Introduction
MicroRNAs are a class of small non-coding RNAs
[ 1,
2] can inhibit target genes through binding with their 3′ untranslated regions (3′UTR)
[ 3]. Previous studies showed that microRNAs can participate in cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis
[ 4–
6]. The miR-29 family contains three members, miR-29a, miR-29b and miR-29c
[ 7], and they have similar expression patterns and biofunctions. MiR-29 can participate in many physiological and chemical processes. It has been reported that miR-29a can inhibit apoptosis and protect the mitochondrial functions during forebrain ischemia through targeting the pro-apoptosis
PUMA gene in astrocytes
[ 8]. Also, many studies have shown that miR-29s can inhibit tissue fibrosis through downregulating collagen genes and inhibition of IGF-1 and PDGC growth factors
[ 5,
9,
10]. Furthermore, miR-29s can restrain the activities of DNA methyltransferases and demethylases
[ 11], promote murine osteoclastogenesis
[ 12] and inhibit tumorigenesis
[ 13].
MiR-29s are also important in skeletal muscle development. A recent study reported that miR-29 was downregulated in the dystrophic muscle and restoration of the expression of miR-29 in muscle tissue can improve dystrophy pathology by promoting regeneration and inhibiting of fibrogenesis
[ 2]. Also, miR-29s can repress proliferation and promote differentiation of myoblasts in skeletal muscle development by targeting the
Akt3 gene
[ 6]. Furthermore, they can regulate myogenesis via the NF-KB-
YY1-miR-29 signaling pathway in mice
[ 14]. Although some functions of miR-29s in muscle development have been reported in mice and human, this has not been studied in pigs. In this study, we focused on the role of miR-29c in muscle development in pigs.
Materials and methods
Tissues and animals
The longissimus lumborum (LL) muscle samples of Meishan pigs at different stages, 50-day-old fetuses (E50d), 95-day-old fetuses (E95d) and adult stage (12 month), and Large White pigs at adult stage (12 month), were collected. The samples were stored at -80°C until assayed by qPCR. A Large White population of 233 animals was selected for trait association analysis. All the pigs were slaughtered at about 90 kg and meat quality traits of intramuscular fat content (IMF) by Soxhlet extraction and 24 h postmortem muscle pH (pHu) determined by pH meter. In addition, muscle drip loss (DLS) and loin eye area were determined by methods described in previous studies
[ 1,
15].
Cells and transfection
PK-15 cells (a porcine kidney epithelial cell line) were cultured in high-glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Hyclone, Logan, UT, USA) with 12% (v/v) fetal bovine serum. Cells were transferred to 24 well plates with growth medium, 24 h before transfection. Cells were transfected with miRNA mimics (GenePharma, Shanghai, China) and plasmid using the Lipofectamine 2000 transfection reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Opti-MEM I Reduced Serum Medium (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) was used to dilute Lipofectamine 2000 and nucleic acids. Transfection procedure was performed follow the manufacturer’s instructions.
Cloning for dual-luciferase assay
The psiCHECK-2 dual-luciferase reporter vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) housing the 3′ UTR of YY1 gene was used to examine the effect of miR-29 on Renilla luciferase production. YY1 3′ UTR was amplified with the use of forward primer 5′ CCGCTCGAGCTCTATCTTGCTCTGTAATCTCG 3′ and reverse primer 5′ ATAAGAATGCGGCCGCTCCAATTTCTGGGAGGCTCA3′. A 2-base substitution in the seed sequence of miR-29 was introduced to create mutant forms of miR-29 when synthesized. The miRNA mimics and 3′ UTR dual-luciferase vector were co-transfected into cells using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). Cells were assayed with the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega) 24 h after transfection.
Quantitative PCR
Total RNA (including miRNA) was extracted from tissues with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). Concentration and quality of RNA were assessed by the NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA) and denatured gel electrophoresis. Reverse transcription was performed using Prime ScriptTM RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (TAKARA BIO INC, Otsu, Shiga, Japan) with miRNA specific primers added to initiate cDNA synthesis. The quantitative PCR (qPCR) reaction was carried out in the LightCycler 480 II (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) system, and the reaction mixture used LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master (Roche) (Appendix A, Table S1).
Genotyping
One SNP under study was selected in the ssc-miR-29b-2/c cluster. The SNP was genotyped by a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method. The PCR product (752 bp) of the SNP was digested with NcoI restriction enzyme (Fermentas, Life Sciences, USA) at 37°C overnight. This restriction enzyme recognizes the sequence T-C. The T-allele carrying the PCR product was cleaved once by the enzyme generating two fragments (631 and 121 bp). All digestion products were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis and the association analysis was performed by SAS program (Appendix A, Table S1).
Results
MiR-29c can target YY1 gene
Previous studies have confirmed that
AKT3 and
YY1 are the target genes of miR-29 in mouse
[ 6,
16]. To test whether the
YY1 gene was also targeted by miR-29c in pigs, the conservation of target site of the miR-29c in the
YY1 gene was analyzed. We found that it was completely conserved among human, mice and pig (Fig. 1a). Then we performed the luciferase activation assays. The fragment of the 3′UTR of the pig
YY1 gene, which contains the binding site of miR-29s, was cloned into the luciferase vector. Subsequently, the interaction between miR-29 and 3′UTR of the
YY1 gene was evaluated through luciferase activity analysis. The results showed that miR-29a, miR-29b and miR-29c could significantly inhibit the luciferase activity when the 3′UTR was inserted (Fig. 1b). Moreover, the mutant miR-29 with two nucleotides substituted in the seed sequence did not inhibit the luciferase activity (Fig. 1c). These results indicated that the
YY1 gene was also targeted by miR-29s in pigs.
