HARNESSING ECOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES AND PHYSIOLOGIC MECHANISMS IN DIVERSIFYING AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS FOR SUSTAINABILITY: EXPERIENCE FROM STUDIES DEPLOYING NATURE-BASED SOLUTIONS IN SCOTLAND

Timothy S. GEORGE, Cathy HAWES, Tracy A. VALENTINE, Alison J. KARLEY, Pietro P. M. IANNETTA, Robin W. BROOKER

PDF(6772 KB)
PDF(6772 KB)
Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. ›› 2022, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (2) : 214-237. DOI: 10.15302/J-FASE-2021437
REVIEW
REVIEW

HARNESSING ECOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES AND PHYSIOLOGIC MECHANISMS IN DIVERSIFYING AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS FOR SUSTAINABILITY: EXPERIENCE FROM STUDIES DEPLOYING NATURE-BASED SOLUTIONS IN SCOTLAND

Author information +
History +

Highlights

● Diversification enhances nature-based contributions to cropping system functions.

● Soil management to improve production and ecosystem function has variable outcomes.

● Management of the production-system to use legacy nutrients will reduce inputs.

● Intercrops, companion crops and cover crops improve ecological sustainability.

● Sustainable interventions within value chains are essential to future-proof agriculture.

Abstract

To achieve the triple challenge of food security, reversing biodiversity declines plus mitigating and adapting to climate change, there is a drive to embed ecological principles into agricultural, value-chain practices and decision-making. By diversifying cropping systems at several scales there is potential to decrease reliance on inputs, provide resilience to abiotic and biotic stress, enhance plant, microbe and animal biodiversity, and mitigate against climate change. In this review we highlight the research performed in Scotland over the past 5 years into the impact of the use of ecological principles in agriculture on sustainability, resilience and provision of ecosystem functions. We demonstrate that diversification of the system can enhance ecosystem functions. Soil and plant management interventions, including nature-based solutions, can also enhance soil quality and utilization of legacy nutrients. Additionally, this is facilitated by greater reliance on soil biological processes and trophic interactions. We highlight the example of intercropping with legumes to deliver sustainability through ecological principles and use legumes as an exemplar of the innovation. We conclude that there are many effective interventions that can be made to deliver resilient, sustainable, and diverse agroecosystems for crop and food production, and these may be applicable in any agroecosystem.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

diversification / ecological principles / legumes / plant management / soil management / soil ecosystem services

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Timothy S. GEORGE, Cathy HAWES, Tracy A. VALENTINE, Alison J. KARLEY, Pietro P. M. IANNETTA, Robin W. BROOKER. HARNESSING ECOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES AND PHYSIOLOGIC MECHANISMS IN DIVERSIFYING AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS FOR SUSTAINABILITY: EXPERIENCE FROM STUDIES DEPLOYING NATURE-BASED SOLUTIONS IN SCOTLAND. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng., 2022, 9(2): 214‒237 https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2021437

