ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF NITROGEN DEPOSITION ON URBAN FORESTS: AN OVERVIEW

Enzai DU , Nan XIA , Yuying GUO , Yuehan TIAN , Binghe LI , Xuejun LIU , Wim de VRIES

Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. ›› 2022, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (3) : 445 -456.

PDF (10309KB)
Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. ›› 2022, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (3) : 445 -456. DOI: 10.15302/J-FASE-2021429
REVIEW
REVIEW

ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF NITROGEN DEPOSITION ON URBAN FORESTS: AN OVERVIEW

Author information +
History +
PDF (10309KB)

Abstract

● Patterns and effects of N deposition on urban forests are reviewed.

● N deposition generally shows an urban hotspot phenomenon.

● Urban N deposition shows high ratios of ammonium to nitrate.

● N deposition likely has distinct effects on urban and natural forests.

The global urban area is expanding continuously, resulting in unprecedented emissions and deposition of reactive nitrogen (N) in urban environments. However, large knowledge gaps remain in the ecological effects of N deposition on urban forests that provide key ecosystem services for an increasing majority of city dwellers. The current understanding of the spatial patterns and ecological effects of N deposition in urban forests was synthesized based on a literature review of observational and experimental studies. Nitrogen deposition generally increases closer to cities, resulting in an urban hotspot phenomenon. Chemical components of N deposition also shift across urban-suburban-rural gradients, showing higher ratios of ammonium to nitrate in and around urban areas. The ecological effects of N deposition on urban forest ecosystems are overviewed with a special focus on ecosystem N cycling, soil acidification, nutrient imbalances, soil greenhouse gas emissions, tree growth and forest productivity, and plant and soil microbial diversity. The distinct effects of unprecedented N deposition on urban forests are discussed in comparison with the common effects in natural forests. Despite the existing research efforts, several key research needs are highlighted to fill the knowledge gaps in the ecological effects of N deposition on urban forests.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

biodiversity / carbon sequestration / nitrogen deposition / nutrient imbalance / soil acidification / urban forest

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Enzai DU, Nan XIA, Yuying GUO, Yuehan TIAN, Binghe LI, Xuejun LIU, Wim de VRIES. ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF NITROGEN DEPOSITION ON URBAN FORESTS: AN OVERVIEW. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng., 2022, 9(3): 445-456 DOI:10.15302/J-FASE-2021429

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

1 INTRODUCTION

The global urban area has expanded rapidly over the past three decades[1,2]. The unprecedented growth of the urban population intensifies fossil fuel consumption, vehicular traffic, waste treatment in urban areas, and agricultural activities in peri-urban regions, resulting in accelerated emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx)[3] and NH3 into the atmosphere[46]. The enhancement of reactive nitrogen (N) emissions and deposition has resulted in cascading environmental effects such as air pollution (e.g., haze and elevated tropospheric O3 concentrations), soil acidification, water eutrophication and damage to human health[7,8]. Urban forests provide key ecosystem services for city dwellers such as regulating the microclimate, removing air pollutants, maintaining urban biodiversity, and benefiting human health[913]. However, major knowledge gaps remain in the ecological effects of N deposition on urban forests.

Nitrogen deposition has been found to exert both beneficial and deleterious effects in natural forests[14] such as a stimulation of forest growth and carbon sequestration under N-limited conditions[15,16] but a loss of species diversity[17], an alteration of non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions (N2O and CH4)[18,19], soil acidification[20] and nutrient imbalances[21] in response to excessive N loads. Unlike natural forests, urban forests consist of less diverse plant species and are subject to distinctive urban environments and considerable horticultural interventions (e.g., irrigation, pruning, cultivation and fertilization)[22,23]. Urban forests generally receive much higher N deposition than natural forests[2427]. However, the urban heat island effect, high moisture stress via evaporation, high-level atmospheric CO2 and air pollutant concentrations (e.g., O3) have a potential to alter tree growth and biogeochemical cycling in urban forests[2832]. Therefore, the ecological effects of N deposition are likely to be distinct in urban forests as compared with natural forests.

The ecological effects of N deposition in urban environments are of rising concern given that urbanization continues globally and an increasing majority of people live in cities[27]. Based on a literature review of observational and experimental studies, we developed a new perspective on (1) the spatial pattern of N deposition across urban-suburban-natural gradients as well as the interactions with atmospheric deposition of other elements, and (2) ecological effects of N deposition on urban forest ecosystems with a special focus on ecosystem N cycling, soil acidification, nutrient imbalances, soil greenhouse gas emissions, tree growth and forest productivity, and plant and soil microbial diversity. Instead of using a more quantitative approach (e.g., meta-analysis), our review is based mainly on a qualitative synthesis of the literature because there are limited research results in this emerging field. Finally, we discuss major knowledge gaps and recommend future research efforts that will gain further insights into the consequences of N deposition in urban forests. We also highlight a need to develop integrated forest management approaches to amend negative effects of high-level urban N deposition.

2 NITROGEN DEPOSITION IN URBAN ENVIRONMENTS

2.1 Urban hotspots of nitrogen deposition

Urbanization creates a typical landscape with apparent urban-suburban-natural transitions of land cover and environmental factors (Fig.1). Building density, population density, and road network density generally decrease from urban areas, while vegetation cover increases toward natural areas[33]. Urban areas with high population density are hotspots of anthropogenic emissions of multiple air pollutants including NOx and NH3, due to intensive energy production, motor traffic, waste treatment and industrial activities[34]. As a result, atmospheric NOx and NH3 both show the highest concentrations in the central urban areas as indicated by ground measured data and satellite retrieved data[35,36] (Fig.2).

