Photocatalytic Methane Coupling: A Unified Mechanistic Framework for Oxidative and Non-Oxidative Pathways

Yaoguo Wang , Jingxia Liang , Ailin Du , Lifang Gao , Yuheng Jiang , Yingming Ma , Lei Du , Yingying Fan

Transactions of Tianjin University ›› : 1 -15.

PDF
Transactions of Tianjin University ›› :1 -15. DOI: 10.1007/s12209-026-00463-7
Review
review-article
Photocatalytic Methane Coupling: A Unified Mechanistic Framework for Oxidative and Non-Oxidative Pathways
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Direct and selective upgrading of methane to multicarbon hydrocarbons under mild conditions remains one of the most compelling yet elusive goals spanning chemistry, energy, and environmental science. Solar-driven photocatalysis now offers an avenue to activate the inert C–H bonds of methane at ambient temperature and pressure; however, a clear, comparative mechanistic understanding of oxidative coupling versus non-oxidative coupling remains lacking, hindering rational catalyst design and pathway optimization. This review systematically dissects the photocatalytic reaction mechanisms of oxidative versus non-oxidative coupling, outlines key challenges associated with catalyst efficiency, selectivity, and stability, and highlights promising research directions for both pathways. The primary objective of this review is to further advance photocatalytic methane conversion technologies and to provide strategic guidance for the rational design of high-performance photocatalysts.

Keywords

Photocatalysis / Methane / Non-oxidative coupling of methane / Radical / C–H bond activation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yaoguo Wang, Jingxia Liang, Ailin Du, Lifang Gao, Yuheng Jiang, Yingming Ma, Lei Du, Yingying Fan. Photocatalytic Methane Coupling: A Unified Mechanistic Framework for Oxidative and Non-Oxidative Pathways. Transactions of Tianjin University 1-15 DOI:10.1007/s12209-026-00463-7

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Nesterenko N, Medeiros-Costa IC, Clatworthy EB, et al. . Methane-to-chemicals: a pathway to decarbonization. Natl Sci Rev, 2023, 10 nwad116

[2]

Li Q, Ouyang Y, Li H, et al. . Photocatalytic conversion of methane: recent advancements and prospects. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2022, 61 e202108069

[3]

Tang P, Zhu Q, Wu Z, et al. . Methane activation: the past and future. Energy Environ Sci, 2014, 7: 2580-2591

[4]

Go KS, Son SR, Kim SD, et al. . Hydrogen production from two-step steam methane reforming in a fluidized bed reactor. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34: 1301-1309

[5]

Choudhary VR, Kinage AK, Choudhary TV. Low-temperature nonoxidative activation of methane over H-galloaluminosilicate (MFI) zeolite. Science, 1997, 275: 1286-1288

[6]

Jones G, Jakobsen JG, Shim SS, et al. . First principles calculations and experimental insight into methane steam reforming over transition metal catalysts. J Catal, 2008, 259: 147-160

[7]

Pakhare D, Spivey J. A review of dry (CO2) reforming of methane over noble metal catalysts. Chem Soc Rev, 2014, 43: 7813-7837

[8]

Yoshida H, Matsushita N, Kato Y, et al. . Active sites in sol–gel prepared silica-alumina for photoinduced non-oxidative methane coupling. Phys Chem Chem, 2002, 4: 2459-2465

[9]

Wang G, Mu X, Tan R, et al. . Fabrication of stepped CeO2 nanoislands for efficient photocatalytic methane coupling. ACS Catal, 2023, 13: 11666-11674

[10]

Schwach P, Pan X, Bao X. Direct conversion of methane to value-added chemicals over heterogeneous catalysts: challenges and prospects. Chem Rev, 2017, 117: 8497-8520

[11]

Song S, Song H, Li L, et al. . A selective Au-ZnO/TiO2 hybrid photocatalyst for oxidative coupling of methane to ethane with dioxygen. Nat Catal, 2021, 4: 1032-1042

[12]

Fei M, Williams B, Wang L. Highly selective photocatalytic methane coupling by Au-modified Bi2WO6. ACS Catal, 2024, 14: 1855-1861

[13]

Zhang H, Sun P, Fei X, et al. . Unusual facet and co-catalyst effects in TiO2-based photocatalytic coupling of methane. Nat Commun, 2024, 15 4453

[14]

Li X, Wang C, Yang J, et al. . PdCu nanoalloy decorated photocatalysts for efficient and selective oxidative coupling of methane in flow reactors. Nat Commun, 2023, 14: 6343