References

[1]
Brooker R W, George T S, Homulle Z, Karley A J, Newton A C, Pakeman R J, Schöb C. Facilitation and biodiversity– ecosystem function relationships in crop production systems and their role in sustainable farming. Journal of Ecology, 2021, 109( 5): 2054–2067
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Martin-Guay M O, Paquette A, Dupras J, Rivest D. The new Green Revolution: sustainable intensification of agriculture by intercropping. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 615 : 767–772
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Karley A J, Newton A C, Brooker R W, Pakeman R J, Guy D, Mitchell C, Iannetta P P M, Weih M, Scherber C, Kiær L. DIVERSify-ing for sustainability using cereal-legume ‘plant teams’. Aspects of Applied Biology, 2018, 138 : 57–62
[4]
Li C, Hoffland E, Kuyper T W, Yu Y, Zhang C, Li H, Zhang F, van der Werf W. Syndromes of production in intercropping impact yield gains. Nature Plants, 2020, 6(6): 653–660
[5]
Li C, Hoffland E, Kuyper T W, Yu Y, Li H, Zhang C, Zhang F, van der Werf W. Yield gain, complementarity and competitive dominance in intercropping in China: a meta-analysis of drivers of yield gain using additive partitioning. European Journal of Agronomy, 2020, 113: 125987
[6]
Brandmeier J, Reininghaus H, Pappagallo S, Karley A J, Kiær L P, Scherber C. Intercropping in high input agriculture supports arthropod diversity without risking significant yield losses. Basic and Applied Ecology, 2021, 53 : 26–38
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Weih M, Karley A J, Newton A C, Kiær L P, Scherber C, Rubiales D, Adam E, Ajal J, Brandmeier J, Pappagallo S, Villegas-Fernández A, Reckling M, Tavoletti S. Grain yield stability of cereal-legume intercrops is greater than sole crops in more productive conditions. Agriculture, 2021, 11( 3): 255
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Carvell C, Meek W R, Pywell R F, Goulson D, Nowakowski M. Comparing the efficacy of agri-environment schemes to enhance bumble bee abundance and diversity on arable field margins. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007, 44( 1): 29–40
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Simba L D, Foord S H, Thebault E, van Veen F J F, Joseph G S, Seymour C L. Indirect interactions between crops and natural vegetation through flower visitors: the importance of temporal as well as spatial spill over. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2018, 253 : 148–156
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Gaba S, Perronne R, Fried G, Gardarin A, Bretagnolle F, Biju‐Duval L, Colbach N, Cordeau S, Fernández‐Aparicio M, Gauvrit C, Gibot‐Leclerc S, Guillemin J P, Moreau D, Munier-Jolain N, Strbik F, Reboud X. Response and effect traits of arable weeds in agro‐ecosystems: a review of current knowledge. Weed Research, 2017, 57( 3): 123–147
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Storkey J, Westbury D B. Managing arable weeds for biodiversity. Pest Management Science, 2007, 63( 6): 517–523
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Pakeman R J, Brooker R W, Karley A J, Newton A C, Mitchell C, Hewison R L, Pollenus J, Guy D C, Schöb C. Increased crop diversity reduces the functional space available for weeds. Weed Research, 2020, 60( 2): 121–131
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Cheriere T, Lorin M, Corre-Hellou G. Species choice and spatial arrangement in soybean-based intercropping: levers that drive yield and weed control. Field Crops Research, 2020, 256 : 107923
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Liebman M. Weed management: a need for ecological approaches. In: Liebman M, Mohler C L, Staver C P, eds. Ecological Management of Agricultural Weeds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, 1–39
[15]
Kanatas P. Mini-review: the role of crop rotation intercropping sowing dates and increased crop density towards a sustainable crop and weed management in arable crops. Journal of Agricultural Science, 2020, 31( 1): 22–27
[16]
Karley A J, Pitchford J W, Douglas A E, Parker W E, Howardh J J. The causes and processes of the mid-summer population crash of the potato aphids Macrosiphum euphorbiae and Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Bulletin of Entomological Research, 2003, 93( 5): 425–438
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Karley A J, Parker W E, Pitchford J W, Douglas A E. The mid-season crash in aphid population: why and how does it occur. Ecological Entomology, 2004, 29( 4): 383–388
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Humphreys R K, Ruxton G D, Karley A J. Drop when the stakes are high: adaptive, flexible use of dropping behaviour by aphids. Behaviour, 2021, 158( 7): 603–623
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Polin S, Simon J C, Outreman Y. An ecological cost associated with protective symbionts of aphids. Ecology and Evolution, 2014, 4( 6): 826–830
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Smith A H, Łukasik P, O’Connor M P, Lee A, Mayo G, Drott M T, Doll S, Tuttle R, Disciullo R A, Messina A, Oliver K M, Russell J A. Patterns, causes and consequences of defensive microbiome dynamics across multiple scales. Molecular Ecology, 2015, 24( 5): 1135–1149
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Slater J M, Gilbert L, Johnson D, Karley A J. Limited effects of the maternal rearing environment on the behaviour and fitness of an insect herbivore and its natural enemy. PLoS One, 2019, 14( 1): e0209965
