Genome-wide analysis reveals selection for Chinese Rongchang pigs
Lei CHEN, Shilin TIAN, Long JIN, Zongyi GUO, Dan ZHU, Lan JING, Tiandong CHE, Qianzi TANG, Siqing CHEN, Liang ZHANG, Tinghuan ZHANG, Zuohua LIU, Jinyong WANG, Mingzhou LI
Genome-wide analysis reveals selection for Chinese Rongchang pigs
Livestock have undergone domestication and consequently strong selective pressure on genes or genomic regions that control desirable traits. To identify selection signatures in the genome of Chinese Rongchang pigs, we generated a total of about 170 Gb of DNA sequence data with about 6.4-fold coverage for each of six female individuals. By combining these data with the publically available genome data of 10 Asian wild boars, we identified 449 protein-coding genes with selection signatures in Rongchang pigs, which are mainly involved in growth and hormone binding, nervous system development, and drug metabolism. The accelerated evolution of these genes may contribute to the dramatic phenotypic differences between Rongchang pigs and Chinese wild boars. This study illustrated how domestication and subsequent artificial selection have shaped patterns of genetic variation in Rongchang pigs and provides valuable genetic resources that can enhance the use of pigs in agricultural production and biomedical studies.
domestication / genome / pig / re-sequencing / selection
[1] |
Groenen M A M, Archibald A L, Uenishi H, Tuggle C K, Takeuchi Y, Rothschild M F, Rogel-Gaillard C, Park C, Milan D, Megens H J, Li S, Larkin D M, Kim H, Frantz L A F, Caccamo M, Ahn H, Aken B L, Anselmo A, Anthon C, Auvil L, Badaoui B, Beattie C W, Bendixen C, Berman D, Blecha F, Blomberg J, Bolund L, Bosse M, Botti S, Bujie Z, Bystrom M, Capitanu B, Carvalho-Silva D, Chardon P, Chen C, Cheng R, Choi S H, Chow W, Clark R C, Clee C, Crooijmans R P M A, Dawson H D, Dehais P, De Sapio F, Dibbits B, Drou N, Du Z Q, Eversole K, Fadista J, Fairley S, Faraut T, Faulkner G J, Fowler K E, Fredholm M, Fritz E, Gilbert J G R, Giuffra E, Gorodkin J, Griffin D K, Harrow J L, Hayward A, Howe K, Hu Z L, Humphray S J, Hunt T, Hornshøj H, Jeon J T, Jern P, Jones M, Jurka J, Kanamori H, Kapetanovic R, Kim J, Kim J H, Kim K W, Kim T H, Larson G, Lee K, Lee K T, Leggett R, Lewin H A, Li Y, Liu W, Loveland J E, Lu Y, Lunney J K, Ma J, Madsen O, Mann K, Matthews L, McLaren S, Morozumi T, Murtaugh M P, Narayan J, Truong Nguyen D, Ni P, Oh S J, Onteru S, Panitz F, Park E W, Park H S, Pascal G, Paudel Y, Perez-Enciso M, Ramirez-Gonzalez R, Reecy J M, Rodriguez-Zas S, Rohrer G A, Rund L, Sang Y, Schachtschneider K, Schraiber J G, Schwartz J, Scobie L, Scott C, Searle S, Servin B, Southey B R, Sperber G, Stadler P, Sweedler J V, Tafer H, Thomsen B, Wali R, Wang J, Wang J, White S, Xu X, Yerle M, Zhang G, Zhang J, Zhang J, Zhao S, Rogers J, Churcher C, Schook L B. Analyses of pig genomes provide insight into porcine demography and evolution. Nature, 2012, 491(7424): 393–398
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Chen K, Baxter T, Muir W M, Groenen M A, Schook L B. Genetic resources, genome mapping and evolutionary genomics of the pig (Sus scrofa). International Journal of Biological Sciences, 2007, 3(3): 153–165
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Rubin C J, Megens H J, Barrio A M, Maqbool K, Sayyab S, Schwochow D, Wang C, Carlborg O, Jern P, Jorgensen C B, Archibald A L, Fredholm M, Groenen M A M, Andersson L. Strong signatures of selection in the domestic pig genome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012, 109(48): 19529–19536
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Ai H, Fang X, Yang B, Huang Z, Chen H, Mao L, Zhang F, Zhang L, Cui L, He W, Yang J, Yao X, Zhou L, Han L, Li J, Sun S, Xie X, Lai B, Su Y, Lu Y, Yang H, Huang T, Deng W, Nielsen R, Ren J, Huang L. Adaptation and possible ancient interspecies introgression in pigs identified by whole-genome sequencing. Nature Genetics, 2015, 47(3): 217–225
