GRASSLAND AGRICULTURE IN CHINA—A REVIEW

Fujiang HOU, Qianmin JIA, Shanning LOU, Chuntao YANG, Jiao NING, Lan LI, Qingshan FAN

Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. ›› 2021, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1) : 35-44.

PDF(1156 KB)
Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. All Journals
PDF(1156 KB)
Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. ›› 2021, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1) : 35-44. DOI: 10.15302/J-FASE-2020378
REVIEW
REVIEW

GRASSLAND AGRICULTURE IN CHINA—A REVIEW

Author information +
History +

Highlights

• Grassland-based livestock production systems cover large areas in China.

• China is facing degradation of rangeland and has great shortage of forage.

• Five types of mixed crop-livestock systems in China described.

• Improving crop–livestock integration requires S&T and policy supports.

Abstract

Interactions between crops and livestock have been at the core of the evolution of many agricultural systems. In this paper, we review the development and characteristics of mixed crop-livestock systems, with a focus on grassland-based systems, as these cover large areas in China, and face several challenges. Following the transition from the original hunting and foraging systems to a sedentary lifestyle with integrated crop-livestock production systems some 8000 years ago, a range of different mixed systems have developed, depending on rainfall, solar radiation and temperature, culture and markets. We describe 5 main types of integrated systems, (1) livestock and rangeland, (2) livestock and grain production, (3) livestock and crop – grassland rotations, (4) livestock, crops and forest (silvo-pasture), and (5) livestock, crops and fish ponds. Next, two of these mixed systems are described in greater detail, i.e., the mountain-oasis-desert system and its modifications in arid and semi-arid regions, and the integrated crop-livestock production systems on the Loess Plateau. In general, crop-livestock interactions in integrated systems have significant positive effects on crop production, livestock production, energy use efficiency and economic profitability. We conclude that improved integration of crop-livestock production systems is one of the most important ways for achieving a more sustainable development of animal agriculture in China.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

food security / ruminant agriculture, herbivove agriculture / crop-livestock interaction / energy balance analysis

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Fujiang HOU, Qianmin JIA, Shanning LOU, Chuntao YANG, Jiao NING, Lan LI, Qingshan FAN. GRASSLAND AGRICULTURE IN CHINA—A REVIEW. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng., 2021, 8(1): 35‒44 https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2020378
Precision agriculture, which can be also called precision farming, may be defined as a management strategy that uses information and communication technologies (ICT) to bring data from multiple sources to bear on decisions associated with crop production. As the introduction of this new technological and industrial revolution proceeds, biotechnology, new materials and nanotechnology, Internet of things (IoT), and new energy technologies have been infiltrating rapidly into agriculture. Advanced manufacturing of agricultural equipment, agricultural big data, and agricultural robots are being adopted by the industry and are gradually being introduced to all fields of production agriculture. Smart agriculture, as the upgrade of precision agriculture is often called, has developed a strong momentum in terms of research, development, commercialization and adoption.
Data acquisition is the first step in implementing precision agriculture and remote sensing can provide an important and convenient method for acquisition of data. Chenghai YANG provides an overview of commercially available high resolution satellite sensors that have been used or have potential for precision agriculture. The applications of these sensors in precision agriculture are reviewed and examples based on the application of the author’s work are provided to illustrate how high resolution satellite imagery has been used for crop identification, crop yield variability mapping and pest management.
Multispectral and hyperspectral imaging are other powerful tools for acquisition data in precision agriculture. Yong ZHANG and Naiqian ZHANG review applications of imaging technologies in high-throughput phenotyping, the applications of imaging technologies in detecting and measuring plant morphological, physiological, and pathological traits, and discuss their advantages and limitations. Du-Han KIM et al. describe a real-time onion disease monitoring system using image acquisition that consists of a motorized driving system and a PTZ (pan, tilt and zoom) camera to take images of plants which, after image processing and analysis, can identify the disease areas of onion. Yongjun DING et al. introduce procedures for the extraction of hyperspectral images to detect immature green citrus fruit. After taking the hyperspectral images within citrus trees under natural illumination conditions, the successive projections algorithm (SPA) selects characteristic wavebands and three slope parameters which are used to identify the green citrus fruit. Construction of a detection model according to the Grey Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) identifies green fruit by analyzing texture features of separate areas. Results show that the developed algorithm has a great potential for identifying immature green citrus for early yield estimation.
Data modelling and interpretion is also an important step in precision agriculture. Yuxin MIAO et al. propose an integrated approach to site-specific management zone delineation. There are three basic approaches to management zone delineation using soil and/or landscape properties, yield information, or both sources of information. Authors suggest an integrated approach to delineate site-specific management zones using relative elevation, organic matter, slope, electrical conductivity, yield spatial trend maps, and yield temporal stability maps. It is concluded that the integrated approach combining soil, landscape and yield spatial-temporal variability information can overcome the weaknesses of approaches using only soil, landscape or yield information, and is more robust for management zone delineation. Taking the late blight potato disease as the subject, Alexey FILIPPOV et al. have developed a weather-based model to determine potential yield losses caused by the disease and optimize fungicide application. Muhammad WASEEM et al. focus on the suitability of common models for estimating hydrology and diffuse water pollution in North-eastern German lowland catchments with intensive agricultural land use, and review desired hydrological, hydraulic and water quality (nitrogen fate and transport in surface, subsurface and groundwater bodies). All those research results can be used in DSS (decision support system) of precision agriculture or smart agriculture.
VRT (variable rate treatment) is the essential part of precision agriculture or smart agriculture. Qing TANG et al. carried out high-speed wind tunnel evaluations of the droplet spectra of air induction nozzles. A series of air induction nozzles were tested and the parameters influencing the droplets distribution were studied and analyzed. UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle) is the symbol of modern agricultural machinery and has been widely utilized in precision agriculture. Weixiang YAO et al. researched the effect of UAV prewetting on pesticide droplet deposition during the flowering period of cotton. After prewetting, the mean droplet deposition quantity was obviously increased and the droplet deposition uniformity on the leaf blade was improved. The results provided a valuable reference for future research and practice to improve the effectiveness of pesticides applied to cotton by aerial applications.
Technology trajectory is also important in precision agriculture or smart agriculture. Beth CLARK et al. propose a framework for accelerating technology trajectories in agriculture in China. The results will provide the policy support to secure sustainable food production and to implement precision agriculture in China.
The articles in this special issue focused on hot topics in precision agriculture. All results and conclusions will be very valuable and helpful to the practice of precision agriculture. As the Guest Editors, we would like to thank all authors and reviewers for their contribution and hard work, as well as the FASE editorial team for their input and support.
Fig.1

