Determination of heterozygosity for avirulence/virulence loci through sexual hybridization of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici

Yuan TIAN, Gangming ZHAN, Xia LU, Jie ZHAO, Lili HUANG, Zhensheng KANG

Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. ›› 2017, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (1) : 48-58.

PDF(1226 KB)
Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. All Journals
PDF(1226 KB)
Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. ›› 2017, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (1) : 48-58. DOI: 10.15302/J-FASE-2016114
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Determination of heterozygosity for avirulence/virulence loci through sexual hybridization of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Wheat stripe rust caused by Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici is one of the most devastating diseases of wheat worldwide and resistant cultivars are vital for its management. Therefore, investigating the heterozygosity of the pathogen is important because of rapid virulence changes in isolates heterozygous for avirulence/virulence. An isolate of P. striiformis f. sp. tritici was selfed on Berberis shensiana to determine the heterozygosity for avirulence/virulence loci. One hundred and twenty progeny isolates obtained from this selfing were phenotyped using 25 lines of wheat containing Yr genes and genotyped with 96 simple sequencing repeat markers, with 51 pathotypes and 55 multi-locus genotypes being identified. All of these were avirulent on lines with Yr5, Yr10, Yr15, Yr24 and Yr26 and virulent on lines with Yr17, Yr25 and YrA, indicating that the parental isolate was homozygously avirulent or homozygously virulent for these loci. Segregation was found for wheat lines with Yr1, Yr2, Yr4, Yr6, Yr7, Yr8, Yr9, Yr27, Yr28, Yr32, Yr43, Yr44, YrExp2, YrSp, YrTr1, YrTye and YrV23. The 17 cultivars to which the Pst was identified as heterozygous with respect to virulence/avirulence should not be given priority in breeding programs to obtain new resistant cultivars.

Keywords

Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici / selfing / heterozygosity / virulence inheritance

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yuan TIAN, Gangming ZHAN, Xia LU, Jie ZHAO, Lili HUANG, Zhensheng KANG. Determination of heterozygosity for avirulence/virulence loci through sexual hybridization of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng., 2017, 4(1): 48‒58 https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2016114

1 Introduction

Stripe rust, caused by Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici (Pst) causes significant yield losses during epidemics that have resulted in famines throughout human history[ 1]. The application of resistant cultivars is an effective way to control Pst. However, resistance in cultivars is usually not durable, and the appearance of Pst races that overcome widely deployed resistance (R) genes has led to destructive pandemics in the past. New races continuously appear due to mutation, introduction, genetic drift, asexual and/or sexual recombination, and host selection[ 27]. Most changes in virulence of Melampsora lini isolates, for example, were found to be due to mutations followed by sexual recombination[ 8]. Studying the level of heterozygosity in Pst seems appropriate because virulence changes take place more rapidly in isolates heterozygous for avirulence than in isolates homozygous for avirulence[ 9]. High genome heterozygosity has been shown for Pst based on molecular markers, and allelic and genomic sequences[ 1, 10, 11]. Direct evidence for virulence/avirulence heterozygosity can be acquired from a selfing or crossing experiment on an alternate host[ 12].
Pst is a heteroecious pathogen, and five spore stages represented by urediospores, teliospores, basidiospores, pycniospores and aeciospores are included in its life cycle, with the first two stages present on wheat and the rest on an alternate host[ 13]. Crossing experiments in the greenhouse indicated that new races of Pst could be produced on barberry (Berberis spp.)[ 14, 15]. However, barberry and Oregon grape (Mahonia spp.) were only recently confirmed as alternate hosts for Pst[ 16, 17]. Heterozygosity, inheritance of avirulence/virulence, and linkage relationships of genes for pathogenicity may be acquired using long-established genetic approaches including selfing and hybridization of isolates[ 9, 1820]. The confirmation of Berberis spp. as alternate hosts for Pst made it possible to study the genetics of virulence of Pst by selfing and crosses. The inheritance of virulence/avirulence of Pst has been studied by Wang et al. [ 21] in the USA, Rodriguez-Algaba et al. [ 22] in Europe and Tian et al.[ 12] in China.
The gene-for-gene relationship implies that the pathogenicity genotype of a pathogen isolate can be determined through studying the infection patterns of its progeny isolates on host lines harboring different resistance genes[ 23]. A set of near-isogenic lines of wheat genotypes with an “Avocet Susceptible” background was found to be useful in distinguishing races of Pst except for ones which cannot infect Avocet S[ 24]. Resistance genes encode putative receptors that respond to the products of ‘Avr genes’ (Avr, avirulence) which are a subset of pathogen-secreted virulence proteins produced by the pathogen during infection[ 25, 26].
In this study, a sexual population comprising 120 isolates produced by selfing of an isolate collected from Gansu Province, China with a relatively wide virulence spectrum was built. Virulence tests and SSR genotypes were used to determine inheritance and heterozygosity of avirulence/virulence loci corresponding to various Yr genes in the population. The data obtained on the heterozygosity of Pst may help to predict virulence changes in rust populations, which could prove significant in the decision making process for the generation and distribution of new resistant wheat cultivars.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Urediospore multiplication and teliospore production

The parental isolate was collected from Gansu Province, China in 2013. Urediospores were multiplied from a single urediospore on susceptible wheat cv. Mingxian 169 with no known resistance genes to Pst. Wheat seedlings were grown in 10 cm square pots. When the first few leaves were fully expanded, seedlings were inoculated with a spore suspension (0.1 mg·mL-1)[ 22], and incubated for 24 h at 10°C in the dark in a dew chamber. Afterwards, the plants were transferred to a growth chamber at 16°C with a 16L:8D h photoperiod. Teliospores were produced by inoculating urediospores onto vegetative plants at the 5 leaf stage. When heavy sporulation became visible, the temperature was raised to 25°C during the day and 16°C at night to induce telia formation. Teliospore-producing leaves were harvested 1 month after inoculation. Leaves were dried at room temperature for 2 days, put in paper bags, and kept in a desiccator at 4°C for about 1 week.