Differential expression analysis of miR-29c, YY1 and Akt3
The expression of miR-29c at E95d was 1.8 fold higher than that of E50d and it was sharply increased approximately 170 fold at the adult stage (Fig. 2a). In addition, the expression patterns of YY1 and Akt3 genes were also measured. The results showed that expression of both was decreased during muscle development in Meishan pigs (Fig. 2b, Fig. 2c). Moreover, expression of miR-29c was significantly higher in Meishan than that in Large White at the adult stage (Fig. 3a). In contrast, the expression of Akt3 and YY1 was significantly lower in Meishan than in Large White (Fig. 3b, Fig. 3c). The expression patterns of YY1 and Akt3 genes were opposite to that of miR-29c. These results also indicated that YY1 and Akt3 genes are targeted by miR-29c in pigs.
The SNP in the ssc-miR-29b-2/c cluster influences pHu
We detected a C/T SNP in the ssc-miR-29b-2/c cluster at 443 nt downstream of pre-miR-29b-2 and 33 nt upstream of pre-miR-29c, which caused a NcoI polymorphism (Fig. 4a, Fig. 4b). For genotyping, the 752 bp DNA fragment was amplified and the genotype was identified using PCR-RFLP analysis. As indicated, the CC genotype has one 752 bp band; the TT genotype has 631 and 121 bp bands, and the CT genotype has three bands (Fig. 4c). Furthermore, we found that the expression of miR-29c in the CC genotype was significant higher than in TT genotype (Fig. 4d).
The trait association of the Large White population showed that the polymorphism of this locus was significantly associated with the pHu trait. However, there was no significant association between this SNP and other muscle quality traits. According to our results, the mean value of pHu of CC individuals was significantly higher than TT individuals (5.67±0.03 vs 5.52±0.03, P<0.01) (Table 1). This result showed that this polymorphism in miR-29c is important in determining the pHu trait of pig skeletal muscle.
Discussion
Previous studies indicated that miR-29s is important in myogenesis processes and it can target
YY1 and
Akt3 genes in mice
[ 6,
16]. In this study, we found that in pigs the expression of miR-29c was upregulated, while
YY1 and
Akt3 were downregulated during muscle development. Also, through luciferase analysis we found that the porcine
YY1 gene can be targeted by miR-29c. Therefore in pigs, miR-29c may also participate in muscle development through targeting
YY1 and
Akt3 genes. It has been reported that
YY1 and
Akt3 are important in myogenesis and muscle growth. In mice, our previous study found that
Akt3 can promote the proliferation of myoblasts
[ 6].
YY1 is a transcription factor containing a zinc finger DNA binding domain
[ 17]. It has been confirmed that
YY1 had negative effects on myogenesis of muscle cells through inhibiting the expression of myogenic differentiation marker genes including a-actin, Tnnc, Tnni2 and MyHC
[ 18]. Moreover,
YY1 can inhibit myogenesis through transcriptional regulation of non-coding RNAs including miR-1, miR-29 and lncRNA Yam-1
[ 14,
19]. Based on these results, we conclude that miR-29s can regulate skeletal muscle development through targeting
YY1 and
Akt3 genes in pigs.
In this study, we also found that miR-29 was associated with the pH value trait of pigs. Previous studies have shown that the pH value was associated with glycometabolism, and the concentration of glycogen in muscle tissue was positively correlated with its pHu value
[ 20,
21]. Also, previous studies indicated that both
Akt3 and
YY1 played positive roles in glucose and energy metabolism of the muscle tissue. In mice,
YY1 knock out lead to hyperactivation of the
insulin/IGF signaling, which can suppress the diabetic-like symptoms arising when treated with rapamycin. The YY1 protein can bind to the promoter regions of insulin/IGF and inhibit their transcription, which reduced the metabolism efficiency of blood glucose. Furthermore,
YY1 can form a complex with mTOR and PGC-1a to regulate mitochondrial genes expression and energy metabolism
[ 22]. A previous study indicated that
Akt3 also participated into glucose transport, and impaired
Akt3 expression was related to insulin resistance of muscle tissue in humans
[ 1]. In addition, glucose homeostasis was impaired in
Akt2 and
Akt3 genes double knockout mice and they displayed glucose and insulin intolerance
[ 22–
24].
These studies indicated that YY1 and AKT3 are important in glucose and energy metabolism. Thus, miR-29c may affect the muscle pHu value through targeting Akt3 and YY1 genes.
Conclusions
In conclusion, miR-29c was upregulated, while Akt3 and YY1 genes were downregulated, during muscle development of pigs. The miR-29c can participate in muscle development through targeting Akt3 and YY1 genes. A T to C mutation was detected in the miR-29c genomic sequence, which was association with pHu trait in pigs. Therefore, we conclude that miR-29 is important for the skeletal muscle development in pigs.
Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg