Producing more with less: reducing environmental impacts through an integrated soil-crop system management approach

Zhenling CUI, Zhengxia DOU, Hao YING, Fusuo ZHANG

Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. ›› 2020, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (1) : 14-20.

PDF(163 KB)
Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. All Journals
PDF(163 KB)
Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. ›› 2020, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (1) : 14-20. DOI: 10.15302/J-FASE-2019295
REVIEW
REVIEW

Producing more with less: reducing environmental impacts through an integrated soil-crop system management approach

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Balancing crop productivity with resource use efficiency and beneficial environmental consequences is essential for sustainable agricultural development worldwide. Various strategies and approaches have been proposed and debated, but turning the concept into management practices in the field with measurable outcomes over several scales remains a challenge. An innovative approach, Integrated Soil-Crop System Management (ISSM), for producing more grain with greater nutrient use efficiencies and less environmental pollution is presented. The ISSM approach has been used in China, in field experiments as well as in thousands of farmer fields, to substantially increase the yields of maize, rice and wheat while simultaneously increasing nitrogen use efficiency and reducing environmental footprints. The scientific principle, implementation strategy and procedures of ISSM are discussed and examples of its demonstrated successes at local and regional levels across China are given. Perspectives for further development of ISSM and expanding its potential impact are also proposed and discussed.

Keywords

China / environmental protection / food security / high-yielding / nitrogen management

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhenling CUI, Zhengxia DOU, Hao YING, Fusuo ZHANG. Producing more with less: reducing environmental impacts through an integrated soil-crop system management approach. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng., 2020, 7(1): 14‒20 https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2019295

1 Introduction

Pig somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) technique have valuable applications in agriculture, bioscience, and biomedicine[15]. However, SCNT-generated cloned porcine embryos only have a full-term developmental rate of approximately 1%[6], which is considerably lower than the developmental efficiency of in vivo fertilized pig embryos[7]. Furthermore, previous reports indicated that the cloned pigs were had stillborn rates of 17%–32.8%[812] and 48%–74.5% mortality from birth to weaning[1214], which is much higher than in vivo fertilization-derived piglets (3%–8% and 10%–18%, respectively)[1517].
Low birth weight, which parallels intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), is believed to be related to the survival ability of the fetus in the uterus and/or after birth[1820]. Placental dysfunction is also considered the major cause of IUGR, late fetal loss, and postnatal death[14,2124]. In addition, umbilical cord malformation is associated with fetal death and neonatal mortality[12,14,25]. Therefore, the high stillbirth rate and postnatal death rate observed in SCNT piglets could be related to retarded intrauterine growth and abnormal placenta and umbilical cord development.
Relatively limited information is available in the literature, however, on the assessment of birth weight and placenta and umbilical cord development in cloned piglets. In this study, we compared the birth weight, umbilical cord status, placental traits and placental gene expression patternss between SCNT and artificial insemination (AI)-derived piglets.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Production of piglets by SCNT and AI

Piglets were produced following the protocols described in a previous report[14].

2.2 Placenta and umbilical cord collection and analysis

At birth, placental umbilical cord with a number representing the birth order of a piglet was used to distinguish individual placentas. This method was adapted from Wilson et al.[26]. Briefly, one assistant gently held the piglets to prevent umbilical breakdown caused by the movement of the piglets at birth. A prenumbered piece of sterile surgical thread was tied to the umbilical cord end close to the placenta, while a second assistant tied a sterile surgical thread round the cord at about 4 cm from the umbilicus of piglets to prevent blood loss. The cord was then cut between two ligatures, and the tagged umbilical cord was allowed to retract back into the uterus. After placental expulsion, the placentas were dissected and analyzed. The piglets were immediately dried and weighed, and birth order was recorded corresponding to the tagged umbilical cord on the placenta. After expulsion, individual placentas were dissected from secundines, and placental tissue samples were immediately collected from the center of individual placenta, washed with PBS and stored in liquid nitrogen. Each placenta was weighed after the attached amniotic membrane, necrotic tips of a vascularized chorion and umbilical cord were removed. Each placenta was then spread unwrinkled on paper, and the placental surface area was estimated by doubling the area on the paper bounded by a line traced around the placenta. Placental efficiency was defined as the ratio of piglet birth weight to placental weight. Placental tissue samples were used to analyze gene expression. Additionally, the umbilical cord status of piglets during farrowing was recorded to obtain the proportion of abnormal umbilical cords in piglets.

