Development and Challenges of Electrode Ionomers Used in the Catalyst Layer of Proton-Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells: A Review

Abstract

The electrode ionomer plays a crucial role in the catalyst layer (CL) of a proton-exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) and is closely associated with the proton conduction and gas transport properties, structural stability, and water management capability. In this review, we discuss the CL structural characteristics and highlight the latest advancements in ionomer material research. Additionally, we comprehensively introduce the design concepts and exceptional performances of porous electrode ionomers, elaborate on their structural properties and functions within the fuel cell CL, and investigate their effect on the CL microstructure and performance. Finally, we present a prospective evaluation of the developments in the electrode ionomer for fabricating CL, offering valuable insights for designing and synthesizing more efficient electrode ionomer materials. By addressing these facets, this review contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the role and potential of electrode ionomers for enhancing PEMFC performance.

Keywords

Electrode ionomer / Proton conduction / Oxygen transport resistance / Catalyst layer / Proton-exchange membrane fuel cell

References

[1] Jiao K, Xuan J, Du Q, et al. Designing the next generation of proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. Nature, 2021, 595(7867): 361-369.

[2] Cullen DA, Neyerlin KC, Ahluwalia RK, et al. New roads and challenges for fuel cells in heavy-duty transportation. Nat Energy, 2021, 6(5): 462-474.

[3] Moriarty P, Honnery D Global renewable energy resources and use in 2050, 2019 Managing Global Warming. Amsterdam Elsevier 221-235.

[4] Gasteiger HA, Marković NM Just a dream or future reality?. Science, 2009, 324(5923): 48-49.

[5] Editor (2021) Moving forward with fuel cells. Nat Energy 6(5):451

[6] Jinnouchi R, Kudo K, Kodama K, et al. The role of oxygen-permeable ionomer for polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Nat Commun, 2021, 12: 4956.

[7] Rikukawa M, Sanui K Proton-conducting polymer electrolyte membranes based on hydrocarbon polymers. Prog Polym Sci, 2000, 25(10): 1463-1502.

[8] Liang X, Wu L, Xu T Role of ionomer in membrane electrode assembly for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Sci Sin-Chim, 2018, 48(9): 1040-1057.

[9] Fan J, Chen M, Zhao Z, et al. Bridging the gap between highly active oxygen reduction reaction catalysts and effective catalyst layers for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Nat Energy, 2021, 6(5): 475-486.

[10] Tian X, Zhao X, Su YQ, et al. Engineering bunched Pt-Ni alloy nanocages for efficient oxygen reduction in practical fuel cells. Science, 2019, 366(6467): 850-856.

[11] Chong L, Wen J, Kubal J, et al. Ultralow-loading platinum-cobalt fuel cell catalysts derived from imidazolate frameworks. Science, 2018, 362(6420): 1276-1281.

[12] Debe MK Electrocatalyst approaches and challenges for automotive fuel cells. Nature, 2012, 486(7401): 43-51.

[13] Xia BY, Ng WT, Wu HB, et al. Self-supported interconnected Pt nanoassemblies as highly stable electrocatalysts for low-temperature fuel cells. Angew Chem, 2012, 124(29): 7325-7328.

[14] Ott S, Orfanidi A, Schmies H, et al. Ionomer distribution control in porous carbon-supported catalyst layers for high-power and low Pt-loaded proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Nat Mater, 2020, 19(1): 77-85.

[15] Yarlagadda V, Carpenter MK, Moylan TE, et al. Boosting fuel cell performance with accessible carbon mesopores. ACS Energy Lett, 2018, 3(3): 618-621.

[16] Poojary S, Islam MN, Shrivastava UN, et al. Transport and electrochemical interface properties of ionomers in low-Pt loading catalyst layers: effect of ionomer equivalent weight and relative humidity. Molecules, 2020, 25(15): 3387.

[17] Karan K PEFC catalyst layer: recent advances in materials, microstructural characterization, and modeling. Curr Opin Electrochem, 2017, 5(1): 27-35.

[18] Aitbekova A, Zhou C, Stone ML, et al. Templated encapsulation of platinum-based catalysts promotes high-temperature stability to 1, 100 ℃. Nat Mater, 2022, 21(11): 1290-1297.

[19] Zaman S, Su YQ, Dong CL, et al. Scalable molten salt synthesis of platinum alloys planted in metal-nitrogen-graphene for efficient oxygen reduction. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2022, 61(6

[20] Tian X, Lu XF, Xia BY, et al. Advanced electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction in energy conversion technologies. Joule, 2020, 4(1): 45-68.

