Polyaniline–polypyrrole nanocomposites using a green and porous wood as support for supercapacitors

Jian LI, Yue JIAO

Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. ›› 2019, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (2) : 137-143.

PDF(1115 KB)
Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. All Journals
PDF(1115 KB)
Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. ›› 2019, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (2) : 137-143. DOI: 10.15302/J-FASE-2019257
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Polyaniline–polypyrrole nanocomposites using a green and porous wood as support for supercapacitors

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Wood is an ideal type of support material whose porous structure and surface functional groups are beneficial for deposition of various guest substances for different applications. In this paper, wood is employed as a porous support, combined with two kinds of conductive polymers (i.e., polyaniline (PANI) and polypyrrole (PPy)) using an easy and fast liquid polymerization method. Scanning electron microscope observations indicate that the PANI–PPy complex consists of nanoparticles with a size of ~20 nm. The interactions between oxygen-containing groups of the wood and the nitrogen composition of PANI–PPy were verified by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The self-supported PANI–PPy/wood composite is capable of acting as a free-standing supercapacitor electrode, which delivers a high gravimetric specific capacitance of 360 F·g1 at 0.2 A·g1.

Keywords

wood / polypyrrole / polyaniline / supercapacitors / nanocomposites

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jian LI, Yue JIAO. Polyaniline–polypyrrole nanocomposites using a green and porous wood as support for supercapacitors. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng., 2019, 6(2): 137‒143 https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2019257

1 Introduction

Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf. (Trifoliate orange) is a member of the family Rutaceae and closely related to the genus Citrus. It is also known as Chinese bitter orange and its center of origin is northern China. Sometimes it is included as a species in the genus Citrus. Swingle[ 1] recorded and compared the characters of Poncirus and Citrus and demonstrated that some pronounced characters, namely, being a deciduous tree with compound leaves, pubescent fruit, shrub-like tree structure and very thorny branches, make it difficult to place Poncirus as an ordinary member in the genus Citrus. The resistance of Poncirus against the Phytophthora root rot, the citrus tristeza virus (CTV) and the citrus nematode (CN), its cold tolerance and graft compatibility with other citrus species make it a perfect rootstock for commercial propagation of cultivated citrus species.
SSR markers have been widely used in genetic diversity, population genetic studies, linkage map construction as well as several breeding applications due to the superior characteristics of SSR markers over other molecular markers[ 2]. Previous studies suggested that Expressed Sequence Tag (EST) databases are valuable sources from which to develop SSR markers[ 3 7]. The development of SSR markers specific to P. trifoliata is important and critical for improving its varieties and assisting breeding programs. Till to date, no EST-SSR markers have been reported for P. trifoliata. Hence, the aim of this study was to develop P. trifoliata specific EST-SSR markers, investigate their cross-taxa transferability and utility for germplasm characterization.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Plant materials

A total of 42 accessions (Appendix A, Table S1) of citrus and its relatives were obtained from the Citrus Germplasm and Conservation Center of Huazhong Agricultural University, China. DNA of those accessions was extracted from the young leaves using the CTAB (Hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide) methods described by Cheng et al.[ 8].

2.2 EST processing and marker development

EST sequences of P. trifoliata were downloaded from the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) on the18th April, 2012. A perl script est_trimmer.pl was used to remove unusual EST sequences, vector contamination, poly A and poly T bases from the downloaded P. trifoliata EST sequences. After that, high quality EST sequences were assembled, redundancy of the ESTs were removed using Cap3 (http://mobyle.pasteur.fr/cgi-bin/portal.py#forms::cap3) software. Assembled ESTs were screened for SSR marker development by using SSRLocator software[ 9] using a minimum SSR repeat length of 16 bp, an expected product size of 100–300 bp, an annealing temperature of 50–55°C and a GC content of 45%–50%. To identify putative functions of the developed P. trifoliata EST-SSR primers, flanking regions of the primer pairs were blasted against the NCBI protein database using Blast2Go tool (www.blast2go.com). Virtual PCR strategy was applied to select in silico polymorphic SSR markers. Selected SSR primers were synthesized by the Sangon Company, Shanghai, China.

