Mapping Landscape Architects’ Expertise in Climate Adaptation With Design Research Projects Over the Past Two Decades

Abstract

This article maps out landscape architects’ expertise in multidisciplinary, comprehensive climate adaptation discourse. Systemic frameworks and process-driven approaches in contemporary Landscape Architecture discipline can become a powerful tool for harnessing unprecedented solidarity for climate actions across fields. However, landscape expertise is still largely ignored or marginalized in real-life climate discourse dominated by policymakers, scientists, and engineers. This study addresses this gap in understanding landscape expertise through design research projects over the past two decades. The article theorizes a body of landscape architecture projects in the past two decades, and proposes three terms—spatialize, synthesize, and speculate—for describing the landscape expertise in multidisciplinary, comprehensive climate adaptation projects. „Spatialize” refers to landscape architects’ capacity to construct knowledge through strategically displaying „data” through critical cartography. „Synthesize” is the ability to envision multispecies entanglement by combining cultural, ecological, historical, biological, and political lenses through material practices. „Speculate” means to understand landscape design as a long-term practice with repeated operations, and, thus, to design is to deploy a speculative framework that generates knowledge through practice.

Keywords

Climate Change / Landscape Architecture / Interactional Expertise / Landscape Expertise / Cartography / Multispecies Entanglement / Speculation

References

[1] Morton, T. (2013). Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology After the End of the World. University of Minnesota Press.

[2] Fleming, B. (2019). Design and the green new deal. Places Journal.

[3] Gorman, M. E., Zhang, Z., Fauss, K. D., & Bowes, B. D. (2019). Collaboration Among Apparently Incommensurable Expertises: A Case Study of Combining Expertises and Perspectives to Manage Climate Change in Coastal Virginia. In D. S. Caudill, S. N. Conley, M. E. Gorman, & M. Weinel (Eds.), The Third Wave in Science and Technology Studies: Future Research Directions on Expertise and Experience (pp. 255-272). Palgrave Macmillan.

[4] Gorman, M. E. (Ed.). (2010). Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise: Creating New Kinds of Collaboration. MIT Press.

[5] Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2002). The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science, 32(2), 235-296.

[6] Meyer, E. K. (1992). Situating Modern Landscape Architecture. In S. R. Swaffield (Ed.), Theory in Landscape Architecture: A Reader (pp. 21-31). University of Pennsylvania Press.

[7] Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). (B. Massumi, Trans.). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1980)

[8] DeLanda, M. (2016). Assemblage Theory. Edinburgh University Press.

[9] Commonwealth of Virginia. (2021). Virginia Coastal Resilience Master Plan.

[10] Harley, J. B. (1988). Maps, Knowledge, and Power. In D. E. Cosgrove & S. Daniels (Eds.), The Iconography of Landscape: Essays on the Symbolic Representation, Design, and Use of Past Environments. Cambridge University Press.

[11] Crampton, J., & Krygier, J. (2005). An introduction to critical cartography. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 4(1), 11-33.

[12] Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‚Translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387-420.

[13] Drennen, A. & Hardin, S. (2021). Climate deniers in the 117th Congress. The Center for American Progress.

[14] CNN. (2021, August 9). Using nature to combat climate change.

[15] TEDWomen 2010. (2021, December). Reviving New York’s rivers—With oysters!

[16] Billion Oyster Project (2014, August 5). Oyster gardening manual. Issuu.

[17] Tsing, A. L. (2017). The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton University Press.

[18] Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying With the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.

[19] Sorkin, M. (2019, May 2). The last lecture. YouTube.

[20] Davis, B. (2013). Landscapes and instruments. Landscape Journal, 32(2), 293-308.

[21] Cantrell, B., & Holtzman, J. (2016). Responsive Landscapes: Strategies for Responsive Technologies in Landscape Architecture (p. 254). Routledge.

[22] Zhang, Z., & Liu, X. (2020). Control and uncertainty: Towards a paradigm of prototyping. Landscape Architecture Frontiers, 8(4), 10-25.

[23] Zhang, Z., & Cantrell, B. (2021). Cultivated wildness: Technodiversity and wildness in machines. Landscape Architecture Frontiers, 9(1), 52-65.

[24] Zhang, S. (2020). Adaptation handbook. [Master’s thesis, University of Virginia].

[25] Hajer, M. A., & Pelzer, P. (2018). 2050—An energetic Odyssey: Understanding ‚Techniques of Futuring’ in the transition towards renewable energy. Energy Research & Social Science, (44), 222-231.

[26] Robinson, J. B. (1990). Futures under glass: A recipe for people who hate to predict. Futures, 22(8), 820-842.

[27] Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2009). Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva, 47(2), 119-146.

[28] Berrizbeitia, A. (2001). Scales of Undecidability. In J. Czerniak (Ed.), Downsview Park Toronto (pp. 117-125). Prestel Publishing.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2022 Higher Education Press