Process Optimization of Coke Oven Gas to Methanol Based on the Downgrade of By-Product Steam

Abstract

In the coke oven gas to methanol (CTM) process, boiling water (above 200 °C) is generally used as the coolant in the methanol synthesis reactor, and thus, medium-pressure steam is generated as a by-product. In this paper, the influence of the coolant temperature on the CTM process is investigated from two aspects, which are the performance analyses of the reactor and the overall process and the energy integration of by-product steam. The results reveal that the coolant temperature plays a key role in the CTM process optimization. When the coolant temperature is reduced to 187 °C, though low-pressure steam is generated, the techno-economic performance of the whole process is greatly improved: the energy/exergy efficiency is increased by 4–9%, energy cost is saved by 37.1%, income is increased by 5.4 M$/year, and the CO₂ emission is reduced by 21.3%.

Keywords

Coke oven gas / Methanol synthesis / Process optimization / Energy saving

References

[1] Chen WH, Hsu CL, Du SW. Thermodynamic analysis of the partial oxidation of coke oven gas for indirect reduction of iron oxides in a blast furnace. Energy, 2015, 86: 758-771.

[2] Bermúdez JM, Arenillas A, Luque R, et al. An overview of novel technologies to valorise coke oven gas surplus. Fuel Process Technol, 2013, 110: 150-159.

[3] IEA Tracking industrial energy efficiency and CO₂ emissions. Energy Policy, 2007, 30(10): 849-863.

[4] National Bureau of Statistics of China (2016) Coke statistics reports for China. http://data.stats.gov.cn/search.html. Accessed 20 Apr 2018

[5] Yang Z, Zhang Y, Wang X, et al. Design of two-stage membrane reactor for the conversion of coke-oven gas to H₂ and CO. J Energy Chem, 2014, 23(4): 411-413.

[6] Zhang X, Yang K, Liu Y, et al. Development and progress of efficient utilization technology of coke oven gas. Chem Ind Eng Prog, 2010, 29(S1): 322-324 (in Chinese)

[7] Zhou L, Liu K, Sha Y. Analysis of coke oven gas injection into BF then generate electricity. Energy Metall Ind, 2013, 32(3): 41-45 (in Chinese)

[8] Wang S, Wang G, Jiang F, et al. Chemical looping combustion of coke oven gas by using Fe₂O₃/CuO with MgAl₂O₄ as oxygen carrier. Energy Environ Sci, 2010, 3(9): 1353-1360.

[9] Xie H, Yu Q, Zhang Y, et al. New process for hydrogen production from raw coke oven gas via sorption-enhanced steam reforming: thermodynamic analysis. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2017, 42(5): 2914-2923.

[10] Yi Q, Wu G, Gong M, et al. A feasibility study for CO₂ recycle assistance with coke oven gas to synthetic natural gas. Appl Energy, 2017, 193: 149-161.

[11] Dan X, Yan L, Yang Y. Simulation and analysis of coke oven gas methanation process based on Aspen Plus. Technol Dev Chem Ind, 2014, 43(5): 52-57 (in Chinese)

[12] Xiang D, Yang S, Mai Z, et al. Comparative study of coal, natural gas, and coke-oven gas based methanol to olefins processes in China. Comput Chem Eng, 2015, 83: 176-185.

[13] Man Y, Yang S, Xiao H, et al. Modeling, simulation and analysis for coal and coke-oven gas to synthetic natural gas. CIESC J, 2015, 66(12): 4941-4947 (in Chinese)

[14] Xie H, Zhang J, Yu Q, et al. Study on steam reforming of tar in hot coke oven gas for hydrogen production. Energy Fuels, 2016, 30(3): 2336-2344.

[15] Li Z, Liu P, He F, et al. Simulation and exergoeconomic analysis of a dual-gas sourced polygeneration process with integrated methanol/DME/DMC catalytic synthesis. Comput Chem Eng, 2011, 35(9): 1857-1862.

[16] Man Y, Yang S, Zhang J, et al. Conceptual design of coke-oven gas assisted coal to olefins process for high energy efficiency and low CO₂ emission. Appl Energy, 2014, 133: 197-205.

[17] Bermúdez JM, Ferrera-Lorenzo N, Luque S, et al. New process for producing methanol from coke oven gas by means of CO₂ reforming. Comparison with conventional process. Fuel Process Technol, 2013, 115: 215-221.

[18] Razzaq R, Li C, Zhang S. Coke oven gas: availability, properties, purification, and utilization in China. Fuel, 2013, 113: 287-299.