2.3 PCR amplification and PAGE analysis

PCR amplifications were performed in a reaction volume of 15 µL, which consisted of 1U Taq polymerase, 1× reaction buffer (750 mmol·L–1 Tris HCl (pH 9), 50 mmol·L–1 KCl, 200 mmol·L–1 (NH4)2SO4, 0.001% BSA), 0.1 mmol·L–1 of each dNTP, 1.5 mmol·L–1 MgCl2, 3 µmol·L–1 of each primer, and 25 ng DNA sample. The PCR reactions were conducted in a MJ-PTC-200 thermal controller (MJ Research, Waltham MA) under the following conditions: initial denaturing at 94°C for 3 min followed by 35 cycles at 94°C for 30 s, 50–55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 45 s, with a final extension of 7 min at 72°C. The annealing temperatures ranged from 50 to 55°C for different primer pairs (Appendix A, Table S2). PCR product was separated by 6% denaturant PAGE (PolyAcrylamide Gel Electrophoresis) (60 cm × 30 cm × 0.4 cm), and bands visualized by silver-staining according to the protocol of Ruiz et al.[ 10].

2.4 Data analysis

Allele numbers, expected heterozygosity, observed heterozygosity and polymorphic information content (PIC) values were estimated with PowerMarker V3.25.

3 Results

In this study, 25388 non-redundant P. trifoliata EST sequences (obtained after clustering ESTs from NCBI) were screened for microsatellites using the SSRLocator software[ 9]. The search was restricted to repeats with a minimum number of 8, 7, 5, 4 and 4 complete repeat units for di-, tri-, tetra-, penta- and hexa-nucleotide motifs, respectively. In total, 976 SSRs were identified from 887 ESTs (Appendix A, Table S3). Thus 3.49% of the P. trifoliata EST contained one or more microsatellites with one SSR per 4 kb EST (976 SSR in 22.7 Mb). Of the 887 SSR containing EST sequences, 695 (78%) ESTs are suitable for P. trifoliata EST SSR (PteSR) marker development. These sequences were further compared by blast against the NCBI non-redundant protein database with an E-value cut-off of 1.e-3, in order to identify functional EST sequences. As a result, 699 sequences containing di (333), tri (170), tetra (47), penta (60) and hexa (59) microsatellites unites were identified as functional P. trifoliata specific EST SSR motifs ( a). Microsatellites with higher repeat numbers and having a significant similarity to existing proteins in the NCBI database were favored because they are generally considered to be more polymorphic and functional. With these criteria, 542 primer pairs were selected for the in silico PCR (VPCR) amplification analysis, which was performed using SSRLocator. Whole genomic sequences of Citrus sinensis and C. clementina were used as templates for the virtual PCR amplification analysis and results reveal that 226 (41%) primer pairs had positive VPCR amplification. To determine the genomic distribution of developed PteSR marker, we mapped 542 marker on nine chromosome of C. sinensis and results revealed that 198 (36%) markers distributed among nine chromosomes of C. sinensis with an average marker density 0.83 Mb (Figs. 1b, 2). Chromosome mapping of the markers showed highest frequency of markers on chromosome 5 (38 markers, 7%) and lowest on chromosome 1 (8, 1.4%) ( b). In silico cross genera transferability was performed using an in silico PCR strategy to select a sub-set of PteSR marker for subsequent estimatation of their utility for genetic diversity of citrus and relative species. The results showed the highest transferability (42%) in C. sinensis and the lowest (1%) in Arabidopsis with an average of 12% of PteSR markers transferable in citrus and non citrus species ( c). Based on the in silico cross-genera transferability results the best 108 primer pairs were selected for subsequent PCR amplification and analysis for transferability to citrus species and for determining their polymorphism in eight Citrus spp. (C. sinensis, C. reticulata, C. grandis, C. aurantifolia, C. limon, C. medica, C. ichangensis, C. paradisi, P. trifoliata and Fortunella hindsii). Among all 108 primer pairs tested, 18 (16%) failed to amplify the expected products. The remaining 90 microsatellite loci produced the expected products, of which 61 (56%) were found to be polymorphic and transferable to citrus related species.
Fig.1 (a) Distribution of functional SSR, non-functional SSR, functional SSR marker and non-functional SSR markers among different classes of repeat motifs; (b) chromosomal distribution of marker, percent of markers and density; (c) percent transferability of P. trifoliata EST-SSR marker in different citrus and non citrus species.

