Peanut-Like Hematite Prepared by a New Facile Hydrothermal Process for Removal of As(V)

Chengjin Zhang , Shaoyi Jia , Songhai Wu , Yong Liu

Transactions of Tianjin University ›› 2019, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (1) : 23 -30.

PDF
Transactions of Tianjin University ›› 2019, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (1) : 23 -30. DOI: 10.1007/s12209-018-0157-3
Research Article

Peanut-Like Hematite Prepared by a New Facile Hydrothermal Process for Removal of As(V)

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Peanut-like hematite has been prepared by a new facile hydrothermal method and applied in the adsorption removal of As(V). The structural features of the as-prepared hematite were characterized systematically by X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, Brunauer–Emmett–Teller, scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy mapping, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. Results showed that the morphologies of hematite could be tuned to spindle-like, oval-like, and cantaloupe-like shapes by adjusting the hydrothermal conditions. The peanut-like hematite formation followed a five-step route. At pH = 3, the adsorption amount of As(V) over peanut-like hematite reached 13.84 mg/g, and the adsorption kinetic process corresponded to the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. The peanut-like hematite also showed partial selectivity over As(V) in the hydrosphere. This method can be a reference for the preparation of other architectural metal oxide materials.

Keywords

Peanut-like hematite / Arsenic adsorbent / Nanoparticle

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Chengjin Zhang, Shaoyi Jia, Songhai Wu, Yong Liu. Peanut-Like Hematite Prepared by a New Facile Hydrothermal Process for Removal of As(V). Transactions of Tianjin University, 2019, 25(1): 23-30 DOI:10.1007/s12209-018-0157-3

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Xie X, Wang Y, Pi K, et al. In situ treatment of arsenic contaminated groundwater by aquifer iron coating: experimental study. Sci Total Environ, 2015, 527–528: 38-46.

[2]

Pontoni L, Fabbricino M. Use of chitosan and chitosan-derivatives to remove arsenic from aqueous solutions—a mini review. Carbohyd Res, 2012, 356: 86-92.

[3]

Kay A, Cesar I, Graetzel M. New benchmark for water photooxidation by nanostructured α-Fe2O3 films. J Am Chem Soc, 2006, 128(49): 15714-15721.

[4]

Dixit S, Hering JG. Comparison of arsenic(V) and arsenic(III) sorption onto iron oxide minerals: implications for arsenic mobility. Environ Sci Technol, 2003, 37(18): 4182-4189.

[5]

Chang Q, Lin W, Ying WC. Preparation of iron-impregnated granular activated carbon for arsenic removal from drinking water. J Hazard Mater, 2010, 184(1–3): 515-522.

[6]

Liang X, Wang X, Zhuang J, et al. Synthesis of nearly monodisperse iron oxide and oxyhydroxide nanocrystals. Adv Funct Mater, 2006, 16(14): 1805-1813.

[7]

Wu C, Yin P, Zhu X, et al. Synthesis of hematite (α-Fe2O3) nanorods: diameter-size and shape effects on their applications in magnetism, lithium ion battery, and gas sensors. J Phys Chem B, 2006, 110(36): 17806-17812.

[8]

Suber L, Imperatori P, Ausanio G, et al. Synthesis, morphology, and magnetic characterization of iron oxide nanowires and nanotubes. J Phys Chem B, 2005, 109(15): 7103-7109.

[9]

Vayssieres L, Sathe C, Butorin SM, et al. One-dimensional quantum-confinement effect in α-Fe2O3 ultrafine nanorod arrays. Adv Mater, 2005, 17(19): 2320-2323.

[10]

Chen J, Xu L, Li W, et al. α-Fe2O3 nanotubes in gas sensor and lithium-ion battery applications. Adv Mater, 2005, 17(5): 582-586.

[11]

Zhao YM, Li YH, Ma RZ, et al. Growth and characterization of iron oxide nanorods/nanobelts prepared by a simple iron–water reaction. Small, 2006, 2(3): 422-427.

[12]

Chen D, Gao L. A facile route for high-throughput formation of single-crystal α-Fe2O3 nanodisks in aqueous solutions of Tween 80 and triblock copolymer. Chem Phys Lett, 2004, 395(4–6): 316-320.