[21] Kobayashi A, Fujii T, Harada C, et al. Effect of Pt and ionomer distribution on polymer electrolyte fuel cell performance and durability. ACS Appl Energy Mater, 2021, 4(3): 2307-2317.

[22] Uchida M, Park YC, Kakinuma K, et al. Effect of the state of distribution of supported Pt nanoparticles on effective Pt utilization in polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2013, 15(27): 11236.

[23] Park YC, Tokiwa H, Kakinuma K, et al. Effects of carbon supports on Pt distribution, ionomer coverage and cathode performance for polymer electrolyte fuel cells. J Power Sources, 2016, 315: 179-191.

[24] More K, Reeves S TEM specimen preparation of partially-embedded electrodes from proton exchange membrane fuel cell membrane electrode assemblies. Microsc Microanal, 2005, 11(S02): 2104-2105.

[25] More K, Borup R, Reeves K Identifying contributing degradation phenomena in PEM fuel cell membrane electride assemblies via electron microscopy. ECS Trans, 2006, 3(1): 717-733.

[26] Berejnov V, Susac D, Stumper J, et al. 3D chemical mapping of PEM fuel cell cathodes by scanning transmission soft X-ray SpectroTomography. ECS Trans, 2013, 50(2): 361-368.

[27] Lopez-Haro M, Guétaz L, Printemps T, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of Nafion layers in fuel cell electrodes. Nat Commun, 2014, 5: 5229.

[28] Tang M, Zhang S, Chen S Pt utilization in proton exchange membrane fuel cells: structure impacting factors and mechanistic insights. Chem Soc Rev, 2022, 51(4): 1529-1546.

[29] Kim SM, Kang YS, Ahn C, et al. Prism-patterned Nafion membrane for enhanced water transport in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell. J Power Sources, 2016, 317: 19-24.

[30] Ning F, Bai C, Qin J, et al. Great improvement in the performance and lifetime of a fuel cell using a highly dense, well-ordered, and cone-shaped Nafion array. J Mater Chem A, 2020, 8(11): 5489-5500.

[31] Tian ZQ, Lim SH, Poh CK, et al. A highly order-structured membrane electrode assembly with vertically aligned carbon nanotubes for ultra-low Pt loading PEM fuel cells. Adv Energy Mater, 2011, 1(6): 1205-1214.

[32] Zhang C, Yu H, Fu L, et al. An oriented ultrathin catalyst layer derived from high conductive TiO₂ nanotube for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell. Electrochim Acta, 2015, 153: 361-369.

[33] Roshandel R, Ahmadi F Effects of catalyst loading gradient in catalyst layers on performance of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Renew Energy, 2013, 50: 921-931.

[34] Wang Y, Liu T, Sun H, et al. Investigation of dry ionomer volume fraction in cathode catalyst layer under different relative humilities and nonuniform ionomer-gradient distributions for PEM fuel cells. Electrochim Acta, 2020, 353.

[35] Deng R, Xia Z, Sun R, et al. Nanostructured ultrathin catalyst layer with ordered platinum nanotube arrays for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. J Energy Chem, 2020, 43: 33-39.

[36] Ahn CY, Park JE, Kim S, et al. Differences in the electrochemical performance of Pt-based catalysts used for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells in liquid half- and full-cells. Chem Rev, 2021, 121(24): 15075-15140.

[37] Zhang S, Yuan X, Wang H, et al. A review of accelerated stress tests of MEA durability in PEM fuel cells. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2009, 34(1): 388-404.

[38] Danyliv O, Gueneau C, Iojoiu C, et al. Polyaromatic ionomers with a highly hydrophobic backbone and perfluorosulfonic acids for PEMFC. Electrochim Acta, 2016, 214: 182-191.

[39] Lee KS, Jeong MH, Lee JS, et al. Optimizing end-group cross-linkable polymer electrolytes for fuel cell applications. J Membr Sci, 2010, 352(1–2): 180-188.

[40] Takamuku S, Jannasch P Properties and degradation of hydrocarbon fuel cell membranes: a comparative study of sulfonated poly(arylene ether sulfone)s with different positions of the acid groups. Polym Chem, 2012, 3(5): 1202.

[41] Mukherjee R, Mandal AK, Banerjee S (2020) Sulfonated poly(arylene ether sulfone) functionalized polysilsesquioxane hybrid membranes with enhanced proton conductivity. e-Polymers 20(1):430–442

[42] Chen R, Li G New sulfonated poly(arylene ether sulfone) copolymers containing phenyl side chains as proton exchange membranes. New J Chem, 2016, 40(4): 3755-3762.

[43] He C, Guiver MD, Mighri F, et al. Surface orientation of hydrophilic groups in sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) membranes. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2013, 409: 193-203.

