Methanethiol removal from biogas by biological conversion in an anaerobic biotrickling filter

Abstract

In this study, methanethiol(MT)-degradation bacteria were cultivated by using MT, methanol and trimethylamine as carbon sources under anaerobic conditions. It was found that the batch bacteria used MT and methanol as carbon sources grew faster than those used trimethylamine. The enriched bacteria used MT and methanol as the carbon sources were respectively inoculated in different biotrickling filters. The biological conversion performance of MT under anaerobic conditions was investigated in biotrickling filters. The results showed that the performance of the biotrickling filter inoculated with the bacteria enriched using MT was better than that inoculated with the bacteria enriched using methanol. When the inlet concentration of MT was 0.005vol%(50,ppm), the empty bed residence time was 50 s, pH value was 8.0, and the flow rate of the nutrient solution was 10 L/h, the removal efficiency of MT reached 95.3%. Adding methanol stimulated the growth of the biomass and the degradation of MT, but caused that some bacteria only degrading methanol outcompeted the bacteria only degrading MT. The concentration of sodium bicarbonate in the nutrient solution needed to be controlled lower than 30 g/L, otherwise, it would be harmful to the degradation of MT.

Keywords

methanethiol / degradation / biotrickling filter / methanol / sodium bicarbonate

References

[1] Rasi S, Veijanen A, Rintala J. Trace compounds of biogas from different biogas production plants [J]. Energy, 2007, 32(8): 1375-1380.

[2] van den Bosch P L F, de Graaff M, Fortuny-Picornell M, et al. Inhibition of microbiological sulfide oxidation by methanethiol and dimethyl polysulfides at natron-alkaline conditions [J]. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2009, 83(3): 579-587.

[3] Lomans B P, Maas R, Luderer R, op den Camp H J M, et al. Isolation and characterization of Methanomethylovorans hollandica gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from freshwater sediment, a methylotrophic methanogen able to grow on dimethyl sulfide and methanethiol [J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1999, 65(8): 3641-3650.

[4] Simankova M V, Kotsyurbenko O R, Lueders T, et al. Isolation and characterization of new strains of methanogens from cold terrestrial habitats [J]. Syst Appl Microbiol, 2003, 26(2): 312-318.

[5] Ni S, Boone D R. Biogeochemistry of Global Change: Catabolism of Dimethylsulfide and Methanethiol by Methylotrophic Methanogens [M], 1993, New York: Springer Publishing Company.

[6] Sipma J, Janssen A J H, Hulshoff-Pol L W, et al. Development of a novel process for the biological conversion of H₂S and methanethiol to elemental sulfur [J]. Biotechnol Bioeng, 2003, 82(1): 1-11.

[7] Janssen A J H, Ma S C, Lens P, et al. Performance of a sulfide-oxidizing expanded-bed reactor supplied with dissolved oxygen [J]. Biotechnol Bioeng, 1997, 53(1): 32-40.

[8] Janssen A J H, Sleyster R, van der Kaa C, et al. Biological sulphide oxidation in a fed-batch reactor [J]. Biotechnol Bioeng, 1995, 47(3): 327-333.

[9] Bentley R, Chasteen T G. Environmental VOSCs-formation and degradation of dimethyl sulfide, methanethiol and related materials [J]. Chemosphere, 2004, 55(3): 291-317.

[10] Sipma J, Svitelskaya A, van der Mark B, et al. Potentials of biological oxidation processes for the treatment of spent sulfidic caustics containing thiols [J]. Water Res, 2004, 38(20): 4331-4340.

[11] Finster K, Tanimoto Y, Bak F. Fermentation of methanethiol and dimethylsulfide by a newly isolated methanogenic bacterium [J]. Arch Microbiol, 1992, 157(5): 425-430.

[12] Zhang C Z, Zhang W J, Xu J. Isolation and identification of methanethiol-utilizing bacterium CZ05 and its application in bio-trickling filter of biogas [J]. Bioresour Technol, 2013, 150: 338-343.