Development of CO2-Responsive Draw Solution for Trace Antibiotic Wastewater Treatment

Ling Lei , Jiaxiang Wang , Feng Tian , Mingjie Yin , Wentao Wang , Mengna Li , Liangliang Dong

Transactions of Tianjin University ›› : 1 -13.

PDF
Transactions of Tianjin University ›› :1 -13. DOI: 10.1007/s12209-026-00468-2
Research Article
research-article
Development of CO2-Responsive Draw Solution for Trace Antibiotic Wastewater Treatment
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The detection of trace antibiotics in aquatic environments poses a critical global challenge, threatening both ecological safety and public health. Forward osmosis (FO) membrane separation technology has emerged as a highly efficient approach for purification of trace antibiotics, characterized by high treatment efficiency and low energy consumption. However, challenges inherent to the recycling of draw solutions restrict the development of FO technology. Herein, we report the synthesis and application of a novel CO2-responsive SiO2@PDEA nanocomposite as a highly recyclable particulate draw solution. This system leverages CO2/heat-triggered reversible switching between hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity to enable facile recovery. The 6 wt% SiO2@PDEA solution leads to a significantly enhanced water flux (Jw) to 5.31 LMH (PRO mode), a threefold increase over bare SiO2. Crucially, the ratio of reverse solute flux (Js) to Jw was minimized to 0.015 g/L, providing a substantial cost advantage over inorganic salts. The efficiency of this approach enabled a threefold concentration of tetracycline. Furthermore, the solution demonstrated outstanding cyclic stability with a solute recovery rate consistently exceeding 99% via mild thermal stimulation. These findings demonstrate that SiO2@PDEA is an exceptionally efficient, sustainable, and cost-effective draw solution with substantial potential for the practical remediation of trace antibiotic-containing wastewater.

Keywords

Forward osmosis / CO2-responsive draw solution / Negligible reverse solute flux / Trace antibiotics purification

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ling Lei, Jiaxiang Wang, Feng Tian, Mingjie Yin, Wentao Wang, Mengna Li, Liangliang Dong. Development of CO2-Responsive Draw Solution for Trace Antibiotic Wastewater Treatment. Transactions of Tianjin University 1-13 DOI:10.1007/s12209-026-00468-2

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Lin L, Yang HR, Xu XC. Effects of water pollution on human health and disease heterogeneity: a review. Front Environ Sci. 2022, 10: 880246.

[2]

Jones ER, Bierkens MFP, Wanders Net al. . Current wastewater treatment targets are insufficient to protect surface water quality. Commun Earth Environ. 2022, 3(1): 221.

[3]

Zhang P, He MM, Teng Wet al. . Ordered mesoporous materials for water pollution treatment: adsorption and catalysis. Green Energy Environ. 2024, 981239-1256.

[4]

Zeng YB, Chang FQ, Liu Qet al. . Recent advances and perspectives on the sources and detection of antibiotics in aquatic environments. J Anal Methods Chem. 2022, 202211-14.

[5]

Xie M, Nghiem LD, Price WEet al. . Comparison of the removal of hydrophobic trace organic contaminants by forward osmosis and reverse osmosis. Water Res. 2012, 46(8): 2683-2692.

[6]

Li B, Zhang T. Biodegradation and adsorption of antibiotics in the activated sludge process. Environ Sci Technol. 2010, 44(9): 3468-3473.

[7]

Zheng H, Wang ZY, Zhao Jet al. . Sorption of antibiotic sulfamethoxazole varies with biochars produced at different temperatures. Environ Pollut. 2013, 181: 60-67.

[8]

Ying GG, He LY, Ying AJet al. . China must reduce its antibiotic use. Environ Sci Technol. 2017, 51(3): 1072-1073.

[9]

Zhang QQ, Ying GG, Pan CGet al. . Comprehensive evaluation of antibiotics emission and fate in the river basins of China: source analysis, multimedia modeling, and linkage to bacterial resistance. Environ Sci Technol. 2015, 49(11): 6772-6782.

[10]

Lu XL, Elimelech M. Fabrication of desalination membranes by interfacial polymerization: history, current efforts, and future directions. Chem Soc Rev. 2021, 50(11): 6290-6307.

[11]

Shi K, Wan HY, Wang KYet al. . Self-sustaining alkaline seawater electrolysis via forward osmosis membranes. Green Energy Environ. 2025, 10(3): 518-527.

[12]

Zhang SJ. The infinite separation principle. Green Energy Environ. 2023, 8(5): 1229-1231.

[13]

Ji JK, Gu YR, Zhang JNet al. . Corrosion-resistant polymer-derived SiOC membrane for effective organic removal via synergistic adsorption and peroxymonosulfate activation. Trans Tianjin Univ. 2024, 30(3): 238-249.

[14]

Feng LY, Xie LX, Suo GFet al. . Influence of temperature on the performance of forward osmosis using ammonium bicarbonate as draw solute. Trans Tianjin Univ. 2018, 24(6): 571-579.

[15]

Andrianov AP, Yantsen OV, Efremov RV. State-of-the-art of forward osmosis technology: prospects and limitations. Membr Membr Technol. 2023, 5(4): 276-289.

[16]

Julian H, Lestari P, Wenten IGet al. . Optimizing food processing efficiency: the role of forward osmosis in concentration. J Eng Technol Sci. 2025, 57(2): 214-242.

[17]

Wang JL, Liu XJ. Forward osmosis technology for water treatment: recent advances and future perspectives. J Clean Prod. 2021, 280(P1): 124354.

[18]

Ibrar I, Altaee A, Zhou JLet al. . Challenges and potentials of forward osmosis process in the treatment of wastewater. Crit Rev Env Sci Technol. 2020, 50131339-1383.