[44] Carbone A, Pedicini R, Portale G, et al. Sulphonated poly(ether ether ketone) membranes for fuel cell application: thermal and structural characterisation. J Power Sources, 2006, 163(1): 18-26.

[45] Kaliaguine S, Mikhailenko SD, Wang KP, et al. Properties of SPEEK based PEMs for fuel cell application. Catal Today, 2003, 82(1–4): 213-222.

[46] Wang Y, Chung TS, Gruender M Sulfonated polybenzimidazole membranes for pervaporation dehydration of acetic acid. J Membr Sci, 2012, 415–416: 486-495.

[47] Escorihuela J, Olvera-Mancilla J, Alexandrova L et al (2020) Recent progress in the development of composite membranes based on polybenzimidazole for high temperature proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell applications. Polymers 12(9):1861

[48] Maity S, Jana T Soluble polybenzimidazoles for PEM: synthesized from efficient, inexpensive, readily accessible alternative tetraamine monomer. Macromolecules, 2013, 46(17): 6814-6823.

[49] Pingitore AT, Huang F, Qian G, et al. Durable high polymer content m/p-polybenzimidazole membranes for extended lifetime electrochemical devices. ACS Appl Energy Mater, 2019, 2(3): 1720-1726.

[50] Shiino K, Otomo T, Yamada T, et al. Structural investigation of sulfonated polyphenylene ionomers for the design of better performing proton-conductive membranes. ACS Appl Polym Mater, 2020, 2(12): 5558-5565.

[51] Miyake J, Taki R, Mochizuki T et al (2017) Design of flexible polyphenylene proton-conducting membrane for next-generation fuel cells. Sci Adv 3(10):eaao0476

[52] Donnadio A, Casciola M, Di Vona ML, et al. Conductivity and hydration of sulfonated polyethersulfone in the range 70–120 °C: effect of temperature and relative humidity cycling. J Power Sources, 2012, 205: 145-150.

[53] Miyatake K, Furuya H, Tanaka M, et al. Durability of sulfonated polyimide membrane in humidity cycling for fuel cell applications. J Power Sources, 2012, 204: 74-78.

[54] Yuan Q, Liu P, Baker GL Sulfonated polyimide and PVDF based blend proton exchange membranes for fuel cell applications. J Mater Chem A, 2015, 3(7): 3847-3853.

[55] Zhang Z, Xu T Proton-conductive polyimides consisting of naphthalenediimide and sulfonated units alternately segmented by long aliphatic spacers. J Mater Chem A, 2014, 2(30): 11583.

[56] Kopitzke RW, Linkous CA, Anderson HR, et al. Conductivity and water uptake of aromatic-based proton exchange membrane electrolytes. J Electrochem Soc, 2000, 147(5): 1677.

[57] Kim E, Weck PF, Balakrishnan N, et al. Nanoscale building blocks for the development of novel proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J Phys Chem B, 2008, 112(11): 3283-3286.

[58] Long Z, Miyake J, Miyatake K Proton exchange membranes containing densely sulfonated quinquephenylene groups for high performance and durable fuel cells. J Mater Chem A, 2020, 8(24): 12134-12140.

[59] Zhang H, Stanis RJ, Song Y, et al. Fuel cell performance of pendent methylphenyl sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone ketone)S. J Power Sources, 2017, 368: 30-37.

[60] Lim Y, Lee S, Jang H, et al. Synthesis and characterization of pendant propane sulfonic acid on phenylene based copolymers by superacid-catalyzed reaction. Renew Energy, 2015, 79: 85-90.

[61] Chae JE, Yoo SJ, Kim JY, et al. Hydrocarbon-based electrode ionomer for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2020, 45(57): 32856-32864.

[62] Katzenberg A, Chowdhury A, Fang M, et al. Highly permeable perfluorinated sulfonic acid ionomers for improved electrochemical devices: insights into structure–property relationships. J Am Chem Soc, 2020, 142(8): 3742-3752.

[63] Fang S, Liu G, Li M, et al. Tailoring ionomer chemistry for improved oxygen transport in the cathode catalyst layer of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. ACS Appl Energy Mater, 2023, 6(6): 3590-3598.

[64] MacAuley N, Lousenberg RD, Spinetta M, et al. Highly durable fluorinated high oxygen permeability ionomers for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Adv Energy Mater, 2022, 12(45): 2201063.

[65] Shimizu R, Park YC, Kakinuma K, et al. Effects of both oxygen permeability and ion exchange capacity for cathode ionomers on the performance and durability of polymer electrolyte fuel cells. J Electrochem Soc, 2018, 165(6): F3063-F3071.

[66] Cheng X, You J, Shen S, et al. An ingenious design of nanoporous nafion film for enhancing the local oxygen transport in cathode catalyst layers of PEMFCs. Chem Eng J, 2022, 439.

[67] Diercks CS, Yaghi OM (2017) The atom, the molecule, and the covalent organic framework. Science 355(6328):eaal1585

[68] Yang Y, He X, Zhang P, et al. Combined intrinsic extrinsic proton conduction in robust covalent organic frameworks for hydrogen fuel cell applications. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2020, 59(9): 3678-3684.

[69] Zhang Y, Xing C, Mu Z, et al. Harnessing self-repairing and crystallization processes for effective enzyme encapsulation in covalent organic frameworks. J Am Chem Soc, 2023, 145(24): 13469-13475.

[70] Huang X, Sun C, Feng X Crystallinity and stability of covalent organic frameworks. Sci China Chem, 2020, 63(10): 1367-1390.

[71] Meng Z, Stolz RM, Mirica KA Two-dimensional chemiresistive covalent organic framework with high intrinsic conductivity. J Am Chem Soc, 2019, 141(30): 11929-11937.

[72] Chandra S, Kundu T, Kandambeth S, et al. Phosphoric acid loaded azo (–N═N–) based covalent organic framework for proton conduction. J Am Chem Soc, 2014, 136(18): 6570-6573.

[73] Xu H, Tao S, Jiang D Proton conduction in crystalline and porous covalent organic frameworks. Nature Mater, 2016, 15(7): 722-726.

[74] Ye Y, Zhang L, Peng Q, et al. High anhydrous proton conductivity of imidazole-loaded mesoporous polyimides over a wide range from subzero to moderate temperature. J Am Chem Soc, 2015, 137(2): 913-918.

[75] Li S, Liu Y, Li L, et al. Enhanced proton conductivity of imidazole-doped thiophene-based covalent organic frameworks via subtle hydrogen bonding modulation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2020, 12(20): 22910-22916.

[76] Zhang Q, Dong S, Shao P, et al. Covalent organic framework–based porous ionomers for high-performance fuel cells. Science, 2022, 378(6616): 181-186.

[77] Ma T, Lutkenhaus JL Hydrogen power gets a boost. Science, 2022, 378(6616): 138-139.

[78] Fan L, Deng H, Zhang Y, et al. Towards ultralow platinum loading proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Energy Environ Sci, 2023, 16(4): 1466-1479.

[79] Pan S, Wen Q, Dan X, et al. Enhanced triple-phase interface in PEMFC by proton conductor absorption on the Pt catalyst. ACS Appl Energy Mater, 2023, 6(2): 763-772.

[80] Gu CC, Xu FH, Zhu WK, et al. Recent advances on covalent organic frameworks (COFs) as photocatalysts: different strategies for enhancing hydrogen generation. Chem Commun, 2023, 59(48): 7302-7320.

[81] Cheng CH, Malek K, Sui PC, et al. Effect of Pt nano-particle size on the microstructure of PEM fuel cell catalyst layers: insights from molecular dynamics simulations. Electrochim Acta, 2010, 55(5): 1588-1597.

[82] Navessin T, Eikerling M, Wang Q, et al. Influence of membrane ion exchange capacity on the catalyst layer performance in an operating PEM fuel cell. J Electrochem Soc, 2005, 152(4): A796.

[83] Schmidt-Rohr K, Chen Q Parallel cylindrical water nanochannels in Nafion fuel-cell membranes. Nature Mater, 2008, 7(1): 75-83.

[84] Cui S, Liu J, Selvan ME, et al. A molecular dynamics study of a nafion polyelectrolyte membrane and the aqueous phase structure for proton transport. J Phys Chem B, 2007, 111(9): 2208-2218.

[85] Hogarth WHJ, Diniz da Costa JC, Max Lu GQ Solid acid membranes for high temperature (140 °C) proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J Power Sources, 2005, 142(1–2): 223-237.

[86] Kim DJ, Jo MJ, Nam SY A review of polymer–nanocomposite electrolyte membranes for fuel cell application. J Ind Eng Chem, 2015, 21: 36-52.

[87] Tai CC, Chen CL, Liu CW Computer simulation to investigate proton transport and conductivity in perfluorosulfonate ionomeric membrane. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2017, 42(7): 3981-3986.

[88] Choe YK, Tsuchida E, Ikeshoji T, et al. Nature of proton dynamics in a polymer electrolyte membrane, nafion: a first-principles molecular dynamics study. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2009, 11(20): 3892.

[89] Paul DK, Fraser A, Karan K Towards the understanding of proton conduction mechanism in PEMFC catalyst layer: conductivity of adsorbed Nafion films. Electrochem Commun, 2011, 13(8): 774-777.