[13]

Hu X, Yu JC, Gong J, et al. α-Fe2O3 nanorings prepared by a microwave-assisted hydrothermal process and their sensing properties. Adv Mater, 2007, 19(17): 2324-2329.

[14]

Atabaev TS. Facile hydrothermal synthesis of flower-like hematite microstructure with high photocatalytic properties. J Adv Ceram, 2015, 4(1): 61-64.

[15]

Sugimoto T, Sakata K, Muramatsu A. Formation mechanism of monodisperse pseudocubic α-Fe2O3 particles from condensed ferric hydroxide gel. J Colloid Interface Sci, 1993, 159(2): 372-382.

[16]

Jia CJ, Sun LD, Luo F, et al. Large-scale synthesis of single-crystalline iron oxide magnetic nanorings. J Am Chem Soc, 2008, 130(50): 16968-16977.

[17]

Zhong LS, Hu JS, Liang HP, et al. Self-assembled 3D flowerlike iron oxide nanostructures and their application in water treatment. Adv Mater, 2006, 18(18): 2426-2431.

[18]

Cao CY, Qu J, Yan WS, et al. Low-cost synthesis of flowerlike α-Fe2O3 nanostructures for heavy metal ion removal: adsorption property and mechanism. Langmuir, 2012, 28(9): 4573-4579.

[19]

Liu ZM, Wu SH, Jia SY, et al. Novel hematite nanorods and magnetite nanoparticles prepared from MIL-100 (Fe) template for the removal of As(V). Mater Lett, 2014, 132: 8-10.

[20]

McIntyre NS, Zetaruk DG. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic studies of iron oxides. Anal Chem, 1977, 49(11): 1521-1529.

[21]

Du Y, Jing Y, Qi M, et al. Fabrication and excellent conductive performance of antimony-doped tin oxide-coated diatomite with porous structure. Mater Chem Phys, 2012, 133(2–3): 907-912.

[22]

Vayssieres L, Beermann N, Lindquist SE, et al. Controlled aqueous chemical growth of oriented three-dimensional crystalline nanorod arrays: application to iron (III) oxides. Chem Mater, 2001, 13(2): 233-235.

[23]

Politi Y, Arad T, Klein E, et al. Sea urchin spine calcite forms via a transient amorphous calcium carbonate phase. Science, 2004, 306(5699): 1161-1164.

[24]

Hu X, Yu JC. Continuous aspect-ratio tuning and fine shape control of monodisperse α-Fe2O3 nanocrystals by a programmed microwave-hydrothermal method. Adv Funct Mater, 2008, 18(6): 880-887.

[25]

Eggleston CM, Khare N, Lovelace DM. Cytochrome c interaction with hematite (α-Fe2O3) surfaces. J Electron Spectrosc Relat Phenom, 2006, 150(2–3): 220-227.

[26]

Hameed BH, Rahman AA. Removal of phenol from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto activated carbon prepared from biomass material. J Hazard Mater, 2008, 160(2–3): 576-581.

[27]

Catalano JG, Park C, Fenter P, et al. Simultaneous inner- and outer-sphere arsenate adsorption on corundum and hematite. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 2008, 72(8): 1986-2004.

[28]

Liu Z, Chen J, Wu Y, et al. Synthesis of magnetic orderly mesoporous ɑ-Fe2O3 nanocluster derived from MIL-100(Fe) for rapid and efficient arsenic(III, V) removal. J Hazard Mater, 2018, 343: 304-314.

[29]

Qin FX, Jia SY, Liu Y, et al. Metal-organic framework as a template for synthesis of magnetic CoFe2O4 nanocomposites for phenol degradation. Mater Lett, 2013, 101: 93-95.

[30]

Fufa F, Alemayehu E, Lennartz B. Sorptive removal of arsenate using termite mound. J Environ Manag, 2014, 132: 188-196.

[31]

Jain A, Loeppert RH. Effect of competing anions on the adsorption of arsenate and arsenite by ferrihydrite. J Environ Qual, 2000, 29(5): 1422-1430.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

147

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/