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Bedoussac L, Journet E P, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Naudin C, Corre-Hellou G, Jensen E S, Prieur L, Justes E. Ecological principles underlying the increase of productivity achieved by cereal-grain legume intercrops in organic farming. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2015, 35( 3): 911–935
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Cowden R J, Shah A N, Lehmann L M, Kiær L P, Henriksen C B, Ghaley B B. Nitrogen fertilizer effects on pea–barley intercrop productivity compared to sole crops in Denmark. Sustainability, 2020, 12( 22): 9335
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Newton A C, Valentine T A, McKenzie B M, George T S, Guy D C, Hackett C A. Identifying spring barley cultivars with differential response to tillage. Agronomy, 2020, 10( 5): 686
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
McKenzie B M, Stobart R, Brown J L, George T S, Morris N, Newton A C, Valentine T A, Hallett P D. Platforms to test and demonstrate sustainable soil management: integration of major UK field experiments. AHDB Final Report RD-2012–3786, Technical Report. ResearchGate, 2017, PR574
[26]
Gatiboni L, Brunetto G, Pavinato P S, George T. Legacy phosphorus in agriculture: role of past management and perspectives for the future. Frontiers in Earth Science, 2020, 8 : 619935
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Xu Z, Qu M, Liu S, Duan Y, Wang X, Brown L K, George T S, Zhang L, Feng G. Carbon addition reduces labile soil phosphorus by increasing microbial biomass phosphorus in intensive agricultural systems. Soil Use and Management, 2020, 36( 3): 536–546
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Fan F, Yu B, Wang B, George T S, Yin H, Xu D, Li D, Song A. Microbial mechanisms of the contrast residue decomposition and priming effect in soils with different organic and chemical fertilization histories. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2019, 135 : 213–221
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Brown L K, Blanz M, Wishart J, Dieterich B, Schmidt S B, Russell J, Martin P, George T S. Is Bere barley specifically adapted to fertilisation with seaweed as a nutrient source? Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2020, 118(2): 149–163
[30]
Brown L K, Kazas C, Stockan J, Hawes C, Stutter M, Ryan C M, Squire G R, George T S Is green manure from riparian buffer strip species an effective nutrient source for crops? Journal of Environmental Quality, 2019, 48(2): 385–393
[31]
Mendes G D O, Bahri-Esfahani J, Csetenyi L, Hillier S, George T S, Gadd G M. Chemical and physical mechanisms of fungal bioweathering of rock phosphate. Geomicrobiology Journal, 2021, 38( 5): 384–394
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Teodoro M, Trakal L, Gallagher B N, Šimek P, Soudek P, Pohořelý M, Beesley L, Jačka L, Kovář M, Seyedsadr S, Mohan D. Application of co-composted biochar significantly improved plant-growth relevant physical/chemical properties of a metal contaminated soil. Chemosphere, 2020, 242 : 125255
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Trakal L, Raya-Moreno I, Mitchell K, Beesley L. Stabilization of metal(loid)s in two contaminated agricultural soils: comparing biochar to its non-pyrolysed source material. Chemosphere, 2017, 181 : 150–159
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Mitchell K, Trakal L, Sillerova H, Avelar-González F J, Guerrero-Barrera A L, Hough R, Beesley L. Mobility of As, Cr and Cu in a contaminated grassland soil in response to diverse organic amendments; a sequential column leaching experiment. Applied Geochemistry, 2018, 88 : 95–102
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Mitchell K, Moreno-Jimenez E, Jones R, Zheng L, Trakal L, Hough R, Beesley L. Mobility of arsenic, chromium and copper arising from soil application of stabilised aggregates made from contaminated wood ash. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 393 : 122479
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Zheng F, Zhu D, Giles M, Daniell T, Neilson R, Zhu Y G, Yang X R. Mineral and organic fertilization alters the microbiome of a soil nematode Dorylaimus stagnalis and its resistome. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 680 : 70–78
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Cheng Y, Jiang Y, Wu Y, Valentine T A, Li H. Soil nitrogen status modifies rice root response to nematode-bacteria interactions in the rhizosphere. PLoS One, 2016, 11( 2): e0148021
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Mezeli M M, Page S, George T S, Neilson R, Mead A, Blackwell M S A, Haygarth P M. Using a meta-analysis approach to understand complexity in soil biodiversity and phosphorus acquisition in plants. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2020, 142 : 107695
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Boilard G, Bradley R L, Paterson E, Sim A, Brown L K, George T S, Bainard L, Carubba A. Interaction between root hairs and soil phosphorus on rhizosphere priming of soil organic matter. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2019, 135 : 264–266
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Robertson-Albertyn S, Alegria Terrazas R, Balbirnie K, Blank M, Janiak A, Szarejko I, Chmielewska B, Karcz J, Morris J, Hedley P E, George T S, Bulgarelli D. Root hair mutations displace the barley rhizosphere microbiota. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017, 8 : 1094
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Zhou J, Chai X, Zhang L, George T S, Wang F, Feng G. Different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi cocolonizing on a single plant root system recruit distinct microbiomes. mSystems, 2020, 5( 6): e00929-20