[15]

Li X, Li C, Xu Y, et al. . Efficient hole abstraction for highly selective oxidative coupling of methane by Au-sputtered TiO2 photocatalysts. Nat Energy, 2023, 8: 1013-1022

[16]

Zhai G, Cai L, Ma J, et al. . Highly efficient, selective, and stable photocatalytic methane coupling to ethane enabled by lattice oxygen looping. Sci Adv, 2024, 10 eado4390

[17]

Kato Y, Yoshida H, Hattori T. Photoinduced non-oxidative coupling of methane over silica-alumina and alumina around room temperature. Chem Commun, 1998, 11: 2389-2390

[18]

Meng L, Chen Z, Ma Z, et al. . Gold plasmon-induced photocatalytic dehydrogenative coupling of methane to ethane on polar oxide surfaces. Energy Environ Sci, 2018, 11: 294-298

[19]

Longo V, De Pasquale L, Tavella F, et al. . Correction: high photocatalytic yield in the non-oxidative coupling of methane using a Pd–TiO2 nanomembrane gas flow-through reactor. EES Catal, 2024, 2: 1320

[20]

Chen Z, Ye Y, Feng X, et al. . High-density frustrated Lewis pairs based on Lamellar Nb2O5 for photocatalytic non-oxidative methane coupling. Nat Commun, 2023, 14: 2000

[21]

Chen Z, Wu S, Ma J, et al. . Non-oxidative coupling of methane: N-type doping of niobium single atoms in TiO2–SiO2 induces electron localization. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2021, 60: 11901-11909

[22]

Asami K, Shikada T, Fujimoto K, et al. . Oxidative coupling of methane over lead oxide catalyst: kinetic study and reaction mechanism. Ind Eng Chem Res, 1987, 26: 2348-2353

[23]

Zhang H, Zhong W, Gong Q, et al. . Photo-driven iron-induced non-oxidative coupling of methane to ethane. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2023, 62 e202303405

[24]

Wu M, Zhu J, Wu Y, et al. . Photocatalytic oxidative coupling of methane to ethane using CO2 as a soft oxidant over the Au/TiO2−Vo nanosheets. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2025, 64 e202414814

[25]

Gunsalus NJ, Koppaka A, Park SH, et al. . Homogeneous functionalization of methane. Chem Rev, 2017, 117: 8521-8573

[26]

Song H, Sun K, Huang H, et al. . Integrating photochemical and photothermal effects for selective oxidative coupling of methane into C2+ hydrocarbons with multiple active sites. Nat Commun, 2025, 16 2831

[27]

Zhang J, Shen J, Li D, et al. . Efficiently light-driven nonoxidative coupling of methane on Ag/NaTaO3: a case for molecular-level understanding of the coupling mechanism. ACS Catal, 2023, 13: 2094-2105

[28]

Jiang Y, Fan Y, Li S, et al. . Photocatalytic methane conversion: insight into the mechanism of C(sp3)–H bond activation. CCS Chem, 2023, 5: 30-54

[29]

Wu S, Wang L, Zhang J. Photocatalytic non-oxidative coupling of methane: recent progress and future. J Photochem Photobiol C, 2020, 46 100400

[30]

Al-Dosari M. Surface species formed during methane oxidation over some rare earth elements oxides. Green Chem, 2018, 8: 1-18

[31]

Zhan Q, Kong Y, Wang X, et al. . Photocatalytic non-oxidative conversion of methane. Chem Commun, 2024, 60: 2732-2743

[32]

Shao W, Li X, Zhu J, et al. . Metaln+-Metalδ+ pair sites steer C-C coupling for selective CO2 photoreduction to C2 hydrocarbons. Nano Res, 2022, 15: 1882-1891

[33]

Jiang Y, Li S, Wang S, et al. . Enabling specific photocatalytic methane oxidation by controlling free radical type. J Am Chem Soc, 2023, 145: 2698-2707

[34]

Amano F, Ishimaru M. Hydroxyl radical formation on metal-loaded Ga2O3 photocatalysts for dehydrogenative coupling of methane to ethane with water. Energy Fuels, 2022, 36: 5393-5402

[35]

Zhang T. Recent advances in heterogeneous catalysis for the nonoxidative conversion of methane. Chem Sci, 2021, 12: 12529-12545

[36]