[90] Shen S, Han A, Yan X, et al. Influence of equivalent weight of ionomer on proton conduction behavior in fuel cell catalyst layers. J Electrochem Soc, 2019, 166(12): F724-F728.

[91] Nagao Y Highly oriented sulfonic acid groups in a nafion thin film on Si substrate. J Phys Chem C, 2013, 117(7): 3294-3297.

[92] Siroma Z, Kakitsubo R, Fujiwara N, et al. Depression of proton conductivity in recast Nafion® film measured on flat substrate. J Power Sources, 2009, 189(2): 994-998.

[93] Paul DK, Karan K, Docoslis A, et al. Characteristics of self-assembled ultrathin nafion films. Macromolecules, 2013, 46(9): 3461-3475.

[94] Paul DK, McCreery R, Karan K Proton transport property in supported nafion nanothin films by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. J Electrochem Soc, 2014, 161(14): F1395-F1402.

[95] Péron J, Nedellec Y, Jones DJ, et al. The effect of dissolution, migration and precipitation of platinum in Nafion®-based membrane electrode assemblies during fuel cell operation at high potential. J Power Sources, 2008, 185(2): 1209-1217.

[96] Salari S, Tam M, McCague C, et al. The ex-situ and in situ gas diffusivities of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell catalyst layer and contribution of primary pores, secondary pores, ionomer and water to the total oxygen diffusion resistance. J Power Sources, 2020, 449.

[97] Beuscher U Experimental method to determine the mass transport resistance of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell. J Electrochem Soc, 2006, 153(9): A1788.

[98] Shen S, Cheng X, Wang C, et al. Exploration of significant influences of the operating conditions on the local O₂ transport in proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2017, 19(38): 26221-26229.

[99] Ohma A, Mashio T, Sato K, et al. Analysis of proton exchange membrane fuel cell catalyst layers for reduction of platinum loading at Nissan. Electrochim Acta, 2011, 56(28): 10832-10841.

[100] Kongkanand A, Mathias MF The priority and challenge of high-power performance of low-platinum proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. J Phys Chem Lett, 2016, 7(7): 1127-1137.

[101] Greszler TA, Caulk D, Sinha P The impact of platinum loading on oxygen transport resistance. J Electrochem Soc, 2012, 159(12): F831-F840.

[102] Sakai K, Sato K, Mashio T, et al. Analysis of reactant gas transport in catalyst layers; effect of Pt-loadings. ECS Trans, 2009, 25(1): 1193-1201.

[103] Ono Y, Mashio T, Takaichi S, et al. The analysis of performance loss with low platinum loaded cathode catalyst layers. ECS Trans, 2010, 28(27): 69-78.

[104] Nonoyama N, Okazaki S, Weber AZ, et al. Analysis of oxygen-transport diffusion resistance in proton-exchange-membrane fuel cells. J Electrochem Soc, 2011, 158(4): B416.

[105] Yoon W, Weber AZ Modeling low-platinum-loading effects in fuel-cell catalyst layers. J Electrochem Soc, 2011, 158(8): B1007.

[106] Kudo K, Jinnouchi R, Morimoto Y Humidity and temperature dependences of oxygen transport resistance of nafion thin film on platinum electrode. Electrochim Acta, 2016, 209: 682-690.

[107] Yakovlev YV, Lobko YV, Vorokhta M, et al. Ionomer content effect on charge and gas transport in the cathode catalyst layer of proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. J Power Sources, 2021, 490.

[108] Guan S, Zhou F, Tan J, et al. Influence of pore size optimization in catalyst layer on the mechanism of oxygen transport resistance in PEMFCs. Prog Nat Sci Mater Int, 2020, 30(6): 839-845.

[109] Wang S, Li X, Wan Z, et al. Effect of hydrophobic additive on oxygen transport in catalyst layer of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J Power Sources, 2018, 379: 338-343.

[110] Kudo K, Suzuki T, Morimoto Y Analysis of oxygen dissolution rate from gas phase into nafion surface and development of an agglomerate model. ECS Trans, 2010, 33(1): 1495-1502.

[111] Kudo K, Morimoto Y Analysis of oxygen transport resistance of nafion thin film on Pt electrode. ECS Trans, 2013, 50(2): 1487-1494.

[112] Jinnouchi R, Kudo K, Kitano N, et al. Molecular dynamics simulations on O₂ permeation through nafion ionomer on platinum surface. Electrochim Acta, 2016, 188: 767-776.

[113] Sakai K, Tokumasu T Molecular dynamics study of oxygen permeation in PFSA ionomer on the Pt catalyst surface. ECS Trans, 2011, 41(1): 2105-2113.

