CFD prediction of mean flow field and impeller capacity for pitched blade turbine

Shengchao Qiao , Rijie Wang , Xiaoxia Yang , Yuefei Yan

Transactions of Tianjin University ›› 2015, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (3) : 250 -258.

PDF
Transactions of Tianjin University ›› 2015, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (3) : 250 -258. DOI: 10.1007/s12209-015-2408-x
Article

CFD prediction of mean flow field and impeller capacity for pitched blade turbine

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

This work focused on exploring a computational fluid dynamics(CFD)method to predict the macro-mixing characteristics including the mean flow field and impeller capacity for a 45° down-pumping pitched blade turbine( PBT)in stirred tanks. Firstly, the three typical mean flow fields were investigated by virtue of three components of liquid velocity. Then the effects of impeller diameter(D)and off-bottom clearance(C)on both the mean flow field and three global macro-mixing parameters concerning impeller capacity were studied in detail. The changes of flow patterns with increasing C/D were predicted from these effects. The simulation results are consistent with the experimental results in published literature.

Keywords

CFD simulation / PBT / stirred tank / flow field / pumping capacity

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Shengchao Qiao, Rijie Wang, Xiaoxia Yang, Yuefei Yan. CFD prediction of mean flow field and impeller capacity for pitched blade turbine. Transactions of Tianjin University, 2015, 21(3): 250-258 DOI:10.1007/s12209-015-2408-x

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Ali A M, Yuan H H S, Dickey D S, et al. Liquid dispersion mechanisms in agitated tanks (part I): Pitched blade turbine[J]. Chemical Engineering Communications, 1981, 10(4/5): 205-213.

[2]

Khopkar A R, Aubin J, Xuereb C. Gas-liquid flow generated by a pitched-blade turbine: Particle image velocimetry measurements and computational fluid dynamics simulations[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2003, 42(21): 5318-5332.

[3]

Sharma R N, Shaikh A A. Solid suspension in stirred tanks with pitched blade turbines [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2003, 58(10): 2123-2140.

[4]

Chen J, Xiao W. Solids suspension study in a side-entering stirred tank through CFD modeling[J]. International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, 2013, 11(1): 331-346.

[5]

Aubin J, Mavros P, Fletcher D F, et al. Effect of axial agitator configuration(up-pumping, down-pumping, reverse rotation) on flow patterns generated in stirred vessels[J]. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2001, 79(8): 845-856.

[6]

Ranade V V, Joshi J B. Flow generated by pitched blade turbines I: Measurements using laser Doppler anemometer[J]. Chemical Engineering Communications, 1989, 81(1): 197-224.

[7]

Rewatkar V B, Joshi J B. Effect of impeller design on liquid phase mixing in mechanically agitated reactors[J]. Chemical Engineering Communications, 1991, 102(1): 1-33.

[8]

Kresta S M, Wood P E. The mean flow field produced by a 45o pitched blade turbine: Changes in the circulation pattern due to off-bottom clearance[J]. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 1993, 71(1): 42-53.

[9]

Mao D, Feng L, Wang K, et al. The mean flow field generated by a pitched blade turbine: Changes in the circulation pattern due to impeller geometry[J]. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 1997, 75(2): 307-316.

[10]

Delafosse A, Line A, Morchain J, et al. LES and URANS simulations of hydrodynamics in mixing tank: Comparison to PIV experiments[J]. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2008, 86(12): 1322-1330.

[11]

Murthy N B, Joshi J B. Assessment of standard k-ɛ, RSM and LES turbulence models in a baffled stirred vessel agitated by various impeller designs[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2008, 63(22): 5468-5495.

[12]

Aubin J, Fletcher D F, Xuereb C. Modeling turbulent flow in stirred tanks with CFD: The influence of the modeling approach, turbulence mode and numerical scheme[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2004, 28(5): 431-445.

[13]

Deglon D A, Meyer C J. CFD modelling of stirred tanks: Numerical considerations[J]. Minerals Engineering, 2006, 19(10): 1059-1068.

[14]

Coroneo M, Montante G, Paglianti A, et al. CFD prediction of fluid flow and mixing in stirred tanks: Numerical issues about the RANS simulations[J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2011, 35(10): 1959-1968.

[15]

Jaworski Z, Dyster K N, Nienow A W. The effect of size, location and pumping direction of pitched blade turbine impellers on flow patterns: LDA measurements and CFD predictions[J]. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2001, 79(8): 887-894.

[16]

Rahimi M, Parvareh A. Experimental and CFD investigation on mixing by a jet in a semi-industrial stirred tank[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2005, 115(1/2): 85-92.

[17]

Ranade V V. Computational Flow Modelling for Chemical Reactor Engineering[M], 2002, New York: Academic Press.

[18]

Khazam O, Kresta S M. Mechanisms of solids drawdown in stirred tanks[J]. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2008, 86(4): 622-634.

[19]

Chen T, Wang L, Wu D, et al. Investigation of the mechanism of low-density particle and liquid mixing process in a stirred vessel[J]. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2012, 90(4): 925-935.

[20]

Rewatkar V B, Raghava K S M S, Joshi J B. Power consumption in mechanically agitated contactors using pitched bladed turbine impellers[J]. Chemical Engineering Communications, 1990, 88(1): 69-90.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

107

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/