Improvement of Camera Calibration Accuracy Based on Periodic Arrangement Characteristics of Calibration Target Pattern

Abstract

Conventional camera calibration that employs calibration targets is a commonly used method to acquire a camera’s intrinsic and/or extrinsic parameters. The calibration targets are usually designed as periodic arrays of simple high-contrast patterns that provide highly accurate world coordinate system points and the corresponding image pixel coordinate system points. The existing pixel coordinate extraction algorithms can reach a sub-pixel level; however, they treat each single pattern in one image as an independent individual, which makes it difficult to further improve extraction accuracy. In this paper, a novel method is proposed by utilizing the periodic arrangement characteristics of the calibration target pattern as a global constraint to improve the calibration accuracy. Based on a camera’s pinhole model, the intersection point of two fitted curves is used as an optimized pixel point to replace the initial one. Following the pixel coordinate optimization procedures, experiments were performed using real data from a 3D laser line scanner and a dynamic precision calibration target. Our results show that the relative errors of camera homography matrix elements obtained by the proposed optimization method were reduced compared with the commonly used method. The average coordinate measurement accuracy can be improved by nearly 0.05 mm. It is shown that the proposed optimization method can enhance the camera calibration accuracy, especially when the extracted pixels are of poorer precision.

Keywords

Camera calibration / Pixel coordinate optimization / Periodic arrangement characteristic / Intersection point / Concentric circle control point

References

[1] Tsai RY. A versatile camera calibration technique for high-accuracy 3D machine vision metrology using off-the-shelf TV cameras and lenses. IEEE J Robot Autom, 1987, 3: 323-344.

[2] Salvi J, Armangué X, Batlle J. A comparative review of camera calibrating methods with accuracy evaluation. Pattern Recogn, 2002, 35: 1617-1635.

[3] Heikkilä J. Geometric camera calibration using circular control points. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 2000, 22: 1066-1077.

[4] Mallon J, Whelan PF. Which pattern? Biasing aspects of planar calibration patterns and detection methods. Pattern Recogn Lett, 2007, 28: 921-930.

[5] Vo M, Wang ZY, Pan B, et al. Hyper-accurate flexible calibration technique for fringe-projection-based three-dimensional imaging. Opt Express, 2012, 20: 16926-16941.

[6] Sun W, Cooperstock JR. An empirical evaluation of factors influencing camera calibration accuracy using three publicly available techniques. Mach Vis Appl, 2006, 17: 51-67.

[7] Dutta A, Kar A, Chatterji BN. Corner detection algorithms for digital images in last three decades. IETE Tech Rev, 2008, 25: 123-133.

[8] Mühlich M, Aach T (2007) High accuracy feature detection for camera calibration: a multi-steerable approach. In: DAGM 2007, LNCS 4713: 284–293

[9] de la Escalera A, Armingol JM. Automatic chessboard detection for intrinsic and extrinsic camera parameter calibration. Sensors, 2010, 10: 2027-2044.

[10] Krüger L, Wöhler C. Accurate chequerboard corner localisation for camera calibration. Pattern Recogn Lett, 2011, 32: 1428-1435.

[11] Chu J, GuoLu Anzheng, Wang L. Chessboard corner detection under image physical coordinate. Opt Laser Technol, 2013, 48: 599-605.

[12] Luhmann T, Robson S, Kyle S, et al. Close range photogrammetry: principles, methods and applications, 2010, Dunbeath: Whittles Publishing.

[13] Chen XY, Hu Y, Ma Z, et al. The location and identification of concentric circles in automatic camera calibration. Opt Laser Technol, 2013, 54: 185-190.

[14] Heikkilä J. Moment and curvature preserving technique for accurate ellipse boundary detection. Pattern Recogn, 1998, 1: 734-737.

[15] Ouellet J-N, Hébert P. Precise ellipse estimation without contour point extraction. Mach Vis Appl, 2009, 21: 59-67.

[16] Zhou FQ, Cui Y, Peng B, et al. A novel optimization method of camera parameters used for vision measurement. Opt Laser Technol, 2012, 44: 1840-1849.

[17] Pérez Muñoz JC, Ortiz Alarcón CA, Osorio AF, et al. Environmental applications of camera images calibrated by means of the Levenberg–Marquardt method. Comput Geosci, 2013, 51: 74-82.

[18] Li YP, Tian QG, Zhang XY, et al. Multi-sensor synchronous calibration method for line laser human-body 3D scanner. Chin J Lasers, 2013, 40: 1008006 in Chinese)

[19] Tian QG, Yang YJ, Zhang XY et al (2013) Extraction of light stripe centerline based on self-adaptive thresholding and contour polygonal representation. In: 4th International conference on digital human modeling and applications in health, safety, ergonomics, and risk management. Las Vegas, USA

[20] Tian QG, Yang YJ, Zhang XY, et al. An experimental evaluation method for the performance of a laser line scanning system with multiple sensors. Opt Lasers Eng, 2014, 52: 241-249.