2.3 Quantitative real-time PCR

Total RNA was extracted from placenta tissue using Total RNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Inc., Norcross, GA, USA). The RNA concentration was measured by Nanodrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). RNA quality was analyzed using nondenaturing agarose gel electrophoresis. Only RNA samples that did not show signs of degradation were used and stored at -80°C. Subsequently, cDNA was synthesized from 1 mg of total RNA using PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (Takara Bio, Otsu, Shiga, Japan). The cDNA was stored at -20°C for further analysis. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using SYBR Select Master Mix Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and EcoTM Real-Time PCR System (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The primer information for target genes is presented in Table 1. Each reaction mixture (10 mL) contained 1 mL of cDNA solution, 0.3 mL of 10 mmol·L1 of each specific primer, 5 mL of SYBR Select Master Mix, and 3.4 mL of ddH2O. The reactions were run as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min; followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 s, 60°C for 15 s, and 72°C for 20 s; and finally a melting cycle at 95°C for 15 s, 55°C for 15 s, and 60°C for 15 s. The transcripts of all genes were quantified in triplicates. Specificity of the PCR reaction was confirmed through a single peak in the melting curve. b-actin was used as an endogenous control to normalize gene expression throughout this study. The relative gene expression level of the target gene was calculated through the 2ΔΔCT method.
Tab.1 Sequences of primers used for the analysis of gene expression in the placenta
Gene Sequence (5′–3′) Product size/bp GenBank accession no.
BCL-2 F: TTGCCGAGATGTCCAGCCA 255 XM_003121700.4
R: CATCCCAGCCTCCGTTATCCT
BAX F: AAGCGCATTGGAGATGAACT 251 XM_013998624.1
R: CGATCTCGAAGGAAGTCCAG
VEGFA F: GCCTTGCTGCTCTACCTCCA 271 NM_214084
R: TGGCGATGTTGAACTCCTCAGT
VEGFR2 F: GAGTGGCTCTGAGGAACGAG 209 BQ603967
R: ACACAACTCCATGCTGGTCA
PHLDA2 F: TCAAGGTGGACTGCGTGGAG 147 NM_001174057
R: GGCGGTTCTGGAAGTCGATGA
CDKN1C F: TGGACCACGAGGAGCTGAGT 100 HQ679903
R: GGCACGTCCTGCTGGAAGTT
IGF2 F: CGTGGCATCGTGGAAGAGTG 168 X56094
R: CCAGGTGTCATAGCGGAAGAAC
H19 F: GGCCGGAGAATGGGAAAGAAGG 148 AY044827
R: CGCAGTGCTGCGTGGGAACG
PEG3 F: GGAGTGTGCGGAGACCTTCA 118 EF619475
R: CTCGGTGGGATGGGAGTTCT
GRB10 F: GGTCCGTGCATCGTTCAGA 101 NM_001134965
R: TCCAACAAACCAGCCAACCT
SLC2A1 F: GCAGGAGATGAAGGAGGAGAGC 258 EU012358
R: ACGAACAGCGACACGACAGT
SLC2A3 F: GCCCTGAAAGTCCTCGGTTCCT 252 XM_003355585
R: ACACGGCGTTGATGCCAGAGA
SLC38A4 F: CGTGGTCATGGTGCCCAACAAC 118 XM_021092582
R: ACTGCCGTGAAGAGAGCCCTTG
b-actin F: CCACGAGACCACCTTCAACTC 131 DQ845171
R: TGATCTCCTTCTGCATCCTGT

2.4 Statistical analyses

Differences in the survival rate and incidence of abnormal umbilical cord (AUC) between SCNT and AI groups were analyzed by c2 tests. Differences in birth weight, placental traits, and placental gene expression levels between the SCNT and AI groups were analyzed by one-way ANOVA using the SPSS 19.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Values are presented as mean±SEM. Significant difference of means between two different groups was determined at P<0.05.