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Jiang F, Zhang L, Zhou J, George T S, Feng G. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance mineralisation of organic phosphorus by carrying bacteria along their extraradical hyphae. New Phytologist, 2021, 230( 1): 304–315
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Paterson E, Sim A, Davidson J, Daniell T J. Arbuscular mycorrhizal hyphae promote priming of native soil organic matter mineralisation. Plant and Soil, 2016, 408( 1−2): 243–254
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Mwafulirwa L, Baggs E M, Russell J, George T, Morley N, Sim A, de la Fuente Cantó C, Paterson E. Barley genotype influences stabilization of rhizodeposition-derived C and soil organic matter mineralization. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2016, 95 : 60–69
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Cope J E, Norton G J, George T S, Newton A C. Identifying potential novel resistance to the foliar disease ‘Scald’(Rhynchosporium commune) in a population of Scottish Bere barley landrace (Hordeum vulgare L.). Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 2021, 128( 4): 999–1012
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Leybourne D J, Valentine T A, Robertson J A H, Pérez-Fernández E, Main A M, Karley A J, Bos J I B. Defence gene expression and phloem quality contribute to mesophyll and phloem resistance to aphids in wild barley. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2019, 70( 15): 4011–4026
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Cope J E, Russell J, Norton G J, George T S, Newton A C. Assessing the variation in manganese use efficiency traits in Scottish barley landrace Bere (Hordeum vulgare L.). Annals of Botany, 2020, 126( 2): 289–300
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Schmidt S B, George T S, Brown L K, Booth A, Wishart J, Hedley P E, Martin P, Russell J, Husted S. Ancient barley landraces adapted to marginal soils demonstrate exceptional tolerance to manganese limitation. Annals of Botany, 2019, 123( 5): 831–843
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Ruiz S, Koebernick N, Duncan S, Fletcher D M, Scotson C, Boghi A, Marin M, Bengough A G, George T S, Brown L K, Hallett P D, Roose T. Significance of root hairs at the field scale-modelling root water and phosphorus uptake under different field conditions. Plant and Soil, 2020, 447( 1): 281–304
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Kiær L, Scherber C, Brandmeier J, Papagallo S, Newton A C, Karley A J. Breeding for crop mixtures: opportunities and challenges. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Crop Diversification: Book of Abstracts. Budapest: Zenodo, 2019, 18–21
[51]
Kiær L P, Boesen N R. Trait plasticity and G×E challenges when breeding for mixture-ideotypes. In: Baćanović-Šišić J, Dennenmoser D, Finckh M R, eds. Proceedings of the EUCARPIA Symposium on Breeding for Diversification 2018. Witzenhausen: EUCARPIA, 2018, 3–6
[52]
Schneider H M, Lynch J P. Should root plasticity be a crop breeding target? Frontiers in Plant Science, 2020, 11: 546
[53]
Schöb C, Brooker R W, Zuppinger-Dingley D. Evolution of facilitation requires diverse communities. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2018, 2( 9): 1381–1385
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Hawes C, Iannetta P P M, Squire G R. Agroecological practices for whole-system sustainability. Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources, 2021, 16( 5): 5
CrossRef Google scholar
[55]
Hawes C, Young M, Banks G, Begg G, Christie A, Iannetta P P M, Karley A J, Squire G R. Whole-systems analysis of environmental and economic sustainability in arable cropping systems: a case study. Agronomy, 2019, 9( 8): 438
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Hawes C, Alexander C J, Begg G S, Iannetta P P M, Karley A J, Squire G R, Young M. Plant responses to an integrated cropping system designed to maintain yield whilst enhancing soil properties and biodiversity. Agronomy, 2018, 8( 10): 229
CrossRef Google scholar
[57]
Hawes C. Assessing the impact of management interventions in agroecological and conventional cropping systems using indicators of sustainability. In: Wezel A, ed. Agroecological Practices for Sustainable Agriculture: Principles, Applications, and Making the Transition. London: Imperial College Press, 2017, 229–262
[58]
Freitag S, Verrall S R, Pont S D A, McRae D, Sungurtas J A, Palau R, Hawes C, Alexander C J, Allwood J W, Foito A, Stewart D, Shepherd L V T. Impact of conventional and integrated management systems on the water-soluble vitamin content in potatoes, field beans, and cereals. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2018, 66( 4): 831–841
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Hawes C, Begg G S, Iannetta P P M, Karley A J, Squire G R. A whole-systems approach for assessing measures to improve arable ecosystem sustainability. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 2016, 2( 12): e01252
CrossRef Google scholar
[60]
Brooker R W, Bennett A E, Cong W F, Daniell T J, George T S, Hallett P D, Hawes C, Iannetta P P M, Jones H G, Karley A J, Li L, McKenzie B M, Pakeman R J, Paterson E, Schöb C, Shen J, Squire G, Watson C A, Zhang C, Zhang F, Zhang J, White P J. Improving intercropping: a synthesis of research in agronomy, plant physiology and ecology. New Phytologist, 2015, 206( 1): 107–117
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
Root R B. Organisation of a plant-arthropod association in simple and diverse habitats: the fauna of collards (Brassica oleracea). Ecological Monographs, 1973, 43( 1): 95–124
CrossRef Google scholar
[62]
Landis D A, Wratten S D, Gurr G M. Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annual Review of Entomology, 2000, 45( 1): 175–201