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Xia Q, Guo Y, Zhang Z, Li D, Xuan Z, Li Z, Dai F, Li Y, Cheng D, Li R, Cheng T, Jiang T, Becquet C, Xu X, Liu C, Zha X, Fan W, Lin Y, Shen Y, Jiang L, Jensen J, Hellmann I, Tang S, Zhao P, Xu H, Yu C, Zhang G, Li J, Cao J, Liu S, He N, Zhou Y, Liu H, Zhao J, Ye C, Du Z, Pan G, Zhao A, Shao H, Zeng W, Wu P, Li C, Pan M, Li J, Yin X, Li D, Wang J, Zheng H, Wang W, Zhang X, Li S, Yang H, Lu C, Nielsen R, Zhou Z, Wang J, Xiang Z, Wang J. Complete resequencing of 40 genomes reveals domestication events and genes in silkworm (Bombyx). Science, 2009, 326(5951): 433–436
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Rubin C J, Zody M C, Eriksson J, Meadows J R, Sherwood E, Webster M T, Jiang L, Ingman M, Sharpe T, Ka S, Hallböök F, Besnier F, Carlborg O, Bed’hom B, Tixier-Boichard M, Jensen P, Siegel P, Lindblad-Toh K, Andersson L. Whole-genome resequencing reveals loci under selection during chicken domestication. Nature, 2010, 464(7288): 587–591
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Shapiro M D, Kronenberg Z, Li C, Domyan E T, Pan H, Campbell M, Tan H, Huff C D, Hu H, Vickrey A I, Nielsen S C, Stringham S A, Hu H, Willerslev E, Gilbert M T, Yandell M, Zhang G, Wang J. Genomic diversity and evolution of the head crest in the rock pigeon. Science, 2013, 339(6123): 1063–1067
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Carneiro M, Rubin C J, Di Palma F, Albert F W, Alföldi J, Barrio A M, Pielberg G, Rafati N, Sayyab S, Turner-Maier J, Younis S, Afonso S, Aken B, Alves J M, Barrell D, Bolet G, Boucher S, Burbano H A, Campos R, Chang J L, Duranthon V, Fontanesi L, Garreau H, Heiman D, Johnson J, Mage R G, Peng Z, Queney G, Rogel-Gaillard C, Ruffier M, Searle S, Villafuerte R, Xiong A, Young S, Forsberg-Nilsson K, Good J M, Lander E S, Ferrand N, Lindblad-Toh K, Andersson L. Rabbit genome analysis reveals a polygenic basis for phenotypic change during domestication. Science, 2014, 345(6200): 1074–1079
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Axelsson E, Ratnakumar A, Arendt M L, Maqbool K, Webster M T, Perloski M, Liberg O, Arnemo J M, Hedhammar A, Lindblad-Toh K. The genomic signature of dog domestication reveals adaptation to a starch-rich diet. Nature, 2013, 495(7441): 360–364
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Daetwyler H D, Capitan A, Pausch H, Stothard P, van Binsbergen R, Brøndum R F, Liao X, Djari A, Rodriguez S C, Grohs C, Esquerré D, Bouchez O, Rossignol M N, Klopp C, Rocha D, Fritz S, Eggen A, Bowman P J, Coote D, Chamberlain A J, Anderson C, VanTassell C P, Hulsegge I, Goddard M E, Guldbrandtsen B, Lund M S, Veerkamp R F, Boichard D A, Fries R, Hayes B J. Whole-genome sequencing of 234 bulls facilitates mapping of monogenic and complex traits in cattle. Nature Genetics, 2014, 46(8): 858–865
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Li M, Tian S, Jin L, Zhou G, Li Y, Zhang Y, Wang T, Yeung C K, Chen L, Ma J, Zhang J, Jiang A, Li J, Zhou C, Zhang J, Liu Y, Sun X, Zhao H, Niu Z, Lou P, Xian L, Shen X, Liu S, Zhang S, Zhang M, Zhu L, Shuai S, Bai L, Tang G, Liu H, Jiang Y, Mai M, Xiao J, Wang X, Zhou Q, Wang Z, Stothard P, Xue M, Gao X, Luo Z, Gu Y, Zhu H, Hu X, Zhao Y, Plastow G S, Wang J, Jiang Z, Li K, Li N, Li X, Li R. Genomic analyses identify distinct patterns of selection in domesticated pigs and Tibetan wild boars. Nature Genetics, 2013, 45(12): 1431–1438
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Li M, Chen L, Tian S, Lin Y, Tang Q, Zhou X, Li D, Yeung C K L, Che T, Jin L, Fu Y, Ma J, Wang X, Jiang A, Lan J, Pan Q, Liu Y, Luo Z, Guo Z, Liu H, Zhu L, Shuai S, Tang G, Zhao J, Jiang Y, Bai L, Zhang S, Mai M, Li C, Wang D, Gu Y, Wang G, Lu H, Li Y, Zhu H, Li Z, Li M, Gladyshev V N, Jiang Z, Zhao S, Wang J, Li R, Li X. Comprehensive variation discovery and recovery of missing sequence in the pig genome using multiple de novo assemblies. Genome Research, 2017, 27(5): 865–874
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Fu Y, Li C, Tang Q, Tian S, Jin L, Chen J, Li M, Li C. Genomic analysis reveals selection in Chinese native black pig. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6(1): 36354
