Applications of Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy in Energy-Relevant Electrocatalysis

Ruize Ma , Wei Wei , Ruguang Wang , Jisi Li , Quanlu Wang , Zheng Lv , Hui Jin , Jinshuai Xu , Xinyao Hao , Yiren Ren , Ziyan Zhu , Jiaxin Guo , Tao Ling

Transactions of Tianjin University ›› : 1 -15.

PDF
Transactions of Tianjin University ›› :1 -15. DOI: 10.1007/s12209-026-00495-z
Review
review-article
Applications of Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy in Energy-Relevant Electrocatalysis
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Energy-relevant electrocatalytic reactions, such as hydrogen evolution, oxygen evolution, CO2 reduction, and nitrate reduction, are fundamental to sustainable energy conversion and electrochemical manufacturing. Despite decades of progress, advances in electrocatalysis remain constrained by an incomplete understanding of active sites, reaction kinetics, and the interfacial microenvironment under operating electrochemical conditions. As an in situ characterization technique, scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM) is well suited to addressing these challenges because of its submicron spatial resolution and rapid temporal response. Although SECM has been widely applied in recent years, reviews that systematically summarize these advances from the perspective of electrocatalytic reactions and their underlying mechanisms remain scarce. To bridge this gap, this review outlines the fundamental principles of SECM and reframes its functional applications in energy-relevant electrocatalysis through a mechanism-oriented framework. Building on recent progress, we highlight the key contributions of SECM in three areas: identification and quantification of active sites, determination of reaction kinetics, and in situ monitoring of the interfacial microenvironment evolution. Furthermore, we discuss several directions that are expected to shape the future development of SECM, including multimodal correlative characterization, integration of experimental measurements with theoretical modeling, innovations in probe technologies, and the extension of SECM applications from model systems to practical devices. These perspectives provide insight into electrocatalytic mechanisms and guide the design of next-generation electrocatalysts.

Keywords

Scanning electrochemical microscopy / Electrocatalysis / Electrode–electrolyte interface / Active sites / Reaction kinetics / Microenvironment

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ruize Ma, Wei Wei, Ruguang Wang, Jisi Li, Quanlu Wang, Zheng Lv, Hui Jin, Jinshuai Xu, Xinyao Hao, Yiren Ren, Ziyan Zhu, Jiaxin Guo, Tao Ling. Applications of Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy in Energy-Relevant Electrocatalysis. Transactions of Tianjin University 1-15 DOI:10.1007/s12209-026-00495-z

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

International Energy Agency (2025) Global hydrogen review 2025. Paris

[2]

Odenweller A, Ueckerdt F. The green hydrogen ambition and implementation gap. Nat Energy, 2025, 10(1): 110-123

[3]

Wang C, Zhang G, Luo R, et al. . Selective CO2 reduction to acetate via controlled sp2/sp3 carbon hybridization. Nat Commun, 2025, 16(1): 10506

[4]

Wang R, Guo J, Li J, et al. . Transforming single-atom site to dual-atom site in Fe-N-C catalysts: a universal strategy for enhancing durability in proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2025, 64(34) e202510671

[5]

Zhao Y, Yin P, Yang Y, et al. . Converting Fe-N-C single-atom catalyst to a new FeNxSey cluster catalyst for proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2025, 64(9) e202419501

[6]

Seh ZW, Kibsgaard J, Dickens CF, et al. . Combining theory and experiment in electrocatalysis: insights into materials design. Science, 2017, 355(6321): eaad4998

[7]

Wei W, Ma R, Wang R, et al (2025) Anion modification for enhanced anode catalyst performance in seawater electrolysis. Int J Miner, Metall Mater: In press

[8]

Wang Q, Wei H, Liu P, et al. . Recent advances in copper-based catalysts for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction toward multi-carbon products. Nano Res Energy, 2024, 3(3 e9120112

[9]

Gou W, Sun H, Cheng F. Dual active sites engineering of electrocatalysts for alkaline hydrogen evolution. Nano Res Energy, 2024, 3(3 e9120121

[10]

