Bridge pressure flow scour at clear water threshold condition

Abstract

Bridge pressure flow scour at clear water threshold condition is studied theoretically and experimentally. The flume experiments reveal that the measured scour profiles under a bridge are more or less 2-dimensional; all the measured scour profiles can be described by two similarity equations, where the horizontal distance is scaled by the deck width while the local scour by the maximum scour depth; the maximum scour position is located just under the bridge about 15% deck width from the downstream deck edge; the scour begins at about one deck width upstream the bridge while the deposition occurs at about 2.5 deck widths downstream the bridge; and the maximum scour depth decreases with increasing sediment size, but increases with deck inundation. The theoretical analysis shows that: bridge scour can be divided into three cases, i.e. downstream unsubmerged, partially submerged, and totally submerged. For downstream unsubmerged flows, the maximum bridge scour depth is an open-channel problem where the conventional methods in terms of critical velocity or bed shear stress can be applied; for partially and totally submerged flows, the equilibrium maximum scour depth can be described by a scour and an inundation similarity number, which has been confirmed by experiments with two decks and two sediment sizes. For application, a design and field evaluation procedure with examples is presented, including the maximum scour depth and scour profile.

Keywords

bridge decks / bridge design / bridge foundations / bridge hydraulics / bridge inundation / bridge scour / pressure flows / pressure scour / submerged flows

References

[1] Arneson L. A., Abt S. R. Vertical contraction scour at bridges with water flowing under pressure conditions[J]. Transportation Research Record, 1998, 1647 10-17.

[2] Umbrell E. R., Young G. K., Stein S. M., et al. Clear-water contraction scour under bridges in pressure flow[J]. J Hydraul Engrg, 1998, 124(2): 236-240.

[3] Lyn D. A. Pressure-flow scour: A re-examination of the HEC-18 equation[J]. J Hydraul Engrg, 2008, 134(7): 1015-1020.

[4] Richardson E. V., Davis S. R. Evaluation Scour at Bridges[R]. 2001 4 Washing D C: U S Dept of Transp.

[5] Arneson L. A. The Effects of Pressure Flow on Local Scour in Bridge Openings[D]. 1997, Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University.

[6] http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/research/lab.cfm, April, 2009.

[7] Neill C. R. Guide to Bridge Hydraulics[M]. 1973, Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.

[8] Picek T., Havlik A., Mattas D., et al. Hydraulic calculation of bridges at high water stages[J]. J Hydraul Res, 2007, 45(3): 400-406.

[9] Guo J. Basic Laws of Sediment Transport[R]. 1990, Taiyuan, Shanxi: Shanxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation.

[10] Guo J. Discussion: Albert shields story[J]. J Hydraul Engrg, 1997, 123(7): 666.

[11] Guo J. Hunter Rouse and Shields Diagram[C] Proc 13th IAHR-APD Congress, 2002, 2 1096-1098.

[12] Jones J. S., Kerenyi K., Stein S. Effects of Inlet Geometry on Hydraulic Performance of Box Culverts[R]. 2006, Washington DC: US Dept of Transp.

[13] Young D F, Munson B R, Okiishi T H et al. A Brief Introduction to Fluid Mechanics[M]. 4th Edition. John Wiley and Sons, 2007.