Solubility and Thermodynamic Properties of Sulfamethazine–Saccharin Cocrystal in Pure and Binary (Acetonitrile + 2-Propanol) Solvents

Hongyuan Wei , Ningcan Gao , Leping Dang

Transactions of Tianjin University ›› 2021, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6) : 460 -472.

PDF
Transactions of Tianjin University ›› 2021, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6) : 460 -472. DOI: 10.1007/s12209-020-00255-7
Research Article

Solubility and Thermodynamic Properties of Sulfamethazine–Saccharin Cocrystal in Pure and Binary (Acetonitrile + 2-Propanol) Solvents

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

In this work, a new crystallization method was used to prepare two polymorphs of sulfamethazine–saccharin (SMT–SAC) cocrystal in bulk. The purity and crystal form of both polymorphs were confirmed by optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, powder X-ray diffraction, differential scanning calorimetry, and thermogravimetric analysis. Moreover, the solubility of the stable form (form II) was determined by gravimetric analysis in nine pure solvents and one binary (acetonitrile + 2-propanol) solvent at temperatures ranging from 278.15 to 348.15 K at atmospheric pressure. Experimental data were correlated using the modified Apelblat model, the λh equation, the nonrandom two-liquid (NRTL) model, the Jouyban–Acree model, and the CNIBS/Redlich–Kister model. Finally, the apparent thermodynamic properties, such as $\Delta_{\text{dis}} G$, Δdis H, and Δdis S, were calculated on the basis of the activity coefficient obtained by the NRTL model. All the models correlate well, and all the experimental and calculated results indicate that the dissolution behavior of SMT–SAC cocrystal form II is a spontaneous, endothermic, and entropy-driven process.

Keywords

Sulfamethazine–saccharin cocrystal / Solid–liquid equilibrium / Thermodynamic model / Dissolution thermodynamic property

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Hongyuan Wei, Ningcan Gao, Leping Dang. Solubility and Thermodynamic Properties of Sulfamethazine–Saccharin Cocrystal in Pure and Binary (Acetonitrile + 2-Propanol) Solvents. Transactions of Tianjin University, 2021, 27(6): 460-472 DOI:10.1007/s12209-020-00255-7

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Aitipamula S, Banerjee R, Bansal AK, et al. Polymorphs, salts, and cocrystals: what’s in a name?. Cryst Growth Des, 2012, 12(5): 2147-2152.

[2]

Castro RAE, Maria TMR, Évora AOL, et al. A new insight into pyrazinamide polymorphic forms and their thermodynamic relationships. Cryst Growth Des, 2010, 10(1): 274-282.

[3]

Pan BC, Dang LP, Wang ZZ, et al. Preparation, crystal structure and solution-mediated phase transformation of a novel solid-state form of CL-20. CrystEngComm, 2018, 20(11): 1553-1563.

[4]

Pan BC, Wei HY, Jiang J, et al. Solution-mediated polymorphic transformation of CL-20: an approach to prepare purified form ε particles. J Mol Liq, 2018, 265: 216-225.

[5]

Vippagunta SR, Brittain HG, Grant DJW Crystalline solids. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2001, 48(1): 3-26.

[6]

Zong SH, Pan BC, Dang LP, et al. Stability, solubility and thermodynamic properties of dimorphs of furosemide-4,4′-bipyridine cocrystals in organic solvents. J Mol Liq, 2019, 289: 111017.

[7]

Aitipamula S, Chow PS, Tan RBH Polymorphism in cocrystals: a review and assessment of its significance. CrystEngComm, 2014, 16(17): 3451-3465.

[8]

Losev EA, Boldyreva EV A salt or a co-crystal – when crystallization protocol matters. CrystEngComm, 2018, 20(16): 2299-2305.

[9]

Grobelny P, Mukherjee A, Desiraju GR Drug-drug co-crystals: temperature-dependent proton mobility in the molecular complex of isoniazid with 4-aminosalicylic acid. CrystEngComm, 2011, 13(13): 4358-4364.

[10]

Losev EA, Boldyreva E Concomitant cocrystal and salt: no interconversion in the solid state. Acta Crystallogr C, 2019, 75(3): 313-319.

[11]

Lu EX, Rodríguez-Hornedo N, Suryanarayanan R A rapid thermal method for cocrystal screening. CrystEngComm, 2008, 10(6): 665-668.

