.00	66.41	2215.90	59.03	1969.69	332.03	11079.50
Above 65	11892.72	60.84	57.03	247.56	50.69	220.06	285.16	1237.82
Total	133281.11			3175.08		2822.29		15875.39

Note: a the population data comes from the Sixth National Population Census[3], which only included Mainland China; b proteins provide 10%−15% of the total calories, and the median value of 12.5% was used; fat provides 25% of the total calories, while carbohydrates provide 60%−65%, and the median value of 62.5% was used[4].

Tab.2 Oil and fat consumption in China (2013)

Type	Source	Yield/kt ( × 10)			Consumption/kt ( × 10)
		Fat content	Domestic resource	Import	Population	Livestock and poultry
Vegetable oil	Soybean oil		251	1535	1140	105
	Rapeseed oil		614	153	580	/
	Palm oil		1	598	428	230
	Peanut oil		252	6	246	/
	Sunflower Seed oil		50	75	100	25
	Corn oil		72	148	72	/
	Tea-seed oil		45	/	45	/
	Cottonseed oil		118	/	30	30
	Sesame oil		25	10	20	/
	Total		1428	2525	2661	390
Animal fat	Egg	8.8%	2876	/	254
	Milk	3.4%	3531	20	163
	Fish	2.5%	3160	417	82
	Pork	28%	5493	58	1473
	Beef	10.2%	673	29	61
	Mutton	14.1%	408	26	57
	Total		16141	550	2090

Note: Domestic production includes that made in Mainland China and import means the sum of the oil directly imported to Mainland China and the oil quantity converted from imported oil seeds.

Carbohydrates are the main nutrients that supply energy. They occur extensively in rice, wheat, corn, tuberous crops and bean crops. In 2013, the food production in China included grain production of 601 Mt[9], which contains 400 Mt of carbohydrates, and about 201 Mt[10] of carbohydrates used for human consumption. In terms of the total nutritional requirements, the people in Mainland China needed about 159 Mt of carbohydrates per year, and the domestic grain production can meet this need now and for the next 20 years (Tab.1). The proportion of China’s food consumption to total grain consumption decreased gradually by 51% between 1995 and 2008, reaching 268 Mt in 2008. The growth of grain used for animal feed is the main reason for the increase of grain consumption in China, with the proportion reaching 34% in 2009, and grain for industrial uses accounting for 15%[11]. While the proportion of grain imports in gross production was less than 3%[12]. These data illustrate that China’s supply of carbohydrates can perfectly ensure the nutritional requirements of its population.

Proteins are indispensable for sustaining life, and mainly come from meat, eggs, milk, fish, beans, wheat and corn (Tab.3). Based on the required protein intake, which also provides 12.5%−15% of the total calories, the preliminarily estimate of the protein requirement of the Chinese population is 31.8 to 38.1 Mt in 2013 (Tab.1). In 2013, protein consumption in China was 46.3 Mt (equivalent to the recommended dietary protein, Tab.4) and the current supply of protein was lower than the protein requirement based on a healthy target. Secondly, lysine, methionine, threonine and tryptophan in plant-derived proteins occur in relatively low proportions, which means the supply of these amino acids from plant sources is restricted and must be supplemented by animal-based foods[13]. Currently vegetable protein (2.5 Mt) and animal protein (9.0 Mt) available in China come from imported meat products or are indirectly produced from imported agricultural products, including imported soybeans (63 Mt). The country’s self-sufficiency rate of edible proteins is 73.1% (Tab.5), and the self-sufficiency rate for protein feeds is about 52.6%. Imported agricultural products can have a competitive price advantage over domestic agricultural products. Therefore, from the perspective of nutritional requirements and food quality, the grain security issue is, in essence, dependent on protein production and supply.