2.2 Inoculation of barberry

Seedlings of Berberis shensiana for inoculation were grown in pots in the greenhouse. Teliospores were germinated following the method described by Zhao et al.[ 27]. After abundant basidiospore production was observed, these were used for inoculation as detailed by Tian et al.[ 12]. All further steps were described by Tian et al.[ 12].

2.3 Selfing of the parental isolate

After appearance of nectar on the pycnia, nectar was transferred from one pycnium to another with a toothpick that had been soaked in sterile water for several hours. Aecia appeared at 5–7 days after crossing.

2.4 Development of uredial progeny

Aeciospores were collected from barberry leaves carrying mature aecia by gentle tapping above a microscope slide. A single aeciospore was picked with a fine glass fiber under the stereomicroscope and used to inoculate a seedling of wheat cv. Mingxian 169 at the one-leaf stage. Prior to inoculation, the wax layer on the leaves was removed. Inoculated plants were kept at 10°C in a dew chamber for 24 h in the dark. Afterwards plants were transferred to a growth chamber at 16°C with a 16L:8D h photoperiod. Plants successfully inoculated in one pot were separated to new pots to avoid contamination. After 15 days of incubation, urediospores produced on a single leaf were collected with a glass fiber and stored in a desiccator at 4°C for later use.

2.5 Virulence assays

The parental isolate and progeny isolates were tested for pathogenicity on a set of 25 wheat genotypes, most of which were near-isogenic lines from an Avocet-susceptible background (Table S1). Cultivar Mingxian 169 was used as susceptible control. The procedures and conditions for inoculation and cultivation were as previously described[ 28]. Infection types (ITs) were scored 18–20 days after inoculation based on a 0–9 scale as described by Line and Qayoum[ 29]. ITs 0–5 were considered avirulent (A) and ITs 6–9 virulent (V). Virulence phenotyping was repeated twice for all isolates. For genetic analysis, the progeny isolates produced by selfing were considered as F2 generation, and the heterokaryotic urediospores were considered as diploid. X2 tests were used to determine the degree of fit of observed numbers to theoretical segregation ratios for both virulence and SSR markers. The number of virulence phenotypes (VPs), that is pathotypes, was determined using VAT 1.0 software[ 30].

2.6 DNA extraction

DNA was extracted from urediospores using the method described by Aljanabi and Martinez[ 31] with modifications. Urediospores were transferred to a 1.5 mL centrifuge tube, sterilized silica sand equivalent to the spore volume and 200 mL extraction buffer (0.4 mol·L-1 NaCl; 10 m mol·L-1 Tris-HCl, pH 8; 2 m mol·L-1 EDTA pH 8) were added, and the mixture was ground with a plastic pestle for 10–15 min. After adding another 300 mL of extraction buffer and 5 mL of 10 mg·mL-1 proteinase K and gentle mixing, the mixture was incubated at 65°C for 2 h. A standard phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol extraction followed and the dried DNA pellet was finally dissolved in 50 mL TE buffer. 1.0 ml of 20 mg·mL-1 RNase A was added and the mixture incubated at 37°C for 30 min. RNase was removed by phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol extraction and purified DNA was dissolved in TE buffer. DNA concentration was determined with an ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Bio-Rad, Martinez, CA, USA), and the concentration was adjusted to 50 ng·mL-1.

2.7 SSR primers, PCR amplification, electrophoresis and data analyses

Ninety six pairs of Pst SSR primers[ 3236] (Table S2) were screened for useful markers. Forward primers were fluorescently 5′-labeled with either FAM, HEX, TAM or ROX. Primers were synthesized by Shanghai Sangon Company (Shanghai, China). PCR was performed in a S1000 Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) in a 25 mL volume comprised of 1.0 mL of DNA, 2.5 mL of 10 × reaction buffer (Mg2+-free), 2.0 mL of Mg2+ (25 m mol·L-1), 0.5 mL of dNTPs (10 m mol·L-1), 0.5 mL of each primer (10 m mol·L-1), 0.2 mL Taq DNA polymerase (5 U·mL-1, Takara Bio Inc., Kusatsu, Japan) and 17.8 mL of ddH2O. PCR was carried out under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min; 10 cycles at 95°C for 30 s, 63°C for 30 s with a 1°C decrease per cycle, and 72°C for 30 s; 20 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 58°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s; and 72°C for 6 min. PCR products were analyzed on an Applied Biosystems 3730xl DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). The lengths of the SSR amplicons were scored using GeneMarker[ 37]. The correlation coefficient of virulence phenotypes and SSR genotypes was calculated using NTSYS-pc (V2.10) MXCOMP[ 38]. Linkage maps were constructed using QTL IciMapping software (V4.1)[ 39].