[19] Wang T (2005) Coke oven gas: technical and economic comparison of different utilization methods of power generation, hydrogen production, methanol production and direct reduced iron. In: Coal processing and utilization technology, market and industrialization information exchange conference and development strategy seminar in China. Xi’an, China, pp 241–243 (in Chinese)

[20] Yi Q, Wu Y, Fan Y, et al. Economic evaluation of industrial chain extension solutions for coke oven gas to methanol and chemicals. CIESC J, 2014, 65(3): 1003-1011 (in Chinese)

[21] Qian Y, Man Y, Peng L, et al. Integrated process of coke-oven gas tri-reforming and coal gasification to methanol with high carbon utilization and energy efficiency. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2015, 54: 2519-2525.

[22] Yi Q, Gong MH, Huang Y, et al. Process development of coke oven gas to methanol integrated with CO₂ recycle for satisfactory techno–economic performance. Energy, 2016, 112: 618-628.

[23] Gong M, Yi Q, Huang Y, et al. Coke oven gas to methanol process integrated with CO₂ recycle for high energy efficiency, economic benefits and low emissions. Energy Convers Manag, 2012, 133: 318-331.

[24] Wu Z, Li H, Wang W. Process parameter optimization of COG reforming for a 300 kt/a methanol plant. Nat Gas Chem Ind, 2012, 37(5): 32-35 (in Chinese)

[25] Manenti F, Cieri S, Restelli M. Considerations on the steady-state modeling of methanol synthesis fixed-bed reactor. Chem Eng Sci, 2011, 66(2): 152-162.

[26] Shahrokhi M, Baghmisheh GR. Modeling, simulation and control of a methanol synthesis fixed-bed reactor. Chem Eng Sci, 2005, 60(15): 4275-4286.

[27] Manenti F, Leon-Garzon AR, Bozzano G. Energy-process integration of the gas-cooled/water-cooled fixed-bed reactor network for methanol synthesis. Chem Eng Trans, 2013, 35: 1243-1248.

[28] Manenti F, Leon-Garzon AR, Ravaghi-Ardebili Z, et al. Systematic staging design applied to the fixed-bed reactor series for methanol and one-step methanol/dimethyl ether synthesis. Appl Therm Eng, 2014, 70(2): 1228-1237.

[29] Bozzano G, Manenti F. Efficient methanol synthesis: perspectives, technologies and optimization strategies. Prog Energy Combust Sci, 2016, 56: 71-105.

[30] König DH, Baucks N, Dietrich RU, et al. Simulation and evaluation of a process concept for the generation of synthetic fuel from CO₂ and H₂. Energy, 2015, 91: 833-841.

[31] Meng WX, Banerjee S, Zhang X, et al. Process simulation of multi-stage chemical-looping combustion using Aspen Plus. Energy, 2015, 90: 1869-1877.

[32] Khojasteh SY, Adams TA. Integrated petroleum coke and natural gas polygeneration process with zero carbon emissions. Energy, 2015, 91: 479-490.

[33] Bussche KMV, Froment GF. A steady-state kinetic model for methanol synthesis and the water gas shift reaction on a commercial Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalyst. J Catal, 1996, 10(156): 1-10.

[34] Luyben WL. Design and control of a methanol reactor/column process. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2010, 49(13): 6150-6163.

[35] Douglas JM. Conceptual design of chemical processes, 1988, New York: McGraw-Hill.

[36] Turton R, Bailie RC, Whiting WB, et al. Analysis, synthesis, and design of chemical processes, 2012, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

[37] Man Y, Yang S, Qian Y. Integrated process for synthetic natural gas production from coal and coke-oven gas with high energy efficiency and low emission. Energy Convers Manag, 2016, 117: 162-170.

[38] Xiang D, Yang S, Liu X, et al. Techno–economic performance of the coal-to-olefins process with CCS. Chem Eng J, 2014, 240: 45-54.

[39] Ranjan KR, Kaushik SC. Energy, exergy and thermo-economic analysis of solar distillation systems: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2013, 27: 709-723.

[40] Gökgedik H, Yürüsoy M, Keçebaş A. Improvement potential of a real geothermal power plant using advanced exergy analysis. Energy, 2016, 112: 254-263.

[41] De Jong ED, Keuken H, Van Der PE, et al. Exergy analysis of industrial processes using AI techniques. Comput Chem Eng, 1996, 20(96): 1631-1636.

[42] Xiang D, Xiang J, Sun Z, et al. The integrated coke-oven gas and pulverized coke gasification for methanol production with highly efficient hydrogen utilization. Energy, 2017, 140: 78-91.