Tab.3 Protein source for China (2013)

	Source	Protein content	Total/kt ( × 10)			Population consumption/kt ( × 10)			Livestock consumption/kt ( × 10)
			Domestic	Imported	Food	Protein	Feed	Protein
Vegetable protein	Rice	8.5%	20308	227	16190	1376	1690	144
	Wheat	14.0%	10490	553	8275	1159	1525	214
	Corn	11.0%	20020	327	1360	150	15400	1694
	Potato	2.3%	8893	4	5783	133	1512	35
	Soybean	35.0%	1256	6338	938	328	/	/
	Bean pulp	42.0%	992	5153	/	/	5220	2193
	Rapeseed meal	36.0%	1105	20	/	/	638	230
	Cotton seed meal	44.0%	437	127	/	/	375	165
	Total	/	63601	12749	32546	3146	26360	4675
Animal protein	Egg	13.3%	2020	863	2883	383	/	/
	Milk	3.3%	3531	20	3538	117	/	/
	Fish	18.5%	3160	417	3277	606	/	/
	Pork	13.2%	2498	3053	5262	695	/	/
	Beef	20.0%	673	29	659	132	/	/
	Mutton	19.0%	408	26	406	77	/	/
		/	13603	3545	16025	2010	/	/

Note: Protein contents are mean values for all kinds of food.

Tab.4 Edible dietary protein for Chinese (2013)

	Type	Consumable Protein/kt ( × 10)	Loss rate	Dietary protein for population/kt ( × 10)		Type	Consumable Protein/kt ( × 10)	Loss rate	Dietary protein for population/kt ( × 10)
Vegetable protein	Rice	1376	20%	1101	Animal protein	Egg	383	12.5%	335
	Wheat	1159	20%	927		Milk	117	5%	111
	Corn	150	20%	120		Fish	606	15%	515
	Potato	133	20%	106		Pork	695	12%	612
	Soybean	328	20%	262		Beef	132	12%	116
						Mutton	77	12%	68
	Total			2516		Total	2010		1757
Recommended dietary protein /kt ( × 10)		4273

Note: The value of loss rate were adopted according to mean estimated value.

Tab.5 Supply and requirement of protein in Chinaa

Type	Amount/kt ( × 10)	Requirementb/kt ( × 10)				Supply rate/%
		2013*	2013#	2030*	2030#	2013*	2030#
Consumption	4273	3175	3810	3617	4340	134.6	98.5
Domestic resource	3122					98.3	71.9
Imported resource	1151					36.3	26.5
Potential by techniques	927					29.2	21.4
Predictionc	4049					127.5	93.3
Max domestic potentiald	4850					152.8	111.8

Note: a the population data comes from the Sixth National Population Census, which included only Mainland China[3]; b the population is estimated to be 1.515 billion in 2030; c the predicted supply was calculated based on the sum of domestic and potential yield in 2013 from processing and preserving techniques; d the value is estimated based on land and sea resources of Mainland China in 2025 assuming that food and agricultural products from oversea cannot be imported. * assuming that proteins provide 12.5% of the total calories; # assuming that proteins provide 15% of the total calories.

2 Problems concerning China’s food security and protein security

People are the foundation of a nationality, food is the basic requirement of the people. China’s total grain production has been increasing for ten consecutive years, which lays a solid foundation for ensuring the national grain security and stabilizing the economic development. However, considering the large population and relatively scarce agricultural land in China, the total agricultural resources are insufficient and the per capita resources are far below the world average. Grain security remains a critically important global strategic issue for the future, which has a bearing on national economic development, social stability and national security in China.

2.1 China faces great pressure in guaranteeing the continuously adequate grain supply

Over the last decade, China’s grain production has been increasing annually, with the total grain production reaching 602 Mt in 2013[9], which was the highest level of production recorded. Concurrently, the yield of grain crop per unit showed logarithmic growth; the yield of the grain per unit continues to increase and variation in yields decreased gradually. This indicates that to achieve an increase in grain yield per unit area will become increasingly difficult[14]. It can thus be seen that China faces great pressure to enhance grain production. The three main factors that restrict the increase of grain production are as follows.