3 Results

A total of 111 male piglets were delivered by 20 artificially inseminated sows, and 58 male cloned piglets were farrowed from 13 recipient sows (Table 2). The stillbirth rate and postnatal death rate of SCNT piglets were significantly higher than those of AI piglets (stillbirth rate, 20.7% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.002; postnatal death rate, 65.2% vs. 5.7%, P<0.001) (Table 2).
Tab.2 Comparison of stillbirth rate and postnatal death rate between SCNT-derived and AI-derived piglets
Item No. of litters Total piglets born Stillborn Postnatal death
AI 20 111# 6 (5.4/%) 6 (5.7/%)*
SCNT 13 58 12 (20.7/%) 30 (65.2/%)
P-value 0.002 <0.001

Note: #Only male AI-derived piglets were included in this table, because SCNT-derived piglets were cloned from male donor cells. *Postnatal death and survival were only recorded four days after birth.

The umbilical cords of newborn piglets were divided into normal umbilical cord and AUC according to their characteristics (Fig. 1). The incidence of AUC in SCNT piglets was significantly higher than that in AI piglets (39.7% vs. 10.8%, P<0.001). SCNT-liveborn (SCNT-LB) piglets also exhibited a significantly higher AUC frequency than AI-liveborn (AI-LB) piglets (32.6% vs. 14.2%, P = 0.009). However, the SCNT-stillborn (SCNT-SB) group and AI-stillborn (AI-SB) group showed no significant differences in the incidence of AUC (66.7% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.18) (Table 3).
Fig.1 Phenotype of normal umbilical cord (NUC) and abnormal umbilical cord (AUC) in newborn piglets. NUCs are light red and spiraled (green arrow). AUCs are dark, are not spiraled, and have severe occlusive thrombus (black arrow).

Full size|PPT slide

Tab.3 Comparison of the frequency of abnormal umbilical cords (AUC) between AI and SCNT piglets
Item Total piglets Piglets with AUC
AI 111 17 (10.8%)
SCNT 58 23 (39.7%)
P-value <0.001
AI-LB 105 15 (14.2%)
SCNT-LB 46 15 (32.6%)
P-value 0.009
AI-SB 6 2 (33.3%)
SCNT-SB 12 8 (66.7%)
P-value 0.18
Birth weight, placental surface area, placental weight, and placental efficiency of the AI and AI-LB groups were significantly higher than those of the SCNT and SCNT-LB groups (P<0.001) (Table 4). Birth weight, placental surface area, and placental weight of AI-SB piglets were also significantly higher than those of SCNT-SB piglets (P<0.05), but placental efficiency was not different between the two groups (P>0.05) (Table 4)
Tab.4 Comparison of birth weight and placental parameters between AI and SCNT piglets
Item Birth weight/g Placental weight/g Placental surface area/cm2 Placental efficiency/(g·g1)#
AI (n = 111) 1430±35 177±5 2530±69 8.41±0.16
SCNT (n = 58) 1040±47 147±6 1850±76 7.17±0.21
P-value <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
AI-LB (n = 105) 1440±36 177±6 2530±71 8.43±0.17
SCNT-LB (n = 46) 1130±41 157±6 1950±74 7.36±0.24
P-value <0.001 0.036 <0.001 <0.001
AI-SB (n = 6) 1400±127 180±20 2500±356 7.79±0.29
SCNT-SB (n = 12) 714±127 107±13 1450±203 6.42±0.49
P-value 0.004 0.007 0.012 0.082

Note: Values are presented as mean±SEM. #Placental efficiency represents the ratio of birthweight to placental weight

