Structural evaluation of the novel connection system between adjacent breakwater caissons

Seungbok LEE , Kyeongjin KIM , Meeju LEE , Jeongho KIM , Seokmun KIM , Jaeha LEE

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (8) : 1222 -1239.

PDF (4647KB)
Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (8) : 1222 -1239. DOI: 10.1007/s11709-025-1209-0
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Structural evaluation of the novel connection system between adjacent breakwater caissons

Author information +
History +
PDF (4647KB)

Abstract

Climate change is having an increasing impact on coastal infrastructure, leading to more frequent and intensified wave activity, including higher waves driven by typhoons and abnormal sea conditions. Consequently, issues related to the stability of existing port structures, such as caissons, have become a significant concern. In particular, gravity-type caisson on the land side of coastal port structures require enhanced stability and safety. Gravity-type caissons, which resist external forces through their own weight, are highly vulnerable to functional failures, such as sliding displacement, triggered by abnormal waves shifting specific caissons. The destruction of caisson and quay walls can lead to substantial recovery costs, necessitating improvements in caisson stability to address the challenges posed by increased wave forces and changes in port logistics due to larger vessels. One approach to enhancing caisson stability is the use of long caissons. Long caisson is commonly used where a breakwater is needed to withstand wave action and distribute forces evenly along a length of breakwater. The construction of caissons faces challenges due to limitations on the size of individual units imposed by construction conditions, launching methods, and marine crane requirements. Therefore, connecting multiple caissons to form long caissons presents a viable alternative. This study suggested two connection methods for long caissons. The first method was a hemisphere caisson, which allows the connection parts to seat against each other under self-weight during construction. The second method was a displacement-allowing connection utilizing rubble (embedded rebar connection within riprap connection). This approach allows some displacement while employing rebar to resist excessive deformation, thereby dispersing the resulting wave forces to adjacent caissons. Performance comparisons between the developed connections and conventional gravity-type caissons were conducted using a finite element analysis model. The results indicate that the proposed connections demonstrate improved resistance to wave forces compared to traditional caissons without such connections. Further studies should include field applications and performance evaluations of various caisson sizes under different environmental and geological conditions.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

interlocking caisson / hemisphere connection / deformable joint / marine concrete structures / discrete element method-finite element method coupling analysis

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Seungbok LEE, Kyeongjin KIM, Meeju LEE, Jeongho KIM, Seokmun KIM, Jaeha LEE. Structural evaluation of the novel connection system between adjacent breakwater caissons. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2025, 19(8): 1222-1239 DOI:10.1007/s11709-025-1209-0

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Takayama T, Higashira K. Statistical analysis on damage characteristics of breakwaters.Proceedings of Civil Engineering in the Ocean, 2002, 18: 263–268

[2]

Chaudhary B, Hazarika H, Murakami A, Fujisawa K. Countermeasures for enhancing the stability of composite breakwater under earthquake and subsequent tsunami.Acta Geotechnica, 2018, 13(4): 997–1017

[3]

Chaudhary B, Hazarika H. Centrifuge modelling for stability evaluation of a breakwater foundation subjected to an earthquake and a tsunami.Ocean Engineering, 2018, 148: 169–181

[4]

Chaudhary B, Hazarika H, Murakami A, Fujisawa K. Mitigation of earthquake induced damage of breakwater by geogrid reinforced foundation.Marine Georesources and Geotechnology, 2018, 36(7): 827–840

[5]

Chaudhary B, Hazarika H, Nishimura N. Effects of duration and acceleration level of earthquake ground motion on the behavior of unreinforced and reinforced breakwater foundation.Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2017, 98: 24–37

[6]

Chaudhary B, Hazarika H, Ishibashi I, Abdullah A. Sliding and overturning stability of breakwater under combined effect of earthquake and tsunami.Ocean Engineering, 2017, 136: 106–116

[7]

Chaudhary B, Hazarika H, Pasha S M K. Countermeasures for breakwater foundation subjected to foreshocks and main shock of earthquake loading.Marine Georesources and Geotechnology, 2018, 36(3): 308–322

[8]

Chaudhary B, Hazarika H, Nishimura N. Effects of reinforcement on the performance of breakwater foundation subjected to earthquake loadings.International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 11(2): 186–197

[9]

Mimura N. Sea-level rise caused by climate change and its implications for society.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and Biological Sciences, 2013, 89(7): 281–301

[10]

TakahashiSShimosakoK. Reduction of Wave Force on a Long Caisson of Vertical Breakwater and Its Stability. Technical Notes. 1990, 685

[11]

Park W S, Won D, Seo J, Lee B W. Proposal of rotating stability assessment formula for an interlocking caisson breakwater subjected to wave forces.Journal of Korean Society of Coastal and Ocean Engineers, 2020, 32(1): 11–16