Observational studies generally suggest that N deposition shows a strong spatial trend across urban-suburban-natural gradients[25,39,40] (Fig.2). Based on a spatial analysis of field-measured data on N deposition in Chinese forests, Du et al.[38] found that N deposition generally showed a power-law increase closer to large cities, i.e., urban hotspots of N deposition (Fig.2), being in line with the observed urban hotspots of atmospheric reactive N concentrations[35,36]. Recently, a global meta-analysis further confirmed the occurrence of urban hotspots of N deposition in global cities and showed that N deposition in urban areas was on average twice as high as in nearby rural areas[27]. Urban forests are thus subject to extremely high levels of N deposition compared with their natural counterparts.

Chemical components of N deposition also shift across urban-suburban-natural gradients (Fig.2). In contrast to the conventional view that oxidized N dominates total N emissions and deposition in urban areas, Du et al.[38] found that the ratios of ammonium (NH4+) to nitrate (NO3) in bulk precipitation and throughfall in Chinese forests both showed a significant increase closer to large cities. This shift in components of N deposition toward the urban area is further confirmed by a global synthesis, demonstrating that urban N deposition is predominately composed of chemically reduced (e.g., NH3 and NH4+) rather than oxidized N forms (e.g., NOx and NO3)[27]. The prevalence of reduced N forms in urban N deposition is likely due to three causes. First, cities are hotspots of NH3 emissions because of excessive vehicular traffic, sewage treatment, waste disposal and/or fertilizer applications in lawns[4,5,36,41]. Second, atmospheric NH3 has a shorter residence time than NOx and thus ammonium deposition is accelerated in urban areas[42,43]. Third, NOx emissions have been substantially curbed in most countries but NH3 emissions remain largely unregulated, thus contributing to the dominance of reduced N forms in and around urban areas[4446].

2.2 Interactions with atmospheric deposition of other elements

Nitrogen deposition is an important component of acid deposition with an additional contribution from sulfur (S) deposition. Although NH3 neutralizes sulfuric and nitric acids in cloud water and precipitation, deposited ammonium has a strong potential to generate soil acidification[47,48]. By synthesizing chemical fluxes in bulk precipitation and throughfall in forests of southern China, Du et al.[26] proposed the concept of an urban acid island and demonstrated that atmospheric deposition of nitrate, ammonium and sulfate all showed a power-law increase toward the urban areas, whereas rainwater pH showed a logarithmic decline closer to large cities. The emerging industrial clusters in suburban areas under transitional economies may cause increasing S deposition in suburban areas[49], thus changing the spatial pattern of SO2 emissions at local scale. Given that S deposition has declined globally due to a decline in anthropogenic SO2 emissions in recent decades[50], the contribution of N deposition to acid deposition and thereby to urban acid islands is thus of increasing importance.

Atmospheric inputs of base cations (e.g., K+, Ca2+ and Mg2+) can partially buffer the effect of acid deposition by N and S compounds. A synthesis of bulk deposition data across Chinese forests showed a power-law increase in base cation deposition closer to large cities. The urban hotspots of base cation deposition thus neutralize a considerable proportion of the potential acid load due to acid deposition and partially replenish the leaching loss of soil base cations[51]. Also, a synthesis of field-measured data in Chinese forests indicates high N:P ratios in bulk deposition and throughfall deposition, being 2–3 times of that in plant leaves[37]. The imbalanced N and P deposition thus likely enhances P limitation in urban forests over time. However, P deposition also exhibits an urban hotspot pattern, partially alleviating the N-induced P limitation in urban environments[37].

3 EFFECTS OF NITROGEN DEPOSITION ON URBAN FOREST ECOSYSTEMS

Insights into the ecological effects of N deposition on urban forests are mainly derived from manipulative N addition experiments and field-based monitoring studies across N deposition gradients. However, such studies are rare in urban forests compared with those conducted in natural forests. Here, we describe a new perspective on the effects of unprecedented urban N deposition on ecosystem N cycling, soil acidification, nutrient imbalances, soil greenhouse gas emissions, tree growth and forest productivity, and plant and soil microbial diversity (Fig.3).

3.1 Effects on nitrogen cycling

Urban forests are important sinks of N inputs from atmospheric deposition[59,60]. Similar to the effects in natural forests[52,53], N deposition directly increases N availability and thereafter alters ecosystem N cycling in urban forests. For example, field studies along an urban-rural gradient in the Pearl River Delta of southern China indicate that N deposition significantly increased soil available N concentrations in urban and suburban forests as compared with that in rural forests[39,61]. Across an urban-rural tropical forest gradient in Puerto Rico, higher soil nitrate concentrations were found nearer to the urban core in parallel with higher atmospheric N deposition[62]. A study of Mediterranean ecosystems across an N deposition gradient in proximity to urban Los Angeles shows that N deposition strongly shaped regional soil N availability, resulting in an increase in soil nitrate and ammonium concentrations and a decrease in soil C:N ratios toward the urban area[63]. Also, a field study across the greater Boston area indicates that the soil nitrate concentration increased with throughfall nitrate inputs while the soil ammonium concentration was not correlated with throughfall N inputs[64].

Urban hotspots of N deposition likely reshape a regional pattern of N cycling across urban-rural-natural forests. For example, net N mineralization was found to decrease significantly from urban to rural forests in the New York City metropolitan area with a larger proportion of the mineralized N being nitrified in urban and suburban forests whereas net nitrification was mostly below the detection limit in rural forests[65]. Field studies across urban-rural forests in the Pearl River Delta showed an increase in soil nitrification and a decrease in soil and plant foliage δ15N values with the higher N deposition, implying a significant alteration of regional N cycling[39,66]. Generally, high-level N deposition likely results in faster N cycling and an easier N saturation in urban forests than in rural forests[39,65]. Consequently, nitrate leaching to stream water was found to increase with N deposition and showed high levels in urban forests, potentially contributing to the eutrophication of urban waterbodies[25,39].