2.1.1 High rate of loss of cultivated land resources

Cultivated land is the basis of food production as it produces grain directly and provides various meat and milk products indirectly via the feed use pathway. First, the quality of cultivated land is being seriously degraded and this degradation poses a clear threat to the stability of grain production. Overuse of land and man-made emissions of waste gas, waste water and other wastes destroy the nutritive materials in the soil, resulting in the degradation of farmland. Currently, degraded farmland accounts for over 40% of the total cultivated area in the country[15]. Secondly, the quantity of farmland is reduced. As the economy is developing and the ratio of urbanization is increasing, a large amount of agricultural land is transformed into urban land and farmland per capita declines. Mu et al. pointed out that the farmland per capita in China declined from 0.10605 hm² in 1996 to 0.10138 hm² in 2009[16]. In the investigation conducted by Liu Jinghui, it was found that medium and high-production farmland contributed more than 80% of grains[17]. Therefore, the present low population-carrying capacity of farmland in China is a serious problem, which limits the development of China's agriculture as well as the increase of protein production.

2.1.2 Water resources are in short supply and unevenly distributed

China is a country with relatively scarce water resources which, on a per capita basis, are only equivalent to 28% of the world average. Also, national water resources are unevenly distributed, with water and soil resources being severely misaligned. Northern farmland area takes up 60% of the national farmland area while water resources only account for 20% of the national total[18]. Finally, with the increase in domestic and industrial sewage, available water resources for irrigation further decline. Wang et al. found serious problems contributing to agricultural water shortage and pollution which would restrict the development of agriculture[19]. Thus, water resources have a serious influence on the stability of grain production, further influencing protein security in China.

2.1.3 High dependence on imported protein

Over recent years, feed resource shortage has become a limiting factor for China’s feed and breeding industries, and the dependence on imported protein feed resources country increases annually. Soybean and fish meal are the main proteins in good supply for quality feed, but these are lacing in China and must be imported in large amount. In 2013, domestic production of soybeans was 12.6 Mt and imports were 63.4 Mt, meaning the dependence on imported soybean was 83.9%[20]. During the period from 2004 to 2010, the external dependence of China on fish meal remained above 70%[21]. Thus, protein supply in China showed obvious characteristics of limited domestic production growth, sharp increase of imports, and high foreign dependence.

2.2 Demand for protein in China increases annually

With growth of population, rising incomes, and promotion of urbanization, total demand for food proteins in China increases annually.

Firstly, the population is growing and the economy is developing. China’s population increases on average by 12 million per year and the demand for proteins increases about 0.3 Mt, equivalent to 1.3 Mt of pork. At the same time as growth in population, urbanization directly promotes a change in nutritional and dietary patterns, thus increasing the demand for proteins per capita[22]. Hence, population growth and urbanization are becoming increasingly important factors influencing the demand for proteins in China.

Secondly, the consumption of proteins of high biological value is increasing. With increased food consumption and improved consumption structure, China’s consumption of animal proteins has grown rapidly[23]. In 1990, China consumed meat products, aquatic animal, and milk of 25.3, 12.5, and 4.2 Mt, respectively, and 71.0, 64.9, and 47.9 Mt respectively in 2013. From 2010 to 2012, the average growth rate of feed production reached 8%[24], while the growth rates of grain were only 2.9, 4.5, and 3.2%[25]. The growth rate of feed grain greatly exceeded that of grain production in the same period, which has exerted great pressure on grain production, feed grain supply and food security in China.

2.3 Improvements in storage, transportation, and processing technology for protein production

Currently, there are mainly three aspects affecting China’s protein resource development and utilization. Firstly, losses occur during grain preservation, transportation. Secondly, the contribution of protein processing technologies to both resource and the overall utilization rate are both relatively low. Finally, there is considerable wastage of food resources during utilization.

2.3.1 Serious post-harvest loss of grain

Post-harvest loss of grain is an issue that cannot be ignored and requires an urgent solution. Looking at the domestic and international conditions of food utilization, a large amount of food is not stored or transported appropriately after production. Loss and waste inevitably occur during harvesting, purchase, transport, storage, processing and consumption of food. China’s loss rate at all stages is shown in Fig.1, with the overall loss rate reaching 16%−22%[26]. Considering just the storage, transport and processing, the total amount of grain loss and table waste after production reached 122 Mt (in 2012, China’s total grain production weighed 590 Mt), taking up 21% of the country’s total production in 2012[27].

