Balancing the Activity and Selectivity of Propane Oxidative Dehydrogenation on NiOOH (001) and (010)

Abstract

Propane oxidative dehydrogenation (ODH) is an energy-efficient approach to produce propylene. However, ODH suffers from low propylene selectivity due to a relatively higher activation barrier for propylene formation compared with that for further oxidation. In this work, calculations based on density functional theory were performed to map out the reaction pathways of propane ODH on the surfaces (001) and (010) of nickel oxide hydroxide (NiOOH). Results show that propane is physisorbed on both surfaces and produces propylene through a two-step radical dehydrogenation process. The relatively low activation barriers of propane dehydrogenation on the NiOOH surfaces make the NiOOH-based catalysts promising for propane ODH. By contrast, the weak interaction between the allylic radical and the surface leads to a high activation barrier for further propylene oxidation. These results suggest that the catalysts based on NiOOH can be active and selective for the ODH of propane toward propylene.

Keywords

Density functional theory / Oxidative dehydrogenation / Propane / Nickel oxide hydroxide / Two-step radical mechanism / Selectivity

References

[1] Zheng B, Hua WM, Yue YH, et al. Dehydrogenation of propane to propene over different polymorphs of gallium oxide. J Catal, 2005, 232(1): 143-151.

[2] Akah A, Al-Ghrami M. Maximizing propylene production via FCC technology. Appl Petrochem Res, 2015, 5(4): 377-392.

[3] Kung HH. Oxidative dehydrogenation of light (C₂ to C₄) alkanes. Adv Catal, 1994, 40: 1-38.

[4] Baek J, Yun HJ, Yun D, et al. Preparation of highly dispersed chromium oxide catalysts supported on mesoporous silica for the oxidative dehydrogenation of propane using CO₂: insight into the nature of catalytically active chromium sites. ACS Catal, 2012, 2(9): 1893-1903.

[5] Chen M, Xu J, Liu YM, et al. Supported indium oxide as novel efficient catalysts for dehydrogenation of propane with carbon dioxide. Appl Catal A Gen, 2010, 377(1–2): 35-41.

[6] Derouane EG, Parmon V, Lemos F, et al. Sustainable strategies for the upgrading of natural gas: fundamentals, challenges, and opportunities, 2005, Dordrecht: Springer.

[7] Mashayekhi NA, Kung MC, Kung HH. Selective oxidation of hydrocarbons on supported Au catalysts. Catal Today, 2014, 238: 74-79.

[8] Cavani F, Ballarini N, Cericola A. Oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane and propane: how far from commercial implementation?. Catal Today, 2007, 127(1–4): 113-131.

[9] Liu HG, Dong XM, Xia JP, et al. Preparation of γ-Al₂O₃ via hydrothermal synthesis using ρ-Al₂O₃ as raw material for propane dehydrogenation. Trans Tianjin Univ, 2019

[10] Li YX, Li JX, Yang X, et al. Preparation of CeO₂-modified Mg(Al)O-supported Pt–Cu alloy catalysts derived from hydrotalcite-like precursors and their catalytic behavior for direct dehydrogenation of propane. Trans Tianjin Univ, 2019, 25(2): 169-184.

[11] Sattler JJHB, Ruiz-Martinez J, Santillan-Jimenez E, et al. Catalytic dehydrogenation of light alkanes on metals and metal oxides. Chem Rev, 2014, 114(20): 10613-10653.

[12] Li ZY, Peters AW, Platero-Prats AE, et al. Fine-tuning the activity of metal–organic framework-supported cobalt catalysts for the oxidative dehydrogenation of propane. J Am Chem Soc, 2017, 139(42): 15251-15258.

[13] Grabowski R. Kinetics of oxidative dehydrogenation of C2–C3 alkanes on oxide catalysts. Catal Rev, 2006, 48(2): 199-268.

[14] Kristoffersen HH, Neilson HL, Buratto SK, et al. Stability of V₂O₅ supported on titania in the presence of water, bulk oxygen vacancies, and adsorbed oxygen atoms. J Phys Chem C, 2017, 121(15): 8444-8451.

[15] Carrero CA, Schloegl R, Wachs IE, et al. Critical literature review of the kinetics for the oxidative dehydrogenation of propane over well-defined supported vanadium oxide catalysts. ACS Catal, 2014, 4(10): 3357-3380.

[16] Chen KD, Khodakov A, Yang J, et al. Isotopic tracer and kinetic studies of oxidative dehydrogenation pathways on vanadium oxide catalysts. J Catal, 1999, 186(2): 325-333.

[17] Khodakov A, Yang J, Su S, et al. Structure and properties of vanadium oxide–zirconia catalysts for propane oxidative dehydrogenation. J Catal, 1998, 177(2): 343-351.

[18] Delgado D, Sanchís R, Cecilia JA, et al. Support effects on NiO-based catalysts for the oxidative dehydrogenation (ODH) of ethane. Catal Today, 2019, 333: 10-16.