Gu X, Guo S, Zhang Y, et al. . Boosting oxygen evolution performance over synergistic tiara nickel clusters and thin layered double hydroxides. Nano Res Energy, 2024, 3(4 e9120134

[11]

Todorova M, Wippermann S, Neugebauer J. First-principles approaches and concepts to simulate electrochemical interfaces. Nat Rev Chem, 2026, 10(2): 133-146

[12]

Guo J, Wang R, Li J et al (2026) Water dissociation: a new dimension for understanding and designing aqueous electrocatalysts. Adv Mater: e72916

[13]

Pastor E, Lian Z, Xia L, et al. . Complementary probes for the electrochemical interface. Nat Rev Chem, 2024, 8(3): 159-178

[14]

Shen J, Wang D. How to select heterogeneous CO2 reduction electrocatalyst. Nano Res Energy, 2024, 3(1) e9120096

[15]

Jin Z. High-spatiotemporal-resolution electrochemical measurements of electrocatalytic reactivity. Anal Chem, 2023, 95(16): 6477-6489

[16]

Jin Z, Li P, Fang Z, et al. . Emerging electrochemical techniques for probing site behavior in single-atom electrocatalysts. Acc Chem Res, 2022, 55(5): 759-769

[17]

Oja SM, Wood M, Zhang B. Nanoscale electrochemistry. Anal Chem, 2013, 85(2): 473-486

[18]

Sarma BB, Maurer F, Doronkin DE, et al. . Design of single-atom catalysts and tracking their fate using operando and advanced X-ray spectroscopic tools. Chem Rev, 2023, 123(1): 379-444

[19]

Xie C, Chen W, Wang Y, et al. . Dynamic evolution processes in electrocatalysis: structure evolution, characterization and regulation. Chem Soc Rev, 2024, 53(22): 10852-10877

[20]

Guo J, Wang R, Wang Q, et al. . Constructing an OH––enriched microenvironment on the electrode surface for natural seawater electrolysis. Nano Res, 2024, 17(11): 9483-9489

[21]

Chen S, Zhang T, Han J, et al. . Interface engineering of Fe-Sn-Co sulfide/oxyhydroxide heterostructural electrocatalyst for synergistic water splitting. Nano Res Energy, 2024, 3(2) e9120106

[22]

Jiang C, Jin C, Lv Y, et al. . Topology-controlled chirality and spin selectivity in two-dimensional covalent organic frameworks. J Am Chem Soc, 2026, 148(2): 2551-2562

[23]

Feng J, Li W, Ma M, et al. . Real-space quantitative molecular analysis at single-molecule resolution. J Am Chem Soc, 2025, 147(37): 33571-33580

[24]

Lin Z, Gu T, Li W, et al. . Mild-condition upcycling of polyolefins enabled by micropore confinement in zeolites. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 2026, 138(9) e25081

[25]

Bard AJ, Fan FRF, Kwak J, et al. . Scanning electrochemical microscopy. Introduction and principles. Anal Chem, 1989, 61(2): 132-138

[26]

Kwak J, Bard AJ. Scanning electrochemical microscopy. Theory of the feedback mode. Anal Chem, 1989, 61(11): 1221-1227

[27]

Lee C, Miller CJ, Bard AJ. Scanning electrochemical microscopy: preparation of submicrometer electrodes. Anal Chem, 1991, 63(1): 78-83

[28]

Horrocks BR, Mirkin MV, Pierce DT, et al. . Scanning electrochemical microscopy. 19. Ion-selective potentiometric microscopy. Anal Chem, 1993, 65(9): 1213-1224

[29]

Zhou F, Unwin PR, Bard AJ. Scanning electrochemical microscopy. 16. Study of second-order homogeneous chemical reactions via the feedback and generation/collection modes. J Phys Chem, 1992, 96(12): 4917-4924

[30]

Unwin PR, Bard AJ. Scanning electrochemical microscopy. 14. Scanning electrochemical microscope induced desorption: a new technique for the measurement of adsorption/desorption kinetics and surface diffusion rates at the solid/liquid interface. J Phys Chem, 1992, 96(12): 5035-5045

[31]