3.2 Effects on soil acidification

Nitrogen deposition has been found to increase soil acidification and the toxicity of metals (e.g., Al and Fe) in natural forests[20]. In view of the urban acid island hypothesis[26], high-level N deposition may contribute to stronger soil acidification in urban forests than in rural and natural forests. Based on field investigations across urban-rural forests in the Pearl River Delta, soil pH decreased significantly with higher N deposition[39,61]. Although base cation deposition also shows urban hotspots and partially buffers acid deposition[51], the field evidence given above implies a stronger effect of the urban acid island. Also, high-level N deposition likely causes accelerated leaching of base cations and further increases concentrations of soluble aluminum and/or iron over time, causing negative effects on plant growth and biodiversity[20].

3.3 Effects on nutrient imbalances

Nitrogen deposition in natural ecosystems frequently causes imbalances of leaf N in relation to other nutrients due to increased N availability[54]. Urban hotspots of N deposition likely result in stronger nutrient imbalances in urban forests due to increased soil N availability and acidification. Soil calcium and potassium concentrations were found to decrease significantly with N deposition from rural forests to urban forests in the Guangzhou metropolitan area, China[61], potentially causing a deficiency of base cationic nutrients in urban forests due to soil acidification. Long-term N deposition has been demonstrated to increase leaf N:P ratios in two forests close to urban centers in subtropical China, resulting in an enhancement of P limitation[67]. Also, a field monitoring study of soil nutrient leaching across urban parks in Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States, found that urban trees substantially reduced leaching of P but not N to groundwater[68], implying a risk of N saturation and P deficiency driven by high-level urban N deposition.

3.4 Effects on soil greenhouse gas fluxes

Urban forest soils are both sinks of CH4 and sources of N2O and CO2 that are strongly regulated by N availability[6971]. High-level N deposition is conventionally thought to increase soil N2O emissions and suppress soil heterotrophic respiration and CH4 uptake in many natural ecosystems[18,72,73]. In contrast, positive effects of low-level N deposition on soil heterotrophic respiration and CH4 uptake are also suggested in N-limited natural forests[15,19]. In view of the urban hotspot effect, N deposition tends to reduce soil respiration and CH4 uptake and cause stronger soil N2O emissions in urban forests. A strong urban heat island effect may cause lower soil moisture contents in urban environments, potentially causing an increase in soil CH4 uptake and a decrease in N2O emissions[74,75]. Watering practices, frequently conducted in urban forests, likely increase drying and rewetting cycles with periods of high N2O and CO2 emissions[75,76]. These processes might mediate the fluxes of soil greenhouse gases in response to N deposition in urban forests.

Field monitoring studies across urban-rural forests generally showed a lower capacity of soil CH4 uptake in urban forests relative to rural forests and this decline in soil CH4 uptake in urban forests was partially attributed to high-level N deposition[69,77]. Fertilizer applications may also increase N2O emissions in urban garden systems[78]. Experimental N additions in three forests along an urban-rural gradient in Hefei city, east China, suggested an increase in soil respiration by N deposition[79]. In contrast, a monitoring study across the greater Boston area, Massachusetts, United States, indicates that soil respiration was not associated with N deposition[64]. These inconsistent results based on limited studies highlight key knowledge gaps in the effects of N deposition on soil greenhouse gas emissions in urban forests.

3.5 Effects on tree growth and forest productivity

Nitrogen deposition favors tree growth in most natural forests and tends to increase the aboveground biomass allocation[16,55]. Urban forests are likely less limited by N than natural forests in view of high-level urban N deposition. In that case, N deposition is likely to exert only minor stimulatory effects on tree growth in urban forests and other factors will be more important. For example, cottonwood (Populus deltoids) was found to grow faster in an urban area of New York City than in surrounding rural areas and this difference was attributed to the effect of O3 (i.e., higher O3 concentrations in rural areas) instead of N deposition[80]. A field study along an urban-rural transect from the central area of New York City indicates a strong growth stimulation of red oak (Quercus rubra) seedlings at urban sites relative to those grown at rural sites but this effect was mainly due to higher temperatures at urban sites[81]. In contrast, high-level N deposition may suppress urban forest growth over time due to an increase in P limitation, soil acidification and a decrease in water use efficiency[67]. Also, high-level N deposition can increase tree leaf N contents and decrease resistant metabolites, potentially increasing the risk of pest outbreak and consequent damage to urban forests.

3.6 Effects on plant and soil microbial diversity

Urban forests are key to maintaining plant biodiversity in urban areas. In line with the well-recognized negative effects on plant biodiversity in natural ecosystems[17,56], high-level N deposition also likely alters understory species composition and decreases plant species richness in urban forests, especially those with less management. By evaluating the plant species richness of Mediterranean-type ecosystems across a strong gradient of N deposition with proximity to Los Angeles, California, USA, Valliere et al.[63] found a significant decline in species richness of native forbs and shrubs with higher N deposition, while N deposition had no effect on the richness of introduced species but significantly increased their cover. A field study across urban-rural forests in metropolitan Guangzhou, south China, demonstrated a decline in understory herb-layer diversity with higher N deposition due to N-related changes in soil properties (i.e., decreasing pH and loss of Ca2+ and K+)[61]. These results indicate that the selection and arrangement of N-tolerant plant species are important in urban forest planning.