3 Results

3.1 Segregation of virulence

Fifty one VPs were found based on virulence tests of 120 isolates used in this study (Table 1, Table S3). Segregation of virulence was found for 17 of the 25 wheat lines (Table 1). For correspondence with the host genes, the codes CAvr1, CAvr2, CAvr4, CAvr5, CAvr6, CAvr7, CAvr8, CAvr9, CAvr10, CAvr15, CAvr17, CAvr24, CAvr25, CAvr26, CAvr27, CAvr28, CAvr32, CAvr43, CAvr44, CAvrA, CAvrExp2, CAvrSp, CAvrTr1, CAvrTye and CAvrV23 are assigned to the genes for avirulence; Cavr1, Cavr2, Cavr4, Cavr5, Cavr6, Cavr7, Cavr8, Cavr9, Cavr10, Cavr15, Cavr17, Cavr24, Cavr25, Cavr26, Cavr27, Cavr28, Cavr32, Cavr43, Cavr44, CavrA, CavrExp2, CavrSp, CavrTr1, CavrTye and CavrV23 are assigned to the genes for virulence. VP 1 comprised 26 isolates having the same virulence/avirulence pattern as the parental isolate (Table 1). All other VPs contained one to eight isolates. Fifteen VPs containing 42 isolates showed a higher degree of virulence compared to the parental isolate. Seven of these 15 VPs comprising 15 isolates had a wider spectrum of virulence compared to the parental isolate. These isolates had additional virulence on one or several loci of Yr4, Yr7, Yr8, Yr32, YrExp2 and YrSp. VP 10 consisting of only isolate 111 infected 17 of the 25 wheat lines with Yr genes. Twenty six VPs comprising 59 isolates showed a decreased frequency of virulence. The remaining 10 VPs showed the same frequency of virulence as the parental isolate. Taken together, these results indicate that a large number of races with a wide range of virulence can be generated through sexual reproduction.
Tab.1 Virulence patterns of the parental and progeny isolates of Pst on specific wheat Yr lines
VP Number of isolate Avirulence (A) and virulence (V) of parental and progeny isolates of Pst on wheat lines with Yr genes
Yr4 Yr7 Yr8 Yr32 Yr43 YrExp2 YrSp YrTr1 Yr1 Yr2 Yr6 Yr9 Yr27 Yr28 Yr44 YrTye YrV23
Parent 1 A A A A A A A A V V V V V V V V V
Progeny 120
1 26 A A A A A A A A V V V V V V V V V
2 6 A A A A A V A A V V V V V V V V A
3 1 A A A A A V A A V V V V V V V V V
4 1 A A A V A A A A V V V V V V V V V
5 1 A A A A A A A A V V V V V V V A V
6 1 A A A A A A A A V V V A V V V V V
7 1 A A V A A A A A V A V V V V V V V
8 6 A A A A A A A A V A V V V V V V V
9 8 A A A A A A V A V V V V V V V V V
10 1 V V A V A A V A V V V V V V V V V
11 3 A A A A A A V A V A V V V V V V V
12 2 V A A A A A V A V V V V V V V V V
13 1 V A A A A A A A V V V V A V V V V
14 1 A A A A A A A A A V V V A V V V V
15 1 A V A A A A A A V V V V V V A V V
16 1 A V A A A A A A V V V V V V V V V
17 3 A A A A A A A A V A V V V V A V V
18 2 A A A A A A A A V V V V V V A V V
19 1 A A A A A A A A V A V V A V A V V
20 4 A A A A A A V A V A V V V V V V A
21 2 A A V A A A V A V A V V V V V V A
22 1 A A A A A A A A V A V V V V A V A
23 7 A A A A A A A A V A V V V V V V A
24 1 A A A A A A A A V A V V A V V V A
25 1 A A A A A A A A V A V V V V V A A
26 1 A A A A A A V A V A V V V V A V A
27 1 A A A A A A V A V A A V V V A V A
28 1 A A A A A A A A A A V V A V A V A
29 2 A A A A A A A A A A V V V V A V A
30 1 A A V A A V A A V V V V V V V V A
31 1 A A V A A V A A V V V V V V V V V
32 1 A A V A A A A V V V V V V V V V A
33 1 A A V A A A V A V A V V V V A V V
34 1 A A A V V A A A V V V V V A V V V
35 1 A A V A A A A A A A V A V V V V V
36 1 A V A A A A A V V V V V V A V V A
37 1 A V A A A V A V V V V V V A V V A
38 1 A V V A A A V A V A V V V V V A A
39 1 A A V A A V A A A V A V A V V V A
40 1 A V A V A V V A A V A V V V V V V
41 1 V V A A A A V A V V A A V V A A V
42 1 A V V A V V A A V V V A A A V V A
43 2 A V V A V V A A A V V A A V V A A
44 8 A V V A V V A A A V V A A A V A A
45 3 A V V A V V A V A V V A A A V A A
46 1 A V V A V V A V A A V A A A V V A
47 1 A V V A V V A V A V V A A V V V A
48 1 A V V V V V A A V V V V V A V A A
49 1 V V V V V V A A V V V V V V V V A
50 1 A V V A A V A A V A A V V A V A A
51 1 A V V A V V A A V V A A V A V A A

Note: VP, Virulence phenotype. Progeny isolates were separated on 17 of the 25 Yr lines. The parental isolate and progeny isolates were all homozygously avirulent on Yr5, Yr10, Yr15, Yr24, and Yr26 and homozygously virulent on Yr17, Yr25, and YrA.