Full size|PPT slide

Fig.2 Physical map of P. trifoliata EST-SSR marker based on 198 functionally relevant primers

Full size|PPT slide

Furthermore, a subset of 12 primer pairs was used for genotyping 42 accessions from six species (P. trifoliata, Fortunella sp. C. grandis, C. sinensis, C. reticulata, C. limon). Our results reveal that the number of alleles per locus varied from 1 to 6 with an average of 2.38 (). Values of Ho, He and PIC ranged from 0 to 1.00, from 0 to 0.83 and 0 to 0.81, respectively. The highest number of alleles per locus (2.75) and diversity (He= 0.453) was recorded for C. reticulata, followed by P. trifoliata (number of allele= 2.667, He= 0.501). The single taxon from Fortunella appeared to be the least polymorphic for the markers investigated with only 1.66 alleles per locus, a lower expected heterozygosity and lower level of the PIC value.
Tab.1 Results of the initial marker screening in citrus and related species
Locus ID P. trifoliata (8) Fortunella (8) C. grandis (8)
AN He Ho PIC AN He Ho PIC AN He Ho PIC
PteSR046 2 0.48 0.40 0.36 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
PteSR666 4 0.64 0.80 0.58 2 0.50 1.00 0.38 4 0.69 1.00 0.63
PteSR168 2 0.50 1.00 0.38 2 0.38 0.50 0.30 2 0.38 0.00 0.30
PteSR581 2 0.50 1.00 0.38 2 0.50 1.00 0.38 2 0.22 0.25 0.19
PteSR484 2 0.48 0.40 0.36 2 0.50 1.00 0.38 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
PteSR661 2 0.50 0.60 0.38 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.38 0.50 0.30
PteSR563 3 0.46 0.60 0.41 2 0.50 1.00 0.38 2 0.22 0.25 0.19
PteSR755 2 0.28 0.33 0.24 2 0.50 1.00 0.38 3 0.66 0.75 0.58
PteSR299 2 0.48 0.40 0.36 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 0.66 0.75 0.58
PteSR550 3 0.63 0.50 0.55 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.50 1.00 0.38
PteSR493 4 0.58 0.60 0.54 2 0.50 1.00 0.38 2 0.50 1.00 0.38
PteSR366 4 0.48 0.60 0.45 2 0.50 1.00 0.38 2 0.38 0.00 0.30
Mean 2.667 0.501 0.603 0.416 1.667 0.323 0.625 0.247 2.167 0.383 0.458 0.319
Locus ID C. sinensis (5) C. reticulata (8) Lemone-Lime (5)
AN He Ho PIC AN He Ho PIC AN He Ho PIC
PteSR046 2 0.18 0.20 0.16 3 0.56 0.00 0.50 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
PteSR666 2 0.50 1.00 0.38 4 0.74 1.00 0.69 6 0.83 1.00 0.81
PteSR168 3 0.58 0.20 0.49 4 0.58 0.60 0.54 3 0.67 0.67 0.59
PteSR581 2 0.42 0.60 0.33 2 0.50 0.20 0.38 2 0.50 1.00 0.38
PteSR484 3 0.56 0.40 0.50 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
PteSR661 2 0.42 0.60 0.33 2 0.42 0.60 0.33 2 0.50 1.00 0.38
PteSR563 2 0.50 0.20 0.38 2 0.18 0.20 0.16 3 0.61 1.00 0.54
PteSR755 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 4 0.58 0.80 0.54 4 0.75 1.00 0.70
PteSR299 3 0.56 0.00 0.50 2 0.32 0.00 0.27 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
PteSR550 4 0.70 0.80 0.65 4 0.72 1.00 0.67 3 0.61 0.33 0.54
PteSR493 2 0.50 1.00 0.38 3 0.66 0.80 0.59 3 0.61 1.00 0.54
PteSR366 3 0.34 0.20 0.31 2 0.18 0.20 0.16 2 0.50 1.00 0.38
Mean 2.417 0.438 0.433 0.368 2.750 0.453 0.450 0.403 2.583 0.465 0.667 0.405

Note: For each primer pair the number of alleles (AN), expected heterozygosity (He), observed heterozygosity (Ho) and the polymorphic information content (PIC) are given. The sample size for each population is shown in parentheses.

