Effects of Solvent Molecules on the Interlayer Spacing of Graphene Oxide

Abstract

Graphene oxide (GO) contains numerous functional groups that facilitate the intercalation of polar solvents. The properties and applications of GO are closely related to its interlayer spacing. We report on the changes in the interlayer spacing of GO after the adsorption of water molecules and the polar organic solvents C₂H₆O₂ (EG), C₃H₇NO (DMF), C₅H₉NO (NMP). Experiments were conducted to investigate the variations in the functional groups and structure of GO after solvent adsorption, and they play a vital role in modeling and verifying the results of molecular dynamics simulation. The most stable GO structures are obtained through molecular dynamics simulation. The expansion of the interlayer spacing of GO after the adsorption of monolayer solvent molecules corresponds to the minimum three-dimensional size of the solvent molecules. The spatial arrangement of solvent molecules also contributes to the changes in interlayer spacing. Most adsorbed molecules are oriented parallel to the carbon plane of GO. However, as additional molecules are adsorbed into the interlaminations of GO, the adsorbed molecules are oriented perpendicular to the carbon plane of GO, and a large space forms between two GO interlayers. In addition, the role of large molecules in increasing interlayer spacing becomes more crucial than that of water molecules in the adsorption of binary solvent systems by GO.

Keywords

Graphene oxide / Interlayer spacing / Solvent adsorption

References

[1] Lee DW, De Los Santos VL, Seo JW, et al. The structure of graphite oxide: investigation of its surface chemical groups. J Phys Chem B, 2010, 114(17): 5723-5728.

[2] Ou E, Xie Y, Peng C, et al. High concentration and stable few-layer graphene dispersions prepared by the exfoliation of graphite in different organic solvents. RSC Adv, 2013, 3(24): 9490-9499.

[3] Omidvar A, RashidianVaziri MR, Jaleh B, et al. Metal-enhanced fluorescence of graphene oxide by palladium nanoparticles in the blue-green part of the spectrum. Chin Phys B, 2016, 25(11): 118102

[4] Rezania B, Severin N, Talyzin AV, et al. Hydration of bilayered graphene oxide. Nano Lett, 2014, 14(7): 3993-3998.

[5] Zhou X, Duan Y, Wang L, et al. Layering of confined water between two graphene sheets and its liquid–liquid transition. Chin Phys B, 2017, 26(10): 106401

[6] Zokaie M, Foroutan M. Comparative study on confinement effects of graphene and graphene oxide on structure and dynamics of water. RSC Adv, 2015, 5(49): 39330-39341.

[7] Barroso-Bujans F, Cerveny S, Alegría A, et al. Sorption and desorption behavior of water and organic solvents from graphite oxide. Carbon, 2010, 48(11): 3277-3286.

[8] You S, Luzan SM, Szabo T, et al. Effect of synthesis method on solvation and exfoliation of graphite oxide. Carbon, 2013, 52: 171-180.

[9] Klechikov A, Yu J, Thomas D, et al. Structure of graphene oxide membranes in solvents and solutions. Nanoscale, 2015, 7(37): 15374-15384.

[10] Hummers JWS, Offeman RE. Preparation of graphitic oxide. J Am Chem Soc, 1958, 80(6): 1339

[11] Kovtyukhova NI, Ollivier PJ, Martin BR, et al. Layer-by-layer assembly of ultrathin composite films from micron-sized graphite oxide sheets and polycations. Chem Mater, 1999, 11(3): 771-778.

[12] Tan W, Hao R, Liu Y, et al. Desalination of graphite oxide by electrodialysis. Desalination, 2016, 385: 53-57.

[13] Paredes JI, Villar-Rodil S, Martinez-Alonso A, et al. Graphene oxide dispersions in organic solvents. Langmuir, 2008, 24(19): 10560-10564.

[14] Szabó T, Berkesi O, Forgó P, et al. Evolution of surface functional groups in a series of progressively oxidized graphite oxides. Chem Mater, 2006, 18(11): 2740-2749.

[15] Devanathan R, Chase-Woods D, Shin Y, et al. Molecular dynamics simulations reveal that water diffusion between graphene oxide layers is slow. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 29484

[16] Kovář P, Pospíšil M, Káfuňková E, et al. Mg-Al layered double hydroxide intercalated with porphyrin anions: molecular simulations and experiments. J Mol Model, 2010, 16(2): 223-233.

[17] Mayo SL, Olafson BD, Goddard WA. DREIDING: a generic force field for molecular simulations. J Phys Chem, 1990, 94(26): 8897-8909.

[18] Heinz H, Vaia RA, Farmer BL, et al. Accurate simulation of surfaces and interfaces of face-centered cubic metals using 12-6 and 9-6 Lennard-Jones potentials. J Phys Chem C, 2008, 112(44): 17281-17290.

[19] Wang MH, Xie YE, Chen YP. Thermal transport in twisted few-layer graphene. Chin Phys B, 2017, 26(11): 116503

[20] Cheng ZL, Li W, Wu PR, et al. A strategy for preparing modified graphene oxide with good dispersibility and transparency in oil. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2017, 56(19): 5527-5534.

[21] Medhekar NV, Ramasubramaniam A, Ruoff RS, et al. Hydrogen bond networks in graphene oxide composite paper: structure and mechanical properties. ACS Nano, 2010, 4(4): 2300-2306.

[22] Talyzin AV, Hausmaninger T, You S, et al. The structure of graphene oxide membranes in liquid water, ethanol and water–ethanol mixtures. Nanoscale, 2014, 6: 272-281.

[23] Liu T, Chen YQ. A molecular dynamics study of the swelling patterns of Na/Cs-montmorillonites and the hydration of interlayer cations. Chin Phys B, 2013, 22(2): 027103

[24] Xiao X, Li F, Huang J, et al. Reduced adsorption of propanil to black carbon: effect of dissolved organic matter loading mode and molecule size. Environ Toxicol Chem, 2012, 31(6): 1187-1193.

[25] Devineau K, Bihannic I, Michot L, et al. In situ neutron diffraction analysis of the influence of geometric confinement on crystalline swelling of montmorillonite. Appl Clay Sci, 2006, 31(1–2): 76-84.

[26] You S, Luzan S, Yu J, et al. Phase transitions in graphite oxide solvates at temperatures near ambient. J Phys Chem Lett, 2012, 3(7): 812-817.

[27] Chen L, Shi G, Shen J, et al. Ion sieving in graphene oxide membranes via cationic control of interlayer spacing. Nature, 2017, 550(7676): 380-383.