The parental isolate and all S1 progeny isolates were avirulent on lines with Yr5, Yr10, Yr15, Yr24 and Yr26. This indicates that the parental isolate was homozygously avirulent. On lines with Yr17, Yr25 and YrA, the parental isolate and all S1 progeny isolates were virulent. This in turn shows that the parental isolate was homozygous with respect to this group of resistance genes.
Segregation for pathogenicity among S1 progeny isolates occurred on 17 lines with Yr resistance genes (Yr1, Yr2, Yr4, Yr6, Yr7, Yr8, Yr9, Yr27, Yr28, Yr32, Yr43, Yr44, YrExp2, YrSp, YrTr1, YrTye and YrV23). The parental isolate was avirulent on lines with Yr4, Yr7, Yr8, Yr32, Yr43, YrExp2, YrSp or YrTr1, but virulent on lines with Yr1, Yr2, Yr6, Yr9, Yr27, Yr28, Yr44, YrTye or YrV23. The best fit for the segregation of S1 progeny isolates was a 3:1 avirulence to virulence ratio for the reaction on Yr7, Yr8, YrExp2 and YrSp, and 15:1 for the reaction on lines with Yr4, Yr32 and YrTr1 (Table 2). Two examples of different reactions produced by the parental and some progeny isolates are illustrated in Fig. 1. The best fit for the virulence on lines with Yr1, or Yr27 was a 1:3 avirulence to virulence ratio and 1:15 for the reaction on the line with Yr6. Since the P values were all>0.05, these data suggest single recessive Pst genes for virulence (or avirulence) in relation to Yr7, Yr8, YrExp2, YrSp, Yr1 and Yr27. By contrast, two complementary recessive genes for virulence (or two independent dominant genes for avirulence), or avirulence (or two independent dominant genes for virulence) are indicated for the reaction on lines with Yr4, Yr32, YrTr1 and Yr6. The best fit for the segregation of S1 progeny isolates was a 13:3 avirulence to virulence ratio for the line with Yr43 and 3:13 for lines with Yr9, Yr28, Yr44 and YrTye. These ratios indicate the presence of two recessive genes. This could be explained by epistatic interaction of one gene dominant for avirulence and one gene dominant for suppression of avirulence. The best fit for segregation on phenotypes Yr2 and YrV23 was a 7:9 avirulence to virulence ratio when two dominant gene pairs exist conditioning virulence. However, the P value of the ratio on Yr2 was below 0.05.
Tab.2 Infection types, segregation of avirulence/virulence in the progeny isolates derived from selfing parental Pst isolate on wheat lines with the indicated Yr genes and probability (P) values of Chi-square tests
Wheat line with Yr gene Infection type of parental isolate Observed number of
progeny isolates
Expected ratio P
Avirulent Virulent
Yr7 2 92 28 3:1 0.67
Yr8 0 90 30 3:1 1.00
Yr32 1 115 5 15:1 0.35
Yr43 2 100 20 13:3 0.56
YrSp 0 94 26 3:1 0.40
YrTr1 2 112 8 15:1 0.85
YrExp2 2 94 26 3:1 0.40
Yr4 2 115 5 15:1 0.35
Yr1 9 21 99 1:3 0.73
Yr2 9 40 80 7:9 0.03
Yr6 9 6 114 1:15 0.19
Yr9 9 20 100 3:13 0.56
Yr27 9 22 98 1:3 0.09
Yr44 9 15 105 3:13 0.08
YrTye 9 20 100 3:13 0.56
Yr28 9 19 101 3:13 0.41
YrV23 9 53 67 7:9 0.93
Fig.1 Infection types (IT) of the parental isolate (P) and its selfed progeny isolates (1, 3, 20, and 57) on wheat near-isogenic lines of Yr7 (a) and Yr8 (b).

Full size|PPT slide

Chi-square tests for independence indicated linkage between pathogen genes CAvr7, CAvr8 and CAvrExp2, and between Cavr1 and Cavr27 (Table 3). The linkage relationship indicated that CAvr7, CAvr8 and CAvrExp2 may be clustered at a specific location.
Tab.3  Probability (P) values of Chi-square tests for independence of genes for avirulence/virulence
P
CAvr or cavr gene Avirulence (CAvr) Virulence (Cavr)
CAvr8 CAvrExp2 CAvrSp Cavr27
CAvr7 0.00 0.00 0.61
CAvr8 0.00 0.53
CAvrExp2 0.10
Cavr1 0.00

Note: P≥0.05 indicates that the two genes are independent and not linked, and P<0.05 indicates that the two genes are linked.