Placental mRNA expression levels of six imprinted genes and seven non-imprinted genes related to angiogenesis, nutrient transport, and apoptosis were examined and compared between the AI-LB and SCNT-LB groups. Expression levels of angiogenesis-related vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2), nutrient transport-related solute carrier family 2 member 3 (SLC2A3) and solute carrier family 38 member 4 (SLC38A4) in SCNT-LB placentas were significantly lower than those in AI-LB placentas (P<0.05). However, expression levels of angiogenesis-related vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) and nutrient transport-related solute carrier family 2 member 1 (SLC2A1) were not different between the two groups (P>0.05). Expression levels of apoptosis regulator BCL-2 and BCL2 associated X (BAX) were also not different between the two groups (P>0.05). Among the six investigated imprinted genes, H19, growth factor receptor bound protein 10 (GRB10) and pleckstrin homology-like domain family A member 2 (PHLDA2) had significantly lower mRNA expression levels, whereas paternally expressed 3 (PEG3) had significantly higher mRNA expression levels in SCNT-LB placentas than in AI-LB placentas (P<0.05). However, no difference was found in the mRNA expression level of insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2) and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1C (CDKN1C) between the SCNT-LB and AI-LB placentas (P>0.05) (Fig. 2).
Fig.2 Comparison of placental gene expression levels between artificially insemination-derived and somatic cell nuclear transfer-derived liveborn piglets (AI-LB and SCNT-LB, respectively). The expression levels were normalized against β-actin. Values are presented as mean±SEM. Values labeled with asterisk (*) were considered significantly different between two groups (P<0.05).

Full size|PPT slide

4 Discussion

In this study, the SCNT piglets had 20.7% stillbirth rate, which is similar to that (17%–24%) reported by Estrada et al.[10], Kurome et al.[11], and Park et al.[12]. Moreover, the neonatal mortality rate of SCNT-LB piglets reached 65.2%. This remarkably high death rate of neonatal cloned pigs was also consistent with previous studies[12,13,27]. These data indicated that a large portion of cloned piglets die during late gestation period, at birth, and the during neonatal stage.
The high incidence of AUC could be one of the factors responsible for the high stillbirth rate and neonatal death rate in SCNT piglets. AUC would restrict blood flow or oxygen transport to the fetuses, leading to intrauterine asphyxia or hypoxic injury which could result in stillbirth and/or postnatal mortality[2830].
Placental deficiency is also a significant cause of stillbirth and even postnatal death[21,31,32]. In this study, placental surface area, placental weight and placental efficiency of SCNT piglets were significantly lower than those of AI piglets. These results suggest that the high death rate at birth and during neonatal stage of SCNT piglets could be attributed to abnormal placenta development.
Imprinted genes play critical roles in the regulation of placenta development[3335]. The results showed that four examined imprinted genes (H19, GRB10, PHLDA2 and PEG3) exhibited aberrant expression patterns in the placentas of the SCNT piglets. Defective expression of imprinted genes could be related to the abnormal placenta development observed in the SCNT piglets. In addition, the expression levels of angiopoiesis-related VEGFR and nutrient transport-related SLC2A3 and SLC38A4 in the placentas of SCNT piglets were significantly reduced. This phenomenon implies that the SCNT-derived fetuses in the uterus were in a state of malnutrition, which not only causes low birthweight but also leads to stillbirth and/or postnatal mortality.

5 Conclusions

In summary, SCNT piglets exhibited high stillbirth rate and neonatal death rate. The low survival rate of SCNT piglets was associated with AUC and abnormal placenta development. These anomalies could have resulted from the aberrant expression of angiogenesis, nutrient transport and imprinting-related genes in the placentas.

