Effects of red and blue LEDs on in vitro growth and microtuberization of potato single-node cuttings

Lili CHEN, Xuzhang XUE, Yadong YANG, Fei CHEN, Jie ZHAO, Xiquan WANG, Alam Tariful KHAN, Yuegao HU

PDF(800 KB)
PDF(800 KB)
Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. ›› 2018, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (2) : 197-205. DOI: 10.15302/J-FASE-2018224
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effects of red and blue LEDs on in vitro growth and microtuberization of potato single-node cuttings

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to investigate the effects of red and blue LEDs on in vitro growth and microtuberization of potato (Solanum tuberosum) single-node cuttings. Explants were incubated under 6 light treatments: 100% red LEDs (R), 75% red LEDs+ 25% blue LEDs (3RB), 50% red LEDs+ 50% blue LEDs (RB), 25% red LEDs+ 75% blue LEDs (R3B), 100% blue LEDs (B) and white LEDs (W). Most of the growth and physiological parameters were significantly higher in 3RB than W. Enhancement of leaf area and chlorophyll concentrations were obtained in B. Leaf stomata were elliptical with the lowest density in 3RB. However, those in W were round in shape, and those with the smallest size and the highest density were observed in R. Most of the characteristics of microtuberization were also improved in 3RB. The combined spectra of red and blue LEDs increased the number of large microtubers. The fresh weight of individual microtubers in R and W were increased, but not their number. These results suggest that, of the treatments assessed, 3RB is optimal for the in vitro growth of potato plantlets and the combination of red and blue LEDs is beneficial for microtuberization.

Keywords

blue LED / microtuber / plant tissue culture / potato plantlets in vitro / red LED

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Lili CHEN, Xuzhang XUE, Yadong YANG, Fei CHEN, Jie ZHAO, Xiquan WANG, Alam Tariful KHAN, Yuegao HU. Effects of red and blue LEDs on in vitro growth and microtuberization of potato single-node cuttings. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng., 2018, 5(2): 197‒205 https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2018224