CrossRef Google scholar
[63]
Bohan D A, Hawes C, Haughton A J, Denholm I, Champion G T, Perry J N, Clark S J. Statistical models to evaluate invertebrate-plant trophic interactions in arable systems. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 2007, 97( 3): 265–280
CrossRef Google scholar
[64]
Hawes C, Haughton A J, Bohan D A, Squire G R. Functional approaches for assessing plant and invertebrate abundance patterns in arable systems. Basic and Applied Ecology, 2009, 10( 1): 34–42
CrossRef Google scholar
[65]
Smith B M, Aebischer N J, Ewald J, Moreby S, Potter C, Holland J M. The potential of arable weeds to reverse invertebrate declines and associated ecosystem services in cereal crops. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 2020, 3 : 118
CrossRef Google scholar
[66]
Storkey J, Neve P. What good is weed diversity. Weed Research, 2018, 58( 4): 239–243
CrossRef Google scholar
[67]
Squire G R, Hawes C, Begg G S, Young M W. Cumulative impact of GM herbicide-tolerant cropping on arable plants assessed through species-based and functional taxonomies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2009, 16( 1): 85–94
CrossRef Google scholar
[68]
Karley A J, Mitchell C, Hawes C, Young M W, Brooker R W, Pakeman R J, Iannetta P P M, Newton A C. Crop species mixtures as part of integrated farm management. In: Proceedings of the Crop Production in Northern Britain conference. Dundee: CABI, 2020, 143–147
[69]
Garratt M P D, Potts S G, Banks G, Hawes C, Breeze T D, O’Connor R S, Carvell C. Capacity and willingness of farmers and citizen scientists to monitor crop pollinators and pollination services. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2019, 20 : e00781
CrossRef Google scholar
[70]
Breeze T D, Bailey A P, Balcombe K G, Brereton T, Comont R, Edwards M, Garratt M P, Harvey M, Hawes C, Isaac N, Jitlal M, Jones C, Kunin W E, Lee P, Morris R K A, Musgrove A, O’Connor R S, Peyton J, Potts S G, Roberts S P M, Roy D B, Roy H E, Tang C Q, Vanbergen A J, Carvell C. Pollinator monitoring more than pays for itself. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 58( 1): 44–57
CrossRef Google scholar
[71]
Maluk M, Ferrando-Molina F, Lopez del Egido, L, Langarica-Fuentes A, Yohannes G G, Young M W, Martin P, Gantlett R, Kenicer G, Hawes C, Begg G S, Quilliam R S, Squire G R, Young J P W, Iannetta P P M, James E K. Fields with no recent legume cultivation have sufficient nitrogen-fixing rhizobia for crops of faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Plant and Soil, 2022 [Published Online] doi: 10.1007/s11104–021-05246–8
[72]
Zhang L, Shi N, Fan J, Wang F, George T S, Feng G. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi stimulate organic phosphate mobilization associated with changing bacterial community structure under field conditions. Environmental Microbiology, 2018, 20( 7): 2639–2651
CrossRef Google scholar
[73]
Flohre A, Rudnick M, Traser G, Tscharntke T, Eggers T. Does soil biota benefit from organic farming in complex vs. simple landscapes? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2011, 141(1–2): 210–214
[74]
Quadros A F, Zimmer M. Aboveground macrodetritivores and belowground soil processes: insights on species redundancy. Applied Soil Ecology, 2018, 124 : 83–87
CrossRef Google scholar
[75]
Bohan D A, Powers S J, Champion G, Haughton A J, Hawes C, Squire G, Cussans J, Mertens S K. Modelling rotations: can crop sequences explain arable weed seedbank abundance? Weed Research, 2011, 51(4): 422–432
[76]
Oerke E. Crop losses to pests. Journal of Agricultural Science, 2006, 144( 1): 31–43
CrossRef Google scholar
[77]
Begg G S, Cook S M, Dye R, Ferrante M, Franck P, Lavigne C, Lövei G L, Mansion-Vaquie A, Pell J K, Petit S, Quesada N, Ricci B, Wratten S D, Birch A N E. A functional overview of conservation biological control. Crop Protection, 2017, 97 : 145–158
CrossRef Google scholar
[78]
Martin E A, Dainese M, Clough Y, Báldi A, Bommarco R, Gagic V, Garratt M P D, Holzschuh A, Kleijn D, Kovács-Hostyánszki A, Marini L, Potts S G, Smith H G, Al Hassan D, Albrecht M, Andersson G K S, Asís J D, Aviron S, Balzan M V, Baños-Picón L, Bartomeus I, Batáry P, Burel F, Caballero-López B, Concepción E D, Coudrain V, Dänhardt J, Diaz M, Diekötter T, Dormann C F, Duflot R, Entling M H, Farwig N, Fischer C, Frank T, Garibaldi L A, Hermann J, Herzog F, Inclán D, Jacot K, Jauker F, Jeanneret P, Kaiser M, Krauss J, Le Féon V, Marshall J, Moonen A C, Moreno G, Riedinger V, Rundlöf M, Rusch A, Scheper J, Schneider G, Schüepp C, Stutz S, Sutter L, Tamburini G, Thies C, Tormos J, Tscharntke T, Tschumi M, Uzman D, Wagner C, Zubair-Anjum M, Steffan-Dewenter I. The interplay of landscape composition and configuration: new pathways to manage functional biodiversity and agroecosystem services across Europe. Ecology Letters, 2019, 22( 7): 1083–1094
CrossRef Google scholar
[79]
Redlich S, Martin E A, Steffan-Dewenter I. Landscape-level crop diversity benefits biological pest control. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 55( 5): 2419–2428
CrossRef Google scholar
[80]
Feit B, Blüthgen N, Daouti E, Straub C, Traugott M, Jonsson M. Landscape complexity promotes resilience of biological pest control to climate change. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 2021, 288( 1951): 20210547
[81]
Ricci B, Lavigne C, Alignier A, Aviron S, Biju-Duval L, Bouvier J C, Choisis J P, Franck P, Joannon A, Ladet S, Mezerette F, Plantegenest M, Savary G, Thomas C, Vialatte A, Petit S. Local pesticide use intensity conditions landscape effects on biological pest control. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 2019, 286( 1904): 20182898
[82]