4 Discussion

A large amount of EST data in the public domain provides a valuable resource for genetic research, including molecular marker identification, and SSRs have been discovered from EST data for many plant species[ 7, 11 16]. The SSR frequency in the P. trifoliata ESTs was 1/4 .0kb and a similar SSR frequency has been reported in poplar (1/4 .0kb), citrus (1/5.2 kb), Arabidopsis (1/6 .0kb) and sweet potato (1/7.1 kb)[ 17, 18], although much higher and lower SSR frequencies have also been reported in plants, viz., rice (1/40.0 kb) and cucumber (1/1.8 kb)[ 19, 20]. Direct comparison of the frequency of occurrence of SSRs in different reports is difficult given that estimates are dependent on the SSR mining tools, search criteria, size of the data set and the redundancy of EST sequences. Dinucleotide repeats were the most frequent motif types in the transcribed region of the P. trifoliata genome, as has often been observed in other plant species[ 21]. In addition, the frequency of motif types varies greatly according to the SSR search criteria and search tools. The percentage of polymorphic P. trifoliata markers was slightly less than observed in a previous study with C. grandis EST SSR markers, in which 57% of the primers were polymorphic[ 5]. Transferability to the related genera of SSR markers make them useful for genetic research, such as genotyping, linkage map construction, association mapping. P. trifoliata EST-SSR markers showed transferability to the Fortunella and Citrus genera. The rate of SSR transferability in different species is related to the genetic distance between the species from which the SSRs were developed and the other species[ 22]. We also found a similar trend for P. trifoliata EST-SSR markers transferability. As expected 36% anchored in the C. sinensis genome, which might be due to genomic similarity of these two species. This suggests that P. trifoliata EST-SSR markers might be useful for C. sinensis breeding research, such as in mapping, genotyping and population structure estimation.

5 Conclusions

In this study we developed, characterized and utilized the first set of functionally relevant SSR markers forP. trifoliata. These novel highly transferable polymorphic microsatellite markers will be useful for germplasm diversity, genetic mapping, and population structure analysis of Citrus and its relatives, and could help reveal the inter-specific relationships, origin and evolution of cultivated Citrus species.