References

[1]
Zhang F, Cui Z, Fan M, Zhang W, Chen X, Jiang R. Integrated soil-crop system management: reducing environmental risk while increasing crop productivity and improving nutrient use efficiency in China. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2011, 40(4): 1051–1057
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[2]
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). FAOSTAT Statistical Databases. Agriculture Data, 2015. Available at FAO website on August 20, 2019
[3]
Ju X T, Xing G X, Chen X P, Zhang S L, Zhang L J, Liu X J, Cui Z L, Yin B, Christie P, Zhu Z L, Zhang F S. Reducing environmental risk by improving N management in intensive Chinese agricultural systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009, 106(9): 3041–3046
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[4]
Liu X, Duan L, Mo J, Du E, Shen J, Lu X, Zhang Y, Zhou X, He C, Zhang F. Nitrogen deposition and its ecological impact in China: an overview. Environmental Pollution, 2011, 159(10): 2251–2264
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[5]
Liu X, Zhang Y, Han W, Tang A, Shen J, Cui Z, Vitousek P, Erisman J W, Goulding K, Christie P, Fangmeier A, Zhang F. Enhanced nitrogen deposition over China. Nature, 2013, 494(7438): 459–462
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[6]
Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China, 2010. Available at Chinese Ministry of Environmental Protection website on August 20, 2019
[7]
Le C, Zha Y, Li Y, Sun D, Lu H, Yin B. Eutrophication of lake waters in China: cost, causes, and control. Environmental Management, 2010, 45(4): 662–668
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[8]
Guo J H, Liu X J, Zhang Y, Shen J L, Han W X, Zhang W F, Christie P, Goulding K W T, Vitousek P M, Zhang F S. Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands. Science, 2010, 327(5968): 1008–1010
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[9]
Zhang X Y, Pei D, Hu C S. Conserving groundwater for irrigation in the North China Plain. Irrigation Science, 2003, 21(4): 159–166
[10]
Shen J, Li C, Mi G, Li L, Yuan L, Jiang R, Zhang F. Maximizing root/rhizosphere efficiency to improve crop productivity and nutrient use efficiency in intensive agriculture of China. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2013, 64(5): 1181–1192
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[11]
Chen X P, Cui Z L, Vitousek P M, Cassman K G, Matson P A, Bai J S, Meng Q F, Hou P, Yue S C, Römheld V, Zhang F S. Integrated soil-crop system management for food security. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011, 108(16): 6399–6404
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[12]
Chen X, Cui Z, Fan M, Vitousek P, Zhao M, Ma W, Wang Z, Zhang W, Yan X, Yang J, Deng X, Gao Q, Zhang Q, Guo S, Ren J, Li S, Ye Y, Wang Z, Huang J, Tang Q, Sun Y, Peng X, Zhang J, He M, Zhu Y, Xue J, Wang G, Wu L, An N, Wu L, Ma L, Zhang W, Zhang F. Producing more grain with lower environmental costs. Nature, 2014, 514(7523): 486–489
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[13]
Stanford G. Rationale for optimum nitrogen fertilization in corn production. Journal of Environmental Quality, 1973, 2(2): 159–166
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Olfs H W, Blankenau K, Brentrup F, Jasper J, Link A, Lammel J. Soil- and plant-based nitrogen-fertilizer recommendations in arable farming. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2005, 168(4): 414–431
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Shanahan J F, Kitchen N R, Raun W R, Schepers J S. Responsive in-season nitrogen management for cereals. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2008, 61(1): 51–62
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Cui Z L, Chen X P, Miao Y X, Zhang F S, Sun Q P, Schroder J, Zhang H L, Li J L, Shi L W, Xu J F, Ye Y, Liu C S, Yang Z, Zhang Q, Huang S M, Bao D J. On-farm evaluation of the improved soil N-min-based nitrogen management for summer maize in North China Plain. Agronomy Journal, 2008, 100(3): 517–525
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Cui Z L, Zhang F S, Chen X P, Miao Y X, Li J L, Shi L W, Xu J F, Youliang Y L, Liu C S, Yang Z P, Qiang Z, Huang S M, Bao D J. On-farm evaluation of an in-season nitrogen management strategy based on soil N-min test. Field Crops Research, 2008, 105(1–2): 48–55