Lin X, Li X, Qi M, et al. . Methane conversion over artificial photocatalysts. Catal Commun, 2021, 159 106346

[37]

Wu X, Zhang H, Xie S, et al. . Photocatalytic conversion of methane: catalytically active sites and species. Chem Catal, 2023, 3100437

[38]

Farrell BL, Igenegbai VO, Linic S. A viewpoint on direct methane conversion to ethane and ethylene using oxidative coupling on solid catalysts. ACS Catal, 2016, 6: 4340-4346

[39]

Si J, Zhao G, Sun W, et al. . Oxidative coupling of methane: examining the inactivity of the MnOx-Na2WO4/SiO2 catalyst at low temperature. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2022, 61 e202117201

[40]

Godini HR, Gill A, Gorke O, et al. . Sol–gel method for synthesis of Mn–Na2WO4/SiO2 catalyst for methane oxidative coupling. Catal Today, 2014, 236: 12-22

[41]

Nosaka Y, Nosaka A. Generation and detection of reactive oxygen species in photocatalysis. Chem Rev, 2017, 117: 11302-11336

[42]

Yoon S, Lim S, Choi JW, et al. . Study on the unsteady state oxidative coupling of methane: effects of oxygen species from O2, surface lattice oxygen, and CO2 on the C2+ selectivity. RSC Adv, 2020, 10: 35889-35897

[43]

Chen X, Nie L, Li X, et al. . Nanobubbles assisted oxygen/cyano groups-enriched Na-, P-, and O- co-doped g-C3N4 for boosting photocatalytic hydrogen peroxide production. Diam Relat Mater, 2026, 161 113101

[44]

Arndt S, Laugel G, Levchenko S, et al. . A critical assessment of Li/MgO-based catalysts for the oxidative coupling of methane. Catal Rev Sci Eng, 2011, 53: 424-514

[45]

Singh SP, Yamamoto A, Fudo E, et al. . A Pd-Bi dual-cocatalyst-loaded gallium oxide photocatalyst for selective and stable nonoxidative coupling of methane. ACS Catal, 2021, 11: 13768-13781

[46]

Yildiz M, Aksu Y, Simon U, et al. . Silica material variation for the MnxOy-Na2WO4/SiO2. Appl Catal A, 2016, 525: 168-179

[47]

Olivos-Suarez AI, Szécsényi À, Hensen EJM, et al. . Strategies for the direct catalytic valorization of methane using heterogeneous catalysis: challenges and opportunities. ACS Catal, 2016, 6: 2965-2981

[48]

Ortiz-Bravo CA, Chagas CA, Toniolo FS. Oxidative coupling of methane (OCM): an overview of the challenges and opportunities for developing new technologies. J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 2021, 96 104254

[49]

Sun L, Wang Y, Guan N, et al. . Methane activation and utilization: current status and future challenges. Energy Technol, 2019, 8 1900826

[50]

Zhu Z, Guo W, Zhang Y, et al. . Research progress on methane conversion coupling photocatalysis and thermocatalysis. Carbon Energy, 2021, 3: 519-540

[51]

Li X, Pei C, Gong J. Shale gas revolution: catalytic conversion of C1–C3 light alkanes to value-added chemicals. Chem, 2021, 7: 1755-1801

[52]

Wang Y, Hu P, Yang J, et al. . C–H bond activation in light alkanes: a theoretical perspective. Chem Soc Rev, 2021, 50: 4299-4358

[53]

Crabtree RH. Aspects of methane chemistry. Chem Rev, 1995, 95: 987-1007

[54]

Li X, Wang C, Tang J. Methane transformation by photocatalysis. Nat Rev Mater, 2022, 7: 617-632

[55]

Zhao K, Gao Y, Wang X, et al. . Lithium carbonate-promoted mixed rare earth oxides as a generalized strategy for oxidative coupling of methane with exceptional yields. Nat Commun, 2023, 14: 7749

[56]

Yuliati L, Yoshida H. Methane transformation by photocatalysis. Chem Soc Rev, 2008, 37: 1592-1602

[57]

Yoshida H, Matsushita N, Kato Y, et al. . Active sites in sol-gel prepared silica-alumina for photoinduced non-oxidative methane coupling. J Phys Chem B, 2003, 107: 8355-8362

[58]

Yuliati L, Hattori T, Yoshida H. Highly dispersed magnesium oxide species on silica as photoactive sites for photoinduced direct methane coupling and photoluminescence. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2005, 7: 195-201

[59]