Horrocks BR, Schmidtke D, Heller A, et al. . Scanning electrochemical microscopy. 24. Enzyme ultramicroelectrodes for the measurement of hydrogen peroxide at surfaces. Anal Chem, 1993, 65(24): 3605-3614

[32]

Rodríguez-López J, Alpuche-Avilés MA, Bard AJ. Interrogation of surfaces for the quantification of adsorbed species on electrodes: oxygen on gold and platinum in neutral media. J Am Chem Soc, 2008, 130(50): 16985-16995

[33]

Ahn HS, Bard AJ. Switching transient generation in surface interrogation scanning electrochemical microscopy and time-of-flight techniques. Anal Chem, 2015, 87(24): 12276-12280

[34]

Ahn HS, Bard AJ (2016) Surface interrogation scanning electrochemical microscopy of Ni1–xFexOOH (0< x <0.27) oxygen evolving catalyst: kinetics of the “fast” iron sites. J Am Chem Soc 138(1):313–318

[35]

Schorr NB, Jiang AG, Rodríguez-López J. Probing graphene interfacial reactivity via simultaneous and colocalized Raman-scanning electrochemical microscopy imaging and interrogation. Anal Chem, 2018, 90(13): 7848-7854

[36]

Jin Z, Bard AJ. Atom-by-atom electrodeposition of single isolated cobalt oxide molecules and clusters for studying the oxygen evolution reaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2020, 117(23): 12651-12656

[37]

Jin Z, Li P, Meng Y, et al. . Understanding the inter-site distance effect in single-atom catalysts for oxygen electroreduction. Nat Catal, 2021, 4(7): 615-622

[38]

Jin Z, Bard AJ. Surface interrogation of electrodeposited MnOx and CaMnO3 perovskites by scanning electrochemical microscopy: probing active sites and kinetics for the oxygen evolution reaction. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2021, 60(2): 794-799

[39]

Li P, Liao L, Fang Z, et al. . A multifunctional copper single-atom electrocatalyst aerogel for smart sensing and producing ammonia from nitrate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2023, 120(26) e2305489120

[40]

Liu K, Li H, Xie M, et al. . Thermally enhanced relay electrocatalysis of nitrate-to-ammonia reduction over single-atom-alloy oxides. J Am Chem Soc, 2024, 146(11): 7779-7790

[41]

Wang R, Yang Y, Guo J, et al. . Cathode catalyst layers modified with Brønsted acid oxides to improve proton exchange membrane electrolysers for impure water splitting. Nat Energy, 2025, 10(7): 880-889

[42]

Guo J, Wang R, Yang Y, et al. . Local alkalinity enables high-performance pure water anion exchange membrane electrolysis. Nat Commun, 2026, 17(1): 2335

[43]

Zhao Y, Gao S, Chen X, et al. . In situ identification of dynamic active sites in the electrocatalytic nitrate reduction reaction. J Am Chem Soc, 2025, 147(35): 31722-31730

[44]

Liang Z, Ahn HS, Bard AJ. A study of the mechanism of the hydrogen evolution reaction on nickel by surface interrogation scanning electrochemical microscopy. J Am Chem Soc, 2017, 139(13): 4854-4858

[45]

Li H, Du M, Mleczko MJ, et al. . Kinetic study of hydrogen evolution reaction over strained MoS2 with sulfur vacancies using scanning electrochemical microscopy. J Am Chem Soc, 2016, 138(15): 5123-5129

[46]

Xia Y, Zhu Z, Chang L, et al. . An in-situ degradation behavior study of MAO coating on AZ91D magnesium alloy in aqueous solutions by SECM. Int J Electrochem Sci, 2017, 12(3): 2145-2158

[47]

Yu M, Sui PF, Tang YF, et al. . Visualizing electrochemical CO2 conversion via the emerging scanning electrochemical microscope: fundamentals, applications and perspectives. Small Meth, 2024, 8(12): 2301778

[48]

Seo JY, Kim S, Kim JH, et al. . Mechanical shutdown of battery separators: silicon anode failure. Nat Commun, 2024, 15(1): 10134

[49]

Wu J, Jiang N, Xu M. From understanding to control: unifying mechanistic insights and interface engineering in energy storage through advanced characterization. Matter, 2026, 9(1) 102523