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Sawyer J, Nafziger E. Regional approach to corn nitrogen rate decisions. In: Sawyer J, Nafziger E, Randall G, Bundy L, Rehm G, Joern B, eds. Concepts and rationale for regional nitrogen rate guidelines for corn. Iowa: Iowa State University, University Extension, 2006, 15–24
[19]
Peng S B, Huang J L, Zhong X H. Research strategy in improving fertilizer-nitrogen use efficiency of irrigated rice in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2002, 35(9): 1095–1103 (in Chinese)
[20]
Wu W, Ma B. Integrated nutrient management (INM) for sustaining crop productivity and reducing environmental impact: a review. Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 512–513: 415–427
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[21]
Chen G P, Gao J L, Zhao M, Dong S T, Li S K, Yang Q F, Liu Y H, Wang L C, Xue J Q, Liu J G, Li C H, Wang Y H, Wang Y D, Song H X, Zhao J R. Distribution, yield structure, and key cultural techniques of maize super-high yield plots in recent years. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2012, 38(1): 80–85 (in Chinese)
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Meng Q F, Yue S C, Hou P, Cui Z L, Chen X P. Improving yield and nitrogen use efficiency simultaneously for maize and wheat in China: a review. Pedosphere, 2016, 26(2): 137–147
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Dong J W, Liu J Y, Tao F L, Xu X L, Wang J B. Spatio-temporal changes in annual accumulated temperature in China and the effects on cropping systems, 1980s to 2000. Climate Research, 2009, 40(1): 37–48
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Iannucci A, Terribile M R, Martiniello P. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on flowering time of forage legumes in a Mediterranean environment. Field Crops Research, 2008, 106(2): 156–162
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Meng Q F, Hou P, Wu L, Chen X P, Cui Z L, Zhang F S. Understanding production potentials and yield gaps in intensive maize production in China. Field Crops Research, 2013, 143: 91–97
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Guo J M, Wang Y H, Fan T L, Chen X P, Cui Z L. Designing corn management strategies for high yield and high nitrogen use efficiency. Agronomy Journal, 2016, 108(2): 922–929
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Yang H S, Dobermann A, Lindquist J L, Walters D T, Arkebauer T J, Cassman K G. Hybrid-Maize—a Maize simulation model that combines two crop modeling approaches. Field Crops Research, 2004, 87(2–3): 131–154
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Hinsinger P, Bengough A G, Vetterlein D, Young I M. Rhizosphere: biophysics, biogeochemistry and ecological relevance. Plant and Soil, 2009, 321(1–2): 117–152
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Zhang F S, Shen J B, Zhang J L, Zuo Y M, Li L, Chen X P. Rhizosphere processes and management for improving nutrient use efficiency and crop productivity: implications for China. Advances in Agronomy, 2010, 107: 1–32
[30]
Hou P, Gao Q, Xie R Z, Li S K, Meng Q F, Kirkby E A, Romheld V, Muller T, Zhang F S, Cui Z L, Chen X P. Grain yields in relation to N requirement: optimizing nitrogen management for spring maize grown in China. Field Crops Research, 2012, 129: 1–6
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Yue S C, Meng Q F, Zhao R F, Ye Y L, Zhang F S, Cui Z L, Chen X P. Change in nitrogen requirement with increasing grain yield for winter wheat. Agronomy Journal, 2012, 104(6): 1687–1693
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Yan P, Yue S C, Meng Q F, Pan J X, Ye Y L, Chen X P, Cui Z L. An understanding of the accumulation of biomass and nitrogen is benefit for Chinese maize production. Agronomy Journal, 2016, 108(2): 895–904
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Cui Z, Chen X, Zhang F. Current nitrogen management status and measures to improve the intensive wheat-maize system in China. Ambio, 2010, 39(5–6): 376–384
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[34]
Meng Q, Yue S, Chen X, Cui Z, Ye Y, Ma W, Tong Y, Zhang F. Understanding dry matter and nitrogen accumulation with time-course for high-yielding wheat production in China. PLoS One, 2013, 8(7): e68783
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[35]
Zhan A, Chen X P, Li S Q, Cui Z L. Changes in phosphorus requirement with increasing grain yield for winter wheat. Agronomy Journal, 2015, 107(6): 2003–2010