[19] Park JL, Canizales KA, Argyle MD, et al. The effects of doping alumina with silica in alumina-supported NiO catalysts for oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane. Microporous Mesoporous Mater, 2020, 293: 109799.

[20] Khodakov A, Olthof B, Bell AT, et al. Structure and catalytic properties of supported vanadium oxides: support effects on oxidative dehydrogenation reactions. J Catal, 1999, 181(2): 205-216.

[21] Zhang SH, Liu HC. Oxidative dehydrogenation of propane over Mg–V–O oxides supported on MgO-coated silica: structural evolution and catalytic consequence. Appl Catal A Gen, 2019, 573: 41-48.

[22] Zhang SH, Liu HC. Insights into the structural requirements for oxidative dehydrogenation of propane on crystalline Mg–V–O catalysts. Appl Catal A Gen, 2018, 568: 1-10.

[23] Avdeev VI, Bedilo AF. Molecular mechanism of propane oxidative dehydrogenation on surface oxygen radical sites of VO _x/TiO₂ catalysts. Res Chem Intermed, 2016, 42(6): 5237-5252.

[24] Du YJ, Li ZH, Fan KN. A theoretical investigation on the influence of anatase support and vanadia dispersion on the oxidative dehydrogenation of propane to propene. J Mol Catal A Chem, 2013, 379: 122-138.

[25] Huang C, Wang ZQ, Gong XQ. Activity and selectivity of propane oxidative dehydrogenation over VO₃/CeO₂(111) catalysts: a density functional theory study. Chin J Catal, 2018, 39(9): 1520-1526.

[26] Fu H, Liu ZP, Li ZH, et al. Periodic density functional theory study of propane oxidative dehydrogenation over V₂O₅(001) surface. J Am Chem Soc, 2006, 128(34): 11114-11123.

[27] Alexopoulos K, Reyniers MF, Marin GB. Reaction path analysis of propane selective oxidation over V₂O₅ and V₂O₅/TiO₂. J Catal, 2012, 289: 127-139.

[28] Xiong CY, Chen S, Yang PP, et al. Structure–performance relationships for propane dehydrogenation over aluminum supported vanadium oxide. ACS Catal, 2019, 9(7): 5816-5827.

[29] Song YY, Wang GC. A DFT study and microkinetic simulation of propylene partial oxidation on CuO(111) and CuO(100) surfaces. J Phys Chem C, 2016, 120(48): 27430-27442.

[30] Feng YC, Wang NN, Guo X. Influence mechanism of supports on the reactivity of Ni-based oxygen carriers for chemical looping reforming: a DFT study. Fuel, 2018, 229: 88-94.

[31] Fan XQ, Liu DD, Zhao Z, et al. Influence of Ni/Mo ratio on the structure-performance of ordered mesoporous Ni-Mo-O catalysts for oxidative dehydrogenation of propane. Catal Today, 2020, 339: 67-78.

[32] Yu TT, Li Z, Zheng HL, et al. The nature of Ni–O pairs for ethane activation on NiO(100) and NiO(110) surfaces. Mol Catal, 2019, 474: 110417.

[33] Skoufa Z, Xantri G, Heracleous E, et al. A study of Ni–Al–O mixed oxides as catalysts for the oxidative conversion of ethane to ethylene. Appl Catal A Gen, 2014, 471: 107-117.

[34] Smoláková L, Čapek L, Botková Š, et al. Activity of the Ni–Al mixed oxides prepared from hydrotalcite-like precursors in the oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane and propane. Top Catal, 2011, 54(16–18): 1151-1162.

[35] Govind Rajan A, Martirez JMP, Carter EA. Facet-independent oxygen evolution activity of pure β-NiOOH: different chemistries leading to similar overpotentials. J Am Chem Soc, 2020, 142(7): 3600-3612.

[36] Xue Z, Zhang XY, Qin JQ, et al. Revealing Ni-based layered double hydroxides as high-efficiency electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction: a DFT study. J Mater Chem A, 2019, 7(40): 23091-23097.

[37] Song F, Busch MM, Lassalle-Kaiser B, et al. An unconventional iron nickel catalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction. ACS Cent Sci, 2019, 5(3): 558-568.

[38] Martirez JMP, Carter EA. Unraveling oxygen evolution on iron-doped β-nickel oxyhydroxide: the key role of highly active molecular-like sites. J Am Chem Soc, 2019, 141(1): 693-705.

[39] Horànyi TS. Investigation of the effects of heat treatment on the β-Ni(OH)₂–β-NiOOH system using IR spectroscopy. Thermochim Acta, 1989, 142(1): 143-150.

[40] Horányi TS. The thermal stability of the β-Ni(OH)₂–β-NiOOH system. Thermochim Acta, 1989, 137(2): 247-253.