Nitrogen deposition generally exerts a negative effect on total microbial biomass and decreases the fungi-to-bacteria ratio in natural ecosystems[57,58]. Nitrogen deposition also likely results in a profound effect on soil microbial diversity in urban forests and surrounding lawns. In an urban green space covered by Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon), simulated N deposition (NH4NO3 at 50, 100 and 150 kg·ha−1·yr−1 N) significantly changed the bacterial community composition and caused a loss of bacterial diversity in soils[82]. A field study along an urban-rural N deposition gradient in combination with N addition experiments indicates distinct effects of N deposition on arbuscular mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal fungal abundance, i.e., lower mycorrhizal colonization at sites with higher N deposition and plots with N fertilization[83], being consistent with the effects in natural forests[58]. Future research efforts are recommended to reveal the interplay of aboveground plant diversity and belowground microbial diversity in the context of high-level N deposition in urban forests.

4 CONCLUSIONS AND OUTLOOK

4.1 Concluding remarks

By reviewing existing observational and experimental studies in the literature we conclude that N deposition has profound impacts on urban forests and highlights several potential detrimental effects that threaten the health and function of urban forest ecosystems. High-level urban N deposition can accelerate soil acidification, activate the toxicity of metals, induce imbalances between N and other nutrients, and cause N saturation over time. Although N deposition provides external N sources for urban forests it may cause a decline in tree growth when a certain threshold N load is exceeded. High-level urban N deposition likely increases soil N2O emissions and suppresses soil CH4 uptake in urban forests. Also, the urban hotspots of N deposition can exert negative effects on plant and soil microbial diversity, including a facilitation of introduced species and a suppression of native species.

4.2 Future research needs

Despite the existing research efforts, large knowledge gaps remain regarding the ecological effects of N deposition on urban forests. For example, the dominance of ammonium in and around cities indicates a need to separate the effects of ammonium deposition from those of nitrate deposition in urban forests, considering that atmospheric deposited ammonium and nitrate have distinct fates and ecological consequences in natural ecosystems[8486]. Also, terrestrial plants can either directly take up available N from soils via roots that are frequently in association with mycorrhizal fungi or absorb reactive gaseous and ionic N via the leaves[8789]. Compared with natural plants, urban forests might utilize considerable atmospheric reactive N via canopy uptake in view of the high concentrations of atmospheric NOx and NH3 and rain water ammonium and nitrate in urban environments. However, the role of canopy N uptake has been rarely considered when evaluating the effects of N deposition in urban forests.

Unlike natural forest ecosystems, urban forest fragmentation is prevalent due to multiple socioeconomic drivers[90], resulting in a strong increase in forest edges. As indicated by studies in natural forests there are significant changes in light, temperature and soil moisture from the forest edge to the center[91,92]. Also, forest edges are found to be nutrient concentrators of airborne nutrients, especially N[9395]. As an overall result, the edge effect tends to accelerate nutrient (especially N) cycling, favor tree growth and enhance carbon sequestration, and alter plant community structure[92,9698]. However, these consequences have been rarely investigated in urban forests and a knowledge gap thus remains concerning how forest edges interact with the effects of N deposition.

Nitrogen deposition occurs simultaneously with various air pollutants and soil contaminants in urban environments. High-level N deposition has a potential to interplay with other anthropogenic contaminants and affect their biogeochemical cycles. For example, a mesocosm experiment found that N additions significantly decreased soil leaching of phenanthrene (a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon; PAH) and exerted a positive effect on phenanthrene retention in retention in the plant–soil system but did not cause significant effects on the dynamics of pyrene (another PAH)[99]. More research is needed to determine the effects of N deposition on the retention of soil contaminants such as potentially toxic metals, PAHs and microplastics, in urban forest ecosystems that are important sinks of atmospheric pollutants[13,100].

Given that urban forests are subject to strong urban heat island effects and moisture stress, high-level CO2 and ozone concentrations, and frequent horticultural interventions[23,33,81], further research is needed to evaluate the combined effects of urban N deposition and these factors. Also, there is a need to develop integrated forest management approaches[101] to amend negative effects of high-level N deposition in urban forests with the potential for N saturation. These efforts will increase our understanding of urban forest dynamics and have important implications for urban forest management which are closely linked to sustainable development[102].

References

[1]

LiX, Gong P, ZhouY, WangJ, BaiY, ChenB, HuT, Xiao Y, XuB, YangJ, LiuX, CaiW, HuangH, WuT, Wang X, LinP, LiX, Chen J, HeC, LiX, Yu L, ClintonN, ZhuZ. Mapping global urban boundaries from the global artificial impervious area (GAIA) data. Environmental Research Letters , 2020, 15( 9): 094044

[2]

LiuX P, HuangY H, XuX C, LiX C, LiX, Ciais P, LinP, GongK, ZieglerA D, ChenA N, GongP, ChenJ, HuG H, ChenY M, WangS J, WuQ S, HuangK N, EstesL, ZengZ Z. High-spatiotemporal-resolution mapping of global urban change from 1985 to 2015. Nature Sustainability , 2020, 3( 7): 564–570

[3]

DuncanB N, LamsalL N, ThompsonA M, YoshidaY, LuZ, Streets D G, HurwitzM M, PickeringK E. A space-based, high-resolution view of notable changes in urban NOx pollution around the world (2005–2014). Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , 2016, 121( 2): 976–996

[4]

SunK, TaoL, MillerD J, PanD, GolstonL M, ZondloM A, GriffinR J, WallaceH W, LeongY J, YangM M, ZhangY, MauzerallD L, ZhuT. Vehicle emissions as an important urban ammonia source in the United States and China. Environmental Science & Technology , 2017, 51( 4): 2472–2481

[5]

FarrenN J, DavisonJ, RoseR A, WagnerR L, CarslawD C. Underestimated ammonia emissions from road vehicles. Environmental Science & Technology , 2020, 54( 24): 15689–15697

[6]