Dixon A F G. Aphid ecology: an optimization approach. 2nd ed. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media LLC, 1998
[83]
Fenton B, Malloch G, Woodford J A, Foster S P, Anstead J, Denholm I, King L, Pickup J. The attack of the clones: tracking the movement of insecticide-resistant peach-potato aphids Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Bulletin of Entomological Research, 2005, 95( 5): 483–494
CrossRef Google scholar
[84]
Walsh L E, Schmidt O, Foster S P, Varis C, Grant J, Malloch G L, Gaffney M T. Evaluating the impact of pyrethroid insecticide resistance on reproductive fitness in Sitobion avenae. Annals of Applied Biology, 2021 [Published Online] doi: 10.1111/aab.12738
[85]
Guo J, Hatt S, He K, Chen J, Francis F, Wang Z. Nine facultative endosymbionts in aphids. A review. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology, 2017, 20( 3): 794–801
CrossRef Google scholar
[86]
Zytynska S E, Tighiouart K, Frago E. Benefits and costs of hosting facultative symbionts in plant-sucking insects: a meta-analysis. Molecular Ecology, 2021, 30( 11): 2483–2494
CrossRef Google scholar
[87]
Fenton B, Margaritopoulos J T, Malloch G L, Foster S P. Micro-evolutionary change in relation to insecticide resistance in the peach-potato aphid. Myzus persicae. Ecological Entomology, 2010, 35( s1): 131–146
CrossRef Google scholar
[88]
Clarke H V, Foster S P, Oliphant L, Waters E W, Karley A J. Co-occurrence of defensive traits in the potato aphid Macrosiphum euphorbiae. Ecological Entomology, 2018, 43(4): 538−542
[89]
Leybourne D J, Bos J I B, Valentine T A, Karley A J. The price of protection: a defensive endosymbiont impairs nymph growth in the bird cherry-oat aphid, Rhopalosiphum padi. Insect Science, 2020a, 27(1): 69–85
[90]
Leybourne D J, Valentine T A, Bos J I B, Karley A J. A fitness cost resulting from Hamiltonella defensa infection is associated with altered probing and feeding behaviour in Rhopalosiphum padi. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2020b, 223(Pt 1): jeb207936
[91]
Jackson G E, Malloch G, McNamara L, Little D. Grain aphids (Sitobion avenae) with knockdown resistance (kdr) to insecticide exhibit fitness trade-offs, including increased vulnerability to the natural enemy Aphidius ervi. PLoS One, 2020, 15(11): e0230541
[92]
Brooker R W, Hewison R, Mitchell C, Newton A C, Pakeman R J, Schöb C, Karley A J. Does crop genetic diversity support positive biodiversity effects under experimental drought? Basic and Applied Ecology, 2021b, 56: 431–445
[93]
Leybourne D J, Preedy K F, Valentine T A, Bos J I B, Karley A J. Drought has negative consequences on aphid fitness and plant vigor: insights from a meta-analysis. Ecology and Evolution, 2021, 11( 17): 11915–11929
CrossRef Google scholar
[94]
Wade R N, Karley A J, Johnson S N, Hartley S E. Impact of predicted precipitation scenarios on multitrophic interactions. Functional Ecology, 2017, 31( 8): 1647–1658
CrossRef Google scholar
[95]
Preedy K F, Chaplain M A J, Leybourne D J, Marion G, Karley A J. Learning-induced switching costs in a parasitoid can maintain diversity of host aphid phenotypes although biocontrol is destabilized under abiotic stress. Journal of Animal Ecology, 2020, 89( 5): 1216–1229
CrossRef Google scholar
[96]
Lee M, Kim Y, Park J J, Cho K. Prediction of changing predator–prey interactions under warming: a simulation study using two aphid–ladybird systems. Ecological Research, 2021, 36( 5): 788–802
CrossRef Google scholar
[97]
Teixeira A, Iannetta P, Binnie K, Valentine T A, Toorop P. Myxospermous seed-mucilage quantity correlates with environmental gradients indicative of water-deficit stress: Plantago species as a model. Plant and Soil, 2020, 446( 1−2): 343–356
CrossRef Google scholar
[98]
Brown J L, Stobart R, Hallett P D, Morris N L, George T S, Newton A C, Valentine T A, McKenzie B M. Variable impacts of reduced and zero tillage on soil carbon storage across 4–10 years of UK field experiments. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2021, 21( 2): 890–904
CrossRef Google scholar
[99]
Holland J E, Bennett A E, Newton A C, White P J, McKenzie B M, George T S, Pakeman R J, Bailey J S, Fornara D A, Hayes R C. Liming impacts on soils, crops and biodiversity in the UK: a review. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 610–611: 316–332
[100]
Neilson R, Caul S, Fraser F C, King D, Mitchell S M, Roberts D M, Giles M E. Microbial community size is a potential predictor of nematode functional group in limed grasslands. Applied Soil Ecology, 2020, 156 : 103702
CrossRef Google scholar
[101]
Herold M B, Giles M E, Alexander C J, Baggs E M, Daniell T J. Variable response of nirK and nirS containing denitrifier communities to long-term pH manipulation and cultivation. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 2018, 365( 7): fny035
CrossRef Google scholar
[102]
Neilson R, Roberts D M, Loades K W, Lozana A, Daniell T J. Healthy soils for crop production. In: Proceedings Crop Production in Northern Britain 2018. Norwich: Page Bros (Norwich) Ltd., 2018, 17–20
[103]
Neilson R, Lilly A, Aitkenhead M, Artz R, Baggaley N, Giles M E, Holland J, Loades K, Ovando P, Rivington M, Roberts M, Yeluripati J. Measuring the vulnerability of Scottish soils to a changing climate. ClimateXChange Report. Dundee: The James Hutton Institute, 2020
[104]
Ball B C, Guimarães R M L, Cloy J M, Hargreaves P R, Shepherd T G, McKenzie B M. Visual soil evaluation: a summary of some applications and potential developments for agriculture. Soil & Tillage Research, 2017, 173 : 114–124
CrossRef Google scholar
[105]
Murphy C J, Baggs E M, Morley N, Wall D P, Paterson E. Nitrogen availability alters rhizosphere processes mediating soil organic matter mineralisation. Plant and Soil, 2017, 417( 1−2): 499–510