[114] Kurihara Y, Mabuchi T, Tokumasu T Molecular simulation of oxygen permeation through ionomer in catalyst layer. ECS Trans, 2014, 64(3): 559-565.

[115] Sugaya Y, Tokumasu T Molecular dynamics study of oxygen permeation of ionomer of hydrocarbon. ECS Trans, 2013, 58(1): 1165-1174.

[116] Tian ZQ, Wang XL, Zhang HM, et al. Microwave-assisted synthesis of PTFE/C nanocomposite for polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Electrochem Commun, 2006, 8(7): 1158-1162.

[117] Fischer A, Jindra J, Wendt H Porosity and catalyst utilization of thin layer cathodes in air operated PEM-fuel cells. J Appl Electrochem, 1998, 28(3): 277-282.

[118] Gu K, Kim EJ, Sharma SK, et al. Mesoporous carbon aerogel with tunable porosity as the catalyst support for enhanced proton-exchange membrane fuel cell performance. Mater Today Energy, 2021, 19.

[119] Cho YH, Jung N, Kang YS, et al. Improved mass transfer using a pore former in cathode catalyst layer in the direct methanol fuel cell. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2012, 37(16): 11969-11974.

[120] Zhao J, He X, Wang L, et al. Addition of NH₄HCO₃ as pore-former in membrane electrode assembly for PEMFC. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2007, 32(3): 380-384.

[121] Şengül E, Erkan S, Eroğlu İ, et al. Effect of gas diffusion layer characteristics and addition of pore-forming agents on the performance of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Chem Eng Commun, 2008, 196(1–2): 161-170.

[122] Ye G, Wang H, Zhou X, et al. Optimizing catalyst pore network structure in the presence of deactivation by coking. AlChE J, 2019, 65(10

[123] Yamada K, Hommura S, Shimohira T Effect of high oxygen permeable ionomers on MEA performance for PEFC. ECS Trans, 2013, 50(2): 1495-1501.

[124] Shinozaki K, Morimoto Y, Pivovar BS, et al. Suppression of oxygen reduction reaction activity on Pt-based electrocatalysts from ionomer incorporation. J Power Sources, 2016, 325: 745-751.

[125] Speder J, Zana A, Arenz M The colloidal tool-box approach for fuel cell catalysts: systematic study of perfluorosulfonate-ionomer impregnation and Pt loading. Catal Today, 2016, 262: 82-89.

[126] Andersen SM Nano carbon supported platinum catalyst interaction behavior with perfluorosulfonic acid ionomer and their interface structures. Appl Catal B Environ, 2016, 181: 146-155.

[127] Subbaraman R, Strmcnik D, Stamenkovic V et al (2010) Three phase interfaces at electrified metal–solid electrolyte systems 1. study of the Pt(hkl)–nafion interface. J Phys Chem C 114(18):8414–8422

[128] Subbaraman R, Strmcnik D, Paulikas AP, et al. Oxygen reduction reaction at three-phase interfaces. ChemPhysChem, 2010, 11(13): 2825-2833.

[129] Tymoczko J, Calle-Vallejo F, Colic V, et al. Oxygen reduction at a Cu-modified Pt(111) model electrocatalyst in contact with nafion polymer. ACS Catal, 2014, 4(10): 3772-3778.

[130] Kunimatsu K, Yoda T, Tryk DA, et al. In situ ATR-FTIR study of oxygenreduction at the Pt/Nafion interface. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2010, 12(3): 621-629.

[131] Ayato Y, Kunimatsu K, Osawa M, et al. Study of Pt electrode/nafion ionomer interface in HClO₄ by in situ surface-enhanced FTIR spectroscopy. J Electrochem Soc, 2006, 153(2): A203.

[132] Rad AS DFT study of hydrogen fluoride and sulfur trioxide interactions on the surface of Pt-decorated graphene. J Theor Appl Phys, 2016, 10(4): 307-313.

[133] Kodama K, Motobayashi K, Shinohara A, et al. Effect of the side-chain structure of perfluoro-sulfonic acid ionomers on the oxygen reduction reaction on the surface of Pt. ACS Catal, 2018, 8(1): 694-700.

[134] Kodama K, Shinohara A, Hasegawa N, et al. Catalyst poisoning property of sulfonimide acid ionomer on Pt (111) surface. J Electrochem Soc, 2014, 161(5): F649-F652.

[135] Li Y, Intikhab S, Malkani A, et al. Ionic liquid additives for the mitigation of nafion specific adsorption on platinum. ACS Catal, 2020, 10(14): 7691-7698.

[136] Takeshita T, Kamitaka Y, Shinozaki K, et al. Evaluation of ionomer coverage on Pt catalysts in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells by CO stripping voltammetry and its effect on oxygen reduction reaction activity. J Electroanal Chem, 2020, 871.