References

[1]
Wang G, Zhang L, Zhang J. A review of electrode materials for electrochemical supercapacitors. Chemical Society Reviews, 2012, 41(2): 797–828
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[2]
Du C, Pan N. High power density supercapacitor electrodes of carbon nanotube films by electrophoretic deposition. Nanotechnology, 2006, 17(21): 5314–5318
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Yan J, Fan Z, Wei T, Qian W, Zhang M, Wei F. Fast and reversible surface redox reaction of graphene–MnO2 composites as supercapacitor electrodes. Carbon, 2010, 48(13): 3825–3833
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Hu C C, Chen J C, Chang K H. Cathodic deposition of Ni(OH)2 and Co(OH)2 for asymmetric supercapacitors: importance of the electrochemical reversibility of redox couples. Journal of Power Sources, 2013, 221: 128–133
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Wan C, Jiao Y, Li J. A cellulose fibers-supported hierarchical forest-like cuprous oxide/copper array architecture as a flexible and free-standing electrode for symmetric supercapacitors. Journal of Materials Chemistry A: Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2017, 5(33): 17267–17278
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Hung K, Masarapu C, Ko T, Wei B. Wide-temperature range operation supercapacitors from nanostructured activated carbon fabric. Journal of Power Sources, 2009, 193(2): 944–949
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Zhi M, Xiang C, Li J, Li M, Wu N. Nanostructured carbon-metal oxide composite electrodes for supercapacitors: a review. Nanoscale, 2013, 5(1): 72–88
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[8]
Zhong C, Deng Y, Hu W, Qiao J, Zhang L, Zhang J, Qiao J, Zhang L, Zhang J. A review of electrolyte materials and compositions for electrochemical supercapacitors. Chemical Society Reviews, 2015, 44(21): 7484–7539
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[9]
Snook G A, Kao P, Best A S. Conducting-polymer-based supercapacitor devices and electrodes. Journal of Power Sources, 2011, 196(1): 1–12
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Zhang J, Zhao X S. Conducting polymers directly coated on reduced graphene oxide sheets as high-performance supercapacitor electrodes. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2012, 116(9): 5420–5426
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Wan C, Jiao Y, Li J. Flexible, highly conductive, and free-standing reduced graphene oxide/polypyrrole/cellulose hybrid papers for supercapacitor electrodes. Journal of Materials Chemistry A: Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2017, 5(8): 3819–3831
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Wan C, Li J. Wood-derived biochar supported polypyrrole nanoparticles as a free-standing supercapacitor electrode. RSC Advances, 2016, 6(89): 86006–86011
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Li J, Lu W, Yan Y, Chou T W. High performance solid-state flexible supercapacitor based on Fe3O4/carbon nanotube/polyaniline ternary films. Journal of Materials Chemistry A: Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2017, 5(22): 11271–11277
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Wan C, Li J. Synthesis and electromagnetic interference shielding of cellulose-derived carbon aerogels functionalized with α-Fe2O3 and polypyrrole. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2017, 161: 158–165
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[15]
Tian J, Peng D, Wu X, Li W, Deng H, Liu S. Electrodeposition of Ag nanoparticles on conductive polyaniline/cellulose aerogels with increased synergistic effect for energy storage. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2017, 156: 19–25
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[16]
Zhang Y Z, Wang Y, Cheng T, Lai W Y, Pang H, Huang W. Flexible supercapacitors based on paper substrates: a new paradigm for low-cost energy storage. Chemical Society Reviews, 2015, 44(15): 5181–5199
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[17]
Wan C, Lu Y, Sun Q, Li J. Hydrothermal synthesis of zirconium dioxide coating on the surface of wood with improved UV resistance. Applied Surface Science, 2014, 321: 38–42
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Wan C, Jiao Y, Li J. In situ deposition of graphene nanosheets on wood surface by one-pot hydrothermal method for enhanced UV-resistant ability. Applied Surface Science, 2015, 347: 891–897
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Bana R, Banthia A K. Green composites: development of poly(vinyl alcohol)-wood dust composites. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering, 2007, 46(9): 821–829
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Chen C, Zhang Y, Li Y, Dai J, Song J, Yao Y, Gong Y, Kierzewski I, Xie J, Hu L. All-wood, low tortuosity, aqueous, biodegradable supercapacitors with ultra-high capacitance. Energy & Environmental Science, 2017, 10(2): 538–545
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Jiao Y, Wan C, Li J. Scalable synthesis and characterization of free-standing supercapacitor electrode using natural wood as a green substrate to support rod-shaped polyaniline. Journal of Materials Science Materials in Electronics, 2017, 28(3): 2634–2641
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Wan C, Lu Y, Jiao Y, Jin C, Sun Q, Li J. Ultralight and hydrophobic nanofibrillated cellulose aerogels from coconut shell with ultrastrong adsorption properties. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2015, 132(24): 42037
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Tjeerdsma B F, Militz H. Chemical changes in hydrothermal treated wood: FTIR analysis of combined hydrothermal and dry heat-treated wood. Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff, 2005, 63(2): 102–111
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Oh S Y, Yoo D I, Shin Y, Seo G. FTIR analysis of cellulose treated with sodium hydroxide and carbon dioxide. Carbohydrate Research, 2005, 340(3): 417–428
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[25]
Xu J, Zhu L, Bai Z, Liang G, Liu L, Fang D, Xu W. Conductive polypyrrole–bacterial cellulose nanocomposite membranes as flexible supercapacitor electrode. Organic Electronics, 2013, 14(12): 3331–3338
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Xu J, Zhang Y, Zhang D, Tang Y, Cang H. Electrosynthesis of PANI/PPy coatings doped by phosphotungstate on mild steel and their corrosion resistances. Progress in Organic Coatings, 2015, 88: 84–91
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Wan C, Yue J, Jian L. Core–shell composite of wood-derived biochar supported MnO2 nanosheets for supercapacitor applications. RSC Advances, 2016, 6(69): 64811–64817
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Wang H, Bian L, Zhou P, Tang J, Tang W. Core–sheath structured bacterial cellulose/polypyrrole nanocomposites with excellent conductivity as supercapacitors. Journal of Materials Chemistry A: Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2013, 1(3): 578–584
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Wang H, Zhu E, Yang J, Zhou P, Sun D, Tang W. Bacterial cellulose nanofiber-supported polyaniline nanocomposites with flake-shaped morphology as supercapacitor electrodes. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2012, 116(24): 13013–13019
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Chen H, Jiang J, Zhang L, Wan H, Qi T, Xia D. Highly conductive NiCo2S4 urchin-like nanostructures for high-rate pseudocapacitors. Nanoscale, 2013, 5(19): 8879–8883
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[31]
Zhao T, Jiang H, Ma J. Surfactant-assisted electrochemical deposition of α-cobalt hydroxide for supercapacitors. Journal of Power Sources, 2011, 196(2): 860–864
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2572018AB09) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31470584).

Compliance with ethics guidelines

Jian Li and Yue Jiao declare that they have no conflicts of interest or financial conflicts to disclose.
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the any of the authors.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s) 2019. Published by Higher Education Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1115 KB)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Material (229 KB)

Accesses

Citations

1

Altmetric

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/