Progress of forest certification in China

Abstract

The Chinese Government is committed to forest certification as a market-based instrument to promote sustainable forest management. Forest certification includes a number of regulations, rules and policy paradigms related to certification and there are numerous challenges facing the uptake of forest certification in China. In particular, the ban on commercial logging in natural forests implemented by the Natural Forest Protection Program has resulted in little demand for forest certification of natural forest management units. However, there are also certification opportunities, such as the certification of non-timber forest products that benefit local communities who depend on forests for the goods and services they provide. This paper provides an overview of progress in forest certification in China, including its development history, organizational structure, scheme documents, certification scopes and standards, accreditation, certification bodies and auditors, and certification logos. The paper also focuses on government support for the supervision and management of forest certification through policy incentives, including the potential government procurement and subsidy policies for certified forest products. Finally, the paper analyzes certified non-timber forest products as an example of the value of certification to promote sustainable forest management and how the concept of forest certification can be used to add value to forests and ensure they are responsibly and sustainably managed. In general, forest certification in China has a clear role in sustainable forest management, both for timber and non-timber forest products.

Keywords

China Forest Certification Scheme / forest certification / government support / opportunities and challenges / sustainable forest management

References

[1] State Forestry Administration. Guidance to rapidly promote forest certification work, 2010 (in Chinese)

[2] Certification and Accreditation Administration, State Forestry Administration. Forest certification rules, 2015 (in Chinese)

[3] China National Accreditation Service for Conformity Assessment. Accreditation scheme for forest certification bodies, 2015 (in Chinese)

[4] China Forest Certification Council. Usage rules for China forest certification logo, 2012 (in Chinese)

[5] Lu W M, Li  Q J. Policy research report: government procurement policy for certified forest products, 2014 (in Chinese)

[6] Lu W M, Li  X Y. Policy research report: government subsidy policy for certified forest products, 2015 (in Chinese)

[7] Xiao J M, Wan  J. A discussion of conflicts between FSC standard and China’s laws and regulations. World Forestry Research, 2011, 24(1): 60–62 (in Chinese)

[8] Liu X L, Zheng  X X, Xu  B, Huang W B. Current situation and development trend of forest stewardship council in China. Journal of Beijing Forestry University: Social Sciences, 2010, 9(3): 86–90 (in Chinese)

[9] State Forestry Administration. Forest certification in China—non-timber forest products management (LY/T 2273–2014), Beijing: China Standard Press, 2014 (in Chinese)

[10] Li Q J, Chen  S Z, Hu  Y J. Current situation of non-timber forest products certification. World Forestry Research, 2016, 29(1): 14–18 (in Chinese)

[11] Hu Y J. Investigation report for non-timber forest products management certification, 2015 (in Chinese)

[12] Bai Q Y, Lu  W M. Comparative analysis on legality between CFCC chain of custody certification standard and European Union timber regulation. World Forestry Research, 2014, 27(3): 92–96 (in Chinese)

[13] Xu B, Li  Y, Li J. The strategy analysis on reactions of China’s forest products export enterprises to EU timber regulation. World Forestry Research, 2014, 27(4): 55–60 (in Chinese)

[14] United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. Rio declaration on environment and development, 1992

[15] United Nations. Sustainable development goals, 2015

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by forest certification related projects by the Science and Technology Development Center of the State Forestry Administration.

Compliance with ethics guidelines

Wenming Lu and Maharaj Muthoo declare that they have no conflicts of interest or financial conflicts to disclose.

This article is a review and does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s) 2017. Published by Higher Education Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)