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Wu L Q, Cui Z L, Chen X P, Yue S C, Sun Y X, Zhao R F, Deng Y, Zhang W, Chen K R. Change in phosphorus requirement with increasing grain yield for Chinese maize production. Field Crops Research, 2015, 180: 216–220
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Heitholt J J, Croy L I, Maness N O, Nguyen H T. Nitrogen partitioning in genotypes of winter wheat differing in grain N concentration. Field Crops Research, 1990, 23(2): 133–144
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Papakosta D K, Gagianas A A. Nitrogen and dry-matter accumulation, remobilization, and losses for mediterranean wheat during grain filling. Agronomy Journal, 1991, 83(5): 864–870
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Lu D J, Yue S C, Lu F F, Cui Z L, Liu Z H, Zou C Q, Chen X P. Integrated crop-N system management to establish high wheat yield population. Field Crops Research, 2016, 191: 66–74
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Cui Z, Yue S, Wang G, Meng Q, Wu L, Yang Z, Zhang Q, Li S, Zhang F, Chen X. Closing the yield gap could reduce projected greenhouse gas emissions: a case study of maize production in China. Global Change Biology, 2013, 19(8): 2467–2477
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[41]
Zhang F S, Cui Z L, Chen X P, Ju X T, Shen J B, Chen Q, Liu X J, Zhang W F, Mi G H, Fan M S, Jiang R F. Integrated nutrient management for food security and environmental quality in China. Advances in Agronomy, 2012, 116: 1–40
[42]
Liu X, Vitousek P, Chang Y, Zhang W, Matson P, Zhang F. Evidence for a historic change occurring in China. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50(2): 505–506
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[43]
Fan M, Lal R, Cao J, Qiao L, Su Y, Jiang R, Zhang F. Plant-based assessment of inherent soil productivity and contributions to China’s cereal crop yield increase since 1980. PLoS One, 2013, 8(9): e74617
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[44]
Sun Y M, Li G X, Zhang F D. Status quo and developmental strategy of agricultural residues resources in China. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2005, 21(8): 169–173 (in Chinese)
[45]
Li Y, Zhang W, Ma L, Huang G, Oenema O, Zhang F, Dou Z. An analysis of China’s fertilizer policies: impacts on the industry, food security, and the environment. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2013, 42(4): 972–981
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[46]
Cassman K G, Dobermann A, Walters D T, Yang H. Meeting cereal demand while protecting natural resources and improving environmental quality. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2003, 28(1): 315–358
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Shen J B, Cui Z L, Miao Y X, Mi G H, Zhang H Y, Fan M S, Zhang C C, Jiang R F, Zhang W F, Li H G, Chen X P, Li X L, Zhang F S. Transforming agriculture in China: from solely high yield to both high yield and high resource use efficiency. Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment, 2013, 2(1): 1–8
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Zhao P F, Cao G X, Zhao Y, Zhang H Y, Chen X P, Li X L, Cui Z L. Training and organization programs increases maize yield and nitrogen-use efficiency in smallholder agriculture in China. Agronomy Journal, 2016, 108(5): 1944–1950
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Zhang W, Cao G, Li X, Zhang H, Wang C, Liu Q, Chen X, Cui Z, Shen J, Jiang R, Mi G, Miao Y, Zhang F, Dou Z. Closing yield gaps in China by empowering smallholder farmers. Nature, 2016, 537(7622): 671–674
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[50]
Matson P A, Naylor R, Ortiz-Monasterio I. Integration of environmental, agronomic, and economic aspects of fertilizer management. Science, 1998, 280(5360): 112–115
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[51]
Tilman D, Cassman K G, Matson P A, Naylor R, Polasky S. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature, 2002, 418(6898): 671–677
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2015-CB150400) and the Innovative Group Grant of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31421092).

Compliance with ethics guidelines

Zhenling Cui, Zhengxia Dou, Hao Ying, and Fusuo Zhang declare that they have no conflicts of interest or financial conflicts to disclose.
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s) 2019. Published by Higher Education Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(163 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/