[137] Shen J, Xu L, Chang H, et al. Partial flooding and its effect on the performance of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Energy Convers Manag, 2020, 207.

[138] Shojaeefard MH, Molaeimanesh GR, Moqaddari MR Effects of compression on the removal of water droplet from GDLs of PEM fuel cells. Fuel Cells, 2019, 19(6): 675-684.

[139] Tardy E, Courtois F, Chandesris M, et al. Investigation of liquid water heterogeneities in large area PEM fuel cells using a pseudo-3D multiphysics model. Int J Heat Mass Transf, 2019, 145.

[140] Ijaodola OS, El-Hassan Z, Ogungbemi E, et al. Energy efficiency improvements by investigating the water flooding management on proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC). Energy, 2019, 179: 246-267.

[141] Mulyazmi DWRW, Majlan EH, et al. Water balance for the design of a PEM fuel cell system. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2013, 38(22): 9409-9420.

[142] Dai W, Wang H, Yuan XZ, et al. A review on water balance in the membrane electrode assembly of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2009, 34(23): 9461-9478.

[143] Karthikeyan M, Karthikeyan P, Muthukumar M, et al. Adoption of novel porous inserts in the flow channel of pem fuel cell for the mitigation of cathodic flooding. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2020, 45(13): 7863-7872.

[144] Jang S, Park HY, Jung J, et al. Enhanced water management of three-dimensional graphene-Ni foam with patterned wettability in a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell. ACS Sustain Chem Eng, 2019, 7(18): 15487-15494.

[145] Liu HC, Yang WM, Tan J, et al. A fin-shaped flow channel enhances water removal performance in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Fuel Cells, 2019, 19(1): 51-59.

[146] Moçotéguy P, Ludwig B, Beretta D, et al. Study of the impact of water management on the performance of PEMFC commercial stacks by impedance spectroscopy. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2020, 45(33): 16724-16737.

[147] Mohseninia A, Kartouzian D, Schlumberger R, et al. Enhanced water management in PEMFCs: perforated catalyst layer and microporous layers. Chemsuschem, 2020, 13(11): 2931-2934.

[148] Yin Y, Li R, Bai F, et al. Ionomer migration within PEMFC catalyst layers induced by humidity changes. Electrochem Commun, 2019, 109.

[149] Modestino MA, Kusoglu A, Hexemer A, et al. Controlling nafion structure and properties via wetting interactions. Macromolecules, 2012, 45(11): 4681-4688.

[150] Modestino MA, Paul DK, Dishari S, et al. Self-assembly and transport limitations in confined nafion films. Macromolecules, 2013, 46(3): 867-873.

[151] Kusoglu A, Dursch TJ, Weber AZ Nanostructure/swelling relationships of bulk and thin-film PFSA ionomers. Adv Funct Mater, 2016, 26(27): 4961-4975.

[152] Shrivastava UN, Fritzsche H, Karan K Interfacial and bulk water in ultrathin films of nafion, 3M PFSA, and 3M PFIA ionomers on a polycrystalline platinum surface. Macromolecules, 2018, 51(23): 9839-9849.

[153] Tesfaye M, Kushner DI, Kusoglu A Interplay between swelling kinetics and nanostructure in perfluorosulfonic acid thin-films: role of hygrothermal aging. ACS Appl Polym Mater, 2019, 1(4): 631-635.

[154] Ren H, Teng Y, Meng X, et al. Ionomer network of catalyst layers for proton exchange membrane fuel cell. J Power Sources, 2021, 506.

[155] Park YC, Kakinuma K, Uchida H, et al. Effects of short-side-chain perfluorosulfonic acid ionomers as binders on the performance of low Pt loading fuel cell cathodes. J Power Sources, 2015, 275: 384-391.

[156] Ahn CY, Ahn J, Kang SY et al (2020) Enhancement of service life of polymer electrolyte fuel cells through application of nanodispersed ionomer. Sci Adv 6(5):eaaw0870

[157] Cho S, Tamoto K, Uchida M Effect of an electrospray-generated ionomer morphology on polymer electrolyte fuel cell performance. Energy Fuels, 2020, 34(11): 14853-14863.

[158] Orfanidi A, Madkikar P, El-Sayed HA, et al. The key to high performance low Pt loaded electrodes. J Electrochem Soc, 2017, 164(4): F418-F426.

[159] Passalacqua E, Lufrano F, Squadrito G, et al. Nafion content in the catalyst layer of polymer electrolyte fuel cells: effects on structure and performance. Electrochim Acta, 2001, 46(6): 799-805.