[41] Solsona B, López Nieto JM, Concepción P, et al. Oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane over Ni–W–O mixed metal oxide catalysts. J Catal, 2011, 280(1): 28-39.

[42] Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficiency of ab initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput Mater Sci, 1996, 6(1): 15-50.

[43] Blöchl PE. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B, 1994, 50(24): 17953-17979.

[44] Dudarev SL, Botton GA, Savrasov SY, et al. Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: an LSDA + U study. Phys Rev B, 1998, 57(3): 1505.

[45] Grimme S, Antony J, Ehrlich S, et al. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J Chem Phys, 2010, 132(15): 154104.

[46] Casas-Cabanas M, Radin MD, Kim J, et al. The nickel battery positive electrode revisited: stability and structure of the β-NiOOH phase. J Mater Chem A, 2018, 6(39): 19256-19265.

[47] Li YF, Selloni A. Mosaic texture and double c-axis periodicity of β-NiOOH: insights from first-principles and genetic algorithm calculations. J Phys Chem Lett, 2014, 5(22): 3981-3985.

[48] Tkalych AJ, Yu K, Carter EA. Structural and electronic features of β-Ni(OH)₂ and β-NiOOH from first principles. J Phys Chem C, 2015, 119(43): 24315-24322.

[49] Trotochaud L, Young SL, Ranney JK, et al. Nickel–iron oxyhydroxide oxygen-evolution electrocatalysts: the role of intentional and incidental iron incorporation. J Am Chem Soc, 2014, 136(18): 6744-6753.

[50] Henkelman G, Jónsson H. A dimer method for finding saddle points on high dimensional potential surfaces using only first derivatives. J Chem Phys, 1999, 111(15): 7010-7022.

[51] Henkelman G, Uberuaga BP, Jónsson H. A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. J Chem Phys, 2000, 113(22): 9901-9904.

[52] Braga AAC, Maseras F, Urbano J, et al. Mechanism of alkane C–H bond activation by copper and silver homoscorpionate complexes. Organometallics, 2006, 25(22): 5292-5300.

[53] Chen KD, Iglesia E, Bell AT. Isotopic tracer studies of reaction pathways for propane oxidative dehydrogenation on molybdenum oxide catalysts. J Phys Chem B, 2001, 105(3): 646-653.

[54] Deshlahra P, Carr RT, Chai SH, et al. Mechanistic details and reactivity descriptors in oxidation and acid catalysis of methanol. ACS Catal, 2015, 5(2): 666-682.

[55] Cao L, Dai PC, Zhu L, et al. Graphitic carbon nitride catalyzes selective oxidative dehydrogenation of propane. Appl Catal B Environ, 2020, 262: 118277.

[56] Rozanska X, Fortrie R, Sauer J. Oxidative dehydrogenation of propane by monomeric vanadium oxide sites on silica support. J Phys Chem C, 2007, 111(16): 6041-6050.

[57] Cheng L, Ferguson GA, Zygmunt SA, et al. Structure-activity relationships for propane oxidative dehydrogenation by anatase-supported vanadium oxide monomers and dimers. J Catal, 2013, 302: 31-36.

[58] Skoufa Z, Heracleous E, Lemonidou AA. On ethane ODH mechanism and nature of active sites over NiO-based catalysts via isotopic labeling and methanol sorption studies. J Catal, 2015, 322: 118-129.

[59] Fung V, Tao FF, Jiang DE. Understanding oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane on Co₃O₄ nanorods from density functional theory. Catal Sci Technol, 2016, 6(18): 6861-6869.

[60] Grillo F, Natile MM, Glisenti A. Low temperature oxidation of carbon monoxide: the influence of water and oxygen on the reactivity of a Co₃O₄ powder surface. Appl Catal B Environ, 2004, 48(4): 267-274.

[61] Evans MG, Polanyi M. Inertia and driving force of chemical reactions. Trans Faraday Soc, 1938

[62] Bronsted JN. Acid and basic catalysis. Chem Rev, 1928, 5(3): 231-338.

[63] Deshlahra P, Iglesia E. Reactivity and selectivity descriptors for the activation of C–H bonds in hydrocarbons and oxygenates on metal oxides. J Phys Chem C, 2016, 120(30): 16741-16760.

[64] Liu YL, Annamalai L, Deshlahra P. Effects of lattice O atom coordination and pore confinement on selectivity limitations for ethane oxidative dehydrogenation catalyzed by vanadium-oxo species. J Phys Chem C, 2019, 123(46): 28168-28191.

[65] Annamalai L, Liu YL, Deshlahra P. Selective C–H bond activation via NOx-mediated generation of strong H-abstractors. ACS Catal, 2019, 9(11): 10324-10338.

[66] Niu SQ, Sun YC, Sun GJ, et al. Stepwise electrochemical construction of FeOOH/Ni(OH)₂ on Ni foam for enhanced electrocatalytic oxygen evolution. ACS Appl Energy Mater, 2019, 2(5): 3927-3935.