Single-frequency matching pursuits based time-of-flight measurement in viscoacoustic medium

Xiangli Shen , Yi Shen , Naizhang Feng , Jing Jin , Mingjian Sun

Transactions of Tianjin University ›› 2011, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (5) : 356 -361.

PDF
Transactions of Tianjin University ›› 2011, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (5) : 356 -361. DOI: 10.1007/s12209-011-1634-0
Article

Single-frequency matching pursuits based time-of-flight measurement in viscoacoustic medium

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Broadband ultrasound signals will produce distortion in viscoacoustic medium, which may influence the accuracy of time-of-flight (TOF) measurement. Under the condition of single-frequency acoustic source, the wave propagation process in viscoacoustic medium was analyzed and an approximate solution of the wave propagation was given. Instances of broadband ultrasound were analyzed and simulated based on the single-frequency results. A single-frequency matching pursuits (SFMP) algorithm was then introduced to solve the waveform distortion problem. Time-frequency decomposition was applied to extracting the single-frequency compositions from broadband ultrasound signals, and then these compositions were sent to the matching pursuits (MP) algorithm for calculating the TOF parameters. Compared with the broadband signals, the shapes of extracted single-frequency signals change more slightly as distance and attenuation coefficient increase. The residuals of SFMP were far less than those of MP algorithm. Experimental results show that the SFMP algorithm is able to eliminate waveform distortion of broadband ultrasound in viscoacoustic medium, which helps improve the accuracy of TOF measurement.

Keywords

matching pursuit / single-frequency / time-of-flight / ultrasound absorption / viscosity

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xiangli Shen, Yi Shen, Naizhang Feng, Jing Jin, Mingjian Sun. Single-frequency matching pursuits based time-of-flight measurement in viscoacoustic medium. Transactions of Tianjin University, 2011, 17(5): 356-361 DOI:10.1007/s12209-011-1634-0

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Pan X. C., Sidky E. Y., Vannier M. Why do commercial CT scanners still employ traditional, filtered back-projection for image reconstruction?[J]. Inverse Problems, 2009, 25(12): 123009.

[2]

Brenner D. J., Hall E. J. Computed tomography—An increasing source of radiation exposure[J]. New England Journal of Medicine, 2007, 357(22): 2277-2284.

[3]

Mozumdar B C. The control of radiation exposure from CT scans[J]. The Internet Journal of Radiology, 2003, 3(1).

[4]

Littrup P. J., Duric N., Azevedo S., et al. Computerized ultrasound risk evaluation (CURE) system: Development of combined transmission and reflection ultrasound with new reconstruction algorithms for breast imaging[J]. Acoustical Imaging, 2002, 26, 175-182.

[5]

Goossens L., Vanderoost J., Jaecques S., et al. The correlation between the SOS in trabecular bone and stiffness and density studied by finite-element analysis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, 2008, 55(6): 1234-1242.

[6]

Langton C. M., Njeh C. F. The measurement of broadband ultrasonic attenuation in cancellous bone—A review of the science and technology[J]. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, 2008, 55(7): 1546-1554.

[7]

Greenleaf J F, Johnson S A, Lee S L et al. Algebraic reconstruction of spatial distributions of acoustic absorption within tissue from their two-dimensional acoustic projections[C]. In: The 5th International Symposium on Acoustical Holography and Imaging. Palo Alto, California, USA, 1974. 591–603.

[8]

Opielinski K. J., Gudra T. Multi-parameter ultrasound transmission tomography of biological media[J]. Ultrasonics, 2006, 44(Suppl1): 295-302.

[9]

Kalender W. A. Computed Tomography: Fundamentals, System Technology, Image Quality, Applications[M]. 2006, USA: John Wiley & Sons.

[10]

Svilainis L., Dumbrava V. Analysis of the interpolation techniques for time-of-flight estimation[J]. Ultragarsas (Ultrasound), 2008, 63(4): 25-29.

[11]

Hammad A., Hafez A., Elewa M. T. A LabVIEW based experimental platform for ultrasonic range measurements [J]. DSP Journal, 2007, 6(2): 1-8.

[12]

Jeong M. K., Kwon S. J. Multimode ultrasound breast imaging using a new array transducer configuration[J]. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 2010, 36(4): 637-646.

[13]

Shen Xiangli, Shen Yi, Wang Qiang et al. Non-linear matching pursuits and its application in bone mineral measurement[C]. In: International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC 2010). Austin, TX, USA, 2010. 871–875.

[14]

Demirli R., Saniie J. Model-based estimation of ultrasonic echoes (Part I): Analysis and algorithms[J]. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, 2001, 48(3): 787-802.

[15]

Marmarelis V Z, Kim T S, Shehada R E N. High-resolution ultrasound transmission tomography[C]. In: Medical Imaging 2003: Ultrasonic Imaging and Signal Processing. San Diego, CA, USA, 2003. 33–40.

[16]

Jensen J A, Gandhi D, O’Brien W D. Ultrasound fields in an attenuating medium[C]. In: IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium 1993. Baltimore, MD, USA, 1993. 943–946.

[17]

Treeby B. E., Cox B. T. k-Wave: MATLAB toolbox for the simulation and reconstruction of photoacoustic wave fields [J]. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 2010, 15(2): 021314

[18]

Mallat S. G. Zhang Zhifeng. Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 1993, 41(12): 3397-3415.

[19]

Auger F., Flandrin P. Improving the readability of timefrequency and time-scale representations by the reassignment method[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 1995, 43(5): 1068-1089.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

114

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/