[160] Andersen SM, Grahl-Madsen L Interface contribution to the electrode performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells—impact of the ionomer. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2016, 41(3): 1892-1901.

[161] Alink R, Singh R, Schneider P, et al. Full parametric study of the influence of ionomer content, catalyst loading and catalyst type on oxygen and ion transport in PEM fuel cell catalyst layers. Molecules, 2020, 25(7): 1523.

[162] Ishikawa H, Sugawara Y, Inoue G, et al. Effects of Pt and ionomer ratios on the structure of catalyst layer: a theoretical model for polymer electrolyte fuel cells. J Power Sources, 2018, 374: 196-204.

[163] Ohira A, Kuroda S, Mohamed HFM, et al. Effect of interface on surface morphology and proton conduction of polymer electrolyte thin films. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2013, 15(27): 11494.

[164] Shin SJ, Lee JK, Ha HY, et al. Effect of the catalytic ink preparation method on the performance of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. J Power Sources, 2002, 106(1–2): 146-152.

[165] Jeon S, Lee J, Rios GM, et al. Effect of ionomer content and relative humidity on polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) performance of membrane-electrode assemblies (MEAs) prepared by decal transfer method. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2010, 35(18): 9678-9686.

[166] Huang J, Li Z, Zhang J Review of characterization and modeling of polymer electrolyte fuel cell catalyst layer: the blessing and curse of ionomer. Front Energy, 2017, 11(3): 334-364.

[167] Hirano S, Kim J, Srinivasan S High performance proton exchange membrane fuel cells with sputter-deposited Pt layer electrodes. Electrochim Acta, 1997, 42(10): 1587-1593.

[168] Park EJ, Maurya S, Lee AS, et al. How does a small structural change of anode ionomer make a big difference in alkaline membrane fuel cell performance?. J Mater Chem A, 2019, 7(43): 25040-25046.

[169] Li D, Park EJ, Zhu W, et al. Highly quaternized polystyrene ionomers for high performance anion exchange membrane water electrolysers. Nat Energy, 2020, 5(5): 378-385.

[170] Nykaza JR, Li Y, Elabd YA, et al. Effect of alkaline exchange polymerized ionic liquid block copolymer ionomers on the kinetics of fuel cell half reactions. J Electroanal Chem, 2016, 783: 182-187.

[171] Maurya S, Fujimoto CH, Hibbs MR, et al. Toward improved alkaline membrane fuel cell performance using quaternized aryl-ether free polyaromatics. Chem Mater, 2018, 30(7): 2188-2192.

[172] Nallayagari AR, Sgreccia E, Pasquini L, et al. Impact of anion exchange ionomers on the electrocatalytic performance for the oxygen reduction reaction of B-N co-doped carbon quantum dots on activated carbon. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2022, 14(41): 46537-46547.

[173] Chen N, Wang HH, Kim SP, et al. Poly(fluorenyl aryl piperidinium) membranes and ionomers for anion exchange membrane fuel cells. Nat Commun, 2021, 12: 2367.

[174] Chen N, Chen N, Hu C et al (2021) Poly(alkyl-terphenyl piperidinium) ionomers and membranes with an outstanding alkaline-membrane fuel-cell performance of 2.58 W cm^-2. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 60(14):7710–7718

[175] Zhao Y, Lv B, Song W, et al. Influence of the PBI structure on PBI/CsH₅(PO₄)₂ membrane performance for HT-PEMFC application. J Membr Sci, 2023, 674.

[176] Rosli RE, Sulong AB, Daud WRW, et al. A review of high-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell (HT-PEMFC) system. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2017, 42(14): 9293-9314.

[177] Haider R, Wen Y, Ma ZF, et al. High temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells: progress in advanced materials and key technologies. Chem Soc Rev, 2021, 50(2): 1138-1187.

[178] Ergün D High temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells, 2009 Ankara, Turkey Middle East Technical University

[179] Bose S, Kuila T, Nguyen TXH, et al. Polymer membranes for high temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell: recent advances and challenges. Prog Polym Sci, 2011, 36(6): 813-843.

[180] Qu E, Hao X, Xiao M, et al. Proton exchange membranes for high temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells: challenges and perspectives. J Power Sources, 2022, 533.

[181] Atanasov V, Lee AS, Park EJ, et al. Synergistically integrated phosphonated poly(pentafluorostyrene) for fuel cells. Nat Mater, 2021, 20(3): 370-377.

[182] Kim JH, Kim HJ, Lim TH, et al. Dependence of the performance of a high-temperature polymer electrolyte fuel cell on phosphoric acid-doped polybenzimidazole ionomer content in cathode catalyst layer. J Power Sources, 2007, 170(2): 275-280.