[50]

Zoski C. Ultramicroelectrodes: design, fabrication, and characterization. Electroanalysis, 2002, 14(15–16): 1041-1051

[51]

Polcari D, Dauphin-Ducharme P, Mauzeroll J. Scanning electrochemical microscopy: a comprehensive review of experimental parameters from 1989 to 2015. Chem Rev, 2016, 116(22): 13234-13278

[52]

Yuan X, Liu B, Mecklenburg M, et al. . Ultrafast deposition of faceted lithium polyhedra by outpacing SEI formation. Nature, 2023, 620(7972): 86-91

[53]

Yang R, Yang L, Yong W, et al. . Surface interrogation of advanced electrocatalysts by scanning electrochemical microscopy: fundamentals, progress and perspectives. Chem Sci, 2025, 16(40): 18482-18495

[54]

Edwards MA, Martin S, Whitworth AL, et al. . Scanning electrochemical microscopy: principles and applications to biophysical systems. Physiol Meas, 2006, 27(12): R63

[55]

Skaanvik SA, Stephens LI, Gateman SM, et al. . Quantitative feedback referencing for improved kinetic fitting of scanning electrochemical microscopy measurements. Anal Chem, 2022, 94(40): 13852-13859

[56]

Balla RJ, Jantz DT, Kurapati N, et al. . Nanoscale intelligent imaging based on real-time analysis of approach curve by scanning electrochemical microscopy. Anal Chem, 2019, 91(15): 10227-10235

[57]

Li J, Yang H, Gu X, et al. . Recent advances in scanning electrochemical microscopy for probing the sites in electrocatalysts. J Mater Chem A, 2024, 12(30): 18733-18750

[58]

Ahn HS, Bard AJ. Surface interrogation of CoP(i) water oxidation catalyst by scanning electrochemical microscopy. J Am Chem Soc, 2015, 137(2): 612-615

[59]

Kim JY, Ryu CH, Lee JH, et al. . Electrodeposited CuAgHg multimetallic thin films for improved CO2 conversion: the dramatic impact of Hg incorporation on product selectivity. ACS Appl Energy Mater, 2020, 3(7): 6670-6677

[60]

Schott CM, Holl J, Zazpe R, et al. . Revealing catalytic properties of palladium/gold systems toward hydrogen evolution, oxidation, and absorption with scanning electrochemical microscopy. ACS Catal, 2025, 15(11): 9035-9046

[61]

Niu HJ, Yan Y, Jiang S, et al. . Interfaces decrease the alkaline hydrogen-evolution kinetics energy barrier on NiCoP/Ti3C2Tx MXene. ACS Nano, 2022, 16(7): 11049-11058

[62]

Barforoush JM, Jantz DT, Seuferling TE, et al. . Microwave-assisted synthesis of a nanoamorphous (Ni0.8, Fe0.2) oxide oxygen-evolving electrocatalyst containing only “fast” sites. J Mater Chem A, 2017, 5(23): 11661-11670

[63]

Wang J, Barforoush JM, Leonard KC. Sulfur incorporation into NiFe oxygen evolution electrocatalysts for improved high current density operation. Mater Adv, 2023, 4(1): 122-133

[64]

Wei J, Zhu J, Jin R, et al. . Role of site-specific iron in Fe-doped nickel hydroxide toward water oxidation revealed by spatially resolved imaging at the single-particle level. J Am Chem Soc, 2025, 147(16): 13502-13511

[65]

Tang X, Wei Y, Zhai W, et al. . Carbon nanocage with maximum utilization of atomically dispersed iron as efficient oxygen electroreduction nanoreactor. Adv Mater, 2023, 35(5): 2208942

[66]

Ren Z, Shi K, Meng Z, et al. . Elucidating the rate-limiting step of CO2 electroreduction on metal phthalocyanines. Nat Commun, 2026, 17(1): 3720

[67]

Monteiro MCO, Dattila F, Hagedoorn B, et al. . Absence of CO2 electroreduction on copper, gold and silver electrodes without metal cations in solution. Nat Catal, 2021, 4(8): 654-662

[68]