CrossRef Google scholar
[106]
Frison E A. IPES-Food. From uniformity to diversity: a paradigm shift from industrial agriculture to diversified agroecological systems. Louvain-la-Neuve. Belgium: IPES, 2016, 96
[107]
Renard D, Tilman D. National food production stabilized by crop diversity. Nature, 2019, 571( 7764): 257–260
CrossRef Google scholar
[108]
Khoury C K, Bjorkman A D, Dempewolf H, Ramirez-Villegas J, Guarino L, Jarvis A, Rieseberg L H, Struik P C. Increasing homogeneity in global food supplies and the implications for food security. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014, 111( 11): 4001–4006
CrossRef Google scholar
[109]
Rivington M, King R, Duckett D, Iannetta P, Benton T G, Burgess P J, Hawes C, Wellesley L, Polhill J G, Aitkenhead M, Lozada-Ellison L M, Begg G, Williams A G, Newton A, Lorenzo-Arribas A, Neilson R, Watts C, Harris J, Loades K, Stewart D, Wardell-Johnson D, Gandossi G, Udugbezi E, Hannam J A, Keay C. UK food and nutrition security during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Nutrition Bulletin, 2021, 46( 1): 88–97
CrossRef Google scholar
[110]
Zhang H, Li Y, Zhu J K. Developing naturally stress-resistant crops for a sustainable agriculture. Nature Plants, 2018, 4( 12): 989–996
CrossRef Google scholar
[111]
Ferreira H, Pinto E, Vasconcelos M W. Legumes as a cornerstone of the transition towards more sustainable agri-food systems and diets in Europe. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 2021, 5 : 694121
CrossRef Google scholar
[112]
Iannetta P P M, Hawes C, Begg G S, Maaß H, Ntatsi G, Savvas D, Vasconcelos M, Hamann K, Williams M, Styles D, Toma L, Shrestha S, Balázs B, Kelemen E, Debeljak M, Trajanov A, Vickers R, Rees R M. A multifunctional solution for wicked problems: value-chain wide facilitation of legumes cultivated at bioregional scales is necessary to address the climate-biodiversity-nutrition nexus. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 2021, 5 : 692137
CrossRef Google scholar
[113]
Villegas-Fernández A M, Rubiales D. Trends and perspectives for faba bean production in the Mediterranean Basin. Legume Perspectives, 2015, 10 : 31–33
[114]
Reckling M, Döring T F, Bergkvist G, Stoddard F L, Watson C A, Seddig S, Chmielewski F M, Bachinger J. Grain legume yields are as stable as other spring crops in long-term experiments across northern Europe. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2018, 38( 6): 63
CrossRef Google scholar
[115]
Montanarella L. Trends in land degradation in Europe. In: Sivakumar M V K, Ndiang’ui N, eds. Climate and land degradation. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2007, 83–104
[116]
Oldeman L R. Global extent of soil degradation. In: Bi-Annual Report 1991–1992/ISRIC. Wageningen: ISRIC, 1992, 19–36
[117]
Droste N, May W, Clough Y, Börjesson G, Brady M, Hedlund K. Soil carbon insures arable crop production against increasing adverse weather due to climate change. Environmental Research Letters, 2020, 15 : 124034
CrossRef Google scholar
[118]
Iannetta P P M, Young M, Bachinger J, Bergkvist G, Doltra J, Lopez-Bellido R J, Monti M, Pappa V A, Reckling M, Topp C F E, Walker R L, Rees R M, Watson C A, James E K, Squire G R, Begg G S. A comparative nitrogen balance and productivity analysis of legume and non-legume supported cropping systems: the potential role of biological nitrogen fixation. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 7 : 1700
CrossRef Google scholar
[119]
Squire G R, Quesada N, Begg G S, Iannetta P P M. Transitions to greater legume inclusion in cropland: defining opportunities and estimating benefits for the nitrogen economy. Food and Energy Security, 2019, 8( 4): e00175
CrossRef Google scholar
[120]
Leinonen I, Iannetta P P M, Rees R M, Russell W, Watson C, Barnes A P. Lysine supply is a critical factor in achieving sustainable global protein economy. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 2019, 3 : 27
CrossRef Google scholar
[121]
Leinonen I, Iannetta P P M, MacLeod M, Rees R M, Russell W, Watson C, Barnes A P. Regional land use efficiency and nutritional quality of protein production. Global Food Security, 2020, 26 : 100386
CrossRef Google scholar
[122]
Lienhardt T, Black K, Saget S, Costa M P, Chadwick D, Rees R M, Williams M, Spillane C, Iannetta P M, Walker G, Styles D. Just the tonic! Legume biorefining for alcohol has the potential to reduce Europe’s protein deficit and mitigate climate change. Environment International, 2019, 130: 104870
[123]
Lienhardt T, Black K, Saget S, Costa M P, Chadwick D, Rees R, Williams M, Spillane C, Iannetta P, Walker G, Styles D. Data for life cycle assessment of legume biorefining for alcohol. Data in Brief, 2019, 25: 104242
[124]
Black K, Tziboula‐Clarke A, White P J, Iannetta P P M, Walker G. Optimised processing of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) kernels as a brewing adjunct. Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 2021, 127( 1): 13–20
CrossRef Google scholar
[125]
Hermansen J E, Jørgensen U, Laerke P E, Manevski K, Boelt B, Jensen S K, Weisbjerg M R, Dalsgaard T K, Danielsen M, Asp T, Amby-Jensen M, Sørensen C A G, Jensen M V, Gylling M, Lindedam J, Lübeck M, Fog E. Green biomass: protein production through biorefining. Danish Centre for Food & Agriculture (DCA) Report No.93. Aarhus: Aarhus University, 2017
[126]
zu Ermgassen E K, Phalan B, Green R E, Balmford A. Reducing the land use of EU pork production: where there’s swill, there’s a way. Food Policy, 2016, 58 : 35–48
CrossRef Google scholar
[127]