ZhangY, BenedictK B, TangA, SunY, FangY, LiuX. Persistent nonagricultural and periodic agricultural emissions dominate sources of ammonia in urban Beijing: Evidence from 15N stable isotope in vertical profiles. Environmental Science & Technology , 2020, 54( 1): 102–109

[7]

ErismanJ W, GallowayJ N, SeitzingerS, BleekerA, DiseN B, PetrescuA M R, LeachA M, deVries W. Consequences of human modification of the global nitrogen cycle. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences , 2013, 368( 1621): 20130116

[8]

BoningariT, SmirniotisP G. Impact of nitrogen oxides on the environment and human health: Mn-based materials for the NOx abatement. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering , 2016, 13 : 133–141

[9]

NowakD J, CraneD E, StevensJ C, HoehnR E, WaltonJ T, BondJ. A ground-based method of assessing urban forest structure and ecosystem services. Agriculture & Urban Forestry , 2008, 34( 6): 347–358

[10]

JimC Y, ChenW Y. Ecosystem services and valuation of urban forests in China. Cities , 2009, 26( 4): 187–194

[11]

DobbsC, EscobedoF J, ZippererW C. A framework for developing urban forest ecosystem services and goods indicators. Landscape and Urban Planning , 2011, 99( 3–4): 3–4

[12]

PatakiD E, CarreiroM M, CherrierJ, GrulkeN E, JenningsV, PincetlS, PouyatR V, WhitlowT H, ZippererW C. Coupling biogeochemical cycles in urban environments: ecosystem services, green solutions, and misconceptions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment , 2011, 9( 1): 27–36

[13]

GroteR, SamsonR, AlonsoR, AmorimJ H, CariñanosP, ChurkinaG, FaresS, ThiecD L, NiinemetsÜ MikkelsenT N, PaolettiE, TiwaryA, CalfapietraC. Functional traits of urban trees: air pollution mitigation potential. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment , 2016, 14( 10): 543–550

[14]

DuE, Fenn M E, DeVries W, OkY S. Atmospheric nitrogen deposition to global forests: Status, impacts and management options. Environmental Pollution , 2019, 250 : 1044–1048

[15]

DeVries W, DuE Z, Butterbach-BahlK. Short and long-term impacts of nitrogen deposition on carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability , 2014, 9–10: 9–10

[16]

Schulte-UebbingL, deVries W. Global-scale impacts of nitrogen deposition on tree carbon sequestration in tropical, temperate, and boreal forests: a meta-analysis. Global Change Biology , 2018, 24( 2): e416–e431

[17]

PayneR J, DiseN B, FieldC D, DoreA J, CapornS J, StevensC J. Nitrogen deposition and plant biodiversity: past, present, and future. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment , 2017, 15( 8): 431–436

[18]

DengL, HuangC B, KimD G, ShangguanZ P, WangK B, SongX Z, PengC H. Soil GHG fluxes are altered by N deposition: new data indicate lower N stimulation of the N2O flux and greater stimulation of the calculated C pools. Global Change Biology , 2020, 26( 4): 2613–2629

[19]

XiaN, DuE, Wu X, TangY, WangY, deVries W. Effects of nitrogen addition on soil methane uptake in global forest biomes. Environmental Pollution , 2020, 264 : 114751

[20]

BowmanW D, ClevelandC C, HaladaĹ HreškoJ, BaronJ S. Negative impact of nitrogen deposition on soil buffering capacity. Nature Geoscience , 2008, 1( 11): 767–770

[21]

PeñuelasJ, PoulterB, SardansJ, CiaisP, vander Velde M, BoppL, BoucherO, GodderisY, HinsingerP, LlusiaJ, NardinE, ViccaS, ObersteinerM, JanssensI A. Human-induced nitrogen-phosphorus imbalances alter natural and managed ecosystems across the globe. Nature Communications , 2013, 4( 1): 2934

[22]

KonijnendijkC C, RicardR M, KenneyA, RandrupT B. Defining urban forestry—a comparative perspective of North America and Europe. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening , 2006, 4( 3–4): 3–4

[23]

ClintonN, GongP. MODIS detected surface urban heat islands and sinks: global locations and controls. Remote Sensing of Environment , 2013, 134 : 294–304

[24]

LovettG M, TraynorM M, PouyatR V, CarreiroM M, ZhuW X, BaxterJ W. Atmospheric deposition to oak forests along an urban-rural gradient. Environmental Science & Technology , 2000, 34( 20): 4294–4300

[25]

RaoP, HutyraL R, RacitiS M, TemplerP H. Atmospheric nitrogen inputs and losses along an urbanization gradient from Boston to Harvard Forest, MA. Biogeochemistry , 2014, 121( 1): 229–245

[26]

DuE, de Vries W, Liu X, FangJ, GallowayJ N, JiangY. Spatial boundary of urban ‘acid islands’ in southern China. Scientific Reports , 2015, 5( 1): 12625

[27]

DecinaS M, HutyraL R, TemplerP H. Hotspots of nitrogen deposition in the world’s urban areas: a global data synthesis. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment , 2020, 18( 2): 92–100

[28]

CreggB M, DixM E. Tree moisture stress and insect damage in urban areas in relation to heat island effects. Journal of Arboriculture , 2001, 27( 1): 8–17

[29]

KayeJ P, GroffmanP M, GrimmN B, BakerL A, PouyatR V. A distinct urban biogeochemistry. Trends in Ecology & Evolution , 2006, 21( 4): 192–199

[30]

LorenzK, LalR. Biogeochemical C and N cycles in urban soils. Environment International , 2009, 35( 1): 1–8

[31]

KaushalS S, McDowellW H, WollheimW M. Tracking evolution of urban biogeochemical cycles: past, present, and future. Biogeochemistry , 2014, 121( 1): 1–21

[32]