Fig.1 Loss rates at each stage of food production and consumption

Full size|PPT slide

2.3.2 Low overall utilization rate

At present, the utilization rate of protein resource in mainland China is relatively low. Plenty of by-products that are rich in protein are not fully utilized, either being thrown away or used as fertilizers, which causes a huge wastage of protein resources. For instance, around 10 Mt of rapeseed cake (the byproduct of oil extraction) is produced annually in China, only 42% of which is used as fodder. The annual production of cottonseed meal is around 5 Mt, only 30% of which is used for feed and most of which is used as fertilizer. On the whole, the efficiency of transforming feed into protein is low, thus causing huge wastage of feed protein resource. Taking broiler and pig feed, as examples the efficiency of transforming feed into protein in the United States is respectively 18.8% and 25.0% higher than China[28]. Thus, an effective way to solve the issue of China’s protein security is to achieve high-value, resourcing and ecological utilization of low-valued biological protein by using high-tech means, to eliminate toxins and anti-nutritional factors and to provide a balance of dietary amino acids.

2.3.3 Food contamination wastes precious protein

Ever since China’s economic reform and liberalization, the overuse and improper use of pesticides, veterinary drugs and additives has resulted in excessive residues of toxic and harmful substances in agricultural products. Also there has been a series of food safety incidents, such as poisonous milk powder, illegal cooking oil, tainted steamed buns, water-injected meat and the like. These not only affect the intake of the nutritional components in food, but more importantly, cause severe damage to human health[29]. In 2008, the melamine incident caused over 100 kt of inedible tainted milk powder, which is a good example of protein waste, indicating how food safety events can cause protein loss or weaken its nutritional impact. Such food safety events in China affect protein supply or edible value.

2.4 Out-of-balance dietary structure lowers food’s nutritional value and damages human health

Chinese dietary structure is out-of-balance in the country. The distribution situation of consumed protein is also dramatically different for people in economically developed or developing areas. According to an investigation conducted by He Yuna and the others, in 2002, the ratio of calories originating from fat already reached 35% of the total calories consumed by China’s urban residents, exceeding the 30% upper limit recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). The proportion of calories from protein was around 11.8% of the total calories. Among urban dwellers, energy provided by cereals was 48.5% of the total calories, obviously lower than the recommended range of 55%−65% and the 61.5% for rural residents[30]. These data illustrate that urban residents take in excessive fat, insufficient protein and too little carbohydrate. When taking into consideration the regional differences and income gaps, food protein intake is woefully inadequate in some regions. For dwellers in big cities, 49.4% of the protein comes from the high-quality protein contained in beans and animal food, while in the countryside, the percentage ranges between 17.1% and 28.0%, which seriously influences the health of rural people.

3 Suggestions for ensuring food and protein security

3.1 A small increase in total grain production and progressive adjustment to the proportion of animal and plant protein

Guaranteeing grain security is a strategic problem for a country’s social stability and national self-sufficiency. Total grain production can be increased slowly and steadily through policy guidance, meticulous management, technological contributions, and capital-driven means. According to our forecast, even though the population will increase by 13.7% (up to 1.515 billion), China can supply 100% of the carbohydrate and 95% of the fat. Tang predicts that, by 2030, 1.515 billion people may need 586 Mt[31] of grain, and the estimate is calculated at 650 Mt using the econometric methods.

Multiple methods are needed to increase the quantity of protein supply, such as increasing the yield of feed grain, increasing the proportion of non-grain fodder through science and technology, and improving the efficiency of transforming feed into animal protein. The food security policy in China can be refined as the need for protein security. This viewpoint is more intensive and scientific than Pan's presentation that China’s grain problem is mainly the feed grain problem[32]. Therefore, China should ensure the quantity of animal protein transformed from grain or non-grain fodder is sufficient and improve the conversion efficiency.