3.2 Segregation of SSR markers and linkage map

Of the 96 SSR markers used in this study, 11 produced co-dominant amplicons in the parental isolate that segregated among the selfed progeny population. Fifty five multilocus genotypes were identified from the 120 progeny isolates (Table S4). A linkage map that contains four avirulence genes and 11 SSR markers was built using QTL Icimapping software (Fig. 2). The dominant avirulence genes, CAvr7, CAvr8 and CAvrExp2, were more closely linked than CAvrSp. The correlation coefficient between virulence phenotype and SSR genotype was -0.09.
Fig.2 Linkage maps constructed with SSR markers and avirulence data of 120 progeny isolates developed through selfing using QTL IciMapping software

Full size|PPT slide

4 Discussion

In this study, a Pst population containing 120 isolates acquired from selfing a single parental isolate on B. shensiana was built. Virulence tests and SSR molecular markers were used to analyze the population. Segregation of virulence was found for 17 of the 25 virulence/avirulence loci. A linkage map including four avirulence genes and 11 SSR molecular markers was built.
From the 120 progeny isolates, 51 VPs and 55 genotypes were identified. This indicates that sexual reproduction can produce isolates with a higher diversity than asexual reproduction. Among the 51 VPs, seven VPs containing 15 isolates had an even wider spectrum than the parental isolate for one or several loci of Yr4, Yr7, Yr8, Yr32, YrExp2 and YrSp. These 15 isolates are likely to be the dominant races in the future. This work constitutes a novel approach that might be used in the future to predict the appearance of novel races.
Our data are largely compatible with previous studies of selfing a Pst isolate PST-127 from the USA, and isolate Pinglan 17-7 from China[ 12, 21] (Table 4). However, in the present study, we found avirulence on the wheat line with Yr1 is controlled by a single recessive gene, which was previously identified as homozygously virulent by Tian et al.[ 12] and Wang et al.[ 21]. However, the new data indicate that avirulence on lines with Yr2 and Yr9 seems to be controlled by two genes each, and therefore cannot be considered homozygous for virulence in PST-127 and Pinglan 17-7[ 12, 21]. Avirulence on the line with Yr4 seems to be controlled by two dominant genes instead of two recessive genes in Pinglan 17-7[ 12]. Avirulence on the line with Yr6, on the other hand, seems to be controlled by two recessive genes, not by a single dominant gene in PST-127 and Pinglan 17-7. Avirulence on lines with Yr7 and Yr8 is controlled by single dominant genes, which corresponds to the results by Wang et al.[ 21], but not the results by Tian et al.[ 12]. Avirulence on the line with Yr27 in our case seems to be controlled by one recessive gene, as in the study of Tian et al.[ 12], however, Wang et al.[ 21] had identified a single dominant gene. Avirulence on the line with Yr32 is controlled by two dominant genes, and not controlled by two recessive genes in isolate Pinglan 17-7[ 12] and homozygous avirulence in race PST-127[ 21]. Avirulence against YrTr1 was controlled by two dominant gene, not homozygous avirulence to YrTr1 in isolate Pinglan 17-7[ 12] and controlled by one recessive genes in race PST-127[ 21]. Avirulence against YrSp was controlled by a dominant gene in the present study and Pinglan 17-7 [ 12] but homozygous in race PST-127[ 21]. Avirulence against YrExp2 was controlled by one dominant gene in the present study and PST-127[ 21] but homozygous in Pinglan 17-7[ 12]. Avirulence against Yr28, Yr43, Yr44, YrTye and YrV23 was controlled by two genes in the present study but this was not the same for Pinglan 17-7 or PST-127[ 12, 21]. These inconsistencies indicate that avirulence/virulence against a single Yr gene can be either dominant or recessive, and can be controlled by different genes in different segregating populations.
Tab.4 Expected avirulence to virulence ratios of wheat lines with different Yr gene in different sexually reproducing populations
Yr gene in the tested wheat line Avirulence to virulence ratios
Present study PST-127 Pinglan 17-7
Yr1 1: 3 homozygously virulent homozygously virulent
Yr2 7: 9 homozygously virulent homozygously virulent
Yr4 15: 1 1: 15
Yr5 homozygously avirulent homozygously avirulent homozygously avirulent
Yr6 1: 15 3: 1 3: 1
Yr7 3: 1 3: 1 homozygously virulent
Yr8 3: 1 3: 1 homozygously avirulent
Yr9 3: 13 homozygously virulent homozygously virulent
Yr10 homozygously avirulent 1: 3 homozygously virulent
Yr15 homozygously avirulent homozygously avirulent homozygously avirulent
Yr17 homozygously virulent 1: 3 homozygously virulent
Yr24 homozygously avirulent homozygously avirulent homozygously virulent
Yr25 homozygously virulent homozygously virulent
Yr26 homozygously avirulent homozygously virulent
Yr27 1: 3 3: 1 1: 3
Yr28 3: 13 1: 3
Yr32 15: 1 homozygously avirulent 1: 15
Yr43 13: 3 3: 1 3: 1
Yr44 3: 13 3: 1 1: 15
YrA homozygously virulent homozygously virulent
YrExp2 3: 1 3: 1 homozygously virulent
YrSp 3: 1 homozygously avirulent 3: 1
YrTr1 15: 1 1: 3 homozygously avirulent
YrTye 3: 13 3: 1
YrV23 7: 9 homozygously virulent

Note: PST-127 and Pinglan 17-7 were isolates used in previous study for inheritance of Pst[ 12, 21].