[12]

Seo J, Won D, Park W S. Behavior of walls of open-cell caissons using filler under abnormally high waves.Journal of Korean Society of Coastal and Ocean Engineers, 2017, 29(2): 83–91

[13]

Lee BW, Won D, Kim DH, Park WS. Model tests for evaluating the bearing pressure of harbor structures using open cell caisson method.Journal of Coastal Research, 2021, 114(SI): 26–30

[14]

SeoJWonDParkW. Behavior of inter-cell for open-cell caisson breakwater system. In: CODE 2018. Seoul: Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea (COSEIK), 2018, 328

[15]

Kim W, Lee I, Kim K, Jeong Y, Lee J. Evaluation of concrete barriers with novel shock absorbers subjected to impact loading.Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 19(3): 657–671

[16]

Kim W, Lee I, Jeong Y, Zi G, Kim K, Lee J. Design approach for improving current concrete median barriers on highways in South Korea.Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2018, 32(3): 04018022

[17]

MurrayD Y. Users Manual for LS-DYNA Concrete Material Model 159. United States: Federal Highway Administration, Office of Research, Development, and Technology, 2007

[18]

Lee J, Zi G, Lee I, Jeong Y, Kim K, Kim W. Numerical simulation on concrete median barrier for reducing concrete fragment under harsh impact loading of a 25-ton truck.Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 2017, 139(2): 021015

[19]

Lee J, Jeong Y, Kim K, Lee I, Kim W. Experimental and numerical investigation of deformable concrete median barrier.Materials, 2019, 12(19): 3176

[20]

Kim K, Kim W, Seo J, Jeong Y, Lee J. The amount prediction of concrete fragments after impact using smoothed particle hydrodynamics.Engineering Failure Analysis, 2022, 131: 105882

[21]

Kim K, Kim W, Seo J, Jeong Y, Lee J. Quantitative measure of concrete fragment using ANN to consider uncertainties under impact loading.Scientific Reports, 2022, 12(1): 11248

[22]

MurrayD YAbu-OdehABlighR. Evaluation of LS-DYNA Concrete Material Model 159. United States: Federal Highway Administration, Office of Research, Development, and Technology, 2007

[23]

Thai D K, Kim S E, Lee H K. Effects of reinforcement ratio and arrangement on the structural behavior of a nuclear building under aircraft impact.Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2014, 276: 228–240

[24]

TaerweLMatthysS. Fib Model Code for Concrete Structures. Berlin: Wiley, 2010

[25]

Chiorino M A, Lacidogna G. Revision of the design aids of CEB.Design manual on structural effects of time-dependent behaviour of concrete in accordance with CEB-FIP Model Code 1990. CEB Bulletin d’Information, 1993, 215: 297

[26]

KimK. Application of SPH and ANN for prediction of the amount of concrete fragmentation under impact loadings. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Busan: Korea Maritime and Ocean University, 2021

[27]

Cundall P A, Strack O D A. A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies.Geotechnique, 1979, 29(1): 47–65

[28]

Cundall P A. Formulation of a three-dimensional distinct element model—Part I.A scheme to detect and represent contacts in a system composed of many polyhedral blocks. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1988, 25(3): 107–116

[29]

Cundall P A, Hart R D. Numerical modeling of discontinua.Engineering Computations, 1992, 9(2): 101–113

[30]

Kim K, Lee M, Park J, Lee J. Evaluation of lateral resistance for caisson with RC piles encased by riprap.Structures, 2023, 50: 1089–1099

[31]

LeeS W. Influence of surface topography on interface strength and counterface soil structure. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology, 1998

[32]

KragelskiIDobychinMKombalovV. The calculation framework of the friction and wear. Mashynostroenie, 1977, 256–260

[33]

Svanberg A, Larsson S, Mäki R, Jonsén P. Full-scale simulation and validation of wear for a mining rope shovel bucket.Minerals, 2021, 11(6): 623

[34]

KDS64 10 10. Design Standards of Harbor and Fishery Ports. Seoul: Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, 2023

[35]

Moghadam R E, Shafieefar M, Akbari H. A probabilistic approach to predict wave force on a caisson breakwater based on Bayesian regression and experimental data.Ocean Engineering, 2022, 249: 110945

[36]

Goda Y. Random Seas and Design of Maritime Structures.Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company, 2010, 33: 732

[37]

Seo J, Yi J, Park W, Won D. Dispersion characteristics of wave forces on interlocking caisson breakwaters by cross cables.Journal of Korean Society of Coastal and Ocean Engineers, 2015, 27(5): 315–323

[38]

KDS14 20 20. Korea Design Standard Ministry of Land. Infrastructure and Transport. Seoul: Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, 2021

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (4647KB)

261

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/