3.2 Promoting the application of technologies for protein extraction and processing

Intensifying the development and utilization of existing protein resources is the most effective way to guarantee protein security in China. Efficient use of existing technology and the development of new technology could vastly improve the nutritional characteristics of protein resources and enhance the digestibility and use efficiency of protein, effectively removing the toxic and harmful substances, and realizing the goal of saving resources and improving nutrition, food safety and environmental protection. The application of new and high technology such as shell removal, extrusion and expansion, fermentation, ultrafiltration, and superfine grinding can increase the amount of protein extracted from bean pulp, rapeseed meal, cottonseed meal, and other protein resources with high protein content by over 10.5 Mt. Chen et al. found that the functional indices of corn gluten meal after extrusion can be improved significantly, in addition the color, smell and water solubility of the products can also be improved, protease inhibitor activity inhibited, and digestibility and use efficiency raised[33]. Science and technology has a considerable prospect for maximizing the potential of protein resources, and is one of the most effective ways to relieve China’s protein safety problems.

3.3 Adjustments to dietary patterns and promotion of nutrition security

Grain, nutrition and food security is a great challenge for all parts of the world. In October 2012, the Committee on World Food Security suggested to replace “grain security” with “food and nutrition security,” which reflected the rising awareness of this issue at the international level. Chinese people can adopt more balanced dietary patterns to improve the biological value and nutritive value of protein. Eating two or more kinds of protein sources can provide a balance of essential amino-acids for the human body and thus improve the biological value of protein. For example, when eating either bean curd or wheat gluten separately, the biological values of the two are 65 and 67 respectively. But when eating them with a proportion of 42 to 58, the biological value is increased to 76[34]. Advocating a mixed diet of meat and vegetables in our daily life can adequately supplement the value of protein (or limiting amino acids) and make the amino acids or polypeptides in the food more easily absorbed, thus achieving better nutritional and health outcomes.

3.4 Raising awareness of nutrition and improving consumption habits

China should effectively improve people’s cognitive level of nutritional knowledge, gradually popularize the use of nutrition labeling, and adequately promote understanding of the properties of food through the popularization of science and the power of mass media. Furthermore, China should raise people’s awareness of nutrition, correct bad eating habits, improve the dietary patterns, and enhance the health literacy by intensifying education concerning a scientifically-based diet[35]. In addition, China needs to guide the consumers to consume scientifically and rationally, oppose wasteful behavior and change bad consumption habits[36].

4 Conclusions

From the perspective of nutritional requirements and food quality, the supply of fat and carbohydrates from China’s domestic agricultural production can meet the nutritional requirements of a population up to 1.515 billion. The grain security issue is, in essence, dependent on protein production and supply, especially proteins of high biological value or animal protein. Therefore, the food security policy in China can be refined as an issue of protein security. The potential increase in the amount of protein (9.27 Mt) produced by processing and preserving techniques can replace 80.5% of imported protein. A number of measures should be adopted to raise people's awareness of nutrition and improve their consumption behavior to achieve best practice in use of precious protein resources.

References

[1] Liang X, He J, Zhang F, Shen Q, Wu J, Young I M, O'Donnell A G, Wang L, Wang E, Hill J, Chen D. Healthy soils for sustainable food production and environmental quality. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2020, 7(3): 347–355

[2] Wall D H, Six J. Give soils their due. Science, 2015, 347(6223): 695

[3] Guo J, Liu X, Zhang Y, Shen J, Han W, Zhang W, Christie P, Goulding K W P, Vitousek P M, Zhang F. Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands. Science, 2010, 327(5968): 1008–1010

[4] Zhang Q, Chu Y, Xue Y, Ying H, Chen X, Zhao Y, Ma W, Ma L, Zhang J, Yin Y, Cui Z. Outlook of China’s agriculture transforming from smallholder operation to sustainable production. Global Food Security, 2020, 26: 100444

[5] Zhu Q, Liu X, Hao T, Zeng M, Shen J, Zhang F, de Vries W. Cropland acidification increases risk of yield losses and food insecurity in China. Environmental Pollution, 2020, 256: 113145

[6] Yan P, Wu L, Wang D, Fu J, Shen C, Li X, Zhang L, Zhang L, Fan L, Wenyan H. Soil acidification in Chinese tea plantations. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 715: 136963

[7] Lambers H, Wright I J, Guilherme Pereira C, Bellingham P J, Bentley L P, Boonman A, Cernusak L A, Foulds W, Gleason S M, Gray E F, Hayes P E, Kooyman R M, Malhi Y, Richardson S J, Shane M W, Staudinger C, Stock W D, Swarts N D, Turner B L, Turner J, Veneklaas E J, Wasaki J, Westoby M, Xu Y. Leaf manganese concentrations as a tool to assess belowground plant functioning in phosphorus-impoverished environments. Plant and Soil, 2020, 461(1–2): 43–61

[8] Bojórquez-Quintal E, Escalante-Magaña C, Echevarría-Machado I, Martínez-Estévez M. Aluminum, a friend or foe of higher plants in acid soils. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017, 8: 1767

[9] Goulding K W T. Soil acidification and the importance of liming agricultural soils with particular reference to the United Kingdom. Soil Use and Management, 2016, 32(3): 390–399

[10] Zhu H, Chen C, Xu C, Zhu Q, Huang D. Effects of soil acidification and liming on the phytoavailability of cadmium in paddy soils of central subtropical China. Environmental Pollution, 2016, 219: 99–106

[11] Zhao F. Strategies to manage the risk of heavy metal(loid) contamination in agricultural soils. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2020, 7(3): 333–338

[12] Zeng M, de Vries W, Bonten L T C, Zhu Q, Hao T, Liu X, Xu M, Shi X, Zhang F, Shen J. Model-based analysis of the long-term effects of fertilization management on cropland soil acidification. Environmental Science & Technology, 2017, 51(7): 3843–3851

[13] Hao T, Zhu Q, Zeng M, Shen J, Shi X, Liu X, Zhang F, de Vries W. Impacts of nitrogen fertilizer type and application rate on soil acidification rate under a wheat-maize double cropping system. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, 270: 110888

[14] Debonne N, van Vliet J, Ramkat R, Snelder D, Verburg P. Farm scale as a driver of agricultural development in the Kenyan Rift Valley. Agricultural Systems, 2021, 186: 102943

[15] Noack F, Larsen A. The contrasting effects of farm size on farm incomes and food production. Environmental Research Letters, 2019, 14(8): 084024

[16] Ren C, Liu S, van Grinsven H, Reis S, Jin S, Liu H, Gu B. The impact of farm size on agricultural sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 220: 357–367

[17] Wu Y, Xi X, Tang X, Luo D, Gu B, Lam S K, Vitousek P M, Chen D. Policy distortions, farm size, and the overuse of agricultural chemicals in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018, 115(27): 7010–7015

[18] Wang S, Bai X, Zhang X, Reis S, Chen D, Xu J, Gu B. Urbanization can benefit agricultural production with large-scale farming in China. Nature Food, 2021, 2(3): 183–191

[19] Huang J, Hu R, Yi H, Sheng Y, Wang J, Bao M, Liu X. Development visions and policies of China’s agriculture by 2050. Strategic Study of Chinese Academy of Engineering, 2022, 24(1): 11−19 (in Chinese)

[20] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Banana facts and figures. Available at FAO website on October 4, 2022

[21] Textor C. Banana production volume in China from 2011 to 2021. Available at statista website on October 4, 2022

[22] Zhang J, Li B, Zhang J, Christie P, Li X. Organic fertilizer application and Mg fertilizer promote banana yield and quality in an Udic Ferralsol. PLoS One, 2020, 15(3): e0230593

[23] Zhang J, Liu Y, Gao W, Wang B, Ruan Y. Integrated analysis of soil fertility status in the banana orchards in China. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2022, 43(7): 1401−1410 (in Chinese)

[24] Von Uexküll H R, Mutert E. Global extent, development and economic impact of acid soils. Plant and Soil, 1995, 171(1): 1–15

[25] Chen D, Lan Z, Bai X, Grace J B, Bai Y. Evidence that acidification-induced declines in plant diversity and productivity are mediated by changes in below-ground communities and soil properties in a semi-arid steppe. Journal of Ecology, 2013, 101(5): 1322–1334

[26] Fan X, Li J. Effectiveness of alkaline fertilizer on the control of banana Fusarium wilt and regulation of soil acidity in banana orchard. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2014, 20(04): 938−946 (in Chinese)

[27] Khadivi-Khub A. Physiological and genetic factors influencing fruit cracking. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2015, 37(1): 1718

[28] Zhu Q, de Vries W, Liu X, Hao T, Zeng M, Shen J, Zhang F. Enhanced acidification in Chinese croplands as derived from element budgets in the period 1980−2010. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 618: 1497–1505

[29] Wen Y, Li W, Yang Z, Zhuo X, Guan D X, Song Y, Guo C, Ji J. Evaluation of various approaches to predict cadmium bioavailability to rice grown in soils with high geochemical background in the karst region, Southwestern China. Environmental Pollution, 2020, 258: 113645

[30] Gao J, Gai Q, Liu B, Shi Q. Farm size and pesticide use: evidence from agricultural production in China. China Agricultural Economic Review, 2021, 13(4): 912–929

[31] Zhu Y, Waqas M A, Li Y, Zou X, Jiang D, Wilkes A, Qin X, Gao Q, Wan Y, Hasbagan G. Large-scale farming operations are win-win for grain production, soil carbon storage and mitigation of greenhouse gases. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 172: 2143–2152

[32] Guangxi Nanning Municipal Bureau of Statistics. Nanning Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2018 (in Chinese)

[33] Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Statistics Bureau (GBS). The rise of Long’an: an analysis of Long’an County’s economic development since the Tenth Five-year Plan. Available at GBS website on October 4, 2022

[34] National Agricultural Technical Extension and Service Center of the People’s Republic of China. Organic fertilizer resources in China. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1999 (in Chinese)

[35] Li B. Investigation of nutrient management technology and its application in drip irrigated banana plantation—Case study in Guangxi Jinsui Agricultural Group Co. Ltd. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2015 (in Chinese)

[36] Liu L, Zhang X, Wang S, Zhang W, Lu X. Bulk sulfur (S) deposition in China. Atmospheric Environment, 2016, 135: 41–49

[37] Du E, de Vries W, Han W, Liu X, Yan Z, Jiang Y. Imbalanced phosphorus and nitrogen deposition in China’s forests. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2016, 16(13): 8571–8579

[38] Ma M, Nong Z. The nutrient element content of irrigation water in suburban counties of Liuzhou. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 1992, 11(2): 14−17 (in Chinese)

[39] Moreira A, Fageria N K. Yield, uptake, and retranslocation of nutrients in banana plants cultivated in upland soil of central Amazonian. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2009, 32(3): 443–457

[40] Turner D W, Lahav E. Temperature influences nutrient absorption and uptake rates of bananas grown in controlled environments. Scientia Horticulturae, 1985, 26(4): 311–322

[41] Gu B, Ju X, Chang J, Ge Y, Vitousek P M. Integrated reactive nitrogen budgets and future trends in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, 112(28): 8792–8797

[42] Zhang W, Tang X, Feng X, Wang E, Li H, Shen J, Zhang F. Management strategies to optimize soil phosphorus utilization and alleviate environmental risk in China. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2019, 48(5): 1167–1175

[43] De Vries W, Breeuwsma A. The relation between soil acidification and element cycling. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 1987, 35(3−4): 293−310

[44] Duan L. Study on mapping critical loads of acid deposition in China. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2000 (in Chinese)

[45] Chen X, Cui Z, Vitousek P M, Cassman K G, Matson P A, Bai J, Meng Q, Hou P, Yue S, Römheld V, Zhang F. Integrated soil-crop system management for food security. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011, 108(16): 6399–6404

[46] Yu J, Wu J. The sustainability of agricultural development in China: the agriculture-environment nexus. Sustainability, 2018, 10(6): 1776

[47] Chen X. Resource and environmental costs of cropping structure change in China. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2018 (in Chinese)

