IDMI analysis of regional low-carbon development based on system dynamic simulation

Abstract

During the decision-making process, especially in multi-disciplinary complex cases, assessment technique is needed to assist policy-makers in making the right decision. Many of such assessment techniques have been developed for policy-makers, but the inevitable subjectivity of policy-makers often becomes the main obstacle in making the right or proper policy. Interlink decision-making index (IDMI) is a newly proposed assessment method with the advantages of being simple to use and having less human interference over other methods, as it does not require a weighting process of each selection criterion. This paper implements IDMI to assist with decision-making in national or regional low-carbon development, using China as a case study. The Chinese government has announced its carbon emission reduction target along with other development targets by 2020. Many policy settings can be chosen in order to achieve those targets. The problem is how to determine the best setting and the means by which decision-makers can avoid subjectivity and extremes. A number of policy setting options are generated carefully by a system dynamic model under different policy scenarios. The IDMI demonstrates a perfect way to assist in selecting the “best” among all the options that can achieve the goals within the acceptable range.

Keywords

IDMI / decision-making / low-carbon economy / system dynamics

References

[1] Harris R. Introduction to Decision-Making [EB/OL]. http://www.virtualsalt.com/crebook5.htm. 2012-09.

[2] Linstone H A, Turoff M. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications[M]. 1975, USA: Adison-Wesley.

[3] Kim K K, O’Bryan C A, Crandall P G, et al. Identifying baseline food safety training practices for retail delis using the Delphi expert consensus method [J]. Food Control, 2013, 32(1): 55-62.

[4] Simon Herbert A. The New Science of Management Decision[M]. 1977, NJ: Prentice Hall PTR Upper Saddle River.

[5] Doukas H. Modelling of linguistic variables in multicriteria energy policy support [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 227(2): 227-238.

[6] Marta H, Enrique R. Review of combined approaches and multi-criteria analysis for corporate environmental evaluation [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2013, 39, 355-371.

[7] Nemhauser G L, Rinnooy Kan A H G, Todd M. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Optimization[M]. 1989, Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Inc..

[8] Steuer R E. Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation and Application[M]. 1986, USA: Wiley.

[9] Plous S. The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making[M]. 1993, USA: The Mcgraw-Hill Companies.

[10] Drake R A. Processing persuasive arguments(2): Discounting of truth and relevance as a function of agreement and manipulated activation asymmetry [J]. Journal of Research in Personality, 1993, 27(2): 184-196.

[11] Turner M E, Pratkanis A R. Twenty-five years of groupthink theory and research: Lessons from the evaluation of a theory [J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1998, 73(2/3): 105-115.

[12] Tulving E, Schacter D L, Stark H A. Priming effects in word fragment completion are independent of recognition memory [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 1982, 8(4): 336-342.

[13] Wang J, Jing Y, Zhang C, et al. Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2009, 13(9): 2263-2278.

[14] Wang Jianqiang. Overview on fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach [J]. Control and Decision, 2013, 23(6): 601-606.

[15] Hu E, Abley W, Zou L. Environmental related decision making using the interlink decision making index (IDMI) [J]. International Journal of Environment and Waste Management, 2008, 2(3): 257-266.

[16] Belton V, Stewart T J. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach [M]. 2002, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

[17] Stewart T J. Decision-making approaches[C]. Encyclopedia of Information Systems, 2003, USA: Academic Press.

[18] Wang H, Xue Huifeng. System dynamic modeling on energy consumption: In case of Shanxi Province [J]. System Simulation Technology, 2010, 6(2): 158-163.

[19] Hu E, Zou L, Craig L. A new interlink decision making index for making multi-criteria decisions [J]. The Australian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, 2004, 4(2): 33-42.

[20] Sterman J D. Businuss Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World[M]. 2000, USA: The McGraw-Hill Companies.

[21] Jiang Jinhe. An evaluation and decomposition analysis of carbon emissions in China [J]. Resources Science, 2011, 33(4): 597-604.

[22] Hanley N. Are there environmental limits to cost benefit analysis [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 1992, 2(1): 33-59.