Li L, Li G-D, Yan C, et al. . Efficient sunlight-driven dehydrogenative coupling of methane to ethane over a Zn+-modified zeolite. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2011, 50: 8299-8303

[60]

Chou L-W, Shin N, Sivaram SV, et al. . Tunable mid-infrared localized surface plasmon resonances in silicon nanowires. J Am Chem Soc, 2012, 134: 16155-16158

[61]

Tang C, Du S, Huang H, et al. . Au–Pd tandem photocatalysis for nonoxidative coupling of methane toward ethylene. ACS Catal, 2023, 13: 6683-6689

[62]

Zhang N, Fu Y, Kong W, et al. . Defects influence photocatalytic NOCM product selectivity by controlling photogenerative carriers. J Environ Chem Eng, 2023, 11 110665

[63]

Wang X, Lu L, Wang B, et al. . Frustrated Lewis pairs accelerating CO2 reduction on oxyhydroxide photocatalysts with surface lattice hydroxyls as a solid-state proton donor. Adv Funct Mater, 2018, 28 1804191

[64]

Zheng X, Zulkifly I, Heilmann A, et al. . Colorimetric metal-free detection of carbon monoxide: reversible CO uptake by a BNB frustrated Lewis pair. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2021, 133: 16552-16555

[65]

Godini HR, Bhasin MM. Oxidative coupling of methane: a review study on the catalytic performance. Molecules, 2024, 29: 4649

[66]

Chen K, Zhao X, Zhang X-J, et al. . Enhanced photocatalytic CO2 reduction by constructing an In2O3–CuO heterojunction with CuO as a cocatalyst. Catal Sci Technol, 2021, 11: 2713-2717

[67]

Saunois M, Jackson RB, Bousquet P, et al. . The growing role of methane in anthropogenic climate change. Environ Res Lett, 2016, 11 120207

[68]

Zhao Z, Chong K, Jiang J, et al. . Low-carbon roadmap of chemical production: a case study of ethylene in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2018, 97: 580-591

[69]

Au CT, Zhou XP, Liu YW, et al. . The characterization of BaF2/Y2O3 catalysts for the OCM reaction. J Catal, 1998, 174: 153-163

[70]

Xie J, Jin R, Li A, et al. . Highly selective oxidation of methane to methanol at ambient conditions by titanium dioxide-supported iron species. Nat Catal, 2018, 1: 889-896

[71]

Jiang W, Low J, Mao K, et al. . Pd-modified ZnO–Au enabling alkoxy intermediates formation and dehydrogenation for photocatalytic conversion of methane to ethylene. J Am Chem Soc, 2021, 143: 269-278

[72]

Zhang W, Fu C, Low J, et al. . High-performance photocatalytic nonoxidative conversion of methane to ethane and hydrogen by heteroatoms-engineered TiO2. Nat Commun, 2023, 13: 2806

[73]

Arinaga AM, Ziegelski MC, Marks TJ. Alternative oxidants for the catalytic oxidative coupling of methane. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2021, 60: 10502-10515

[74]

Xu L, Zanina A, Wu K, et al. . Breaking the dilemma of low selectivity in the oxidative coupling of methane over Mn-Na2WO4/SiO2 at low temperatures. Chem Eng J, 2023, 473 145372

[75]

Wang Y, Sourav S, Malizia JP, et al. . Deciphering the mechanistic role of individual oxide phases and their combinations in supported Mn–Na2WO4 catalysts for oxidative coupling of methane. ACS Catal, 2022, 12: 11886-11898

[76]

Jaso S, Sadjadi S, Godini HR, et al. . Experimental investigation of fluidized-bed reactor performance for oxidative coupling of methane. J Nat Gas Chem, 2012, 21: 534-543

[77]

Stöcker M. Methanol-to-hydrocarbons: catalytic materials and their behavior. Microporous Mesoporous Mater, 1999, 29: 3-48

[78]

Jiang Y, Fan Y, Liu X, et al. . Steering photooxidation of methane to formic acid over a priori screened supported catalysts. J Am Chem Soc, 2024, 146: 16039-16051

[79]

Jiang Y, Li S, Fan Y, et al. . Best practices for experiments and reports in photocatalytic methane conversion. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2024, 63 e202404658

[80]

Zhang X, Jiang Y, Gu H, et al. . Near-infrared photon-triggered CH4-to-CH3OH conversion over plasmonic oxyselenides. Nat Commun, 2025, 16 7612

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/