Segregation for virulence was found for 17 avirulence/virulence loci. Segregation on lines with Yr2, Yr4, Yr32, YrTr1, Yr6, Yr43, Yr9, Yr28, Yr44, YrTye and YrV23 suggests that there are two genes controlling avirulence or virulence. However, this is inconsistent with the gene-for-gene concept. As genes for resistance in near-isogenic lines should correspond to genes for pathogenicity in the pathogen[ 23]. However, the reaction to some resistance genes might be controlled by multiple genes as indicated by work on wheat brown rust and barley powdery mildew[ 9, 41, 42]. There may be two reasons for this: 1) an additional gene for resistance in these cultivars, or two genes for virulence were acquired by Pst to overcome the single resistant gene; or 2) the presence of an additional modifier gene[ 9, 42, 43]. Avirulence against Yr2 favored a 7:9 ratio over other ratios (P<0.05), this may be due to the limited numbers of progeny.
Linkage between avirulence genes has been observed in M. lini, P. recondita and P. graminis, though not frequently[ 9, 18, 42, 44]. In the present study, from the linkage map we found both CAvr7 and CAvr8 linked to CAvrExp2 within 8.41 cM. CAvrrSp on the other hand seems independently inherited. Close genetic linkage was also found for Cavr1 and Cavr27. Linkage between Avr6 and Avr43 was found within 7.37 cM in a previous study[ 12]. This is contrary to a study on P. recondita, where almost all avirulence/virulence loci segregated independently and did not cluster at specific locations[ 43].
It has been reported that there is a substantial amount of heterozygosity in P. recondita[ 9, 18]. In this study, we found the same for Pst. Segregation was found on 17 of 25 marker loci, which indicates that the parental isolate was heterozygous at these 17 loci. Investigating the heterozygosity in rust fungi is useful to predict virulence changes in rust populations[ 13]. Heterozygosity probably leads to an increase in pathogenic variation in natural Pst populations, as virulence changes will occur in heterozygous populations more rapidly than in a homozygous ones[ 18]. The use of resistant cultivars is an effective way to control Pst. Knowledge about homozygosity or heterozygosity for avirulence/virulence genes is therefore a prerequisite for successful resistance breeding. Avirulence to Yr5 and Yr15 was homozygous in the present study and in a previous one[ 12]. This result is in accordance with the effectiveness of these resistance genes at present in China and the USA[ 45]. Avirulence to Yr10, Yr24 and Yr26 was homozygous in this study. However, virulence to Yr10, Yr24 or Yr26 has been identified in the Pst population in China[ 46, 47]. This may be due to only one Pst isolate being used in this study. More isolates representing diverse races should be studied to improve knowledge of homozygosity or heterozygosity for avirulence/virulence genes in natural Pst populations. Avirulence to Yr24, Yr32 and YrSp was homozygous in PST-127 from America, and frequencies of virulence toward these resistance genes were low in USA[ 21, 45]. The 17 cultivars identified as heterozygous with respect to virulence/avirulence should not be given priority in breeding programs to obtain new resistant cultivars. For breeding programs, it is better to combine resistance genes that are still effective against all known races, and to combine effective all-stage resistance with durable adult-plant resistance genes[ 48].
Segregation was only found for 11 of 96 markers selected for this study. Few SSR markers presenting diversity were also found in previous studies[ 12, 22]. The correlation coefficient between virulence phenotype and SSR genotype was low. The low correlation indicated that SSR markers were not based on virulence genes. The limited SSR markers that present diversity in the population of Pst showed that SSR markers were not a good choice for mapping of avirulence genes in Pst. Other molecular markers presenting high diversity between progeny of sexual reproduction should be used in the study on mapping of avirulence genes. This will lay a foundation for avirulence/virulence genes cloning using a map-based cloning approach.

5 Conclusions

Virulence tests and SSR genotypes were used to analyze a population produced by selfing an isolate collected from Gansu Province, China to determine inheritance and heterozygosity of avirulence/virulence loci corresponding to various Yr genes. Seventeen of the 25 loci tested in this study were heterozygous. Avirulence/virulence on wheat cultivars with Yr genes was controlled by one or two genes. The linkage relationship indicated that CAvr7, CAvr8 and CAvrExp2 may be clustered at a specific location. These data on heterozygosity of avirulence/virulence loci will be useful in the development and distribution of new resistant wheat cultivars.