[19]

Cath TY, Childress AE, Elimelech M. Forward osmosis: principles, applications, and recent developments. J Membr Sci. 2006, 281(1–2): 70-87.

[20]

Liu PX, Zhang HM, Feng YJet al. . Influence of spacer on rejection of trace antibiotics in wastewater during forward osmosis process. Desalination. 2015, 371: 134-143.

[21]

Zhang YY, Mu TW, Huang MHet al. . Nanofiber composite forward osmosis (NCFO) membranes for enhanced antibiotics rejection: fabrication, performance, mechanism, and simulation. J Membr Sci. 2020, 595(C): 117425.

[22]

Chen HS, Huang MH, Wang ZWet al. . Enhancing rejection performance of tetracycline resistance genes by a TiO2/AgNPs-modified nanofiber forward osmosis membrane. Chem Eng J. 2020, 382: 123052.

[23]

Hafiz M, Talhami M, Ba-Abbad MMet al. . Optimization of magnetic nanoparticles draw solution for high water flux in forward osmosis. Water Basel. 2021, 13243653.

[24]

Guan X, Huang Z, Fang Pet al. . CO2 responsive emulsions stabilized with fatty acid soaps in NaCl brine. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2019, 571134-141.

[25]

Tang Z, Chen Y, Cai Cet al. . CO2-responsive ionic liquid for the sustainable extraction and separation of Rosa roxburghii polysaccharides. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025, 308Pt 4142708.

[26]

Ricky XE, Kawamala M, Liu Set al. . Development of CO2-responsive gels for CO2 conformance control in high-permeability reservoirs using the Taguchi optimization method. Sep Purif Technol. 2025, 377P2134312.

[27]

Korchinsky SR, Brito LGJ, Fieldhouse Let al. . Forward osmosis followed by reverse osmosis for the removal of contaminants of emerging concern using a CO2-responsive draw agent. J Hazard Mater. 2025, 500: 140368.

[28]

Yin C, Dong L, Wang Zet al. . CO2-responsive graphene oxide nanofiltration membranes for switchable rejection to cations and anions. J Membr Sci. 2019, 592117374.

[29]

Joafshan M, Shakeri A, Razavi SRet al. . Gas responsive magnetic nanoparticle as novel draw agent for removal of Rhodamine B via forward osmosis: high water flux and easy regeneration. Sep Purif Technol. 2022, 282119998.

[30]

Sim SL, He T, Tscheliessnig Aet al. . Protein precipitation by polyethylene glycol: a generalized model based on hydrodynamic radius. Biotechnol J. 2012, 1572315-319.

[31]

Zeng LM, Du MY, Wang XLet al. . A thermodynamical approach for evaluating energy consumption of the forward osmosis process using various draw solutes. Water. 2017, 93189.

[32]

Khan BE, Mahmood A, Zaman Met al. . Zinc sulfate as a draw solute in forward osmosis and its regeneration by reagent precipitation. Desalination. 2024, 571: 117087.

[33]

Dai FW, Zhuang QY, Huang Get al. . Infrared spectrum characteristics and quantification of OH groups in coal. ACS Omega. 2023, 81917064-17076.

[34]

Coakley MP. Study of N-H frequencies in some metal-halide chelates of o-phenylenediamine. Appl Spectrosc. 1968, 224310-312.

[35]

Stevens JJ, Anderson SJ, Boyd SA. FTIR study of competitive water-arene sorption on tetramethylammonium- and trimethylphenylammonium-montmorillonites. Clays Clay Miner. 1996, 44(1): 88-95.

[36]

Castner DG, Ratner BD, Hirao Aet al. . Characterization of poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) by XPS. Surf Sci Spectra. 1996, 4(1): 14-20.

[37]

Ghorbal A, Grisotto F, Laudé Met al. . The in situ characterization and structuring of electrografted polyphenylene films on silicon surfaces. An AFM and XPS study. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2008, 328(2): 308-313.

[38]

Feng NJ, Cheng LY, Zhang YKet al. . Multiple-site activation induced by guanidine ionic liquid decorated chromium (III) terephthalate for coupling of carbon dioxide with epoxides. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2025, 687: 561-572.

[39]

Garand E, Wende T, Goebbert DJet al. . Infrared spectroscopy of hydrated bicarbonate anion clusters: HCO3(H2O)1–10. J Am Chem Soc. 2010, 132(2): 849-856.

[40]

Zagorodnyaya AN, Abisheva ZS, Sharipova ASet al. . Sorption of rhenium and uranium by strong base anion exchange resin from solutions with different anion compositions. Hydrometallurgy. 2013, 131–132: 127-132.

[41]

Ooizumi T, Tamagawa H, Akahane Yet al. . Permeability of sugar alcohols with different molecular weights into fish meat. Fish Sci. 2000, 66(5): 974-979.

[42]

Zhou ZZ, Lee JY, Chung TSet al. . Thin film composite forward-osmosis membranes with enhanced internal osmotic pressure for internal concentration polarization reduction. Chem Eng J. 2014, 249: 236-245.

[43]

Azadi F, Karimi-Jashni A, Zerafat MMet al. . Fabrication, optimization, and performance of a novel double-skinned Al2O3.TiO2 ceramic nanocomposite membrane for forward osmosis application. Environ Technol Innov. 2021, 22: 101423.

[44]

Ahmed M, Kumar R, Garudachari Bet al. . Performance evaluation of a thermoresponsive polyelectrolyte draw solution in a pilot scale forward osmosis seawater desalination system. Desalination. 2019, 452132-140.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/