ZipperS C, SchatzJ, KucharikC J, LoheideS P II. Urban heat island-induced increases in evapotranspirative demand. Geophysical Research Letters , 2017, 44( 2): 873–881

[33]

GrimmN B, FaethS H, GolubiewskiN E, RedmanC L, WuJ, Bai X, BriggsJ M. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science , 2008, 319( 5864): 756–760

[34]

SarzynskiA. Bigger is not always better: a comparative analysis of cities and their air pollution impact. Urban Studies , 2012, 49( 14): 3121–3138

[35]

BeirleS, BoersmaK F, PlattU, LawrenceM G, WagnerT. Megacity emissions and lifetimes of nitrogen oxides probed from space. Science , 2011, 333( 6050): 1737–1739

[36]

RecheC, VianaM, KaranasiouA, CusackM, AlastueyA, ArtiñanoB, RevueltaM A, López-MahíaP, Blanco-HerasG, RodríguezS, Sánchezde la Campa A M, Fernández-CamachoR, González-CastanedoY, MantillaE, TangY S, QuerolX. Urban NH3 levels and sources in six major Spanish cities. Chemosphere , 2015, 119 : 769–777

[37]

DuE Z, DeVries W, HanW X, LiuX J, YanZ B, JiangY. Imbalanced phosphorus and nitrogen deposition in China’s forests. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics , 2016, 16( 13): 8571–8579

[38]

DuE Z, JiangY, FangJ Y, DeVries W. Inorganic nitrogen deposition in China’s forests: status and characteristics. Atmospheric Environment , 2014, 98 : 474–482

[39]

FangY T, YohM, KobaK, ZhuW X, TakebayashiY U, XiaoY H, LeiC, MoJ M, ZhangW, LuX K. Nitrogen deposition and forest nitrogen cycling along an urban-rural transect in southern China. Global Change Biology , 2011, 17( 2): 872–885

[40]

BettezN D, GroffmanP M. Nitrogen deposition in and near an urban ecosystem. Environmental Science & Technology , 2013, 47( 11): 6047–6051

[41]

WangW, HaverD, PatakiD E. Nitrogen budgets of urban lawns under three different management regimes in southern California. Biogeochemistry , 2014, 121( 1): 127–148

[42]

AsmanW A, SuttonM A, SchjørringJ K. Ammonia: emission, atmospheric transport and deposition. New Phytologist , 1998, 139( 1): 27–48

[43]

WenigM, SpichtingerN, StohlA, HeldG, BeirleS, WagnerT, JahneB, PlattU. Intercontinental transport of nitrogen oxide pollution plumes. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics , 2003, 3( 2): 387–393

[44]

DuE. Rise and fall of nitrogen deposition in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , 2016, 113( 26): E3594–E3595

[45]

CastellanosP, BoersmaK F. Reductions in nitrogen oxides over Europe driven by environmental policy and economic recession. Scientific Reports , 2012, 2( 1): 265

[46]

LiuX J, XuW, Du E Z, TangA H, ZhangY, ZhangY Y, WenZ, HaoT X, PanY P, ZhangL, GuB J, ZhaoY, ShenJ L, ZhouF, GaoZ L, FengZ Z, ChangY H, GouldingK, CollettJ L Jr, VitousekP M, ZhangF S. Environmental impacts of nitrogen emissions in China and the role of policies in emission reduction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A , 2020, 378( 2183): 20190324

[47]

DeVries W, BreeuwsmaA. The relation between soil acidification and element cycling. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution , 1987, 35( 3–4): 3–4

[48]

GallowayJ N. Acid deposition: perspectives in time and space. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution , 1995, 85( 1): 15–24

[49]

ZhangL, YueW, LiuY, FanP, WeiY D. Suburban industrial land development in transitional China: spatial restructuring and determinants. Cities , 2018a, 78: 96–107

[50]

LuoJ, HanY, ZhaoY, LiuX, HuangY, WangL, ChenK, TaoS, LiuJ, MaJ. An inter-comparative evaluation of PKU-FUEL global SO2 emission inventory. Science of the Total Environment , 2020, 722 : 137755

[51]

DuE Z, DeVries W, McNultyS, FennM E. Bulk deposition of base cationic nutrients in China’s forests: annual rates and spatial characteristics. Atmospheric Environment , 2018, 184 : 121–128

[52]

GundersenP, EmmettB A, KjønaasO J, KoopmansC J, TietemaA. Impact of nitrogen deposition on nitrogen cycling in forests: a synthesis of NITREX data. Forest Ecology and Management , 1998, 101( 1–3): 1–3

[53]

ChengY, WangJ, ChangS X, CaiZ, MüllerC, ZhangJ. Nitrogen deposition affects both net and gross soil nitrogen transformations in forest ecosystems: a review. Environmental Pollution , 2019, 244 : 608–616

[54]

MaoJ, MaoQ, ZhengM, MoJ. Responses of foliar nutrient status and stoichiometry to nitrogen addition in different ecosystems: a meta-analysis. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences , 2020, 125( 2): e2019JG005347

[55]

LiW, Zhang H, HuangG, LiuR, WuH, Zhao C, McDowellN G. Effects of nitrogen enrichment on tree carbon allocation: a global synthesis. Global Ecology and Biogeography , 2020b, 29(3): 573–589

[56]

BobbinkR, HicksK, GallowayJ, SprangerT, AlkemadeR, AshmoreM, BustamanteM, CinderbyS, DavidsonE, DentenerF, EmmettB, ErismanJ W, FennM, GilliamF, NordinA, PardoL, DeVries W. Global assessment of nitrogen deposition effects on terrestrial plant diversity: a synthesis. Ecological Applications , 2010, 20( 1): 30–59

[57]