References

[1]
Zheng W M, Huang L L, Huang J Q, Wang X J, Chen X M, Zhao J, Guo J, Zhuang H, Qiu C Z, Liu J, Liu H Q, Huang X L, Pei G L, Zhan G M, Tang C L, Cheng Y L, Liu M J, Zhang J S, Zhao Z T, Zhang S J, Han Q M, Han D J, Zhang H C, Zhao J, Gao X N, Wang J F, Ni P X, Dong W, Yang L F, Yang H M, Xu J R, Zhang G Y, Kang Z S. High genome heterozygosity and endemic genetic recombination in the wheat stripe rust fungus. Nature Communications, 2013, 4: 2673
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Chen X M. Epidemiology and control of stripe rust [Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici] on wheat. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 2005, 27(3): 314–337
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Gassner G, Straib W. The determination of biological races of wheat yellow rust (Puccinia glumarum f. sp. tritici (Schmidt) Erikss.u. Henn.). Working from the Imperial Biological Institute for land and Forestry, Berlin, 1932, 20: 141–163 (in German)
[4]
Goddard M V. Cytological studies of Puccinia striiformis (yellow rust of wheat). Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 1976, 66(3): 433–437
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Little R, Manners J G. Production of new physiological races in Puccinia striiformis (yellow rust) by heterokaryosis. Nature, 1967, 213(5074): 422
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Park R F, Wellings C R. Somatic hybridization in the Uredinales. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 2012, 50(1): 219–239
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Wang Z Y, Zhao J, Chen X M, Peng Y L, Ji J J, Zhao S L, Lv Y J, Huang L L, Kang Z S. Virulence variations of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici isolates collected from Berberis spp. in China. Plant Disease, 2016, 100(1): 131–138
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Flor H H. Current status of the gene-for-gene concept. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 1971, 9(1): 275–296
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Statler G D. Inheritance of pathogenicity of culture 70–1, Race 1, of Puccinia recondita tritici. Phytopathology, 1979, 69(6): 661–663
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Cheng P, Chen X M. Virulence and molecular analyses support asexual reproduction of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici in the U.S. Pacific Northwest. Phytopathology, 2014, 104(11): 1208–1220
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Liu B, Chen X M, Kang Z S. Gene sequences reveal heterokaryotic variations and evolutionary mechanisms in Puccinia striiformis, the Stripe Rust pathogen. Open Journal of Genomics, 2012, 1(1): 1
[12]
Tian Y, Zhan G M, Chen X M, Tungruentragoon A, Lu X, Zhao J, Huang L L, Kang Z S. Virulence and simple sequence repeat marker segregation in a Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici population produced by selfing a Chinese isolate on Berberis shensiana. Phytopathology, 2016, 106(2): 185–191
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Zhao J, Wang M N, Chen X M, Kang Z S. Role of alternate hosts in epidemiology and pathogen variation of cereal rusts. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 2016, 54(1): 207–228
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Newton M, Johnson T, Brown A M. A preliminary study on the hybridization of physiological forms of Puccinia graminis tritici. Scientia Agrícola, 1930, 10(11): 721–731
[15]
Waterhouse W L. A preliminary account of the origin of two new Australian physiological forms of Puccinia graminis tritici. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, 1929, 54: 96–106
[16]
Jin Y, Szabo L J, Carson M. Century-old mystery of Puccinia striiformis life history solved with the identification of Berberis as an alternate host. Phytopathology, 2010, 100(5): 432–435
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Wang M N, Chen X M. First report of Oregon grape (Mahonia aquifolium) as an alternate host for the wheat stripe rust pathogen (Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici) under artificial inoculation. Plant Disease, 2013, 97(6): 839
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Statler G D. Inheritance of virulence of culture 73–47 Puccinia recondita. Phytopathology, 1977, 67(7): 906–908
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Statler G D. Inheritance of pathogenicity of progeny from an F1 culture of Melampsora lini. Journal of Phytopathology, 1990, 128(3): 184–190
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Statler G D. Inheritance of virulence of Puccinia triticina culture X47, the F1 of the cross 71–112 x 70–1. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 2000, 22(3): 276–279
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Wang M N, Wan A M, Chen X M. Genetic characterization of virulence/avirulence genes of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici. Phytopathology, 2012, 102(S4): 132
[22]
Rodriguez-Algaba J, Walter S, Sørensen C K, Hovmøller M S, Justesen A F. Sexual structures and recombination of the wheat rust fungus Puccinia striiformis on Berberis vulgaris. Fungal Genetics and Biology, 2014, 70: 77–85
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Flor H H. Tests for allelism of rust-resistance genes in flax. Crop Science, 1965, 5(5): 415–418
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Wellings C R. Puccinia striiformis in Australia: a review of the incursion, evolution, and adaptation of stripe rust in the period 1979–2006. Crop & Pasture Science, 2007, 58(6): 567–575
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
McDowell J M, Woffenden B J. Plant disease resistance genes: recent insights and potential applications. Trends in Biotechnology, 2003, 21(4): 178–183
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Yoshida K, Saitoh H, Fujisawa S, Kanzaki H, Matsumura H, Yoshida K, Tosa Y, Chuma I, Takano Y, Win J, Kamoun S, Terauchi R. Association genetics reveals three novel avirulence genes from the rice blast fungal pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae. Plant Cell, 2009, 21(5): 1573–1591
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Zhao J, Wang L, Wang Z Y, Chen X M, Zhang H C, Yao J N, Zhan G M, Chen W, Huang L L, Kang Z S. Identification of eighteen Berberis species as alternate hosts of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici and virulence variation in the pathogen isolates from natural infection of barberry plants in China. Phytopathology, 2013, 103(9): 927–934