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Li M, Tian S, Yeung C K, Meng X, Tang Q, Niu L, Wang X, Jin L, Ma J, Long K, Zhou C, Cao Y, Zhu L, Bai L, Tang G, Gu Y, Jiang A, Li X, Li R. Whole-genome sequencing of Berkshire (European native pig) provides insights into its origin and domestication. Scientific Reports, 2014, 4(4): 4678
Pubmed
|
[15] |
Bosse M, Megens H J, Frantz L A, Madsen O, Larson G, Paudel Y, Duijvesteijn N, Harlizius B, Hagemeijer Y, Crooijmans R P, Groenen M A. Genomic analysis reveals selection for Asian genes in European pigs following human-mediated introgression. Nature Communications, 2014, 5: 4392
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Frantz L A, Schraiber J G, Madsen O, Megens H J, Bosse M, Paudel Y, Semiadi G, Meijaard E, Li N, Crooijmans R P, Archibald A L, Slatkin M, Schook L B, Larson G, Groenen M A. Genome sequencing reveals fine scale diversification and reticulation history during speciation in Sus. Genome Biology, 2013, 14(9): R107
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics, 2009, 25(14): 1754–1760
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics, 2009, 25(16): 2078–2079
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Huang W, Sherman B T, Lempicki R A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nature Protocols, 2009, 4(1): 44–57
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Patterson N, Price A L, Reich D. Population structure and eigenanalysis. PLoS Genetics, 2006, 2(12): e190
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Nguyen D T, Lee K, Choi H, Choi M K, Le M T, Song N, Kim J H, Seo H G, Oh J W, Lee K, Kim T H, Park C. The complete swine olfactory subgenome: expansion of the olfactory gene repertoire in the pig genome. BMC Genomics, 2012, 13(1): 584
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Marchese S, Pes D, Scaloni A, Carbone V, Pelosi P. Lipocalins of boar salivary glands binding odours and pheromones. European Journal of Biochemistry, 1998, 252(3): 563–568
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Mak G K, Enwere E K, Gregg C, Pakarainen T, Poutanen M, Huhtaniemi I, Weiss S. Male pheromone-stimulated neurogenesis in the adult female brain: possible role in mating behavior. Nature Neuroscience, 2007, 10(8): 1003–1011
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Larson G, Dobney K, Albarella U, Fang M, Matisoo-Smith E, Robins J, Lowden S, Finlayson H, Brand T, Willerslev E, Rowley-Conwy P, Andersson L, Cooper A. Worldwide phylogeography of wild boar reveals multiple centers of pig domestication. Science, 2005, 307(5715): 1618–1621
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Albert F W, Somel M, Carneiro M, Aximu-Petri A, Halbwax M, Thalmann O, Blanco-Aguiar J A, Plyusnina I Z, Trut L, Villafuerte R, Ferrand N, Kaiser S, Jensen P, Pääbo S. A comparison of brain gene expression levels in domesticated and wild animals. PLoS Genetics, 2012, 8(9): e1002962
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Amaral A J, Ferretti L, Megens H J, Crooijmans R P, Nie H, Ramos-Onsins S E, Perez-Enciso M, Schook L B, Groenen M A. Genome-wide footprints of pig domestication and selection revealed through massive parallel sequencing of pooled DNA. PLoS One, 2011, 6(4): e14782
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Li Y, Vonholdt B M, Reynolds A, Boyko A R, Wayne R K, Wu D D, Zhang Y P. Artificial selection on brain-expressed genes during the domestication of dog. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2013, 30(8): 1867–1876
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Hare B, Plyusnina I, Ignacio N, Schepina O, Stepika A, Wrangham R, Trut L. Social cognitive evolution in captive foxes is a correlated by-product of experimental domestication. Current Biology, 2005, 15(3): 226–230
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[29] |
Topál J, Gergely G, Erdohegyi A, Csibra G, Miklósi A. Differential sensitivity to human communication in dogs, wolves, and human infants. Science, 2009, 325(5945): 1269–1272
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[30] |
Meyer U A, Zanger U M, Schwab M. Omics and drug response. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 2013, 53(53): 475–502
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |