Mitigation of blast effects on aluminum foam protected masonry walls

Yu Su , Chengqing Wu , Mike Griffith

Transactions of Tianjin University ›› 2008, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (Suppl 1) : 558 -562.

PDF
Transactions of Tianjin University ›› 2008, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (Suppl 1) : 558 -562. DOI: 10.1007/s12209-008-0096-5
Article

Mitigation of blast effects on aluminum foam protected masonry walls

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Terrorist attacks using improvised explosive devices (IED) can result in unreinforced masonry (URM) wall collapse. Protecting URM wall from IED attack is very complicated. An effective solution to mitigate blast effects on URM wall is to retrofit URM walls with metallic foam sheets to absorb blast energy. However, mitigation of blast effects on metallic foam protected URM walls is currently in their infancy in the world. In this paper, numerical models are used to simulate the performance of aluminum foam protected URM walls subjected to blast loads. A distinctive model, in which mortar and brick units of masonry are discritized individually, is used to model the performance of masonry and the contact between the masonry and steel face-sheet of aluminum foam is modelled using the interface element model. The aluminum foam is modelled by a nonlinear elastoplastic material model. The material models for masonry, aluminum foam and interface are then coded into a finite element program LS-DYNA3D to perform the numerical calculations of response and damage of aluminum foam protected URM walls under airblast loads. Discussion is made on the effectiveness of the aluminum foam protected system for URM wall against blast loads.

Keywords

mitigation / blast loads / aluminium foam / masonry

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yu Su, Chengqing Wu, Mike Griffith. Mitigation of blast effects on aluminum foam protected masonry walls. Transactions of Tianjin University, 2008, 14(Suppl 1): 558-562 DOI:10.1007/s12209-008-0096-5

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Davidson J. S., Fisher J. W., Hammons M. I., et al. Failure mechanisms of polymer-reinforced concrete masonry walls subjected to blast[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2005, 131(8): 1194-1205.

[2]

Buchan P. A., Chen J. F.. Blast resistance of FRP composites and polymer strengthened concrete and masonry structures: A state-of-the-art review[J]. Composites Part B-Engineering, 2007, 38(5/6): 509-522.

[3]

Schenker A., Anteby I., Nizri B., et al. Foam-protected reinforced concrete structures under impact: Experimental and numerical studies[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2005, 131(8): 1233-1242.

[4]

Davidson J. S., Porter J. R., Dinan R. J., et al. Explosive testing of polymer retrofit masonry walls[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, ASCE, 2004, 18(2): 100-106.

[5]

Myers J. J., Belarbi A.. Blast resistance of FRP retrofitted un-reinforced masonry (URM) walls with and without arching action[J]. TMS Journal, 2004, 22(1): 9-27.

[6]

Eamon C. D., Baylot J. T., O’Daniel J. L.. Modeling concrete masonry walls subjected to explosive loads[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 2004, 130(9): 1098-1106.

[7]

Schenker A., Anteby I., Gal E., et al. Full-scale field tests of concrete slabs subjected to blast loads[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2008, 35(3): 184-198.

[8]

Department of Defence Structures to Resist the Effect of Accidental Explosions, 1990, Washington DC: US Department of the Army, Navy and Air Force Technical Manual, TM-5-1300.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

189

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/