ZhangT, ChenH Y H, RuanH. Global negative effects of nitrogen deposition on soil microbes. ISME Journal , 2018, 12( 7): 1817–1825

[58]

LilleskovE A, KuyperT W, BidartondoM I, HobbieE A. Atmospheric nitrogen deposition impacts on the structure and function of forest mycorrhizal communities: A review. Environmental Pollution , 2019, 246 : 148–162

[59]

GroffmanP M, LawN L, BeltK T, BandL E, FisherG T. Nitrogen fluxes and retention in urban watershed ecosystems. Ecosystems , 2004, 7( 4): 393–403

[60]

RacitiS M, GroffmanP M, FaheyT J. Nitrogen retention in urban lawns and forests. Ecological Applications , 2008, 18( 7): 1615–1626

[61]

HuangL J, ZhuW X, RenH, ChenH F, WangJ. Impact of atmospheric nitrogen deposition on soil properties and herb-layer diversity in remnant forests along an urban-rural gradient in Guangzhou, southern China. Plant Ecology , 2012, 213( 7): 1187–1202

[62]

CusackD F, LeeJ K, McCleeryT L, LeCroyC S. Exotic grasses and nitrate enrichment alter soil carbon cycling along an urban-rural tropical forest gradient. Global Change Biology , 2015, 21( 12): 4481–4496

[63]

ValliereJ M, BucciarelliG M, BytnerowiczA, FennM E, IrvineI C, JohnsonR F, AllenE B. Declines in native forb richness of an imperiled plant community across an anthropogenic nitrogen deposition gradient. Ecosphere , 2020, 11( 2): e03032

[64]

DecinaS M, TemplerP H, HutyraL R, GatelyC K, RaoP. Variability, drivers, and effects of atmospheric nitrogen inputs across an urban area: Emerging patterns among human activities, the atmosphere, and soils. Science of the Total Environment , 2017, 609 : 1524–1534

[65]

ZhuW X, CarreiroM M. Temporal and spatial variations in nitrogen transformations in deciduous forest ecosystems along an urban-rural gradient. Soil Biology & Biochemistry , 2004, 36( 2): 267–278

[66]

KuangY W, SunF F, WenD Z, XuZ H, HuangL B, LiJ. Nitrogen deposition influences nitrogen isotope composition in soil and needles of Pinus massoniana forests along an urban-rural gradient in the Pearl River Delta of south China. Journal of Soils and Sediments , 2011, 11( 4): 589–595

[67]

HuangZ, LiuB, DavisM, SardansJ, PeñuelasJ, BillingsS. Long-term nitrogen deposition linked to reduced water use efficiency in forests with low phosphorus availability. New Phytologist , 2016, 210( 2): 431–442

[68]

NidzgorskiD A, HobbieS E. Urban trees reduce nutrient leaching to groundwater. Ecological Applications , 2016, 26( 5): 1566–1580

[69]

GroffmanP M, PouyatR V. Methane uptake in urban forests and lawns. Environmental Science & Technology , 2009, 43( 14): 5229–5235

[70]

GroffmanP M, WilliamsC O, PouyatR V, BandL E, YesilonisI D. Nitrate leaching and nitrous oxide flux in urban forests and grasslands. Journal of Environmental Quality , 2009, 38( 5): 1848–1860

[71]

DecinaS M, HutyraL R, GatelyC K, GetsonJ M, ReinmannA B, ShortGianotti A G, TemplerP H. Soil respiration contributes substantially to urban carbon fluxes in the greater Boston area. Environmental Pollution , 2016, 212 : 433–439

[72]

LiuL, GreaverT L. A review of nitrogen enrichment effects on three biogenic GHGs: the CO2 sink may be largely offset by stimulated N2O and CH4 emission. Ecology Letters , 2009, 12( 10): 1103–1117

[73]

JanssensI A, DielemanW, LuyssaertS, SubkeJ A, ReichsteinM, CeulemansR, CiaisP, DolmanA J, GraceJ, MatteucciG, PapaleD, PiaoS L, SchulzeE D, TangJ, LawB E. Reduction of forest soil respiration in response to nitrogen deposition. Nature Geoscience , 2010, 3( 5): 315–322

[74]

LiuL, EstiarteM, PeñuelasJ. Soil moisture as the key factor of atmospheric CH4 uptake in forest soils under environmental change. Geoderma , 2019, 355 : 113920

[75]

BarratH A, EvansJ, ChadwickD R, ClarkI M, LeCocq K, CardenasL M. The impact of drought and rewetting on N2O emissions from soil in temperate and Mediterranean climates . European Journal of Soil Science , 2020 [Published online] doi: 10.1111/ejss.13015

[76]

ZhangS, YuZ, Lin J, ZhuB. Responses of soil carbon decomposition to drying-rewetting cycles: a meta-analysis. Geoderma , 2020, 361 : 114069

[77]

ZhangW, WangK, LuoY, FangY, YanJ, ZhangT, ZhuX, ChenH, WangW, MoJ. Methane uptake in forest soils along an urban-to-rural gradient in Pearl River Delta, South China. Scientific Reports , 2014, 4( 1): 5120

[78]

LivesleyS J, DoughertyB J, SmithA J, NavaudD, WylieL J, ArndtS K. Soil-atmosphere exchange of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide in urban garden systems: impact of irrigation, fertiliser and mulch. Urban Ecosystems , 2010, 13( 3): 273–293

[79]

FuR X, XuX N, YuY C, ZhangY B, SunZ L, TaoX. Forest soil respiration response to increasing nitrogen deposition along an urban-rural gradient. Global Ecology and Conservation , 2021, 27 : e01575

[80]

GreggJ W, JonesC G, DawsonT E. Urbanization effects on tree growth in the vicinity of New York City. Nature , 2003, 424( 6945): 183–187