Full size|PPT slide

Dr. Chunjiang ZHAO, Academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering, is the director of the National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture (NERCITA), chief expert of the National Research Center of Intelligent Equipment for Agriculture (NRCIEA), director of the National Engineering Laboratory of Agri-product Quality Traceability, and director of the Key Laboratory of Agri-informatics (Ministry of Agriculture). He is also the chairman of the Intelligent Agriculture Committee of the Chinese Association for Artificial Intelligence (CAAI), Vice-President of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, and Vice-President of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery. Dr. ZHAO has been mainly engaged in research on agricultural informatics, agricultural intelligent system, and precision agriculture technology and equipment. He has successively served as the chief expert of the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) “Digital Agriculture Technology and Equipment” in the field of Modern Agriculture, and the team leader of the technical expert group of the 863 Program “Application and Demonstration of Intelligent Agricultural Information Technology” in the field of Information Technology. He has also led the implementation of other national programs such as “Computer Agriculture”, “Digital Agriculture”, and “Precision Agriculture”. Dr. ZHAO has won four Second Class Prizes of the State Scientific and Technological Progress Award, and the UN World Summit Award (WSA) on IT in 2003.
Fig.2

Full size|PPT slide

Dr. Minzan LI, Professor from the College of Information and Electrical Engineering at China Agricultural University, is the director of the Key Laboratory of Modern Precision Agriculture System Integration Research, Ministry of Education. He has served as a vice-chairman of the Committee of Basic Technologies, Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery and a vice-chairman of the Committee of Agricultural Aviation, Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering. Dr. LI has been mainly engaged in detection of soil fertility parameters based on spectral analysis and advanced sensing technology, crop growth detection based on spectroscopy and remote sensing, development of intelligent grain yield measurement system, application of agricultural UAV technology, and application of Internet of Things in agriculture. He has published more than 200 refereed papers and filed more than 20 patents in agricultural informatics and spectroscopy.

