Collaborative Ecological Regeneration—An Adaptable Toolkit for Reviving Ecological Infrastructures With Case Study on Beijing's Practices

Abstract

In the background of developing sustainable cities worldwide, Beijing aims at "a harmonious and livable city" with Master Plan of Beijing (2016–2035) based on Ecological Security Patterns and a series of renewal projects on ecological infrastructure in the central city. Based on Ecological Urbanism, this study pointed out such practices can help link this green vision to individuals' actions. The theoretical lens consists of environmental, social and mental ecology, and provides triad indicators for regenerative ecological practices—restore ecological infrastructure, revive neighborhoods, rebuild social-environmental bond. Critical evaluation of an exemplar—Shougang Industry Services Park project revealed gaps on relating landscape with users' engagement and individuals' everyday actions. An evolved practice model—"collaborative ecological regeneration" was proposed, to integrate intermediary landscapes transformation with participation. It is supported by an adaptable toolkit including strategies on three aspects to care for EI components, form inclusive social collaboration and raise environmental awareness. The key tool "Urban Prototypes" can connect tactics across layers, conceptualize previous practices, and link to future ones, with proposed application to Beijing inner-city practices setting a few examples. This new mode indicates an open-ended regeneration process, while Urban Prototypes could be adapted to urban dynamics and stakeholders' desires.

● Urban renewal practices can help link Beijing’s green vision to individuals’ actions

● Collaborative ecological regeneration process can build a set of relations reviving natural and social communities

● The toolkit provides strategies to restore ecological infrastructure, revive neighborhoods, and rebuild socio-environmental bond

● Urban prototypes draw how intermediary landscapes transformation can combine with public participation

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Urban Regeneration / Ecological Infrastructure / Collaborative Ecological Regeneration / Inclusive Social Collaboration / Socio-Environmental Bond / Urban Prototypes / Public Participation / Shougang Industry Services Park

References

[1] United Nations. (n. d.). World urbanization prospects 2018.

[2] Revi, A., Satterthwaite, D. E., Aragón-Durand, F., Corfee-Morlot, J., Kiunsi, R. B. R., Pelling, M., Roberts, D. C., & Solecki, W. (2014). Urban Areas. In: C. B. Field, V. R. Barros, D. J. Dokken, K. J. Mach, M. D. Mastrandrea, T. E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K. L. Ebi, Y. O. Estrada, R. C. Genova, B. Girma, E. S. Kissel, A. N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P. R. Mastrandrea, & L. L. White (Eds.), Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 535–612). Cambridge University Press.

[3] United Nations. (n. d.). Sustainable development goals.

[4] Kossak, F. (2018). Strategien für Kreuzberg: Relocating the Urban Regeneration Debates in the Neighbourhood. In: M. Theordorou, & A. Katsakou (Eds.), Experimenting With & Within Architecture Competitions (pp. 181–189). RIBA Publishing.

[5] Lee, I. T. (2011). The role of green infrastructure in urban regeneration: A case study from Taipei [Doctoral dissertation]. The University of Manchester.

[6] McHarg, I. L. (1992). Design With Nature. Wiley.

[7] Mostafavi, M. (2016). Why Ecological Urbanism? Why Now? In: M. Mostafavi, & G. Doherty (Eds.), Ecological Urbanism (pp. 12–53). Harvard University Graduate School of Design with Lars Müller Publishers.

[8] Han, L., Zhang, M., & Shi, L. (2019). Definition, connotation and research progress on ecosystem services of ecological infrastructure. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(19), 7311– 7321.

[9] Orff, K. (2016). Toward an Urban Ecology, The Monacelli Press

[10] Tisma, A., & Meijer, J. (2018). Integral landscape planning in the Netherlands: Lessons learned from the intentions and consequences. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, (217), 269– 280.

[11] Lin, Z. (2018). Ecological urbanism in East Asia: A comparative assessment of two eco-cities in Japan and China. Landscape and Urban Planning, (179), 90– 102.

[12] Hansen, M. H., Li, H., & Svarverud, R. (2018). Ecological civilization: Interpreting the Chinese past, projecting the global future. Global Environmental Change, (53), 195– 203.

[13] Yu, K., Wang, S., & Li, D. (2011). The negative approach to urban growth planning of Beijing, China. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54(9), 1209– 1236.

[15] Till, J. (2008). Three myths and one model. Building Material, (17), 4– 10.

[16] Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications.

[17] Abrams, J., & Hall, P. (Eds.). (2006). Else/Where: Mapping: New Cartographies of Networks and Territories. University of Minnesota Design Institute.

[18] Fielding, N., Lee, R. M., & Blank, G.. (2008). The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods. SAGE.

[19] Bunschoten, R.. (2016). Urban Prototypes. In: M. Mostafavi, & G. Doherty (Eds.), Ecological Urbanism (pp. 626–631). Harvard University Graduate School of Design with Lars Müller Publishers.

[20] Wates, N.. (2014). The Community Planning Handbook: How People Can Shape Their Cities, Towns & Villages in Any Part of the World (2nd ed.). Earthscan/Routledge.

[21] Guattari, F.. (2000). The Three Ecologies. Athlone.

[22] Steiner, F. (2011). Landscape ecological urbanism: Origins and trajectories. Landscape and Urban Planning, (100), 333– 337.

[23] Waldheim, C. (2006). The Landscape Urbanism Reader, Princeton Architectural Press

[24] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (Ed.). (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being. Island Press.

[25] Venart, C. A. S. (2014). Ecology as a Framework for a Design Methodology. In: A. Kimm, & J. Choi (Eds.), Open Cities: The New Post-Industrial World Order. Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture.

[26] Forman, R. T. T. (2016). Urban Ecological and the Arrangement of Nature in Urban Regions. In: M. Mostafavi, & G. Doherty (Eds.), Ecological Urbanism (pp. 328–337). Harvard University Graduate School of Design with Lars Müller Publishers.

[27] Dovey, K.. (2016). Urban Design Thinking: A Conceptual Toolki. Bloomsbury Academic.

[28] Beijing Municipal Bureau of Statistics, & NBS Survey Office in Beijing. (2021). Beijing statistical yearbook 2021.

[29] Li, X. (2020). Identifying urban flood regulation priority areas in Beijing based on an ecosystem services approach. Sustainability, 12(6), 2297

[30] Li, B. (2020). On the patterns of changes in Shougang industrial landscape (1919-2019). Chinese Landscape Architecture, 36(3), 15– 20.

[31] Wu, C., Jin, H., Bai, N., Zhou, T., & Bai, C. (2020). The exploration of urban character evaluation and guidelines in Shougang project—A methodology for the development and transformation of large scale industrial heritage. Beijing Planning Review, (2), 170– 178.

[32] C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group. (2016, June 8). New Beijing project first in China to be accepted into C40's Climate Positive Development Programme.

[33] Arup. (n. d.). Shaping China's first Climate Positive project.

[34] Beijing Municipal Commission of Planning and Natural Resources. (2011, August 16). Adoption of opinions collected during public consultation of Shougang Industry Services Park master plan.

[35] Zhu, W., Wu, W., & Wu, C. (2016). Analysis on architectural forms of existing buildings of Shougang Group District, Beijing. Urban Design, (5), 68– 83.

[36] Zhu, Y., & Meng, F. (2016). Potential and strategies of urban open space transforming in BCIW. Urban Environment Design, (2), 127– 133.

[37] Peng, Z., Deng, L., & Chang, J. (2023). Exploring ecological resources value improvement mode on river basin scale—A case study on Yongding River restoration project. China Ecological Civilization, (Z1), 68– 74.

[38] Tian, J., Lu, H., & Zhu, Y. (2022). Culture & green, heritage of the Olympic Winter Games Beijing 2022—Winter Olympic landscape construction practice from Shougang to Chongli. Urban Architecture Space, 29(2), 28– 33.

[39] Petrescu, D., & Petcou, C. (2020). Resilience value in the face of climate change. Architectural Design, 90(4), 30– 37.

[40] Promotional Centre of Beijing Municipal Bureau of Culture and Tourism. (n. d.). Beijing 2022 Internet-popular Spots Recommended List.

[41] The People's Government of Beijing Municipality. (2019, February 14). Action Plans to accelerate the construction process of Shougang Industry Services Park and to make a new landmark of capital regeneration (2019-2021).

[42] School of Life Science, Peking University. (2016, December 8). Achievements in participating conference on biology field trip exchange between universities in Beijing.

[43] Beijing Daily. (2019, March 11). Arbor Day: 18 places for tree-planting in Beijing.

[44] Dashilar. (2018, December 5). Yangmeizhu Street: Urban regeneration under sustainable development.

[45] Beijing Daily. (2023, October 18). Agriculture going into urban communities: A new public space beside Xueyuan Road.

[46] Atelier d'Architecture Autogérée, & Association ECObox. (n. d.). Ecobox.

[47] Awan N., Schneider T., & Till J.. (2020). Spatial Agency: Other Ways of Doing Architecture. Routledge

[48] Sasaki Associates. (n. d.). Greenwood Community Park master plan and implementation.

Acknowledgements

● China Architecture Design & Research Group Youth Science and Technology Fund (No. 1100C080220283)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 Higher Education Press 2023