Westhoek H, Rood T, van den Berg M, Janse J, Nijdam D, Reudink M, Stehfest E. The protein puzzle: the consumption and production of meat, dairy and fish in the European Union. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, 2011, 123–144
[128]
Iannetta P P M, Muel F, Charlton A, Rosa E. Legume Value Chain: market requirements and economic impact. The International Legume Society, 2017, 14
[129]
Vasconcelos M W, Balázs B, Kelemen E, Squire G R, Iannetta P P M. Editorial: transitions to sustainable food and feed systems. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, 10 : 1283
CrossRef Google scholar
[130]
Vasconcelos M W, Gomes A M, Pinto E, Ferreira H, Vieira E D F, Martins A P, Santos C S, Balázs B, Kelemen E, Hamann K T, Williams M, Iannetta P P M. The push, pull and enabling capacities necessary for legume grain inclusion into sustainable agri-food systems and healthy diets. In: Biesalski H K, ed. Hidden Hunger and the Transformation of Food Systems. How to Combat the Double Burden of Malnutrition? Basel, Karger: World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2020, 193–211
[131]
Vasconcelos M W, Grusak M A, Pinto E, Gomes A, Ferreira H, Balázs B, Centofanti T, Ntatsi G, Savvas D, Karkanis A, Williams M, Vandenberg A, Toma L, Shrestha S, Akaichi F, Ore Barrios C, Gruber S, James E K, Maluk M, Karley A, Iannetta P. The biology of legumes and their agronomic, economic, and social impact. In: Hasanuzzaman M, Araújo S, Gill S S, eds. The Plant Family Fabaceae. Singapore: Springer 2020, 3–25
[132]
Shukla P R, Skea J, Calvo Buendia E, Masson-Delmotte V, Pörtner H O, Roberts D C, Zhai P, Slade R, Connors S, Van Diemen R, Ferrat M. Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. Switzerland: Intergovermental Panel of Climate Change, 2019
[133]
Alexander P, Brown C, Arneth A, Finnigan J, Rounsevell M D A. Human appropriation of land for food: the role of diet. Global Environmental Change, 2016, 41 : 88–98
CrossRef Google scholar
[134]
Springmann M, Mason-D’Croz D, Robinson S, Garnett T, Godfray H C J, Gollin D, Rayner M, Ballon P, Scarborough P. Global and regional health effects of future food production under climate change: a modelling study. Lancet, 2016, 387( 10031): 1937–1946
CrossRef Google scholar
[135]
Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, Vermeulen S, Garnett T, Tilman D, DeClerck F, Wood A, Jonell M, Clark M, Gordon L J, Fanzo J, Hawkes C, Zurayk R, Rivera J A, De Vries W, Majele Sibanda L, Afshin A, Chaudhary A, Herrero M, Agustina R, Branca F, Lartey A, Fan S, Crona B, Fox E, Bignet V, Troell M, Lindahl T, Singh S, Cornell S E, Srinath Reddy K, Narain S, Nishtar S, Murray C J L. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet, 2019, 393( 10170): 447–492
CrossRef Google scholar
[136]
Balázs B, Kelemen E, Centofanti T, Vasconcelos M W, Iannetta P P M. Integrated policy analysis to identify transformation paths to more sustainable legume-based food and feed value-chains in Europe. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 2021, 45( 6): 931–953
CrossRef Google scholar
[137]
Schöb C, Hortal S, Karley A J, Morcillo L, Newton A C, Pakeman R J, Powell J R, Anderson I C, Brooker R W. Species but not genotype diversity strongly impacts the establishment of rare colonisers. Functional Ecology, 2017, 31( 7): 1462–1470
CrossRef Google scholar
[138]
Brooker R W, Karley A J, Morcillo L, Newton A C, Pakeman R J, Schöb C. Crop presence, but not genetic diversity, impacts on the rare arable plant Valerianella rimosa. Plant Ecology & Diversity, 2018, 10(5–6): 5–6
[139]
Engbersen N, Brooker R W, Stefan L, Studer B, Schöb C. Temporal differentiation of resource capture and biomass accumulation as a driver of yield increase in intercropping. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2021, 12 : 668803
CrossRef Google scholar
[140]
Schofield E J, Rowntree J K, Paterson E, Brooker R W. Temporal dynamics of resource capture: a missing factor in ecology? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2018, 33(4): 277–286
[141]
Schofield E J, Brooker R W, Rowntree J K, Price E A C, Brearley F Q, Paterson E. Plant-plant competition influences temporal dynamism of soil microbial enzyme activity. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2019a, 139: 107615
[142]
Schofield E J, Rowntree J K, Paterson E, Brewer M J, Price E A C, Brearley F Q, Brooker R W. Cultivar differences and impact of plant-plant competition on temporal patterns of nitrogen and biomass accumulation. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, 10 : 215
CrossRef Google scholar
[143]
Félix F K D C, Letti L A J, Vinícius de Melo Pereira G, Bonfim P G B, Soccol V T, Soccol C R. L-lysine production improvement: a review of the state of the art and patent landscape focusing on strain development and fermentation technologies. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 2019, 39( 8): 1031–1055
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

The research activities of all the authors and many of the examples highlighted in this review were supported by the 2016–2021 strategic research program funded by the Scottish Government’s Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division. The authors thank Lawrie Brown and Ian Riley for useful comments and input to an advanced draft of the manuscript.

Compliance with ethics guidelines

Timothy S. George, Cathy Hawes, Tracy A. Valentine, Alison J. Karley, Pietro P. M. Iannetta, and Robin W. Brooker declare that they have no conflicts of interest or financial conflicts to disclose. This article does not contain any study with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s) 2022. Published by Higher Education Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(6772 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/