Experimental and Numerical Studies of Failure Modes and Load-Carrying Capacity of Through-Diaphragm Connections

Abstract

Shear failure in panel zones and plastic hinges in steel beams are the two major failure modes of connections between concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) columns and steel beams. To investigate the behavior of this type of connection in both modes, two through-diaphragm connections were tested under cyclic and monotonic loadings and the load-carrying capacity, ductility, and strength of degradation of connections were discussed. Using ABAQUS software, we developed nonlinear finite-element models (FEMs) to simulate the load-carrying capacity and failure modes of the connections under monotonic loading. The finite-element (FE) analysis and test results showed reasonable agreement for the through-diaphragm connections, which confirms the accuracy of FEMs in predicting the load-carrying capacity and failure modes of connections. Based on the validated FEM, a parametric study was then conducted to investigate the influence of the thicknesses of the tube and diaphragm on the load-carrying capacity and failure modes of these connections. The results indicate that the strength, stiffness, and load-carrying capacity are influenced less by the thickness of the diaphragm, and more by the thickness of the steel tube. According to the FE analysis results, it can be found that the critical condition between the two failure modes is determined by the shear resistance and bending resistance.

Keywords

Through-diaphragm connections / Failure mode / Finite-element analysis / Parametric analysis / Monotonic loading / Cyclic loading

References

[1] Morino S, Kawaguchi J, Yasuzaki C et al (1992) Elasto-plastic behavior of concrete filled steel tubular three-dimensional subassemblies. In: Proceedings of an engineering foundation conference: composite construction of steel and concrete II, Potosi, USA

[2] Sasaki S, Teraoka M, Morita K et al (1995) Structural behavior of concrete-filled square tubular column with partial-penetration weld corner seam to steel H-beam connections. In: Proceedings of the 4th Pacific Structural Steel Conference. Singapore, pp 34–40

[3] Kang CH, Shin KJ, Oh YS, et al. Hysteresis behavior of CFT column to H-beam connections with external T-stiffeners and penetrated elements. Eng Struct, 2001, 23(9): 1194-1201.

[4] Cheng CT, Chung LL. Seismic performance of steel beams to concrete-filled steel tubular column connections. J Constr Steel Res, 2003, 59(3): 405-426.

[5] Nishiyama I, Fujimoto T, Fukumoto T, et al. Inelastic force-deformation response of joint shear panels in beam-column moment connections to concrete-filled tubes. J Struct Eng, 2004, 130(2): 244-252.

[6] Nie JG, Qin K, Cai CS. Seismic behavior of connections composed of CFSSTCs and steel–concrete composite beams—experimental study. J Constr Steel Res, 2008, 64(10): 1178-1191.

[7] Qin Y, Chen ZH, Wang XD. Experimental investigation of new internal-diaphragm connections to CFT columns under cyclic loading. J Constr Steel Res, 2014, 98: 35-44.

[8] Qin Y, Chen ZH, Rong B. Component-based mechanical models for axially-loaded through-diaphragm connections to concrete-filled RHS columns. J Constr Steel Res, 2014, 102: 150-163.

[9] Chiew SP, Lie ST, Dai CW. Moment resistance of steel I-beam to CFT column connections. J Struct Eng ASCE, 2001, 127(10): 1164-1172.

[10] Shin KJ, Kim YJ, Oh YS, et al. Behavior of welded CFT column to H-beam connections with external stiffeners. Eng Struct, 2004, 26(13): 1877-1887.

[11] Choi SM, Hong SD, Kim YS. Modeling analytical moment-rotation curves of semi-rigid connections for CFT square columns and steel beams. Adv Struct Eng, 2006, 9(5): 697-706.

[12] Chou CC, Chen JH, Chen YC, et al. Evaluating performance of post-tensioned steel connections with strands and reduced flange plates. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam, 2006, 35(9): 1167-1185.

[13] Zhang GT, Han JH, Rong B, et al. Influence of axial load ratio on shear behavior of through-diaphragm connections of concrete-filled square steel tubular columns. Trans Tianjin Univ, 2015, 21(4): 341-346.

[14] Nie JG, Qin K, Cai CS. Seismic behavior of connections composed of CFSSTCs and steel-concrete composite beams—finite element analysis. J Constr Steel Res, 2008, 64(6): 680-688.

[15] Zhang DX, Gao SB, Gong JH. Seismic behavior of steel beam to circular CFST column assemblies with external diaphragms. J Constr Steel Res, 2012, 76: 155-166.

[16] GB 50011-2010 Code for seismic design of buildings, 2008, Beijing, China: China Architecture & Building Press (in Chinese)

[17] Qin Y, Chen ZH, Yang QY, et al. Experimental seismic behavior of through-diaphragm connections to concrete-filled rectangular steel tubular columns. J Constr Steel Res, 2014, 93: 32-43.

[18] Fan JS, Li QW, Nie JG, et al. Experimental study on the seismic performance of 3D joints between concrete-filled square steel tubular columns and composite beams. J Struct Eng, 2014, 140(12): 04014094

[19] Tang JR. Seismic resistance of joints in reinforced concrete frames, 1989, Nanjing, China: Southeast University Press (in Chinese)

[20] Simulia ABAQUS analysis user’s manual, 2007, USA: ABAQUS Inc.

[21] Han LH, Yao GH, Zhao XL. Tests and calculations of hollow structural steel (HSS) stub columns filled with self-consolidating concrete (SCC). J Constr Steel Res, 2005, 61(9): 1241-1269.

[22] Park SH, Choi SM, Kim YS, et al. Hysteresis behavior of concrete filled square steel tube column-to-beam partially restrained composite connections. J Constr Steel Res, 2010, 66(7): 943-953.