El-Giar EEM, Wipf DO. Microparticle-based iridium oxide ultramicroelectrodes for pH sensing and imaging. J Electroanal Chem, 2007, 609(2): 147-154

[69]

Gray NJ, Unwin PR. Simple procedure for the fabrication of silver/silver chloride potentiometric electrodes with micrometre and smaller dimensions: application to scanning electrochemical microscopy. Analyst, 2000, 125(5): 889-893

[70]

Santos CS, Lima AS, Battistel D, et al. . Fabrication and use of dual-function iridium oxide coated gold SECM tips. An application to pH monitoring above a copper electrode surface during nitrate reduction. Electroanalysis, 2016, 28(7): 1441-1447

[71]

Botz A, Clausmeyer J, Öhl D, et al. . Local activities of hydroxide and water determine the operation of silver-based oxygen depolarized cathodes. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2018, 57(38): 12285-12289

[72]

Monteiro MCO, Mirabal A, Jacobse L, et al. . Time-resolved local pH measurements during CO2 reduction using scanning electrochemical microscopy: buffering and tip effects. JACS Au, 2021, 1(11): 1915-1924

[73]

Park J, Ko YJ, Lim C, et al. . Strategies for CO2 electroreduction in cation exchange membrane electrode assembly. Chem Eng J, 2023, 453 139826

[74]

Huang B, Tang X, Hong Y, et al. . Electron-donors-acceptors interaction enhancing electrocatalytic activity of metal-organic polymers for oxygen reduction. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2023, 62(33) e202306667

[75]

Liberman I, He W, Shimoni R, et al. . Spatially confined electrochemical conversion of metal–organic frameworks into metal-sulfides and their in situ electrocatalytic investigation via scanning electrochemical microscopy. Chem Sci, 2020, 11(1): 180-185

[76]

Liberman I, Ifraemov R, Shimoni R, et al. . Localized electrosynthesis and subsequent electrochemical mapping of catalytically active metal–organic frameworks. Adv Funct Mater, 2022, 32(19) 2112517

[77]

Sun T, Wang D, Mirkin MV, et al. . Direct high-resolution mapping of electrocatalytic activity of semi-two-dimensional catalysts with single-edge sensitivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2019, 116(24): 11618-11623

[78]

Kim Y, Kim J, Choi SI, et al. . Structure dependent accessibility of active sites governs catalytic activity and stability of iridium oxides in the acidic oxygen evolution reaction. J Am Chem Soc, 2026, 148(1): 957-966

[79]

Wei X, An M, Tang X, et al. . Near-100% site utilization of single atoms for efficient electrocatalysis. Nat Commun, 2026, 17(1): 1013

[80]

Shi R, Wang Y, Chen J, et al. . Electrooxidation of ethylene glycol to glycolic acid in a neutral electrolyte via enhanced *OH generation and directional spillover. J Am Chem Soc, 2026, 148(9): 10216-10224

[81]

Li H, Tsai C, Koh AL, et al. . Activating and optimizing MoS2 basal planes for hydrogen evolution through the formation of strained sulphur vacancies. Nat Mater, 2016, 15(1): 48-53

[82]

Xu Y, Xia Z, Gao W, et al. . Cation effect on the elementary steps of the electrochemical CO reduction reaction on Cu. Nat Catal, 2024, 7(10): 1120-1129

[83]

Banerjee S, Zhang ZQ, Hall AS, et al. . Surfactant perturbation of cation interactions at the electrode–electrolyte interface in carbon dioxide reduction. ACS Catal, 2020, 10(17): 9907-9914

[84]

Cui WG, Gao F, Na G, et al. . Insights into the pH effect on hydrogen electrocatalysis. Chem Soc Rev, 2024, 53(20): 10253-10311

[85]

Guo J, Zheng Y, Hu Z, et al. . Direct seawater electrolysis by adjusting the local reaction environment of a catalyst. Nat Energy, 2023, 8(3): 264-272

[86]

Sebastián-Pascual P, Herzog A, Zhang Y, et al. . Electrolyte effects in proton–electron transfer reactions and implications for renewable fuels and chemicals synthesis. Nat Catal, 2025, 8(10): 986-999