[48] Zhou H, Xu M, Cai Z, Wen S, Wu H. Quantitative analysis of driving-factors of soil acidification in Qiyang County, Hunan Province. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(8): 1400−1412 (in Chinese)

[49] Chen X, Yu W, Cai Y, Zhang S, Muneer M A, Zhu Q, Xu D, Ma C, Yan X, Li Y, Huang S, Wu L, Zhou S, Zhang F. How to identify and adopt cleaner strategies to improve the continuous acidification in orchard soils?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 330: 129826

[50] Armour J D, Nelson P N, Daniells J W, Rasiah V, Inman-Bamber N G. Nitrogen leaching from the root zone of sugarcane and bananas in the humid tropics of Australia. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2013, 180: 68–78

[51] Muñoz-Carpena R, Ritter A, Socorro A R, Pérez N. Nitrogen evolution and fate in a Canary Islands (Spain) sprinkler fertigated banana plot. Agricultural Water Management, 2002, 52(2): 93–117

[52] Xu R, Zhao A, Yuan J, Jiang J. pH buffering capacity of acid soils from tropical and subtropical regions of China as influenced by incorporation of crop straw biochars. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2012, 12(4): 494–502

[53] Zhang T, Hou Y, Meng T, Ma Y, Tan M, Zhang F, Oenema O. Replacing synthetic fertilizer by manure requires adjusted technology and incentives: a farm survey across China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2021, 168: 105301

[54] Jin S, Zhang B, Wu B, Han D, Hu Y, Ren C, Zhang C, Wei X, Wu Y, Mol A P J, Reis S, Gu B, Chen J. Decoupling livestock and crop production at the household level in China. Nature Sustainability, 2021, 4(1): 48–55

[55] Strokal M, Janssen A B G, Chen X, Kroeze C, Li F, Ma L, Yu H, Zhang F, Wang M. Green agriculture and blue water in China: reintegrating crop and livestock production for clean water. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2021, 8(1): 72–80

[56] Ju X, Gu B, Wu Y, Galloway J N. Reducing China’s fertilizer use by increasing farm size. Global Environmental Change, 2016, 41: 26–32

[57] Zhang W, Cao G, Li X, Zhang H, Wang C, Liu Q, Chen X, Cui Z, Shen J, Jiang R, Mi G, Miao Y, Zhang F, Dou Z. Closing yield gaps in China by empowering smallholder farmers. Nature, 2016, 537(7622): 671–674

[58] Chen X, Ma L, Ma W, Wu Z, Cui Z, Hou Y, Zhang F. What has caused the use of fertilizers to skyrocket in China?. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2018, 110(2): 241–255

[59] Cai Z, Wang B, Xu M, Zhang H, He X, Zhang L, Gao S. Intensified soil acidification from chemical N fertilization and prevention by manure in an 18-year field experiment in the red soil of southern China. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2015, 15(2): 260–270

[60] Zhang X, Fang Q, Zhang T, Ma W, Velthof G L, Hou Y, Oenema O, Zhang F. Benefits and trade-offs of replacing synthetic fertilizers by animal manures in crop production in China: a meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 2020, 26(2): 888–900

[61] Liu X, Bi Q, Qiu L, Li K, Yang X, Lin X. Increased risk of phosphorus and metal leaching from paddy soils after excessive manure application: Insights from a mesocosm study. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 666: 778–785

Supplementary materials

The online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2022475 contains supplementary materials (Fig. S1; Table S1).

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by Major Science and Technology Project of Yunnan Province (202102AE090053-2), National Natural Science Youth Foundation of China (41907142) and Natural Science Foundation of Hainan Province (422MS095). We thank our colleagues Xiaodong Chen and Yuqian Suo for their efforts on the farm survey. We thank Guangxi Jinsui Ecological Technology Group Co., Ltd. for the support in data collection.

Compliance with ethics guidelines

Donghao Xu, Jiangzhou Zhang, Yajuan Li, Shiyang Li, Siyang Ren, Yuan Feng, Qichao Zhu, and Fusuo Zhang declare that they have no conflicts of interest or financial conflicts to disclose. All applicable institutional and national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s) 2022. Published by Higher Education Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)