Geometrical Design and Hydraulic Feasibility of Inner-Reinforced Girders in Hydropower Bifurcations

Abstract

Inner-reinforced girders, also known as ribs, are widely used in hydropower bifurcations. However, while they strengthen structures, they also cause energy loss. This work aims to develop an appropriate geometry form for ribs that can diminish head loss in hydropower bifurcations. The term rib/breadth ratio (RBR) is defined to describe the geometrical form of ribs. An investigation is conducted to study the flow and performance characteristics of bifurcations with ribs using computational fluid dynamics. The dependence of the head loss coefficient on the RBR is given in six working conditions. Results show that the ribs change the local flow patterns and slightly increase the water head loss in some cases. In other cases, however, the ribs make the flow smooth. An appropriate RBR is the key to improve the flow patterns in hydropower bifurcations. The head loss varies with the RBR and reaches the minimum when the RBR is 0.3.

Keywords

Hydropower / Bifurcation / Rib / Computational fluid dynamics / Head loss / Flow pattern

References

[1] Nazari ME, Ardehali MM, Jafari S. Pumped-storage unit commitment with considerations for energy demand, economics, and environmental constraints. Energy, 2010, 35(10): 4092-4101.

[2] Ardizzon G, Cavazzini G, Pavesi G. A new generation of small hydro and pumped-hydro power plants: advances and future challenges. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2014, 31: 746-761.

[3] American Society of Civil Engineers (2012) ASCE manuals and reports on engineering practice no. 79, steel penstocks, 2nd edn. American Society of Civil Engineers

[4] Wu HG, Shi CZ, Su K. Study on structure characteristics of embedded crescent-rib reinforced bifurcated pipe. J Hydraul Eng, 2008, 39(4): 460-465 (in Chinese)

[5] Pérez-García J, Sanmiguel-Rojas E, Hernández-Grau J, et al. Numerical and experimental investigations on internal compressible flow at T-type junctions. Exp Therm Fluid Sci, 2006, 31(1): 61-74.

[6] Pérez-García J, Sanmiguel-Rojas E, Viedma A. New experimental correlations to characterize compressible flow losses at 90-degree T-junctions. Exp Therm Fluid Sci, 2009, 33(2): 261-266.

[7] Pérez-García J, Sanmiguel-Rojas E, Viedma A. New coefficient to characterize energy losses in compressible flow at T-junctions. Appl Math Model, 2010, 34(12): 4289-4305.

[8] Gan G, Riffat SB. Numerical determination of energy losses at duct junctions. Appl Energy, 2000, 67(3): 331-340.

[9] Tang JL, Wang LW, Li X. Resistance characteristics of hydraulic oil through isodiametric T-type duct with sharp corners. Chin J Mech Eng, 2009, 22(2): 250-255. in Chinese)

[10] Jeong W, Seong J. Comparison of effects on technical variances of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software based on finite element and finite volume methods. Int J Mech Sci, 2014, 78: 19-26.

[11] Romero-Gomez P, Ho CK, Choi CY. Mixing at cross junctions in water distribution systems. I: numerical study. J Water Resour Plan Manag, 2008, 134(3): 285-294.

[12] Austin RG, Waanders BVB, Mckenna S, et al. Mixing at cross junctions in water distribution systems. II: experimental study. J Water Resour Plan Manag, 2008, 134(3): 295-302.

[13] Liu H, Li P. Even distribution/dividing of single-phase fluids by symmetric bifurcation of flow channels. Int J Heat Fluid Flow, 2013, 40: 165-179.

[14] Deane JP, Gallachóir BPÓ, Mckeogh EJ. Techno-economic review of existing and new pumped hydro energy storage plant. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2010, 14(4): 1293-1302.

[15] Wilcox DC. Turbulence Modeling for CFD, 1993, La Canada: DCW Industries Inc.

[16] Shih TH, Liou WW, Shabbir A, et al. A new k − ε eddy viscosity model for high reynolds number turbulent flows. Comput Fluids, 1995, 24(3): 227-238.

[17] ANSYS Inc. (2011) ANSYS FLUENT User’s Guide. Version 14.0. Canonsburg

[18] Ferziger JH, Perić M. Computational methods for fluid dynamics, 2002, 3 Berlin: Springer

[19] Van Doormaal JP, Raithby GD. Enhancements of the SIMPLE method for predicting incompressible fluid flows. Numer Heat Transf, 1984, 7(2): 147-163.

[20] Bassett MD, Winterbone DE, Pearson RJ (2001) Calculation of steady flow pressure loss coefficients for pipe junctions. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 215(8): 861–881

[21] White FM. Fluid mechanics, 2008, 6 New York: McGraw-Hill.

[22] Yang XL, Gao JZ, Liu ZP. Optimal width ratio of crescent rib in bifurcation of pumped storage power station based on numerical simulation of flow. J Hydraul Eng, 2005, 36(9): 1133-1137 (in Chinese)

[23] Kickhofel J, Valori V, Prasser HM. Turbulent penetration in T-junction branch lines with leakage flow. Nucl Eng Des, 2014, 276(3): 43-53.