SUSTAINABLE NITROGEN MANAGEMENT INDEX: DEFINITION, GLOBAL ASSESSMENT AND POTENTIAL IMPROVEMENTS

Highlights

● A composite N management index is proposed to measure agriculture sustainability.

● Nitrogen management has been moving towards sustainability targets globally.

● The improvement was achieved mainly by yield increase, while Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE) stagnated.

● No country achieved both yield and NUE targets and spatial variation is large.

● Region-specific yield targets can be used to supplement the standard Sustainable Nitrogen Management Index (SNMI).

Abstract

To represent the sustainability of nitrogen management in the Sustainable Development Goals indicator framework, this paper proposes a sustainable nitrogen management index (SNMI). This index combines the performance in N crop yield and N use efficiency (NUE), thereby accounting for the need for both food production and environmental protection. Applying SNMI to countries around the world, the results showed improvement in the overall sustainability of crop N management over the past four decades, but this improvement has been mainly achieved by crop yield increase, while global NUE has improved only slightly. SNMI values vary largely among countries, and this variation has increased since the 1970s, implying different levels of success, even failure, in improving N management for countries around the world. In the standard SNMI assessment, the reference NUE was defined as 1.0 (considered an ideal NUE) and the reference yield was defined as 90 kg·ha⁻¹·yr⁻¹ N (considering a globally averaged yield target for meeting food demand in 2050). A sensitivity test that replaced the reference NUE of 1.0 with more realistic NUE targets of 0.8 or 0.9 showed overall reduction in SNMI values (i.e., improved performance), but little change in the ranking among countries. In another test that replaced the universal reference yield with region-specific attainable yield, SNMI values declined (i.e., improved performance) for most countries in Africa and West Asia, whereas they increased for many countries in Europe and South America. The index can be improved by further investigation of approaches for setting region-specific yield targets and high-quality data on crop yield potentials. Overall, SNMI offers promise for a simple and transparent approach to assess progress of countries toward sustainable N management with a single indicator.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

global assessment / indicator / nitrogen management / sustainable agriculture / sustainable development goals

References

[1] ErismanJ W, SuttonM A, GallowayJ, KlimontZ, WiniwarterW. How a century of ammonia synthesis changed the world. Nature Geoscience , 2008, 1( 10): 636–639

[2] ErismanJ W, GallowayJ N, SeitzingerS, BleekerA, DiseN B, PetrescuA M, LeachA M, deVries W. Consequences of human modification of the global nitrogen cycle. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences , 2013, 368( 1621): 20130116

[3] ZhangX, DavidsonE A, ZouT, LassalettaL, QuanZ, LiT, Zhang W. Quantifying nutrient budgets for sustainable nutrient management. Global Biogeochemical Cycles , 2020, 34( 3): 1–25

[4] SteffenW, RichardsonK, RockströmJ, CornellS E, FetzerI, BennettE M, BiggsR, CarpenterS R, deVries W, deWit C A, FolkeC, GertenD, HeinkeJ, MaceG M, PerssonL M, RamanathanV, ReyersB, SörlinS. Sustainability. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science , 2015, 347( 6223): 1259855

[5] DeVries W, KrosJ, KroezeC, SeitzingerS P. Assessing planetary and regional nitrogen boundaries related to food security and adverse environmental impacts. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability , 2013, 5( 3–4): 392–402

[6] UnitedNations (UN). Global indicator framework for the Sustainable Development Goals and targets of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. UN , 2022. Available at UN website on November 20, 2021

[7] Foodand Agricultural Organizations of United Nations (FAO). Proportion of Agricultural Area under Productive and Sustainable Agriculture. Rome: FAO , 2019

[8] UnitedNations (UN). SDG indicator metadata. UN , 2021. Available at UN website on November 20, 2021

[9] SachsJ D, Schmidt-TraubG, KrollC, Durand-DelacreD, TeksozK. An SDG Index and Dashboards—Global Report. New York: Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN) , 2016

[10] WendlingZ A, EmersonJ W, deSherbinin A, EstyD C, HovingK, OspinaC D, MurrayJ M, GunnL, FerratoM, SchreckM, JacobM, DahlN, GordronA, DahlN, DorobekE, HandokoS, Chai-OnnT, MillsJ, LiuQ, FeldmanH, SierksK, ChangR, MadridejosB, Ballesteros-FigueroaA, ChenQ, ChaseG, SlatteryM, ApplebyN, SchulmanD. Environmental Performance Index 2020. New Haven, CT: Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy , 2020

[11] IntergovernmentalScience-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Core indicators. Bonn: IPBES , 2012. Available at IPBES website on February 25, 2022

[12] WorldResources Institute (WRI). Data Set: Indicators of Sustainable Agriculture: A Scoping Analysis. Washington, D.C.: WRI , 2014. Available at WRI website on June 25, 2014

[13] SachsJ D, LafortuneG, KrollC, FullerG, WoelmF. Sustainable Development Report. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 2021

[14] Schmidt-TraubG, KrollC, TeksozK, Durand-DelacreD, SachsJ D. National baselines for the Sustainable Development Goals assessed in the SDG Index and Dashboards. Nature Geoscience , 2017, 10( 8): 547–555

[15] ZhangX, DavidsonE A, MauzerallD L, SearchingerT D, DumasP, ShenY. Managing nitrogen for sustainable development. Nature , 2015, 528( 7580): 51–59