References

[1]
National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBSC). National Data. Available at the NBSC website on August 1, 2020
[2]
National Research Council (NRC). Nutrient requirements of beef cattle, 7th edition. Washington DC: Academy Press, 1996
[3]
Bettinger R L. Echoes from the dreamtime. Nature, 2001, 413(6856): 567–568
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Chen X J, Hou F J, Matthew C, He X Z, Soil C. N and P stocks evaluation under major land uses on China’s Loess Plateau. Rangeland Ecology and Management, 2017, 70(3): 341–347
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Dalin C, Hanasaki N, Qiu H, Mauzerall D L, Rodriguez-Iturbe I. Water resources transfers through Chinese interprovincial and foreign food trade. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014, 111(27): 9774–9779
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[6]
Guo T, Xue B, Bai J, Sun Q Z. Discussion of the present situation of China’ s forage grass industry development: An example using alfalfa and oats.   Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(5): 1466–1474 (in Chinese)
[7]
DeFries R S, Foley J A, Asner G P. Land-use choices: balancing human needs and ecosystem function. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2004, 2(5): 249–257
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Hou F J, Nan Z B, Ren J Z. Integrated crop livestock production system. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2009, 18(5): 211–234 (in Chinese)
[9]
Bishwajit G, Sarker S, Kpoghomou M A, Gao H, Jun L, Yin D G, Ghosh S. Self- sufficiency in rice and food security: a South Asian perspective. Agriculture & Food Security, 2013, 2(1): 10
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Hou F J, Wang C M, Lou S N, Hou X Y, Hu T M. Rangeland productivity in China. Strategic Study of CAE, 2016, 18(1): 80–93 (in Chinese)
[11]
Hou F J, Nan Z B. Improvements to rangeland livestock production on the Loess Plateau: a case study of Daliangwa village, Huanxian County. Invited keynote presentations at the 2nd China-Japan-Korea Grassland Conference. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2006, 15: 104–110 (in Chinese)
[12]
Denham T P, Haberle S G, Lentfer C, Fullagar R, Field J, Therin M, Porch N, Winsborough B. Origins of agriculture at Kuk Swamp in the highlands of New Guinea. Science, 2003, 301(5630): 189–193
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[13]
Diamond J. Ants, crops, and history. Science, 1998, 281(5385): 1974–1975
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Diamond J, Bellwood P. Farmers and their languages: the first expansions. Science, 2003, 300(5619): 597–603
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[15]
Sandweiss D H, Maasch K A, Anderson D G. Transitions in the mid-holocene. Science, 1999, 283(5401): 499–500
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Zhang P, Cheng H, Edwards R L, Chen F, Wang Y, Yang X, Liu J, Tan M, Wang X, Liu J, An C, Dai Z, Zhou J, Zhang D, Jia J, Jin L, Johnson K R. A test of climate, sun, and culture relationships from an 1810-year Chinese cave record. Science, 2008, 322(5903): 940–942
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[17]
Ren J Z, Xu G, Li X L, Lin H L, Tang Z. Trajectory and prospect of China’s prataculture. Science Bulletin, 2016, 61(2): 178–192 (in Chinese)
[18]
Hou F J, Nan Z B, Xie Y Z, Li X L, Lin H L, Ren J Z. Integrated crop-livestock production systems in China. Rangeland Journal, 2008, 30(2): 221–231
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Hou F J, Li G, Chang S H, Yu Y W, AN Y F. Productivity of Gansu wapiti on the Sunan deer farm. Acta Pratacultural Science, 2004, 13(1): 94–100 (in Chinese)
[20]
Ren J Z, Wan C G. System coupling and desert-oasis agro-ecosystem. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 1994, 3(3): 1–8 (in Chinese)
[21]
Lin H L, Xiao J Y, Hou F J. Coupling patterns of the meta-ecosystem of mountain, desert and oasis and its emdollars analysis in the Hexi Corridor, Gansu, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2004, 24(5): 965–971 (in Chinese)
[22]
Ren J Z. Biological improvement and optimization of production model of saline land in Hexi corridor. Beijing: Science Press, 1998 (in Chinese)
[23]
Rao S C, Horn F P. Cereals and brassicas for forage. In: Barnes R, Miller D, Nelson C, eds. Forages—An introduction to grassland agriculture. 5th ed. Iowa: Iowa State Univiversity Press, 1995, 451–462
[24]
Acosta-Martínez V, Bell C W, Morris B E L, Zac J, Allen V G. Long-term soil microbial community and enzyme activity responses to an integrated cropping-livestock system in a semi-arid region. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2010, 137(3–4): 231–240
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Xu L, Wang X Y, Hou F J, Nan Z B. Energy balance of integrated crop-rangeland-livestock production systems in eastern Gansu, China. In: Dove H, Culvenor RA, eds. Food Security from Sustainable Agriculture. New Zealand: Proceedings of 15th Australia Society of Agronomy Conference, 2010, 15–18
[26]
Han X W, Tsunekawa A, Tsubo M, Shao H B. Responses of plant–soil properties to increasing N deposition and implications for large-scale eco-restoration in the semiarid grassland of the northern Loess Plateau, China. Ecological Engineering, 2013, 60: 1–9
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Li Y B, Fan M M, Li W J. Application of payment for ecosystem services in China’s rangeland conservation initiatives: a social-ecological system perspective. Rangeland Journal, 2015, 37(3): 285–296
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Zhen N H, Fu B J, Lü Y H, Zheng Z M. Changes of livelihood due to land use shifts: a case study of Yanchang County in the Loess Plateau of China. Land Use Policy, 2014, 40: 28–35
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Herrero M, Thornton P K, Notenbaert A M, Wood S, Msangi S, Freeman H A, Bossio D, Dixon J, Peters M, van de Steeg J, Lynam J, Rao P P, Macmillan S, Gerard B, McDermott J, Sere C, Rosegrant M. Smart investments in sustainable food production: revisiting mixed crop-livestock systems. Science, 2010, 327(5967): 822–825
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Project of the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA2010010203), the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (2019QZKK0302), the Program for Innovative Research Team of Chinese Ministry of Education (IRT-17R50).

Compliance with ethics guidelines

Fujiang Hou, Qianmin Jia, Shanning Lou, Chuntao Yang, Jiao Ning, Lan Li, and Qingshan Fan declare that they have no conflicts of interest or financial conflicts to disclose. This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s) 2021. Published by Higher Education Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1156 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/