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Zhan G M, Chen X M, Kang Z S, Huang L L, Wang M N, Wan A M, Cheng P, Cao S Q, Jin S L. Virulence and molecular comparison of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici populations in China and the United States. Fungal Biology, 2012, 116(6): 643–653
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Line R F, Qayoum A. Virulence, aggressiveness, evolution and distribution of races of Puccinia striiformis (the cause of stripe rust of wheat) in North America, 1968–87. USDA Technical Bulletin, 1788, 1992: 61
[30]
Kosman E, Leonard K J. Conceptual analysis of methods applied to assessment of diversity within and distance between populations with asexual or mixed mode of reproduction. New Phytologist, 2007, 174(3): 683–696
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Aljanabi S M, Martinez I. Universal and rapid salt-extraction of high quality genomic DNA for PCR-based techniques. Nucleic Acids Research, 1997, 25(22): 4692–4693
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Enjalbert J, Duan X, Giraud T, Vautrin D, De Vallavieille-Pope C, Solignac M. Isolation of twelve microsatellite loci, using an enrichment protocol, in the phytopathogenic fungus Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici. Molecular Ecology Notes, 2002, 2(4): 563–565
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Bahri B, Leconte M, de Vallavieille-Pope C, Enjalbert J. Isolation of ten microsatellite loci in an EST library of the phytopathogenic fungus Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici. Conservation Genetics, 2009, 10(5): 1425–1428
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Chen C Q, Zheng W M, Buchenauer H, Huang L L, Lu N H, Kang Z S. Isolation of microsatellite loci from expressed sequence tags library of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici. Molecular Ecology Resources, 2009, 9(1): 236–238
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Cheng P, Chen X M, Xu L S, See D R. Development and characterization of expressed sequence tag-derived microsatellite markers for the wheat stripe rust fungus Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici. Molecular Ecology Resources, 2012, 12(4): 779–781
[36]
Luo H Y, Wang X J, Zhan G M, Wei G R, Zhou X L, Zhao J, Huang L L, Kang Z S. Genome-wide analysis of simple sequence repeats and efficient development of polymorphic SSR markers based on whole genome re-sequencing of multiple isolates of the Wheat Stripe Rust fungus. PLoS One, 2015, 10(6): e0130362
CrossRef Google scholar
[36a]
Bailey J, Karaoglu H, Weling S C R, Park R F. Isolation and characterisation of 25 genome-derived simple sequence repeat markers for Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici. Molecular Ecology Resources, 2013, 13(4): 760–762
[36b]
Zhan G M, Wang F P, Luo H Y, Jiang S C, Zheng W M, Huang L L, Kang Z S. Screening for simple sequence repeat markers in Puccinia striiformis tritici based on genomic sequence. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B, 2015, 16(8): 727–732
[37]
Holland M M, Parson W. GeneMarker HID: A reliable software tool for the analysis of forensic STR data. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2011, 56(1): 29–35
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Rohlf F. NTSYS-pc N T. Multivariate analysis system, Version 2.10 e.New York: Applied Biostatistics Incorprated, 2000
[39]
Zhang L Y, Wang S Q, Li H H, Deng Q M, Zheng A P, Li S C, Li P, Li Z L, Wang J K. Effects of missing marker and segeregating distortion on QTL mapping in F2 populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2010, 121(6): 1071–1082
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Bourras S, McNally K E, Ben-David R, Parlange F, Roffler S, Praz C R, Oberhaensli S, Menardo F, Stirmweis D, Frenkel Z, Schaefer L K, Flückiger S, Treier G, Herren G, Korol A B, Wicker T, Keller B. Multiple avirulence loci and allele-specific effector recognition control the Pm3 race-specific resistance of wheat to powdery mildew. Plant Cell, 2015, 27(10): 2991–3012
[42]
Zambino P J, Kubelik A R, Szabo L J. Gene action and linkage of avirulence genes to DNA markers in the rust fungus Puccinia graminis. Phytopathology, 2000, 90(8): 819–826
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Samborski D J, Dyck P L. Inheritance of virulence in Puccinia recondita on six backcross lines of wheat with single genes for resistance to leaf rust. Canadian Journal of Botany, 1976, 54(14): 1666–1671
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Lawrence G J. Melampsora lini, rust of flax and linseed. Advances in Plant Pathology, 1988, 6: 313–331
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Wan A M, Chen X M. Virulence characterization of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici using a new set of Yr single-gene line differentials in the United States in 2010. Plant Disease, 2014, 98(11): 1534–1542
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Liu T G, Peng Y L, Chen W Q, Zhang Z Y. First detection of virulence in Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici in China to resistance genes Yr24 (= Yr26) present in wheat cultivar Chuanmai 42. Plant Disease, 2010, 94(9): 1163
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Sharma-Poudyal D, Chen X, Wan A, Zhan G, Kang Z, Cao S, Jin S, Morgounov A, Akin B, Mert Z, Shah S J A, Bux H, Ashraf M, Sharma R C, Madariaga R, Puri K D, Wellings C, Xi K, Wanyera R, Manninger K, Ganzález M I, Koyda M, Sanin S, Patzek L J. Virulence characterization of international collections of the wheat stripe rust pathogen, Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici. Plant Disease, 2013, 97(3): 379–386
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Chen X M. High-temperature adult-plant resistance, key for sustainable control of stripe rust. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 2013, 4(3): 608–627
CrossRef Google scholar

Supplementary materials

The online version of this article at http://dx.doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2016114 contains supplementary materials (Tables S1–S4).

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key Basic Research Program of China (2013CB127700), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31271986, 31371882), Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System in China (CARS-3-1-11), and the 111 Project of the Ministry of Education of China (B07049).

Compliance with ethics guidelines

Yuan Tian, Gangming Zhan, Xia Lu, Jie Zhao, Lili Huang, and Zhensheng Kang declare that they have no conflict of interest or financial conflicts to disclose.
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s) 2016. Published by Higher Education Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1226 KB)

4282

Accesses

9

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/