[16] ZhangX, YaoG, VishwakarmaS, DalinC, KomarekA M, KanterD R, DavisK F, PfeiferK, ZhaoJ, ZouT, D’OdoricoP, FolberthC, RodriguezF G, FanzoJ, RosaL, DennisonW, MusumbaM, HeymanA, DavidsonE A. Quantitative assessment of agricultural sustainability reveals divergent priorities among nations. One Earth , 2021, 4( 9): 1262–1277

[17] ZhangX, ZouT, LassalettaL, MuellerN D, TubielloF N, LiskM D, LuC, Conant R T, DorichC D, GerberJ, TianH, BruulsemaT, MaazT M, NishinaK, BodirskyB L, PoppA, BouwmanL, BeusenA, ChangJ, HavlíkP, LeclèreD, CanadellJ G, JacksonR B, HefferP, WannerN, ZhangW, DavidsonE A. Quantification of global and national nitrogen budgets for crop production. Nature Food , 2021, 2( 7): 529–540

[18] Foodand Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Soil Nutrient Budget. Rome: FAO , 2021. Available at FAO website on November 24, 2021

[19] AlexandratosN, BruinsmaJ. World Agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 Revision. ESA Working Paper No. 12–03. Rome: FAO , 2012

[20] ZhangX, MauzerallD L, DavidsonE A, KanterD R, CaiR. The economic and environmental consequences of implementing nitrogen-efficient technologies and management practices in agriculture. Journal of Environmental Quality , 2015, 44( 2): 312–324

[21] DobermannA, BruulsemaT, CakmakI, GerardB, MajumdarK, McLaughlinM, ReidsmaP, VanlauweB, WollenbergL, ZhangF, ZhangX. Responsible plant nutrition: a new paradigm to support food system transformation. Global Food Security , 2022, 33 : 100636

[22] ZhangX. Biogeochemistry: a plan for efficient use of nitrogen fertilizers. Nature , 2017, 543( 7645): 322–323

[23] YaoG, ZhangX, DavidsonE A, TaheripourF. The increasing global environmental consequences of a weakening US–China crop trade relationship. Nature Food , 2021, 2( 8): 578–586

[24] EUNitrogen Expert Panel. Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE)—an indicator for the utilization of nitrogen in agriculture and food systems. Wageningen: Wageningen University , 2015

[25] VanIttersum M K, CassmanK G, GrassiniP, WolfJ, TittonellP, HochmanZ. Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance—A review. Field Crops Research , 2013, 143 : 4–17

[26] MuellerN D, GerberJ S, JohnstonM, RayD K, RamankuttyN, FoleyJ A. Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management. Nature , 2012, 490( 7419): 254–257

[27] OllenburgerM, KyleP, ZhangX. Uncertainties in estimating global potential yields and their impacts for long-term agro-economic modeling. Food Security , 2022 [Published Online] doi: 10.1007/s12571-021-01228-x

[28] Foodand Agricultural Organizations of United Nations (FAO). The future of food and agriculture—Alternative pathways to 2050. Rome: FAO , 2018

[29] LobellD B, CassmanK G, FieldC B. Crop yield gaps: their importance, magnitudes, and causes. Annual Review of Environment and Resources , 2009, 34( 1): 179–204

[30] LassalettaL, BillenG, GrizzettiB, AngladeJ, GarnierJ. 50 year trends in nitrogen use efficiency of world cropping systems: The relationship between yield and nitrogen input to cropland. Environmental Research Letters , 2014, 9( 10): 105011

[31] WendlingZ A, EmersonJ W, EstyD C, LevyM A, deSherbinin A, SpiegelN R, PinkertonV, BoucherR, RattéS, MardellS, IchiharaM, BattlesJ, QuayA N, KimS, KhusainovaE, GaoJ, EzroniS, JiangW, JaitehM, Chai-OnnT, MuydinovR, KimE, WaterR, MossG J, GianakosM, ChaseG, CorumJ, WarrenD C, SlatteryM, GarrettM, IvanovaM, Escobar-PemberthyN, WoodS, ReisV. 2018 Environmental Performance Index. New Haven, CT: Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy, 2018

[32] StehfestE, vanVuuren D P, KramT, BouwmanA F, AlkemadeR, BakkenesM, BiemansH, BouwmanA, denElzen M G J, JanseJ H, LucasP L, vanMinnen J, MüllerM, PrinsA G. Integrated Assessment of Global Environmental Change with IMAGE 3.0. Model description and policy applications. The Hague: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, 2014

[33] Schulte-UebbingL, BeusenA, BouwmanA, deVries W. From planetary to regional boundaries for agricultural nitrogen pollution. Research Square , 2022 [Preprint]

[34] SinhaE, CalvinK V, KyleP G, HejaziM I, WaldhoffS T, HuangM, VishwakarmaS, ZhangX. Implication of imposing fertilizer limitations on energy, agriculture, and land systems. Journal of Environmental Management , 2022, 305 : 114391

[35] GlobalYield Gap Atlas (GYGA). Coverage and data download. GYGA , 2022. Available at GYGA website on January 13, 2022

[36] GrassiniP, vanBussel L G J, VanWart J, WolfJ, ClaessensL, YangH, BoogaardH, deGroot H, vanIttersum M K, CassmanK G. How good is good enough? Data requirements for reliable crop yield simulations and yield-gap analysis. Field Crops Research , 2015, 177 : 49–63

[37] vanBussel L G J, GrassiniP, VanWart J, WolfJ, ClaessensL, YangH, BoogaardH, deGroot H, SaitoK, CassmanK G, vanIttersum M K. From field to atlas: Upscaling of location-specific yield gap estimates. Field Crops Research , 2015, 177 : 98–108

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s) 2022. Published by Higher Education Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)