[81]

SearleS Y, TurnbullM H, BoelmanN T, SchusterW S F, YakirD, GriffinK L. Urban environment of New York City promotes growth in northern red oak seedlings. Tree Physiology , 2012, 32( 4): 389–400

[82]

MoL Z, ZanellaA, ChenX H, PengB, LinJ H, SuJ X, LuoX H, XuG L, SquartiniA. Effects of simulated nitrogen deposition on the bacterial community of urban green spaces. Applied Sciences , 2021, 11( 3): 918

[83]

SigüenzaC, CrowleyD E, AllenE B. Soil microorganisms of a native shrub and exotic grasses along a nitrogen deposition gradient in southern California. Applied Soil Ecology , 2006, 32( 1): 13–26

[84]

BrittoD T, KronzuckerH J. NH4+ toxicity in higher plants: a critical review. Journal of Plant Physiology , 2002, 159( 6): 567–584

[85]

TemplerP H, MackM C, ChapinF S 3rd, ChristensonL M, ComptonJ E, CrookH D, CurrieW S, CurtisC J, DailD B, D’AntonioC M, EmmettB A, EpsteinH E, GoodaleC L, GundersenP, HobbieS E, HollandK, HooperD U, HungateB A, LamontagneS, NadelhofferK J, OsenbergC W, PerakisS S, SchleppiP, SchimelJ, SchmidtI K, SommerkornM, SpoelstraJ, TietemaA, WesselW W, ZakD R. Sinks for nitrogen inputs in terrestrial ecosystems: a meta-analysis of 15N tracer field studies. Ecology , 2012, 93( 8): 1816–1829

[86]

YanL, XuX, Xia J. Different impacts of external ammonium and nitrate addition on plant growth in terrestrial ecosystems: a meta-analysis. Science of the Total Environment , 2019, 686 : 1010–1018

[87]

SparksJ P. Ecological ramifications of the direct foliar uptake of nitrogen. Oecologia , 2009, 159( 1): 1–13

[88]

LiuX, ZhangY, HanW, TangA, ShenJ, CuiZ, VitousekP, ErismanJ W, GouldingK, ChristieP, FangmeierA, ZhangF. Enhanced nitrogen deposition over China. Nature , 2013, 494( 7438): 459–462

[89]

WangX, WangB, WangC, WangZ, LiJ, Jia Z, YangS, LiP, Wu Y, PanS, LiuL. Canopy processing of N deposition increases short-term leaf N uptake and photosynthesis, but not long-term N retention for aspen seedlings. New Phytologist , 2021, 229( 5): 2601–2610

[90]

GongC, YuS, Joesting H, ChenJ. Determining socioeconomic drivers of urban forest fragmentation with historical remote sensing images. Landscape and Urban Planning , 2013, 117 : 57–65

[91]

MatlackG R. Microenvironment variation within and among forest edge sites in the eastern United States. Biological Conservation , 1993, 66( 3): 185–194

[92]

SchmidtM, JochheimH, KersebaumK C, LischeidG, NendelC. Gradients of microclimate, carbon and nitrogen in transition zones of fragmented landscapes–a review. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology , 2017, 232 : 659–671

[93]

WeathersK C, CadenassoM L, PickettS T. Forest edges as nutrient and pollutant concentrators: potential synergisms between fragmentation, forest canopies, and the atmosphere. Conservation Biology , 2001, 15( 6): 1506–1514

[94]

DeSchrijver A, DevlaeminckR, MertensJ, WuytsK, HermyM, VerheyenK. On the importance of incorporating forest edge deposition for evaluating exceedance of critical pollutant loads. Applied Vegetation Science , 2007, 10( 2): 293–298

[95]

WuytsK, DeSchrijver A, StaelensJ, GielisL, VandenbruwaneJ, VerheyenK. Comparison of forest edge effects on throughfall deposition in different forest types. Environmental Pollution , 2008, 156( 3): 854–861

[96]

LehvävirtaS, VilisicsF, HambergL, Malmivaara-LämsäM, KotzeD J. Fragmentation and recreational use affect tree regeneration in urban forests. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening , 2014, 13( 4): 869–877

[97]

RemyE, WuytsK, BoeckxP, GinzburgS, GundersenP, DemeyA, VanDen Bulcke J, VanAcker J, VerheyenK. Strong gradients in nitrogen and carbon stocks at temperate forest edges. Forest Ecology and Management , 2016, 376 : 45–58

[98]

SmithI A, HutyraL R, ReinmannA B, MarrsJ K, ThompsonJ R. Piecing together the fragments: elucidating edge effects on forest carbon dynamics. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment , 2018, 16( 4): 213–221

[99]

VauramoS, JääskeläinenV, SetäläH. Environmental fate of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons under different plant traits in urban soil as affected by nitrogen deposition. Applied Soil Ecology , 2011, 47( 3): 167–175

[100]

JanhällS. Review on urban vegetation and particle air pollution— deposition and dispersion. Atmospheric Environment , 2015, 105 : 130–137

[101]

ClarkC M, RichkusJ, JonesP W, PhelanJ, BurnsD A, deVries W, DuE, Fenn M E, JonesL, WatmoughS A. A synthesis of ecosystem management strategies for forests in the face of chronic nitrogen deposition. Environmental Pollution , 2019, 248 : 1046–1058

[102]

ShenJ B, ZhuQ C, JiaoX Q, YingH, WangH L, WenX, XuW, Li T Y, CongW F, LiuX J, HouY, CuiZ L, OenemaO, DaviesW J, ZhangF S. Agriculture Green Development: a model for China and the world. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering , 2020, 7( 1): 5–13

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s) 2021. Published by Higher Education Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (10309KB)

11547

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/