Impact of removal of city gas subsidies on Chinese urban residents

Hua Liao , Zhishuang Zhu , Lu Wang

Transactions of Tianjin University ›› 2012, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (4) : 309 -314.

PDF
Transactions of Tianjin University ›› 2012, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (4) : 309 -314. DOI: 10.1007/s12209-012-1944-x
Article

Impact of removal of city gas subsidies on Chinese urban residents

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The current cost-plus natural gas pricing mechanism makes the gas price too low, resulting in a lot of consumer-side subsidies and over-consumed natural gas. This paper applies the price-gap approach and input-output analysis technology to quantitatively analyze both the direct and indirect effects on urban residents under the condition that natural gas subsidies are cancelled in China in 2007. It is shown that the gas price will increase by 33.3%–41.6%, and the residential consumption expenditure by 0.26%–0.33%. The low-income groups are mostly affected, so different subsidies should be implemented to make subsidies more efficient.

Keywords

price subsidies / price-gap approach / input-output analysis technology

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Hua Liao, Zhishuang Zhu, Lu Wang. Impact of removal of city gas subsidies on Chinese urban residents. Transactions of Tianjin University, 2012, 18(4): 309-314 DOI:10.1007/s12209-012-1944-x

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

BP. Statistical Review of World Energy[M]. London, UK, 2011.

[2]

OECD. Improving the Environment Through Reducing Subsidies[M]. 1998, Paris, France: OECD.

[3]

IEA. World Energy Outlook 1999[M]. 1999, Paris, France: IEA.

[4]

Li H. Fossil energy subsidies and carbon reduction: Summary of the theoretical methods to measure the scale of energy subsidies and empirical analysis [J]. Economic Perspectives, 2011, 3, 92-96.

[5]

Lin B. Q., Jiang Z. J. Estimates of energy subsidies in China and impact of energy subsidy reform [J]. Energy Economics, 2011, 33(2): 273 283

[6]

IEA. World Energy Outlook 2006[M]. 2006, Paris, France: IEA.

[7]

IEA. World Energy Outlook 2008[M]. 2008, Paris, France: IEA.

[8]

Nwachukwu M. U., Chike H. Fuel subsidy in Nigeria: Fact or fallacy[J]. Energy, 2011, 36(5): 2796-2801.

[9]

Kebede B. Energy subsidies and costs in urban Ethiopia: The cases of kerosene and electricity[J]. Renewable Energy, 2006, 31(13): 2140-2151.

[10]

Bushehri M. A. M., Wohlgenant M. K. Measuring the welfare effects of reducing a subsidy on a commodity using micromodels: An application to Kuwait’s residential demand for electricity[J]. Energy Economics, 2012, 34(2): 419-425.

[11]

Lin B Q, Jiang Z J, Lin J. The analysis and design of China’s residential electricity tariff subsidies[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2009 (11): 1–18 (in Chinese).

[12]

Li H, Dong L, Xie M H. A study on the comprehensive evaluation and optimization of how removing gas and electricity subsidies would affect households’ living[J]. Economic Research, 2011 (2): 100–112 (in Chinese).

[13]

National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Energy Statistical Yearbook 2008[M]. 2008, Beijing: China Statistics Press.

[14]

Wang Y C, Wang J, Zheng B et al. China and Turkmenistan Signed a Large Gas Import Contract[EB/OL]. http://www.cs.com.cn/xwzx/05/201111/t20111128_3145460.html, 2011-11-28(in Chinese).

[15]

Wang G. L. Research and Practice of Natural Gas Pricing[M]. 2007, Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press.

[16]

National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Statistical Yearbook 2008[M]. 2008, Beijing: China Statistics Press.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

188

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/