[87]

Li P, Jiang Y, Hu Y, et al. . Hydrogen bond network connectivity in the electric double layer dominates the kinetic pH effect in hydrogen electrocatalysis on Pt. Nat Catal, 2022, 5(10): 900-911

[88]

Lorenzutti F, Seemakurthi RR, Johnson EF, et al. . Microenvironment effects in electrochemical CO2 reduction from first-principles multiscale modelling. Nat Catal, 2025, 8(9): 905-918

[89]

Li T, Wang B, Cao Y, et al. . Energy-saving hydrogen production by seawater electrolysis coupling tip-enhanced electric field promoted electrocatalytic sulfion oxidation. Nat Commun, 2024, 15(1): 6173

[90]

Chen C, Jin H, Wang P, et al. . Local reaction environment in electrocatalysis. Chem Soc Rev, 2024, 53(4): 2022-2055

[91]

Wang Y, Zhou S, Zheng Y, et al. . Measurements of local pH gradients for electrocatalysts in the oxygen evolution reaction by electrochemiluminescence. J Am Chem Soc, 2025, 147(22): 19380-19390

[92]

Wang Z, Li Y, Zhao X, et al. . Localized alkaline environment via in situ electrostatic confinement for enhanced CO2-to-ethylene conversion in neutral medium. J Am Chem Soc, 2023, 145(11): 6339-6348

[93]

Yokoyama Y, Miyazaki K, Kondo Y, et al. . In situ local pH measurements with hydrated iridium oxide ring electrodes in neutral pH aqueous solutions. Chem Lett, 2020, 49(2): 195-198

[94]

Monteiro MCO, Jacobse L, Touzalin T, et al. . Mediator-free SECM for probing the diffusion layer pH with functionalized gold ultramicroelectrodes. Anal Chem, 2020, 92(2): 2237-2243

[95]

Putnam ST, Santiago-Carboney A, Qian P, et al. . Scanning electrochemical microscopy: an evolving toolbox for revealing the chemistry within electrochemical processes. Anal Chem, 2025, 97(15): 8147-8181

[96]

Li L, Antony RP, Santos CS, et al. . Anodic H2O2 generation in carbonate-based electrolytes: mechanistic insight from scanning electrochemical microscopy. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2024, 63(38) e202406543

[97]

Manjakkal L, Szwagierczak D, Dahiya R. Metal oxides based electrochemical pH sensors: current progress and future perspectives. Prog Mater Sci, 2020, 109 100635

[98]

Monteiro MCO, Koper MTM. Measuring local pH in electrochemistry. Curr Opin Electrochem, 2021, 25 100649

[99]

Mefford JT, Akbashev AR, Kang M, et al. . Correlative operando microscopy of oxygen evolution electrocatalysts. Nature, 2021, 593(7857): 67-73

[100]

Li H, Meng XZ, Yan HJ, et al. . Intelligent marine waterborne epoxy coating based on functionalized multiscale nanocomposite: mechanical enhancement, self-reporting, and active/passive anti-corrosion. J Mater Sci Technol, 2025, 221: 68-83

[101]

Harms N, Heins TP, Schröder U. Application of localized electrochemical impedance spectroscopy to lithium-ion cathodes and in situ monitoring of the charging process. Energy Technol, 2016, 4(12): 1514-1519

[102]

Kollender JP, Voith M, Schneiderbauer S, et al. . Highly customisable scanning droplet cell microscopes using 3D-printing. J Electroanal Chem, 2015, 740: 53-60

[103]

Hu H, Liu R, Zhu YB, et al. . Application of molecular ferroelectric in photocatalytic selective oxidization of C(sp3)─H bonds. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2025, 64(24) e202500176

[104]

Leitao SM, Navikas V, Miljkovic H, et al. . Spatially multiplexed single-molecule translocations through a nanopore at controlled speeds. Nat Nanotechnol, 2023, 18(9): 1078-1084

[105]

Ryu CH, Ren H. Simultaneous mapping of electrocatalytic activity and selectivity via hybrid scanning electrochemical probe microscopy. Nano Lett, 2024, 24(20): 6112-6116

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

PDF

3

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/