[12]

Perumalla SR, Wang CG, Guo YW, et al. Robust bulk preparation and characterization of sulfamethazine and saccharine salt and cocrystal polymorphs. CrystEngComm, 2019, 21(13): 2089-2096.

[13]

Fu X, Li JH, Wang LY, et al. Correction: Pharmaceutical crystalline complexes of sulfamethazine with saccharin: same interaction site but different ionization states. RSC Adv, 2016, 6(62): 26474-26478.

[14]

Pan BC, Wei HY, Zong SH, et al. Solid-liquid phase equilibrium and ternary phase diagrams of CL-20 in different solvent systems from 298.15 K to 313.15 K. J Mol Liq, 2019, 289: 111180.

[15]

Manzurola E, Apelblat A Solubilities of l-glutamic acid, 3-nitrobenzoic acid, p-toluic acid, calcium-l-lactate, calcium gluconate, magnesium-dl-aspartate, and magnesium-l-lactate in water. J Chem Thermodyn, 2002, 34(7): 1127-1136.

[16]

Apelblat A, Manzurola E Solubilities of o-acetylsalicylic, 4-aminosalicylic, 3, 5-dinitrosalicylic, and p-toluic acid, and magnesium- DL -aspartate in water from T = (278 to 348) K. J Chem Thermodyn, 1999, 31(1): 85-91.

[17]

Hojjati H, Rohani S Measurement and prediction of solubility of paracetamol in water–isopropanol solution. Part 1. Measurement and data analysis. Org Process Res Dev, 2006, 10(6): 1101-1109.

[18]

Buchowski H, Ksiazczak A, Pietrzyk S Solvent activity along a saturation line and solubility of hydrogen-bonding solids. J Phys Chem, 1980, 84(9): 975-979.

[19]

Renon H, Prausnitz JM Local compositions in thermodynamic excess functions for liquid mixtures. AIChE J, 1968, 14(1): 135-144.

[20]

Gow AS Calculation of vapor-liquid equilibria from infinite-dilution excess enthalpy data using the Wilson or NRTL equation. Ind Eng Chem Res, 1993, 32(12): 3150-3161.

[21]

Wang S, Chen YF, Gong TT, et al. Solid-liquid equilibrium behavior and thermodynamic analysis of dipyridamole in pure and binary solvents from 293.15 K to 328.15 K. J Mol Liq, 2019, 275: 8-17.

[22]

William EA Jr Mathematical representation of thermodynamic properties: Part 2 Derivation of the combined nearly ideal binary solvent (NIBS)/Redlich-Kister mathematical representation from a two-body and three-body interactional mixing model. Thermochim Acta, 1992, 198(1): 71-79.

[23]

Barzegar-Jalali M, Jouyban-Gharamaleki A A general model from theoretical cosolvency models. Int J Pharm, 1997, 152(2): 247-250.

[24]

Jouyban-Gharamaleki A, Acree WE Jr Comparison of models for describing multiple peaks in solubility profiles. Int J Pharm, 1998, 167(1–2): 177-182.

[25]

Khattab IS, Bandarkar F, Fakhree MAA, et al. Density, viscosity, and surface tension of water + ethanol mixtures from 293 to 323K. Korean J Chem Eng, 2012, 29(6): 812-817.

[26]

Zong SY, Wang JK, Xiao Y, et al. Solubility and dissolution thermodynamic properties of lansoprazole in pure solvents. J Mol Liq, 2017, 241: 399-406.

[27]

Gu CH, Li H, Gandhi RB, et al. Grouping solvents by statistical analysis of solvent property parameters: implication to polymorph screening. Int J Pharm, 2004, 283(1–2): 117-125.

[28]

Jouyban A Review of the cosolvency models for predicting solubility of drugs in water-cosolvent mixtures. J Pharm Pharm Sci, 2008, 11(1): 32-58.

[29]

Millard JW, Alvarez-Núñez FA, Yalkowsky SH Solubilization by cosolvents: establishing useful constants for the log–linear model. Int J Pharm, 2002, 245(1–2): 153-166.

[30]

Grunenberg A, Henck JO, Siesler HW Theoretical derivation and practical application of energy/temperature diagrams as an instrument in preformulation studies of polymorphic drug substances. Int J Pharm, 1996, 129(1–2): 147-158.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

145

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/