References

[1]
International Potato Center—Agricultural research for development. Cipotato website, available on January 14, 2017
[2]
Halterman D, Guenthner J, Collinge S, Butler N, Douches D. Biotech potatoes in the 21st century: 20 years since the first biotech potato. American Journal of Potato Research, 2016, 93(1): 1–20
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Charles G, Rossignol L, Rossignol M. Environmental effects on potato plants in vitro. Journal of Plant Physiology, 1992, 139(6): 708–713
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Seabrook J E A. Light effects on the growth and morphogenesis of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in vitro: a review. American Journal of Potato Research, 2005, 82(5): 353–367
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Edesi J, Pirttila A M, Haggman H. Modified light spectral conditions prior to cryopreservation alter growth characteristics and cryopreservation success of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) shoot tips in vitro. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 2017, 128(2): 409–421
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Aksenova N P, Konstantinova T N, Sergeeva L I, Machackova I, Golyanovskaya S A. Morphogenesis of potato plants in vitro. I. Effect of light quality and hormones. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 1994, 13(3): 143–146
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Wilson D A, Weigel R C, Wheeler R M, Sager J C. Light spectral quality effects on the growth of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) nodal cuttings in vitro. In vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology–Plant, 1993, 29(1): 5–8
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[8]
Vinterhalter D, Vinterhalter B, Orbović V. Photo- and gravitropic bending of potato plantlets obtained in vitro from single-node explants. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2012, 31(4): 560–569
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Jao R C, Fang W. Growth of potato plantlets in vitro is different when provided concurrent versus alternating blue and red light photoperiods. HortScience, 2004, 39(2): 380–382
[10]
Ma X F, Wang Y P, Liu M X, Xu J M, Xu Z G. Effects of green and red lights on the growth and morphogenesis of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) plantlets in vitro. Scientia Horticulturae, 2015, 190: 104–109
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Hernández R, Kubota C. Physiological responses of cucumber seedlings under different blue and red photon flux ratios using LEDs. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2016, 121: 66–74
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Hernández R, Eguchi T, Deveci M, Kubota C. Tomato seedling physiological responses under different percentages of blue and red photon flux ratios using LEDs and cool white fluorescent lamps. Scientia Horticulturae, 2016, 213: 270–280
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Fan X X, Xu Z G, Liu X Y, Tang C M, Wang L W, Han X L. Effects of light intensity on the growth and leaf development of young tomato plants grown under under a combination of red and blue light. Scientia Horticulturae, 2013, 153: 50–55
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Poudel P R, Kataoka I, Mochioka R. Effect of red- and blue-light-emitting diodes on growth and morphogenesis of grapes. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 2008, 92(2): 147–153
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Kim S J, Hahn E J, Heo J W, Peak K Y. Effects of LEDs on net photosynthetic rate, growth and leaf stomata of chrysanthemum plantlets in vitro. Scientia Horticulturae, 2004, 101(1–2): 143–151
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Li H M, Xu Z G, Tang C M. Effect of light-emitting diodes on growth and morphogenesis of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plantlets in vitro. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 2010, 103(2): 155–163
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Li H M, Tang C M, Xu Z G. The effects of different light qualities on rapeseed (Brassicanapus L.) plantlet growth and morphogenesis in vitro. Scientia Horticulturae, 2013, 150: 117–124
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Edesi J, Kotkas K, Pirttila A M, Haggman H. Does light spectral quality affect survival and regeneration of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) shoot tips after cryopreservation? Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 2014, 119(3): 599–607
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Dhital S P, Lim H T. Microtuberization of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) as influenced by supplementary nutrients, plant growth regulators, and in vitro culture conditions. Potato Research, 2012, 55(2): 97–108
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Zhang Z J, Zhou W J, Li H Z, Zhang G Q, Subrahmaniyan K, Yu J Q. Effect of jasmonic acid on in vitro explant growth and microtuberization in potato. Biologia Plantarum, 2006, 50(3): 453–456
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Nistor A, Campeanu G, Atanasiu N, Chiru N, Karacsonyi D. Influence of genotype on “in vitro” production of microtubers. Romanian Biotechnological Letters, 2010, 15(3): 5317–5324
[22]
Fixen K R, Thomas S C, Tong C B S. Blue light inhibition of tuberization in a day neutral potato. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2012, 31(3): 342–350
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Ali F H M, Esmail M A. The impact of in vitro light quality on potato microtuberization from single node cuttings. Acta Horticulturae, 2011, (923): 73–77
[24]
Murashige T, Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum, 1962, 15(3): 473–497
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Arnon D I. Copper enzymer in isolated chloroplast polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology, 1949, 24(1): 1–15
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[26]
Zhang Y S, Huang X C. Experimental course of plant physiology.Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2009 (in Chinese)
[27]
Bradford M M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry, 1976, 72(1–2): 248–254
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[28]
Fairbairn N J. A modified anthrone regent. Chemistry & Industry, 1953, 4: 86–86
[29]
Veramendi J, Sota V, Fernández-San Millán A, Villafranca M J, Martin-Closas L, Pelacho A M, Mingo-Castel A M. An in vitro tuberization bioassay to assess maturity class of new potato clones. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, 2000, 75(6): 733–738
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Smith H. Sensing the light environment: the functions of the phytochrome family.Dordrecht:Springer,1993
[31]
Segeeva L I, Machackova I, Knostantinova T N, Golyanovskaya S A, Eder J, Zaltsman O O, Aksenova N P. Morphogensis of potato plants in vitro.II. endogenous levels, distribution, and metabolism of IAA and cytokinins. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 1994, 13(3): 147–152
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Huché-Thélier L, Crespel L, Gourrierec J L, Morel P, Sakr S, Leduc N. Light signaling and plant responses to blue and UV radiations perspectives for applications in horticulture. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2016, 121: 22–38
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Cope K R, Snowden M C, Bugbee B. Photobiological interactions of blue light and photosynthetic photon flux: effects of monochromatic and broad-spectrum light sources. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 2014, 90(3): 574–584
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[34]
Kara A N, Kotov A A, Bukhov N G. Specific distribution of gibberellins, cytokinins indole-3-acetic acid, and abscisic acid in radish plants closely correlates with photomorphogenetic responses to blue or red light. Journal of Plant Physiology, 1997, 151(1): 51–59
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Li C X, Xu Z G, Dong R Q, Chang S X, Wang L Z, Khalil-Ur-Rehman M, Tao J M. An RNA-Seq analysis of grape plantlets grown in vitro reveals different responses to blue, green, red LED light, and white fluorescent light. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017, 8(78): 78
Pubmed
[36]
Mortensen L M, Stromme E. Effects of light quality on some greenhouse crops. Scientia Horticulturae, 1987, 33(1–2): 27–36
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Kowallik W. Blue light effects on respiration. Plant Physiology, 1982, 33(1): 51–72
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Outlaw W H Jr. Integration of cellular and physiological functions of guard cells. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 2003, 22(6): 503–529
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Mohamed M A H, Alsadon A A. Influence of ventilation and sucrose on growth and leaf anatomy of micropropagated potato plantlets. Scientia Horticulturae, 2010, 123(3): 295–300
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Shimazaki K, Doi M, Assmann S M, Kinoshita T. Light regulation of stomatal movement. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2007, 58(1): 219–247
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[41]
Kinoshita T, Doi M, Suetsugu N, Kagawa T, Wada M, Shimazaki K. Phot1 and phot2 mediate blue light regulation of stomatal opening. Nature, 2001, 414(6864): 656–660
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[42]
Roumeliotis E, Visser R G, Bachem C W. A crosstalk of auxin and GA during tuber development. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 2012, 7(10): 1360–1363
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[43]
Lorenzen J H, Ewing E E. Changes in tuberization and assimilate partitioning in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) during the first 18 days of photoperiodic treatment. Annals of Botany, 1990, 66(4): 456–464
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Teo C J, Takahashi K, Shimizu K, Shimamoto K, Taoka K I. Shimamoto, Taoka K. Potato tuber induction is regulated by interactions between components of a tuberigen complex. Plant & Cell Physiology, 2017, 58(2): 365–374
Pubmed

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2013 AA 103005) and the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing (6144022).

Compliance with ethics guidelines

Lili Chen, Xuzhang Xue, Yadong Yang, Fei Chen, Jie Zhao, Xiquan Wang, Alam Tariful Khan, and Yuegao Hu declare that they have no conflicts of interest or financial conflicts to disclose.
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s) 2018. Published by Higher Education Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(800 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/